Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
337
181 employees · 156 contractors · 99 on an average day Deer Meadows Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Philadelphia, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Philadelphia, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Deer Meadows Rehabilitation
With a 182-bed capacity, Deer Meadows Rehabilitation provides nursing home, nursing care, skilled nursing, memory care, hospice care, palliative care, and respite care in Philadelphia, PA. The community also features a secure dementia care unit, accommodating those living with Alzheimer’s or other forms of dementia. Residents also have access to services at all times, with 24-hour staffing available.
Additionally, hospice care and palliative care focus on comfort and symptom management for residents with a serious or terminal illness. Respite care offers a short stay for a family whose usual caregiver needs time away, while the Rehabilitative Care program provides rehabilitation services.
Residents also receive a total of 3 hours and 3 minutes of nursing care daily. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving eligible families options to cover care costs.
The community is in the Northeast Philadelphia neighborhood, where the Walk Score is 60 out of 100. This also suggests that the area is somewhat walkable, so some errands can be completed on foot for a resident who can manage nearby trips independently.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 146th out of 182 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3m
This nursing home is ranked 146th out of 182 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +40% above Pennsylvania average
5 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 25 total: 16 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
25 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
22m
↓ 54% · PA 47mThis facility: 22m per resident per day, 54% below the Pennsylvania average of 47m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 25 total: 16 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
25 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 93 total: 32 of the facility's own employees and 61 agency contractors.
93 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
47m
↓ 14% · PA 55mThis facility: 47m per resident per day, 14% below the Pennsylvania average of 55m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 93 total: 32 of the facility's own employees and 61 agency contractors.
93 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 178 total: 93 of the facility's own employees and 85 agency contractors.
178 staff · 8-hour shifts
1h 54m
↓ 14% · PA 2h 12mThis facility: 1h 54m per resident per day, 14% below the Pennsylvania average of 2h 12m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 178 total: 93 of the facility's own employees and 85 agency contractors.
178 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
8m
↑ 40% · PA 6mThis facility: 8m per resident per day, 40% above the Pennsylvania average of 6m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 46m
↓ 21% · PA 3h 31mThis facility: 2h 46m per resident per day, 21% below the Pennsylvania average of 3h 31m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
15m
↓ 54% · PA 33mThis facility: 15m per resident per day, 54% below the Pennsylvania average of 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
337
181 employees · 156 contractors · 99 on an average day
337 total staff / 191 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.76 : 1
↓ 2% · PA 1.80This facility: 1.76 staff per resident, 2% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.80 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
337 staff ÷ 191 residents
See full Pennsylvania ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.1 h
↑ 4% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 8.1 h, 4% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
74,067 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →85.1% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (85), Licensed Practical Nurse (61), Registered Nurse (9), RN Director of Nursing (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
388
Rank #20 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
388
Rank #20 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
206 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 182 state-licensed beds.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #83 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #83 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
60
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
195
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
96
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypePersonal Care Homes
IssuanceDecember 1, 2025
ExpirationDecember 1, 2026 Expires in 26 days
CountyPhiladelphia
License LevelFULL
License Number141260
CMS Certification Number395425
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation is legally operated by Deer Meadows Operating Ii LLC.
Profit StatusFor-profit
Alzheimer's Units
39 units
Total beds
182 units
Resident Council
Respiratory Therapy
Accelerated Care Plus (ACP) Technology Therapy
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
On-Site Medical Director
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Diabetes Management
IV Hydration and Antibiotics
Dental Services
Optometry Services
Audiology ServicesHearing-related evaluation and treatment provided by an audiologist or other qualified professional. Services can include hearing tests, hearing aids, and communication support.
Podiatry Services
Colostomy CareHelp caring for a colostomy, an opening in the abdomen that allows stool to leave the body into an attached pouch. Support can include pouch changes and skin care.
Heparin Therapy
DietitianListed as: Registered dietician nutrition supervision
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Psychiatric Services
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
104
Total Daily Staff
78
Waking Staff
0
Resident Support Staff
82
Residents Served
4
Hospice Residents
39
Capacity
20
Residents Served
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Fitness Center
Emergency Call System
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
ALM Inspection Grade
78 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
Pennsylvania inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 53% of the grade
C+ · 78/100
3 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100).
206 certified beds, 53% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Typical
86 severity-weighted points (45 citations) · 2× higher than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 37)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
45 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 38)
Pennsylvania state-licensed beds · 47% of the grade
C+ · 78/100
5 points below the Pennsylvania average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
182 licensed beds, 47% of the grade. Graded with Pennsylvania state-licensed facilities on the Pennsylvania scale.
Citations
Typical
4.6 citations per inspection (124 in 27 inspections) · 40% more than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 3.3)
Finding Frequency
Typical
59% of inspections found a citation · 0% fewer than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 59%)
Complaints
Typical
7 complaints · 40% more than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 5)
How the final grade is calculated
C+ · 78/100
78 × 53% + 78 × 47% = 78 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 206 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (53%) and 182 Pennsylvania state-licensed beds (47%). The result, 78 out of 100, is a C+ on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
0vs 1.3 avg↓ 100% fewer than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. PA average
4 Worse
Metrics worse than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (39% above)
• Citations per inspection (7% above)
• Inspections with citations (33% above)
• Total complaints (40% above) 1 At Avg Metrics at Pennsylvania average:
• Inspection citation rate (at PA avg) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total citations (39% above)
• Citations per inspection (7% above)
• Inspections with citations (33% above)
• Total complaints (40% above) 1 At Avg Metrics at Pennsylvania average:
• Inspection citation rate (at PA avg) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 124 | 89.0 | This facility has 39% more total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (124 vs. PA avg 89).↑ 39% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 4.6 | 4.3 | This facility has 7% more citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (4.6 vs. PA avg 4.3).↑ 7% worse Rank #84 / 179 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among the 179 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 27 | 21.0 | This facility has had 29% more total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (27 vs. PA avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 29% more |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 16 | 12.0 | This facility has 33% more inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (16 vs. PA avg 12).↑ 33% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 59% | 59% | This facility has inspection citation rate in line with the Pennsylvania average (59 vs. PA avg 59).— At avg |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 7 | 5.0 | This facility has 40% more total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (7 vs. PA avg 5).↑ 40% worse |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
14
↑ 94% · PA 7.2This facility: 14, 94% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.2 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
45
Rank #152 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 152nd out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 41% · PA 32This facility: 45, 41% above the Pennsylvania average of 32 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.21
Rank #84 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 23% · PA 4.16This facility: 3.21, 23% below the Pennsylvania average of 4.16 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
95% corrected
43 of 45 citations corrected · 2 still open
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.4 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 25% · PA 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the Pennsylvania average of 0.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
43
↑ 44% · PA 29.9This facility: 43, 44% above the Pennsylvania average of 29.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
95% corrected · 2 open
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 11% · PA 0.9This facility: 1, 11% above the Pennsylvania average of 0.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 29, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, moderate), not yet corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 15 of 45 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 29, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Jun 04, 2026
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Mar 09, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 23, 2025
11 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 14, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 16, 2025
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 10, 2025
1 citation
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 30, 2024
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 22, 2024
10 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 25, 2024
1 citation
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 02, 2024
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 31, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 17, 2024
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 16, 2024
13 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 45 citations
Quality of Life & Care
15 deficiencies (33%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
7 deficiencies (16%)
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (13%)
Environmental
4 deficiencies (9%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (7%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (7%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (4%)
Administration
1 deficiency (2%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
32 of 45 citations resulted from standard inspections; 11 of 45 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 45 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
PA avg $58KPennsylvania average: $58,140. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
PA avg 1.78Pennsylvania average: 1.78. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.17Pennsylvania average: 0.17. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 34% · PA 3.7This facility: 5.0, 34% above the PA average of 3.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 7% · PA 3.2This facility: 3.0, 7% below the PA average of 3.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 12% · PA 9.5This facility: 10.7, 12% above the PA average of 9.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 20% · PA 19.8This facility: 15.7, 20% below the PA average of 19.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 3 worse, 2 near PA average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.3%
↓ 3% · PA 16.8This facility: 16.3, 3% below the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.3%
↓ 3% · PA 16.8This facility: 16.3, 3% below the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.7%
↓ 26% · PA 17.0This facility: 12.7, 26% below the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.7%
↓ 26% · PA 17.0This facility: 12.7, 26% below the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.2%
↓ 29% · PA 25.5This facility: 18.2, 29% below the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.2%
↓ 29% · PA 25.5This facility: 18.2, 29% below the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 78% · PA 1.5This facility: 0.3, 78% below the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 78% · PA 1.5This facility: 0.3, 78% below the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4%
↑ 39% · PA 3.1This facility: 4.4, 39% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4%
↑ 39% · PA 3.1This facility: 4.4, 39% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9%
↑ 2% · PA 4.8This facility: 4.9, 2% above the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9%
↑ 2% · PA 4.8This facility: 4.9, 2% above the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.1%
↑ 145% · PA 6.2This facility: 15.1, 145% above the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.1%
↑ 145% · PA 6.2This facility: 15.1, 145% above the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6%
↓ 95% · PA 10.8This facility: 0.6, 95% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6%
↓ 95% · PA 10.8This facility: 0.6, 95% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.6%
↓ 80% · PA 17.7This facility: 3.6, 80% below the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.6%
↓ 80% · PA 17.7This facility: 3.6, 80% below the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 8% · PA 87.5This facility: 94.6, 8% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 8% · PA 87.5This facility: 94.6, 8% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · PA 93.5This facility: 100.0, 7% above the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · PA 93.5This facility: 100.0, 7% above the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.62
↑ 56% · PA 1.68This facility: 2.62, 56% above the PA average of 1.68 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.62
↑ 56% · PA 1.68This facility: 2.62, 56% above the PA average of 1.68 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.06
↓ 12% · PA 1.20This facility: 1.06, 12% below the PA average of 1.20 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.06
↓ 12% · PA 1.20This facility: 1.06, 12% below the PA average of 1.20 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
46.5%
↓ 13% · US 53.7This facility: 46.5, 13% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
46.5%
↓ 13% · US 53.7This facility: 46.5, 13% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.9%
↓ 9% · US 50.6This facility: 45.9, 9% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.9%
↓ 9% · US 50.6This facility: 45.9, 9% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 18% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.2, 18% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 18% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.2, 18% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.8%
↓ 6% · PA 70.0This facility: 65.8, 6% below the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.8%
↓ 6% · PA 70.0This facility: 65.8, 6% below the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.6%
↑ 29% · PA 68.7This facility: 88.6, 29% above the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.6%
↑ 29% · PA 68.7This facility: 88.6, 29% above the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
25.7%
↑ 11% · PA 23.1This facility: 25.7, 11% above the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
25.7%
↑ 11% · PA 23.1This facility: 25.7, 11% above the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.8%
↓ 31% · PA 9.8This facility: 6.8, 31% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.8%
↓ 31% · PA 9.8This facility: 6.8, 31% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
0.2% operating margin
+2.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.1M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
50.8% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #114 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.5M while revenue rose $1.0M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $28.9M | +$1.0M | Trend 20182025 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #27 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Above PA median Higher net patient revenue than 85% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $28.9M | +$0.4M | Trend 20182025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.1M | +$0.6M | Trend 20182025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 0.2% | +2.1 pts | Trend 20182025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.1M | +$0.3M | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $14.7M | +$1.5M | Trend 20182025 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #46 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 74% of homes | Above PA median Higher payroll than 74% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 50.8% | +3.5 pts | Trend 20182025 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #114 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 36% of homes | 19.3 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $25.8M | $27.7M | $27.1M | $25.7M | $27.4M | $29.3M | $27.9M | $28.9M |
| Operating expenses | $25.9M | $27.2M | $26.2M | $25.8M | $27.7M | $29.0M | $28.5M | $28.9M |
| Net patient income | −$0.1M | $0.5M | $0.9M | −$0.0M | −$0.3M | $0.3M | −$0.5M | $0.1M |
| Operating margin | −0.2% | 1.8% | 3.4% | −0.1% | −1.2% | 1.0% | −1.9% | 0.2% |
| Net income | $0.8M | $0.6M | $1.6M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $0.5M | −$0.1M | $0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $12.1M | $12.6M | $12.2M | $13.0M | $13.5M | $14.2M | $13.2M | $14.7M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 46.9% | 45.4% | 44.9% | 50.4% | 49.3% | 48.4% | 47.3% | 50.8% |
| Beds | 332 | 332 | 332 | 332 | 332 | 332 | 332 | 332 |
| Gross revenue | $28.8M | $31.0M | $29.1M | $27.5M | $28.9M | $31.4M | $30.8M | $31.4M |
| Salaries | $10.4M | $10.8M | $10.6M | $11.4M | $11.5M | $12.5M | $11.3M | $13.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.6M | $1.6M | $2.0M | $1.7M | $1.9M | $1.7M |
| Contract labor | — | $0.0M | — | — | — | — | — | $2.2M |
| Other operating costs | $13.8M | $14.6M | $14.0M | $12.8M | $14.2M | $14.8M | $15.2M | $14.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $253 | $262 | $265 | $266 | $280 | $290 | $266 | $282 |
| Cost per day | $253 | $258 | $256 | $266 | $283 | $287 | $271 | $282 |
| Average length of stay | 118.9 days | 120.9 days | 86.0 days | 82.5 days | 96.4 days | 81.1 days | 94.0 days | 96.4 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
722 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
307 · 43%
Medicaid
99 · 14%
Private pay & other
316 · 44%
Resident snapshot
191 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
34 · 18%
Medicaid
124 · 65%
Private pay & other
33 · 17%
Leaving
729 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
249 · 34%
Medicaid
216 · 30%
Private pay & other
264 · 36%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Deer Meadows Rehabilitation
8301 Roosevelt Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19152 — 0.18 miles to nearest hospital (Nazareth Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Deer Meadows Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Philadelphia
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 70.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Philadelphia Protestant Home | NH IL MC SNF | Philadelphia (Northeast Philadelphia) | 304
Facility
304
PA AVG
109
Rank
#19 / 200 | A |
45.2%
Facility
45.2%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#153 / 163 | -40% | 4.33
Facility
4.33
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#63 / 182 | +13% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 8
Facility
8
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#47 / 179 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#113 / 179 | - | 85 | - |
76
Facility
76
PA AVG
50
Rank
#45 / 208 | Philadelphia Protestant Home | $29.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$29.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#26 / 177 | $20.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#16 / 177 | 71%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
71%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#38 / 177 | 395961 | ||||
| Paul’s Run Retirement Community | NH AL CCRC IL RC SNF | Philadelphia | 289
Facility
289
PA AVG
109
Rank
#29 / 200 | ? | - | - | 3.88
Facility
3.88
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#122 / 182 | +6% | -1% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 15
Facility
15
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#79 / 179 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#145 / 179 | - | 113 | A+ |
66
Facility
66
PA AVG
50
Rank
#71 / 208 | Pauls Run Inc | $16.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#99 / 177 | $17.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$17.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#29 / 177 | 106.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
106.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#16 / 177 | 395738 | ||||
| Buckingham Valley Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Newtown | 130
Facility
130
PA AVG
109
Rank
#51 / 200 | ? |
94.9%
Facility
94.9%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#30 / 163 | +26% | 2.93
Facility
2.93
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#163 / 182 | -29% | -26% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 9
Facility
9
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#54 / 179 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#42 / 179 | - | 123 | A+ |
15
Facility
15
PA AVG
50
Rank
#182 / 208 | Bpsh Holdings LLC | $18.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#73 / 177 | $8.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#115 / 177 | 43.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
43.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#158 / 177 | 395188 | ||||
| Simpson House | NH AL IL MC SNF | Philadelphia (Wynnefield Heights) | 142
Facility
142
PA AVG
109
Rank
#42 / 200 | ? |
67.8%
Facility
67.8%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#152 / 163 | -10% | 4.44
Facility
4.44
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#43 / 182 | +45% | +13% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 5
Facility
5
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#26 / 179 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#53 / 179 | - | 96 | A |
50
Facility
50
PA AVG
50
Rank
#105 / 208 | Simpson Senior Services | $12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#119 / 177 | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#100 / 177 | 73.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
73.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#33 / 177 | 395121 | ||||
| Deer Meadows Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Philadelphia (Northeast Philadelphia) | 388
Facility
388
PA AVG
109
Rank
#20 / 200 | C+ | - | - | 3.04
Facility
3.04
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#146 / 182 | -38% | -23% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 45
Facility
45
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#152 / 179 | 3.2
Facility
3.2
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#84 / 179 | 1 | 195 | A+ |
60
Facility
60
PA AVG
50
Rank
#83 / 208 | Deer Meadows Operating II LLC | $28.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$28.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#27 / 177 | $14.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$14.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#46 / 177 | 50.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
50.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#114 / 177 | 395425 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other PA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Pennsylvania
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation is located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Pennsylvania.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Deer Meadows Rehabilitation
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Deer Meadows Rehabilitation in?
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation is in the Northeast Philadelphia neighborhood of Philadelphia.
02 Who is the owner of Deer Meadows Rehabilitation?
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation is legally operated by Deer Meadows Operating Ii LLC.
03 Is Deer Meadows Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation has a walk score of 60. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
04 What is the license number of Deer Meadows Rehabilitation?
According to PA state health department records, Deer Meadows Rehabilitation's license number is 141260.
05 When does Deer Meadows Rehabilitation's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, Deer Meadows Rehabilitation's license expires on December 1, 2026.
06 What is the occupancy rate at Deer Meadows Rehabilitation?
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation's occupancy is 84.6%.
07 Are pets allowed at Deer Meadows Rehabilitation?
No, Deer Meadows Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
Updated on
