2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Cascadia of Nampa offers a warm and welcoming atmosphere that ensures a service delivered with compassion and respect. Focusing on rehabilitation and skilled nursing, the health center creates a vibrant atmosphere for seniors to maintain their independence and individuality. Cascadia of Nampa’s residential life is focused on the holistic wellness of its residents to optimize their fullest potential.
Community amenities help residents do as they please thanks to services such as housekeeping, physical therapy, memory care, fully-equipped bedrooms with utilities included (piped-in oxygen, private sink, wardrobe), restaurant-style dining, short-term stays available, spiritual programs, specialized activities, educational and social engagements.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 12th out of 33 homes in Idaho for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 1h 4m per day | ▲ 27% State avg: 50m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 29m per day | ▼ 38% State avg: 46m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 14m per day | ▼ 9% State avg: 2h 28m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 23m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 3h 28m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 7m per day | ▲ 24% State avg: 6m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 34m per day | ▲ 7% State avg: 32m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Idaho, the Department of Health and Welfare, Bureau of Facility Standards is the state agency tasked with inspecting and licensing assisted living and nursing home facilities.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Idaho state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | ID Average | vs. ID Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 49 | 24 | This facility has 104% more total deficiencies than a typical Idaho nursing home (49 vs. ID avg 24).↑ 104% worse |
|
Deficiencies per year
Average deficiencies per year since 2019.
| 7 | 3.4 | This facility has 106% more deficiencies per year than a typical Idaho nursing home (7 vs. ID avg 3.4).↑ 106% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
Idaho average 3.2
Last Health inspection on Jun 2024
Idaho average 25.2
Idaho average 7.94
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
21 of 25 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 25 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than Idaho averageIdaho average: 0.2
17% better than Idaho averageIdaho average: 1.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
5% fewer staff per resident than Idaho average
0% compared with Idaho average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
32 total: 28 full-time employees and 4 contractors.
32
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.1 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
19 total: 16 full-time employees and 3 contractors.
19
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.9 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
60 total: 58 full-time employees and 2 contractors.
60
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.8 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
774 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 58 | 2 | 60 | 18,727 | 92 | 100% | 8.8 |
| Registered Nurse | 28 | 4 | 32 | 8,042 | 92 | 100% | 9.1 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 16 | 3 | 19 | 4,076 | 92 | 100% | 8.9 |
| Dental Services Staff | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,935 | 81 | 88% | 7.6 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1,433 | 79 | 86% | 6.7 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,061 | 67 | 73% | 7.2 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 3 | 0 | 3 | 765 | 77 | 84% | 6.9 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 565 | 65 | 71% | 8.7 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 2 | 0 | 2 | 505 | 56 | 61% | 8.8 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 487 | 62 | 67% | 7.8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 402 | 64 | 70% | 6.2 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 399 | 50 | 54% | 8 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 5 | 0 | 5 | 349 | 44 | 48% | 6.8 |
| Physician Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 240 | 60 | 65% | 4 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 216 | 27 | 29% | 8 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 112 | 14 | 15% | 8 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 48 | 6 | 7% | 8 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
73% lower than Idaho averageIdaho average: $38K
67% more fines than Idaho averageIdaho average: 1.8
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Idaho averageIdaho average: 0.0
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Nov 6, 2023
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Sep 18, 2023
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Aug 28, 2023Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
10.2
7% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 9.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
18.7
In line with Idaho averageIdaho average: 19.6
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.3%
In line with Idaho averageIdaho average: 16.7%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.2%
In line with Idaho averageIdaho average: 19.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.6%
8% better than Idaho averageIdaho average: 22.5%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.0%
80% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 2.8%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6%
25% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 3.6%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
26% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 2.0%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
5% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 5.6%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.6%
56% better than Idaho averageIdaho average: 12.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.9%
In line with Idaho averageIdaho average: 18.3%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with Idaho averageIdaho average: 97.0%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with Idaho averageIdaho average: 96.2%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
9% better than Idaho averageIdaho average: 89.7%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
21% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.2%
In line with Idaho averageIdaho average: 86.5%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.7%
35% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 17.5%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
9.3%
20% better than Idaho averageIdaho average: 11.6%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.4%
77% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.9%
5% worse than Idaho averageIdaho average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
53.7%
6% better than Idaho averageIdaho average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
24% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
59% of new residents, often for short stays.
17% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
90Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Cascadia Of Nampa from 2018–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #6 / 33Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 6th out of 33 homes in Idaho. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Idaho average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Rankings are based only on facilities in Idaho that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #20 / 33Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 20th out of 33 homes in Idaho. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Idaho average. Well-run Idaho facilities typically land around 54–58% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Rankings are based only on facilities in Idaho that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (59% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 26 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Nampa's city center to Cascadia Of Nampa's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
The information below is reported by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Bureau of Facility Standards.
| Meadow View Nursing & Rehabilitation | NH | Nampa | 122
Facility
122
ID AVG
69
Rank
#10 / 114 |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
ID AVG
69.1%
Rank
#2 / 42 | +37% | 3.60
Facility
3.60
ID AVG
4.12
Rank
#16 / 33 | -22% | -13% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
ID AVG
$41.7k
Rank
#18 / 33 | 20
Facility
20
ID AVG
25.2
Rank
#8 / 33 | 6.7
Facility
6.7
ID AVG
7.9
Rank
#11 / 33 | 1 | 110 | - |
19
Facility
19
ID AVG
40
Rank
#151 / 197 | Chase Gunderson | $17.8M
Facility
$17.8M
ID AVG
$9.7M
Rank
#2 / 33 | $9.8M
Facility
$9.8M
ID AVG
$3.8M
Rank
#2 / 33 | 54.7%
Facility
54.7%
ID AVG
41.3%
Rank
#29 / 33 | 135076 | ||||
| Sunny Ridge | NH AL HC IL RC | Nampa (Meadowbrook Park) | 62
Facility
62
ID AVG
69
Rank
#64 / 114 |
71.1%
Facility
71.1%
ID AVG
69.1%
Rank
#24 / 42 | +3% | 5.50
Facility
5.50
ID AVG
4.12
Rank
#1 / 33 | -15% | +33% | $0
Facility
$0
ID AVG
$41.7k
Rank
#1 / 33 | 30
Facility
30
ID AVG
25.2
Rank
#21 / 33 | 10.0
Facility
10.0
ID AVG
7.9
Rank
#23 / 33 | 2 | 38 | - |
71
Facility
71
ID AVG
40
Rank
#19 / 197 | Cascades At Sunny Ridge, LLC | $6.0M
Facility
$6.0M
ID AVG
$9.7M
Rank
#30 / 33 | $3.5M
Facility
$3.5M
ID AVG
$3.8M
Rank
#29 / 33 | 57.9%
Facility
57.9%
ID AVG
41.3%
Rank
#13 / 33 | 135102 | ||||
| Cascadia Of Nampa | NH MC | Nampa | 100
Facility
100
ID AVG
69
Rank
#25 / 114 |
83.6%
Facility
83.6%
ID AVG
69.1%
Rank
#10 / 42 | +21% | 3.84
Facility
3.84
ID AVG
4.12
Rank
#12 / 33 | +68% | -7% | $10.2k
Facility
$10.2k
ID AVG
$41.7k
Rank
#21 / 33 | 25
Facility
25
ID AVG
25.2
Rank
#15 / 33 | 12.5
Facility
12.5
ID AVG
7.9
Rank
#31 / 33 | 1 | 93 | - |
51
Facility
51
ID AVG
40
Rank
#64 / 197 | Daniel J Allen Do Pc | $12.5M
Facility
$12.5M
ID AVG
$9.7M
Rank
#5 / 33 | $6.7M
Facility
$6.7M
ID AVG
$3.8M
Rank
#6 / 33 | 53.8%
Facility
53.8%
ID AVG
41.3%
Rank
#20 / 33 | 135144 |
Cascadia Of Nampa is located in Nampa, Idaho.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Idaho.
Cascadia Of Nampa has a walk score of 51. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Cascadia Of Nampa's occupancy is 83.6%.
Cascadia Of Nampa is registered as a for-profit in ID.
Yes — there are 7 photos of Cascadia Of Nampa in the photo gallery on this page.
Cascadia Of Nampa is located at 900 N Happy Valley Rd, Nampa, ID 83687.
(208) 401-9639 will put you in contact with the team at Cascadia Of Nampa.
Yes — Cascadia Of Nampa is a CMS-certified provider of Medicare and Medicaid.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
