1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Canterbury Place offers rehabilitation, skilled nursing, memory support, and personal care. The senior home has maintained a high-quality standard of service delivered with compassion. Canterbury Place is a resident-centered community that guarantees full support by professional nurses, licensed practical nurses, and assistants.
Nursing home residents are under inpatient or outpatient programs with therapy and other specific treatment plans. Personal care and memory care residents are able to get on with daily tasks with assistance from the staff, and take part in stimulating activities; they are assisted in everyday living with enriching activities that contribute to a high success rate for recovery
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 90th out of 207 homes in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 1h 14m per day | ▲ 58% State avg: 47m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 23m per day | ▼ 59% State avg: 55m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 26m per day | ▲ 11% State avg: 2h 12m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 29m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 3h 31m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 3m per day | ▼ 50% State avg: 6m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 55m per day | ▲ 68% State avg: 33m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Canterbury Place is legally operated by Canterbury Place.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Pennsylvania state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Pennsylvania nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.
3 points above the Pennsylvania average for nursing homes (83/100)
Rank #193 / 460 in Pennsylvania Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 193rd out of 460 homes in Pennsylvania. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the Pennsylvania average among 460 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. Inspection score: 86 out of 100. Letter grade B. 3 points above the Pennsylvania average for nursing homes (83/100)
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 19 | 63 | This facility has 70% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (19 vs. PA avg 63).↓ 70% better Rank #111 / 482 Total citations — State benchmarked This home is ranked 111th out of 482 homes in Pennsylvania. Shows this facility's total citations compared to the Pennsylvania average among 482 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2021.
| 3.8 | 12.6 | This facility has 70% fewer citations per year than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (3.8 vs. PA avg 12.6).↓ 70% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 3.2 | 5.7 | This facility has 44% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (3.2 vs. PA avg 5.7).↓ 44% better Rank #197 / 482 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 197th out of 482 homes in Pennsylvania. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among 482 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all routine and focused inspections. Excludes complaint investigations.
| 6 | 11 | This facility has 45% fewer total inspections than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (6 vs. PA avg 11).↓ 45% better |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 4 | 8 | This facility has 50% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (4 vs. PA avg 8).↓ 50% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 67% | 73% | This facility has 6 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (67% vs. PA avg 73%).↓ 6% better Rank #223 / 482 Inspection citation rate — State benchmarked This home is ranked 223rd out of 482 homes in Pennsylvania. Shows this facility's % of inspections with citations compared to the Pennsylvania average among 482 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 2 | 4 | This facility has 50% fewer total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (2 vs. PA avg 4).↓ 50% better Rank #186 / 482 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 186th out of 482 homes in Pennsylvania. Shows this facility's complaint inspections compared to the Pennsylvania average among 482 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2021.
| 0.4 | 0.8 | This facility has 50% fewer complaints per year than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (0.4 vs. PA avg 0.8).↓ 50% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
Pennsylvania average 6.7
Last Health inspection on Jul 2025
Pennsylvania average 31.3
Pennsylvania average 4.4
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
21 of 28 citations resulted from standard inspections; 6 of 28 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 28 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 0.3
67% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 0.6
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
33% fewer staff per resident than Pennsylvania average
8% better than Pennsylvania average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
25 total: 24 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
25
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.1 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 7 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
7
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.1 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 62 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
62
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.6 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
4,022 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 62 | 0 | 62 | 24,521 | 92 | 100% | 8.6 |
| Registered Nurse | 24 | 1 | 25 | 9,586 | 92 | 100% | 9.1 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 7 | 0 | 7 | 3,882 | 92 | 100% | 9.1 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 8 | 0 | 8 | 2,670 | 66 | 72% | 7.9 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,958 | 88 | 96% | 7.7 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 2 | 0 | 2 | 824 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 2 | 2 | 639 | 65 | 71% | 6.7 |
| Feeding Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 604 | 63 | 68% | 8.7 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 5 | 1 | 6 | 537 | 58 | 63% | 7.3 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 3 | 3 | 517 | 71 | 77% | 7.2 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 3 | 3 | 516 | 68 | 74% | 7.2 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 503 | 66 | 72% | 7.6 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 479 | 61 | 66% | 7.8 |
| Administrator | 2 | 0 | 2 | 472 | 56 | 61% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 454 | 58 | 63% | 7.8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 2 | 2 | 374 | 59 | 64% | 6 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 3 | 3 | 125 | 14 | 15% | 7.8 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 60 | 20 | 22% | 3 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
22.2
102% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 11.0
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
37.5
69% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 22.2
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
36.6%
93% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 19.0%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
46.1%
118% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 21.1%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.8%
12% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 26.7%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.3%
128% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 3.2%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.8%
96% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 5.5%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
7% better than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 1.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.1%
52% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 6.6%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.5%
35% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 5.5%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3%
36% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 17.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.2%
19% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 86.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.0%
5% better than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 93.5%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.80
7% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 1.68
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.65
38% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 1.20
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.0%
In line with Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 68.8%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5%
59% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.7%
15% better than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 68.7%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.4%
6% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 23.1%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.6%
33% better than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 9.8%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
32.6%
39% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.0%
11% worse than Pennsylvania averagePennsylvania average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
16% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
81% of new residents, often for short stays.
2% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
111Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Canterbury Place from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #60 / 209Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 60th out of 209 homes in Pennsylvania. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #16 / 209Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 16th out of 209 homes in Pennsylvania. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Pennsylvania average. Well-run Pennsylvania facilities typically land around 53–61% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (81% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Pittsburgh's city center to Canterbury Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.25 miles to nearest hospital (Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation)
Add your location
The information below is reported by the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services and Department of Health.
| Overlook Green Senior Living | NH MC | Pittsburgh | 128
Facility
128
PA AVG
94
Rank
#98 / 555 |
53.1%
Facility
53.1%
PA AVG
78.7%
Rank
#419 / 518 | -33% | 5.14
Facility
5.14
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#39 / 207 | -1% | +24% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 210 | 83
Facility
83
PA AVG
83
Rank
#233 / 460 | 9
Facility
9
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#60 / 207 | 1.5
Facility
1.5
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#21 / 207 | 1 | 68 | - |
30
Facility
30
PA AVG
46
Rank
#468 / 668 | Susan Capobianco | $31.7M
Facility
$31.7M
PA AVG
$32.8M
Rank
#40 / 209 | $17.6M
Facility
$17.6M
PA AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#29 / 209 | 55.7%
Facility
55.7%
PA AVG
40%
Rank
#109 / 209 | 395752 | ||||
| Vincentian Home | NH AL IL MC | Pittsburgh | 90
Facility
90
PA AVG
94
Rank
#251 / 555 |
57.8%
Facility
57.8%
PA AVG
78.7%
Rank
#384 / 518 | -27% | 4.64
Facility
4.64
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#70 / 207 | +83% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 210 | 83
Facility
83
PA AVG
83
Rank
#233 / 460 | 35
Facility
35
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#152 / 207 | 4.4
Facility
4.4
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#128 / 207 | - | 52 | A |
20
Facility
20
PA AVG
46
Rank
#533 / 668 | Vincentian Collaborative System | $22.3M
Facility
$22.3M
PA AVG
$32.8M
Rank
#39 / 209 | $12.4M
Facility
$12.4M
PA AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#28 / 209 | 55.7%
Facility
55.7%
PA AVG
40%
Rank
#115 / 209 | 395034 | ||||
| Asbury Heights | NH AL IL MC | Pittsburgh | 120
Facility
120
PA AVG
94
Rank
#127 / 555 |
36.7%
Facility
36.7%
PA AVG
78.7%
Rank
#493 / 518 | -53% | 4.34
Facility
4.34
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#90 / 207 | +58% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 210 | 88
Facility
88
PA AVG
83
Rank
#162 / 460 | 23
Facility
23
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#121 / 207 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#109 / 207 | - | 44 | - |
47
Facility
47
PA AVG
46
Rank
#320 / 668 | Asbury Senior Care LLC | $20.5M
Facility
$20.5M
PA AVG
$32.8M
Rank
#79 / 209 | $8.2M
Facility
$8.2M
PA AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#43 / 209 | 40%
Facility
40%
PA AVG
40%
Rank
#28 / 209 | 395391 | ||||
| Reformed Presbyterian Home | NH IL | Pittsburgh (Perry South) | 56
Facility
56
PA AVG
94
Rank
#422 / 555 |
42.9%
Facility
42.9%
PA AVG
78.7%
Rank
#472 / 518 | -45% | 4.80
Facility
4.80
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#55 / 207 | +151% | +16% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 210 | 75
Facility
75
PA AVG
83
Rank
#338 / 460 | 31
Facility
31
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#146 / 207 | 7.8
Facility
7.8
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#196 / 207 | - | 24 | A+ |
50
Facility
50
PA AVG
46
Rank
#283 / 668 | Lorrie Meneely | $7.3M
Facility
$7.3M
PA AVG
$32.8M
Rank
#184 / 209 | $4.4M
Facility
$4.4M
PA AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#185 / 209 | 60.1%
Facility
60.1%
PA AVG
40%
Rank
#66 / 209 | 395561 | ||||
| Canterbury Place | NH HC MC PC RC | Pittsburgh (Central Lawrenceville) | 78
Facility
78
PA AVG
94
Rank
#311 / 555 | - | - | 4.32
Facility
4.32
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#90 / 207 | +52% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 210 | 86
Facility
86
PA AVG
83
Rank
#193 / 460 | 28
Facility
28
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#135 / 207 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#97 / 207 | 1 | 11 | A+ |
93
Facility
93
PA AVG
46
Rank
#18 / 668 | Upmc | $14.2M
Facility
$14.2M
PA AVG
$32.8M
Rank
#112 / 209 | $9.3M
Facility
$9.3M
PA AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#60 / 209 | 65.2%
Facility
65.2%
PA AVG
40%
Rank
#16 / 209 | 395146 |
Canterbury Place is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Pennsylvania.
Canterbury Place is in the Central Lawrenceville neighborhood of Pittsburgh.
Canterbury Place has a walk score of 93. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
According to PA state health department records, Canterbury Place's license number is 429490.
According to PA state health department records, Canterbury Place's license expires on June 17, 2026.
Canterbury Place's occupancy is 89.5%.
Canterbury Place is registered as a non-profit in PA.
Canterbury Place has 78 beds.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
