Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
94
78 employees · 16 contractors · 37 on an average day Beaumont At Bryn Mawr
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Bryn Mawr, PA
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Bryn Mawr, PA
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr accepts Medicare and private pay.
Beaumont at Bryn Mawr is a continuing care retirement community in Bryn Mawr, PA, with independent living, assisted living, nursing home and skilled nursing care, palliative care, and respite care. Independent living offers private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living includes help with bathing, dressing, and medication management. Nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Palliative care centers on comfort and symptom management, and respite care provides a short stay for a family caregiver who needs to travel or recover.
Several care levels are available on one campus. A resident whose needs grow over time may remain in the community instead of moving elsewhere. Beaumont at Bryn Mawr has 18 beds, so it is a smaller setting where staff and residents can get to know one another. Its 77% occupancy rate means the home is not at full capacity.
Housing includes one bed and two bed layouts. A one bed layout suits one resident, while a two bed layout can work for a couple moving together or someone who wants a companion. Medicare and private pay are accepted, giving families payment options for covered or privately funded care.
Total nurse staffing is 7h 52m per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident. Pets are allowed. Beaumont Retirement Community operates the community, which may be a good fit for someone who could benefit from multiple care levels within one continuing care setting.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
94
78 employees · 16 contractors · 37 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.1 h
↓ 9% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 7.1 h, 9% below the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
24,067 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →93.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.4% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (6), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
18
Rank #199 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 199th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
18
Rank #199 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 199th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #191 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 191st out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #191 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 191st out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
8
/ 100
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
128
days
About This Community
Facility TypePersonal Care Homes
IssuanceFebruary 27, 2026
ExpirationFebruary 27, 2027
CountyMontgomery
License LevelFULL
License Number127930
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr is legally operated by Beaumont Retirement Community Inc.
Profit StatusNonprofit
Housekeeping
Transportation
13
Total Daily Staff
10
Waking Staff
0
Resident Support Staff
13
Residents Served
1
Hospice Residents
Pets Allowed
Swimming Pool
Building Type3-story
Room Types
1 Bed
2 Bed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
0vs 1.3 avg↓ 100% fewer than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. PA average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Pennsylvania average:
• Inspection citation rate (17% above) 4 Better Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (48% below)
• Citations per inspection (33% below)
• Inspections with citations (8% below)
• Total complaints (100% below)
• Inspection citation rate (17% above) 4 Better Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (48% below)
• Citations per inspection (33% below)
• Inspections with citations (8% below)
• Total complaints (100% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 46 | 89.0 | This facility has 48% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (46 vs. PA avg 89).↓ 48% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 2.9 | 4.3 | This facility has 33% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (2.9 vs. PA avg 4.3).↓ 33% better Rank #28 / 179 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among the 179 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 16 | 21.0 | This facility has had 24% fewer total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (16 vs. PA avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 24% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 11 | 12.0 | This facility has 8% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (11 vs. PA avg 12).↓ 8% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 69% | 59% | This facility has 10 percentage points higher inspection citation rate than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (69% vs. PA avg 59%).↑ 10% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 0 | 5.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (0 vs. PA avg 5).↓ 100% better |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
1
↓ 86% · PA 7.2This facility: 1, 86% below the PA average of 7.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
2
Rank #11 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 94% · PA 32This facility: 2, 94% below the PA average of 32 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #28 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 52% · PA 4.16This facility: 2, 52% below the PA average of 4.16 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
2 of 2 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the PA average of 0.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the PA average of 0.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
2
↓ 93% · PA 29.9This facility: 2, 93% below the PA average of 29.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the PA average of 0.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 15, 2024 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 1 of 2 citations · 2 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 15, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 2 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (50%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (50%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 2 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
PA avg $58KPennsylvania average: $58,140. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
PA avg 1.78Pennsylvania average: 1.78. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.17Pennsylvania average: 0.17. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 46% · PA 3.7This facility: 2.0, 46% below the PA average of 3.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 7% · PA 3.2This facility: 3.0, 7% below the PA average of 3.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 1% · PA 9.5This facility: 9.5, 1% below the PA average of 9.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
17.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 14% · PA 19.8This facility: 17.1, 14% below the PA average of 19.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 3 worse, 2 near PA average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.7%
↑ 5% · PA 16.8This facility: 17.7, 5% above the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.7%
↑ 5% · PA 16.8This facility: 17.7, 5% above the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
↓ 25% · PA 17.0This facility: 12.8, 25% below the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
↓ 25% · PA 17.0This facility: 12.8, 25% below the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.9%
↓ 18% · PA 25.5This facility: 20.9, 18% below the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.9%
↓ 18% · PA 25.5This facility: 20.9, 18% below the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
↑ 228% · PA 1.5This facility: 4.8, 228% above the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
↑ 228% · PA 1.5This facility: 4.8, 228% above the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.1%
↑ 158% · PA 3.1This facility: 8.1, 158% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.1%
↑ 158% · PA 3.1This facility: 8.1, 158% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3%
↓ 32% · PA 4.8This facility: 3.3, 32% below the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3%
↓ 32% · PA 4.8This facility: 3.3, 32% below the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
↓ 11% · PA 6.2This facility: 5.5, 11% below the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
↓ 11% · PA 6.2This facility: 5.5, 11% below the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 10.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 10.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.4%
↑ 4% · PA 17.7This facility: 18.4, 4% above the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.4%
↑ 4% · PA 17.7This facility: 18.4, 4% above the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 14% · PA 87.5This facility: 100.0, 14% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 14% · PA 87.5This facility: 100.0, 14% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
↑ 4% · PA 93.5This facility: 97.1, 4% above the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
↑ 4% · PA 93.5This facility: 97.1, 4% above the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.10
↓ 35% · PA 1.68This facility: 1.10, 35% below the PA average of 1.68 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.10
↓ 35% · PA 1.68This facility: 1.10, 35% below the PA average of 1.68 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.80
↓ 33% · PA 1.20This facility: 0.80, 33% below the PA average of 1.20 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.80
↓ 33% · PA 1.20This facility: 0.80, 33% below the PA average of 1.20 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.7%
↓ 17% · US 53.7This facility: 44.7, 17% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.7%
↓ 17% · US 53.7This facility: 44.7, 17% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
50.7%
≈ 0% · US 50.6This facility: 50.7, level with the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
50.7%
≈ 0% · US 50.6This facility: 50.7, level with the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.7%
↑ 28% · PA 70.0This facility: 89.7, 28% above the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.7%
↑ 28% · PA 70.0This facility: 89.7, 28% above the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.4%
↑ 24% · PA 68.7This facility: 85.4, 24% above the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.4%
↑ 24% · PA 68.7This facility: 85.4, 24% above the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.8%
↑ 7% · PA 23.1This facility: 24.8, 7% above the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.8%
↑ 7% · PA 23.1This facility: 24.8, 7% above the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.7%
↓ 52% · PA 9.8This facility: 4.7, 52% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.7%
↓ 52% · PA 9.8This facility: 4.7, 52% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
0.3% operating margin
+2.0 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.8M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
66.4% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #45 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.6M while revenue rose $1.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $22.8M | +$1.3M | Trend 20172024 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #51 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 72% of homes | Above PA median Higher net patient revenue than 72% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $22.7M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.1M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 0.3% | +2.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.9M | — | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.8M | −$1.5M | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $15.2M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #40 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 78% of homes | Above PA median Higher payroll than 78% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 66.4% | −1.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #45 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 75% of homes | 3.7 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $18.2M | $18.5M | $19.3M | $18.8M | $20.5M | $20.4M | $21.5M | $22.8M |
| Operating expenses | $18.5M | $18.9M | $19.3M | $20.0M | $20.0M | $20.3M | $21.9M | $22.7M |
| Net patient income | −$0.2M | −$0.4M | $0.0M | −$1.2M | $0.5M | $0.1M | −$0.4M | $0.1M |
| Operating margin | −1.3% | −2.0% | 0.1% | −6.6% | 2.6% | 0.5% | −1.7% | 0.3% |
| Net income | −$0.2M | −$0.3M | $0.1M | −$0.9M | $0.6M | $0.2M | $2.2M | $0.8M |
| Payroll costs | $12.2M | $12.3M | $12.9M | $13.4M | $13.3M | $13.6M | $14.6M | $15.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 71.5% | 64.7% | 66.6% | 67.8% | 66.4% |
| Beds | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 |
| Gross revenue | $20.6M | $20.7M | $21.8M | $20.8M | $22.8M | $22.6M | $24.1M | $25.6M |
| Salaries | $9.8M | $10.0M | $10.4M | $10.8M | $10.8M | $11.1M | $12.0M | $12.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $2.4M | $2.4M | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.3M | — | — | — | — | — | $0.5M | $0.7M |
| Other operating costs | $6.3M | $6.5M | $6.4M | $6.6M | $6.7M | $6.7M | $7.3M | $7.6M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $937 | $984 | $996 | $1,130 | $1,282 | $1,229 | $1,255 | $1,302 |
| Cost per day | $950 | $1,004 | $995 | $1,204 | $1,248 | $1,223 | $1,277 | $1,299 |
| Average length of stay | 121.6 days | 99.3 days | 133.1 days | 160.9 days | 124.4 days | 136.1 days | 125.9 days | 128.1 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
101 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
56 · 55%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
45 · 45%
Leaving
104 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
44 · 42%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
60 · 58%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Beaumont At Bryn Mawr
1.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bryn Mawr's city center to Beaumont At Bryn Mawr's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Beaumont At Bryn Mawr
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 70.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trillium Place | NH IL MC SNF | Lancaster | 85
Facility
85
PA AVG
109
Rank
#106 / 200 |
81.2%
Facility
81.2%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#69 / 163 | +8% | 5.37
Facility
5.37
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#31 / 182 | -28% | +37% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 1
Facility
1
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#1 / 179 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#1 / 179 | - | 69 | - |
52
Facility
52
PA AVG
50
Rank
#99 / 208 | The Mennonite Home | $57.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$57.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#3 / 177 | $28.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$28.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#6 / 177 | 48.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
48.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#125 / 177 | 395559 | ||||
| Garden Spot Village | NH ADC AL CCRC IL MC SNF | New Holland | 110
Facility
110
PA AVG
109
Rank
#75 / 200 |
53.6%
Facility
53.6%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#138 / 163 | -29% | 5.52
Facility
5.52
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#31 / 182 | +15% | +40% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#121 / 183 | 4
Facility
4
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#20 / 179 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#15 / 179 | 2 | 59 | - |
32
Facility
32
PA AVG
50
Rank
#142 / 208 | Garden Spot Village | $10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#138 / 177 | $19.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$19.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#18 / 177 | 179.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
179.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#10 / 177 | 396079 | ||||
| Beaumont At Bryn Mawr | NH AL CCRC IL PC RC SNF | Bryn Mawr | 18
Facility
18
PA AVG
109
Rank
#199 / 200 | - | - | - | +42% | - | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 2
Facility
2
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#11 / 179 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#28 / 179 | - | 33 | - |
8
Facility
8
PA AVG
50
Rank
#191 / 208 | Beaumont Retirement Community Inc | $22.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$22.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#51 / 177 | $15.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#40 / 177 | 66.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
66.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#45 / 177 | 395753 | ||||
| Laurel View Village | NH AL HC IL MC SNF | Davidsville (Conemaugh Township) | 107
Facility
107
PA AVG
109
Rank
#82 / 200 |
52.3%
Facility
52.3%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#141 / 163 | -31% | 4.91
Facility
4.91
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#38 / 182 | -39% | +25% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 18
Facility
18
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#97 / 179 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#130 / 179 | - | 56 | A+ |
28
Facility
28
PA AVG
50
Rank
#152 / 208 | Allegheny Christian Ministries, Inc | $16.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$16.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#98 / 177 | $10.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#86 / 177 | 63.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
63.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#56 / 177 | 395891 | ||||
| Spiritrust Lutheran the Village at Luther Ridge | NH IL SNF | Chambersburg | 36
Facility
36
PA AVG
109
Rank
#189 / 200 |
83.3%
Facility
83.3%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#63 / 163 | +11% | - | - | +141% | - | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 20
Facility
20
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#106 / 179 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#145 / 179 | 1 | 30 | - |
81
Facility
81
PA AVG
50
Rank
#33 / 208 | Spiritrust Lutheran | $9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#145 / 177 | $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#151 / 177 | 57.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
57.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#77 / 177 | 396146 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other PA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Beaumont At Bryn Mawr
Who is the owner of Beaumont At Bryn Mawr?
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr is legally operated by Beaumont Retirement Community Inc.
Is Beaumont At Bryn Mawr in a walkable area?
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr has a walk score of 8. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the license number of Beaumont At Bryn Mawr?
According to PA state health department records, Beaumont At Bryn Mawr's license number is 127930.
When does Beaumont At Bryn Mawr's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, Beaumont At Bryn Mawr's license expires on February 27, 2027.
What is the occupancy rate at Beaumont At Bryn Mawr?
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr's occupancy is 78.5%.
Are pets allowed at Beaumont At Bryn Mawr?
Yes, Beaumont At Bryn Mawr allows residents to bring their pets.
Does Beaumont At Bryn Mawr operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Beaumont At Bryn Mawr is registered as a non-profit in PA.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
