3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
In Madras, OR, East Cascade Retirement Community is licensed for independent living, assisted living, memory care, nursing home care, and skilled nursing. Independent living is a private residence with community services attached and no daily care, so a working kitchen and your own cooking hours stay yours. Assisted living picks up bathing, dressing, and the medication routine.
Supervision for a person living with dementia is what memory care provides, and it often arrives because a spouse at home has lost their whole day to watching. The nursing tracks cover residents whose health needs run more complex. Staff are here 24 hours a day, and rehabilitation is available to anyone who needs it.
There are 48 beds, so it’s a smaller setting, which mostly means staff are not spread thin across a long hallway of strangers. A Walk Score of 79 puts the area in the very walkable tier. The pharmacy is the errand that recurs abnd cannot be skipped, so walking distance to one counts for more than the rest of the map.
Private funds, Medicare, and Medicaid all pay for care here. Michael Bell is the administrator.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
55
26 employees · 29 contractors · 16 on an average day
55 total staff / 16 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.44 : 1
↑ 23% · OR 2.80This facility: 3.44 staff per resident, 23% above the Oregon average of 2.80 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
55 staff ÷ 16 residents
See full Oregon ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↑ 3% · OR 7.8 hThis facility: 8 h, 3% above the Oregon average of 7.8 h (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
11,776 staff hours this quarter
See full Oregon ranking →90.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oregon average: 89.7% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (19), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Speech Language Pathologist (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
48
Rank #77 / 91Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 91 nursing homes we track in Oregon for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oregon facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #23 / 83Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 83 nursing homes we track in Oregon for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Oregon facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #28 / 98Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 98 nursing homes we track in Oregon for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oregon facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
East Cascade Retirement Community is administered by Andrew G Hyder.
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services, Aging and People with Disabilities performs unannounced surveys and regular inspections to ensure resident safety in all care settings.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Oregon state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | OR Average | vs. OR Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 57 | 34.0 | This facility has 68% more total deficiencies than a typical Oregon nursing home (57 vs. OR avg 34).↑ 68% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 11.4 | 4.4 | This facility has 159% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Oregon nursing home (11.4 vs. OR avg 4.4).↑ 159% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | OR Average | vs. OR Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 5 | 8.0 | This facility has had 38% fewer total inspections than the Oregon average (5 vs. OR avg 8). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 38% fewer |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
State avg 34.1 (50% better than State average)State avg 6.53 (13% better than State average)
100% corrected
17 of 17 citations corrected State avg 0.4 (100% better than State average)State avg 1.1 (9% better than State average)State avg 32.4 (51% better than State average)State avg 0.3 (100% better than State average)
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
16 of 17 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 17 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
6.4
31% better than Oregon averageOregon average: 9.3
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
20.8
9% worse than Oregon averageOregon average: 19.1
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.2%
In line with Oregon averageOregon average: 14.9%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.4%
21% worse than Oregon averageOregon average: 21.8%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
36% better than Oregon averageOregon average: 2.4%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8%
18% worse than Oregon averageOregon average: 5.8%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.4%
371% worse than Oregon averageOregon average: 2.0%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.1%
55% better than Oregon averageOregon average: 4.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
In line with Oregon averageOregon average: 4.9%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
48.8%
250% worse than Oregon averageOregon average: 13.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.4%
In line with Oregon averageOregon average: 95.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.1%
13% better than Oregon averageOregon average: 85.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.6%
306% worse than Oregon averageOregon average: 1.4%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.5%
11% better than Oregon averageOregon average: 81.2%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
41.3%
18% worse than Oregon averageOregon average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
31% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
31% of new residents, often for short stays.
37% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
16Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for East Cascade Retirement Community from 2023–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #61 / 65Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 65 nursing homes we track in Oregon. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #14 / 65Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 65 nursing homes we track in Oregon. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
New residents most often arrive under Medicaid (37% of admissions), and a typical Medicaid stay runs around 6 - 7 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Madras's city center to East Cascade Retirement Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the OR Dept. of Human Services (ODHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Oregon average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas Retirement Village Health Center | NH AL IL MC SNF | Dallas | 121
Facility
121
OR AVG
79
Rank
#6 / 91 |
80.5%
Facility
80.5%
OR AVG
74.4%
Rank
#28 / 67 | +8% | 5.19
Facility
5.19
OR AVG
5.45
Rank
#48 / 82 | +121% | -5% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 83 | 35
Facility
35
OR AVG
34.1
Rank
#46 / 80 | 8.8
Facility
8.8
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#67 / 80 | - | 97 | - |
83
Facility
83
OR AVG
61
Rank
#17 / 98 | Dallas Health Care Center, LLC | $23.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$23.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$11.5M
Rank
#3 / 65 | $11.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$5.6M
Rank
#5 / 65 | 51%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
49.5%
Rank
#46 / 65 | 385207 | ||||
| Clatsop Care Center | NH AL HC MC RC SNF | Astoria | 71
Facility
71
OR AVG
79
Rank
#53 / 91 |
47.7%
Facility
47.7%
OR AVG
74.4%
Rank
#62 / 67 | -36% | 5.16
Facility
5.16
OR AVG
5.45
Rank
#48 / 82 | -42% | -5% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 83 | 23
Facility
23
OR AVG
34.1
Rank
#27 / 80 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#38 / 80 | 4 | 34 | - |
82
Facility
82
OR AVG
61
Rank
#20 / 98 | Clatsop Care Center Health District | $7.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
OR AVG
$11.5M
Rank
#63 / 65 | $3.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$3.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
OR AVG
$5.6M
Rank
#62 / 65 | 44.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
44.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
OR AVG
49.5%
Rank
#11 / 65 | 385144 | ||||
| Willamette View | NH AL HC IL MC RESC SNF | Portland | 6
Facility
6
OR AVG
79
Rank
#91 / 91 |
96.7%
Facility
96.7%
OR AVG
74.4%
Rank
#2 / 67 | +30% | 11.25
Facility
11.25
OR AVG
5.45
Rank
#1 / 82 | - | - | +106% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 83 | 5
Facility
5
OR AVG
34.1
Rank
#1 / 80 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#1 / 80 | - | 6 | - |
45
Facility
45
OR AVG
61
Rank
#77 / 98 | Willamette View, Inc | $1.7M*Fiscal year ending 2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $204.3k*Fiscal year ending 2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 12.2%*Fiscal year ending 2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 385200 | |||
| Rose Linn Care Center | NH AL MC RESC SNF | West Linn (Willamette) | 71
Facility
71
OR AVG
79
Rank
#53 / 91 |
85.9%
Facility
85.9%
OR AVG
74.4%
Rank
#21 / 67 | +15% | 4.45
Facility
4.45
OR AVG
5.45
Rank
#75 / 82 | -12% | -18% | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 83 | 14
Facility
14
OR AVG
34.1
Rank
#13 / 80 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#11 / 80 | - | 61 | - |
33
Facility
33
OR AVG
61
Rank
#84 / 98 | West Linn Care Center Operating Company, LLC | $11.5M*Fiscal year ending 2020These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $5.7M*Fiscal year ending 2020These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 49.9%*Fiscal year ending 2020These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 385278 | ||||
| East Cascade Retirement Community | NH AL IL MC SNF | Madras | 48
Facility
48
OR AVG
79
Rank
#77 / 91 | - | - | - | -1% | - | $0
Facility
$0
OR AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 83 | 17
Facility
17
OR AVG
34.1
Rank
#18 / 80 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
OR AVG
6.5
Rank
#37 / 80 | 1 | 18 | - |
79
Facility
79
OR AVG
61
Rank
#28 / 98 | East Cascade Retirement Community, LLC | $6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$11.5M
Rank
#61 / 65 | $3.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
$5.6M
Rank
#61 / 65 | 50.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OR AVG
49.5%
Rank
#14 / 65 | 385181 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other OR nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
East Cascade Retirement Community has a walk score of 79. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
According to OR state health department records, East Cascade Retirement Community's license number is 70M212.
East Cascade Retirement Community's occupancy is 73.8%.
East Cascade Retirement Community has been operating for approximately 27 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, East Cascade Retirement Community has a no-pet policy.
The team at East Cascade Retirement Community can be reached at ahyder@kalestahc.com.
East Cascade Retirement Community is registered as a for-profit in OR.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
