Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
124
122 employees · 2 contractors · 47 on an average day Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Nursing Home, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Cullman, AL
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 80 / 100, a B- — 3 points below the Alabama average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 80 / 100, a B- — 3 points below the Alabama average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Nursing Home, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Cullman, AL
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 80 / 100, a B- — 3 points below the Alabama average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 80 / 100, a B- — 3 points below the Alabama average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center carries three care types in Cullman, AL. They are skilled nursing, respite care, and nursing home care. Nursing home care here means long-term support, and that is why the licensed cover has to repeat itself night after night rather than simply be present once. Respite is the one thing here that is not about a resident’s health changing, a short stay while the usual caregiver takes time away or recovers.
The licensed bed count is 95. Short-term rehab and the broader rehabilitation services cover what follows a hospital discharge.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay each go toward the cost. The hands-on nursing figure for one resident, across one day, is 3 hours and 48 minutes.
Adam Madison is the administrator. Post-hospital rehabilitation, long-term nursing or a short respite stay are the three things somebody would come here for.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Alabama for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 48m
This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Alabama for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 48m5 of 6 metrics below Alabama average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
46m
↑ 3% · AL 45mThis facility: 46m per resident per day, 3% above the Alabama average of 45m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 8.9-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 10.6-hour shifts
42m
↓ 21% · AL 53mThis facility: 42m per resident per day, 21% below the Alabama average of 53m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 10.6-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 61 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
61 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
2h 20m
↓ 17% · AL 2h 49mThis facility: 2h 20m per resident per day, 17% below the Alabama average of 2h 49m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 61 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
61 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 15% · AL 2mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 15% below the Alabama average of 2m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 57m
↓ 21% · AL 3h 44mThis facility: 2h 57m per resident per day, 21% below the Alabama average of 3h 44m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
21m
↓ 6% · AL 22mThis facility: 21m per resident per day, 6% below the Alabama average of 22m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
124
122 employees · 2 contractors · 47 on an average day
124 total staff / 85 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.46 : 1
↓ 7% · AL 1.57This facility: 1.46 staff per resident, 7% below the Alabama average of 1.57 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
124 staff ÷ 85 residents
See full Alabama ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9 h
↑ 14% · AL 7.9 hThis facility: 9 h, 14% above the Alabama average of 7.9 h (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
39,032 staff hours this quarter
See full Alabama ranking →99.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Alabama average: 95% · Contractors this quarter: Qualified Social Worker (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
95
Rank #86 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 133 nursing homes we track in Alabama for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Alabama facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
95
Rank #86 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 133 nursing homes we track in Alabama for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Alabama facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #11 / 110Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 110 nursing homes we track in Alabama for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Alabama average, with its Statewide rank out of 110. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #11 / 110Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 110 nursing homes we track in Alabama for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Alabama average, with its Statewide rank out of 110. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
95.4%
This home is often near full
Based on 90.6 residents and 95 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Higher than the Alabama average: 82.1%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
110
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusRegular
CountyCullman
CMS Certification Number015048
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center is administered by Adam Madison.
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Maintenance
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Pets not allowed
Wi-Fi
Room Types
Private Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
80 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
3 points below the Alabama average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
25 severity-weighted points (6 deficiencies) · 9% higher than the typical CMS-certified AL facility (median: 23)
Enforcement
Concern
$26,982 in fines · 1 enforcement action
Persistence
Strong
28 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified AL facility (median: 34)
Total health inspections
2
↓ 29% · AL 2.8This facility: 2, 29% below the AL average of 2.8 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
6
Rank #31 / 122Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 122 nursing homes we track in Alabama for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Alabama State average, with a ranking across all 122 AL facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 41% · AL 10.2This facility: 6, 41% below the AL average of 10.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3
Rank #41 / 122Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 122 nursing homes we track in Alabama for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Alabama mean across 122 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 15% · AL 3.54This facility: 3, 15% below the AL average of 3.54 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
6 of 6 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AL 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the AL average of 0.6 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · AL 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the AL average of 0.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 33% · AL 9This facility: 6, 33% below the AL average of 9 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · AL 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the AL average of 0.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Oct 19, 2023 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 1 of 6 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Oct 19, 2023
5 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 04, 2019
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 6 citations
Infection Control
1 deficiency (17%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (17%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (17%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (17%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 6 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Oct 19, 2023 · $26,982 civil money penalty
Oct 19, 2023 · $26,982 civil money penalty
Total fines
$26,982
↓ 66% · AL $78KThis facility: $26,982, 66% below the Alabama average of $78,445. Average among the 39 Alabama facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #113 / 123Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 113th out of 123 nursing homes we track in Alabama for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Alabama average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 123 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 52% · AL 2.1This facility: 1, 52% below the Alabama average of 2.1. Average among the 39 Alabama facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AL avg 0.38Alabama average: 0.38. Average among the 39 Alabama facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Oct 19, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$26,982
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$26,982Fine amount comparison
This facility
$26,982
Alabama average
$78,445
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Alabama and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Alabama average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 14% · AL 7.6This facility: 6.5, 14% below the AL average of 7.6 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 7% · AL 12.3This facility: 11.4, 7% below the AL average of 12.3 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 4 worse, 2 near AL average
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 2 near AL average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.7%
↓ 3% · AL 12.0This facility: 11.7, 3% below the AL average of 12.0 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.7%
↓ 3% · AL 12.0This facility: 11.7, 3% below the AL average of 12.0 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.8%
↓ 61% · AL 12.1This facility: 4.8, 61% below the AL average of 12.1 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.8%
↓ 61% · AL 12.1This facility: 4.8, 61% below the AL average of 12.1 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.7%
↑ 39% · AL 12.8This facility: 17.7, 39% above the AL average of 12.8 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.7%
↑ 39% · AL 12.8This facility: 17.7, 39% above the AL average of 12.8 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
↑ 43% · AL 2.4This facility: 3.4, 43% above the AL average of 2.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
↑ 43% · AL 2.4This facility: 3.4, 43% above the AL average of 2.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↓ 13% · AL 3.3This facility: 2.9, 13% below the AL average of 3.3 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↓ 13% · AL 3.3This facility: 2.9, 13% below the AL average of 3.3 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2%
↑ 53% · AL 5.4This facility: 8.2, 53% above the AL average of 5.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2%
↑ 53% · AL 5.4This facility: 8.2, 53% above the AL average of 5.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↓ 7% · AL 5.4This facility: 5.0, 7% below the AL average of 5.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↓ 7% · AL 5.4This facility: 5.0, 7% below the AL average of 5.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
↑ 31% · AL 1.4This facility: 1.9, 31% above the AL average of 1.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
↑ 31% · AL 1.4This facility: 1.9, 31% above the AL average of 1.4 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↓ 42% · AL 21.2This facility: 12.3, 42% below the AL average of 21.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↓ 42% · AL 21.2This facility: 12.3, 42% below the AL average of 21.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · AL 92.2This facility: 100.0, 8% above the AL average of 92.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · AL 92.2This facility: 100.0, 8% above the AL average of 92.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
↑ 4% · AL 94.8This facility: 98.9, 4% above the AL average of 94.8 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
↑ 4% · AL 94.8This facility: 98.9, 4% above the AL average of 94.8 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · AL 2.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AL average of 2.0 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · AL 2.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AL average of 2.0 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.2%
↑ 2% · AL 85.3This facility: 87.2, 2% above the AL average of 85.3 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.2%
↑ 2% · AL 85.3This facility: 87.2, 2% above the AL average of 85.3 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↑ 2% · AL 80.3This facility: 81.8, 2% above the AL average of 80.3 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↑ 2% · AL 80.3This facility: 81.8, 2% above the AL average of 80.3 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 118 Alabama nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
4.2% operating margin
+9.8 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.6M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Alabama homes
55.0% payroll share of revenue
AL average 53.9%Rank #44 / 116Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Alabama for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.4M while revenue rose $4.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Alabama homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | AL median | Compared with AL homesRank in AL | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $11.0M | +$4.1M | Trend 20162024 | AL median $10.5M | Rank in AL Rank #51 / 118Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 57% of homes | Above AL median Higher net patient revenue than 57% of AL homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $10.6M | +$3.2M | Trend 20162024 | AL median — | Rank in AL Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.5M | +$0.9M | Trend 20162024 | AL median — | Rank in AL Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 4.2% | +9.8 pts | Trend 20162024 | AL median — | Rank in AL Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | AL median — | Rank in AL Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.6M | +$0.2M | Trend — | AL median — | Rank in AL Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Alabama homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | AL median | Compared with AL homesRank in AL | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.1M | +$2.4M | Trend 20162024 | AL median $5.5M | Rank in AL Rank #45 / 118Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 62% of homes | Above AL median Higher payroll than 62% of AL homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 55.0% | +2.4 pts | Trend 20162024 | AL median 52.7% | Rank in AL Rank #44 / 116Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Alabama for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 63% of homes | Near AL average The AL average is 53.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · AL benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Alabama payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AL payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023no report | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.1M | $7.4M | $7.1M | $7.6M | $7.6M | $6.8M | $7.0M | $11.0M | |
| Operating expenses | $7.1M | $7.2M | $7.4M | $7.5M | $7.5M | $7.2M | $7.4M | $10.6M | |
| Net patient income | −$0.0M | $0.1M | −$0.3M | $0.1M | $0.1M | −$0.4M | −$0.4M | $0.5M | |
| Operating margin | −0.2% | 2.0% | −4.2% | 1.3% | 1.8% | −5.6% | −5.7% | 4.2% | |
| Net income | −$0.0M | $0.1M | −$0.3M | $0.0M | $0.1M | $0.8M | $0.4M | $0.6M | |
| Payroll costs | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.7M | $3.6M | $3.6M | $3.6M | $3.7M | $6.1M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 47.3% | 47.2% | 52.0% | 47.0% | 47.3% | 53.0% | 52.6% | 55.0% | |
| Beds | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | |
| Gross revenue | $7.1M | $7.9M | $7.2M | $7.8M | $7.4M | $5.9M | $6.0M | $11.6M | |
| Salaries | $2.9M | $3.0M | $3.2M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.2M | $5.4M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.7M | |
| Contract labor | — | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.0M | |
| Other operating costs | $3.8M | $3.8M | $3.7M | $3.9M | $3.9M | $3.6M | $3.7M | $4.5M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $227 | $224 | $221 | $239 | $246 | $259 | $284 | $343 | |
| Cost per day | $227 | $219 | $230 | $235 | $242 | $274 | $300 | $329 | |
| Average length of stay | 164.0 days | 209.9 days | 194.0 days | 153.8 days | 221.5 days | 412.0 days | 341.8 days | 109.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
308 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
118 · 38%
Medicaid
106 · 34%
Private pay & other
84 · 27%
Resident snapshot
85 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
8 · 9%
Medicaid
64 · 75%
Private pay & other
13 · 15%
Leaving
293 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
53 · 18%
Medicaid
150 · 51%
Private pay & other
90 · 31%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
5.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Cullman's city center to Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AL Dept. of Public Health (ADPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Alabama average is: 53.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albertville Nursing Home | NH RC SNF | North Albertville | 159
Facility
159
AL AVG
118
Rank
#22 / 133 | A- |
96.6%
Facility
96.6%
AL AVG
82.1%
Rank
#9 / 110 | +18% | 5.44
Facility
5.44
AL AVG
4.46
Rank
#13 / 122 | -21% | +22% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 9
Facility
9
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#51 / 122 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#41 / 122 | - | 154 | - |
66
Facility
66
AL AVG
42
Rank
#14 / 124 | Terri Brown | $18.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$18.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#11 / 118 | $11.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#4 / 118 | 58.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
58.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#27 / 116 | 015163 | ||||
| Cleburne County Nursing Home | NH AL | Heflin | 82
Facility
82
AL AVG
118
Rank
#104 / 133 | A |
91.5%
Facility
91.5%
AL AVG
82.1%
Rank
#46 / 110 | +11% | 4.93
Facility
4.93
AL AVG
4.46
Rank
#13 / 122 | -31% | +11% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 2
Facility
2
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#3 / 122 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#1 / 122 | - | 75 | - |
47
Facility
47
AL AVG
42
Rank
#57 / 124 | Tony Culberson | $7.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#96 / 118 | $5.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#66 / 118 | 69.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
69.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#6 / 116 | 015053 | ||||
| Palm Gardens Health and Rehabilitation, LLC | NH PC SNF | Mobile (South Crichton) | 100
Facility
100
AL AVG
118
Rank
#79 / 133 | ? |
90.9%
Facility
90.9%
AL AVG
82.1%
Rank
#40 / 110 | +11% | 4.36
Facility
4.36
AL AVG
4.46
Rank
#64 / 122 | +40% | -2% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 4
Facility
4
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#15 / 122 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#83 / 122 | - | 91 | - |
46
Facility
46
AL AVG
42
Rank
#61 / 124 | Jeanne Freeman | $10.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#57 / 118 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#67 / 118 | 49.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
49.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#78 / 116 | 015403 | ||||
| Athens Health and Rehabilitation, LLC | NH PC SNF | Athens | 149
Facility
149
AL AVG
118
Rank
#31 / 133 | B+ |
93.6%
Facility
93.6%
AL AVG
82.1%
Rank
#23 / 110 | +14% | 4.09
Facility
4.09
AL AVG
4.46
Rank
#95 / 122 | +4% | -8% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 10
Facility
10
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#67 / 122 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#101 / 122 | - | 140 | A+ | - | Northport Holding Operations, LLC | $17.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$17.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#16 / 118 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#21 / 118 | 48.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
48.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#81 / 116 | 015016 | ||||
| Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | NH RC SNF | Ne Cullman | 95
Facility
95
AL AVG
118
Rank
#86 / 133 | B- |
95.4%
Facility
95.4%
AL AVG
82.1%
Rank
#11 / 110 | +16% | 3.80
Facility
3.80
AL AVG
4.46
Rank
#64 / 122 | -13% | -15% | $27.0k
Facility
$27.0k
AL AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#113 / 123 | 6
Facility
6
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#31 / 122 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#41 / 122 | - | 91 | - | - | Alabama Snf Operations Holdings LLC | $11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#51 / 118 | $6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#45 / 118 | 55%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#44 / 116 | 015048 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AL nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
What is the occupancy rate at Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center?
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's occupancy is 95.4%.
Are pets allowed at Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center?
No, Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has a no-pet policy.
Does Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center is registered as a for-profit in AL.
Who is the administrator of Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center?
Adam Madison is the administrator of Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center.
What is the overall rating for Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center?
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center have?
Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has 95 beds.
Are there photos of Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center?
Yes — there are 3 photos of Cullman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
