Beverwyck
A St. Peters Health partner, Beverwyck boasts an elegant and professional atmosphere that ensures a service delivered with compassion and respect. Independent residents of all lifestyles are encouraged to enjoy seamless access to the beautiful community features. The retirement home has built its trusted reputation on excellent customer service, earning the respect of being a reliable senior living community in Albany.
Beverwyck’s person-centered approach allows helpful services that essentially make the lives of each resident stress-free so seniors can pursue and continue their interests every day. Community features include amenities and services such as housekeeping, laundry, social events, recreational activities, fitness classes, medication management, and transportation.
Capacity and availability
About this community
Occupancy
Beverwyck is legally operated by Beverwyck, Inc (Not for Profit).
Inspection History
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
Enforcement Actions
Enforcement actions are formal penalties or interventions imposed by New York regulators when a nursing home fails to meet state or federal care, safety, or regulatory standards. They may include directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
This facility has 1 enforcement action. 33% of New York nursing homes have zero, and the statewide average is 1.6.
- September 28, 2021 Resident Rights #NH-21-246
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Inspection citation rate (14% above)
• Complaints per bed (24% above) 7 Better Metrics better than New York average:
• Total citations (62% below)
• Health citations (70% below)
• Life safety citations (50% below)
• Citations per inspection (13% below)
• Inspections with citations (50% below)
• Total complaints (81% below)
• Complaints per year (81% below)
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
| 8 | 21 | This facility has 62% fewer total citations than a typical New York nursing home (8 vs. NY avg 21).↓ 62% better |
|
Health citations
| 6 | 20 | This facility has 70% fewer health citations than a typical New York nursing home (6 vs. NY avg 20).↓ 70% better |
|
Life safety citations
| 2 | 4 | This facility has 50% fewer life safety citations than a typical New York nursing home (2 vs. NY avg 4).↓ 50% better |
|
Citations per inspection
| 2.0 | 2.3 | This facility has 13% fewer citations per inspection than a typical New York nursing home (2 vs. NY avg 2.3).↓ 13% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 4 | 9 | This facility has had 56% fewer total inspections than the New York average (4 vs. NY avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 56% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
| 2 | 4 | This facility has 50% fewer inspections with citations than a typical New York nursing home (2 vs. NY avg 4).↓ 50% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
| 50% | 44% | This facility has 6 percentage points higher inspection citation rate than a typical New York nursing home (50% vs. NY avg 44%).↑ 6% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
| 15 | 79 | This facility has 81% fewer total complaints than a typical New York nursing home (15 vs. NY avg 79).↓ 81% better |
|
Complaints per year
| 15 | 79 | This facility has 81% fewer complaints per year than a typical New York nursing home (15 vs. NY avg 79).↓ 81% better |
|
Complaints per bed
| 0.62 | 0.50 | This facility has 24% more complaints per bed than a typical New York nursing home (0.62 vs. NY avg 0.5).↑ 24% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
| 4 | 15 | This facility has had 73% fewer complaint investigations than the New York average (4 vs. NY avg 15). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 73% fewer |
Infection Prevention & Vaccination
How this facility protects residents through staff vaccination policies and immunization practices.
Percentage of facility employees vaccinated against influenza.
Lawsuit overview for Beverwyck
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
What does this home offer?
Pets Allowed
Room Sizes: 731 / 815 /829 / 845 - 1,093 sq. ft
Housing Options: 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: Single-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Alexandra Smith serves as the Executive Director at Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center and Eddy Alzheimer’s Services. She has dedicated her career to St. Peter’s Health Partners, holding a Masters in Healthcare Administration and certifications as a Dementia Practitioner and Licensed Nursing Home Administrator. Alexandra leads a team committed to providing the highest level of care to elders in the Capital Region.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Beverwyck
Places of interest near Beverwyck
5.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Slingerlands's city center to Beverwyck's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.93 miles to nearest hospital (Albany Medical Center-South)
Calculate Travel Distance to Beverwyck
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Albany
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 55.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daughters of Sarah Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | NH AL MC RC SNF | Albany | 210
Facility
210
NY AVG
160
Rank
#150 / 736 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#1 / 392 | +10% | 4.02
Facility
4.02
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#70 / 395 | -33% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 12
Facility
12
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#107 / 397 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#59 / 397 | - | 210 | - |
9
Facility
9
NY AVG
64
Rank
#1,088 / 1,150 | Lisa Marrello | $25.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$25.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#185 / 383 | $16.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#121 / 383 | 65.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
65.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#78 / 382 | 335465 | ||||
| Teresian House Center for the Elderly | NH MC RC SNF | Albany | 300
Facility
300
NY AVG
160
Rank
#61 / 736 |
96.0%
Facility
96.0%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#146 / 392 | +6% | 4.00
Facility
4.00
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#70 / 395 | -45% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 26
Facility
26
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#324 / 397 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#308 / 397 | 1 | 288 | - |
8
Facility
8
NY AVG
64
Rank
#1,095 / 1,150 | Frank Yeboah | $33.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$33.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#127 / 383 | $22.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$22.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#63 / 383 | 66.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
66.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#74 / 382 | 335627 | ||||
| Hudson Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH MC SNF | Albany (Town Of Colonie) | 200
Facility
200
NY AVG
160
Rank
#164 / 736 |
41.0%
Facility
41.0%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#384 / 392 | -55% | 3.22
Facility
3.22
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#213 / 395 | -35% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 40
Facility
40
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#378 / 397 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#263 / 397 | - | 82 | A+ |
37
Facility
37
NY AVG
64
Rank
#895 / 1,150 | Jbrnc, LLC (For Profit) | $15.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$15.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#283 / 383 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#259 / 383 | 56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#139 / 382 | 335812 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in New York
Beverwyck is located in Slingerlands, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York State.
Frequently Asked Questions about Beverwyck
What neighborhood is Beverwyck in?
Beverwyck is in the Beverwyck neighborhood of Slingerlands.
Who is the owner of Beverwyck?
Beverwyck is legally operated by Beverwyck, Inc (Not for Profit).
Is Beverwyck in a walkable area?
Beverwyck has a walk score of 73. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
What is the occupancy rate at Beverwyck?
Beverwyck's occupancy is 100%.
Are pets allowed at Beverwyck?
Yes, Beverwyck allows residents to bring their pets.
Does Beverwyck operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Beverwyck is registered as a non-profit in NY.
How many beds does Beverwyck have?
Beverwyck has 24 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





