East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center is a nursing home and respite care community in Warsaw, NY. Nursing home care provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while respite care offers short stays for families whose usual caregiver needs to travel or recover. The community may be a good fit for a resident who needs ongoing nursing care or for a family seeking temporary support.
The home has 80 beds, with private and semi private rooms. A private room provides an individual living space, while a semi private room allows two residents to share a room. Residents can spend time in landscaped grounds with flower and vegetable gardens, an outdoor patio, and a gazebo, while therapeutic activities and stimulating activities for mind and body offer structured ways to stay engaged. Local trips and outings provide additional opportunities to spend time, and East Side Opco operates the community.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
80Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by East Side Opco LLC (For Profit).
In New York State, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
Enforcement actions are formal penalties or interventions imposed by New York State regulators when a nursing home fails to meet state or federal care, safety, or regulatory standards. They may include directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
This facility has 1 enforcement action. 33% of New York State nursing homes have zero, and the statewide average is 1.6.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York State state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 21 | 19.0 | This facility has 11% more total citations than a typical New York State nursing home (21 vs. NY avg 19).↑ 11% worse |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 18 | 20.0 | This facility has 10% fewer health citations than a typical New York State nursing home (18 vs. NY avg 20).↓ 10% better |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 3 | 4.0 | This facility has 25% fewer life safety citations than a typical New York State nursing home (3 vs. NY avg 4).↓ 25% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 1.1 | 2.2 | This facility has 50% fewer citations per inspection than a typical New York State nursing home (1.1 vs. NY avg 2.2).↓ 50% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 20 | 9.0 | This facility has had 122% more total inspections than the New York State average (20 vs. NY avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 122% more |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 12 | 4.0 | This facility has 200% more inspections with citations than a typical New York State nursing home (12 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 200% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 60% | 54% | This facility has 6 percentage points higher inspection citation rate than a typical New York State nursing home (60% vs. NY avg 54%).↑ 6% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 108 | 79.0 | This facility has 37% more total complaints than a typical New York State nursing home (108 vs. NY avg 79).↑ 37% worse |
|
Complaints per bed
Size-adjusted complaint rate based on occupied beds.
| 1.35 | 0.50 | This facility has 170% more complaints per bed than a typical New York State nursing home (1.35 vs. NY avg 0.5).↑ 170% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with New York State regulators.
| 0 | 15.0 | This facility has had 100% fewer complaint investigations than the New York State average (0 vs. NY avg 15). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 100% fewer |
0.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Warsaw's city center to East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 55.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest View Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing | NH PC SNF | Forest Hills | 160
Facility
160
NY AVG
185
Rank
#209 / 422 |
98.8%
Facility
98.8%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#34 / 378 | +8% | 3.54
Facility
3.54
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#140 / 395 | -14% | -1% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 397 | 9
Facility
9
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#49 / 397 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#74 / 397 | - | 158 | A+ |
94
Facility
94
NY AVG
64
Rank
#33 / 450 | Forest View Nursing Home Inc (For Profit) | $22.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$22.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#204 / 382 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#240 / 382 | 42.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
42.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#293 / 381 | 335310 | ||||
| The Plaza Rehab and Nursing Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Bronx (Fordham Manor) | 744
Facility
744
NY AVG
185
Rank
#1 / 422 |
98.0%
Facility
98.0%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#58 / 378 | +7% | 3.18
Facility
3.18
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#213 / 395 | +74% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 397 | 17
Facility
17
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#189 / 397 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#63 / 397 | - | 729 | A+ |
87
Facility
87
NY AVG
64
Rank
#108 / 450 | Tcprnc, LLC (For Profit) | $127.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$127.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#1 / 382 | $51.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$51.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#12 / 382 | 40.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
40.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#314 / 381 | 335462 | ||||
| Amsterdam Nursing Home | NH SNF | New York (Manhattan) | 409
Facility
409
NY AVG
185
Rank
#19 / 422 |
98.0%
Facility
98.0%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#58 / 378 | +7% | 3.13
Facility
3.13
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#248 / 395 | +5% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 397 | 14
Facility
14
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#130 / 397 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#340 / 397 | - | 401 | A+ |
93
Facility
93
NY AVG
64
Rank
#43 / 450 | Amsterdam Nursing Home Corporation (1992) (Not For Profit) | $81.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$81.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#10 / 382 | $30.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$30.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#32 / 382 | 37.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
37.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#334 / 381 | 335570 | ||||
| Shore View Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | NH PC SNF | Brooklyn (Sheepshead Bay) | 320
Facility
320
NY AVG
185
Rank
#38 / 422 |
88.1%
Facility
88.1%
NY AVG
91.6%
Rank
#312 / 378 | -4% | 2.69
Facility
2.69
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#343 / 395 | +77% | -25% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 397 | 2
Facility
2
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#1 / 397 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#1 / 397 | - | 282 | A+ |
85
Facility
85
NY AVG
64
Rank
#121 / 450 | Shore View Acquisition 1, LLC (For Profit) | $49.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$49.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#50 / 382 | $25.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$25.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.0M
Rank
#50 / 382 | 50.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
50.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.5%
Rank
#197 / 381 | 335288 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NY nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center is located in Warsaw, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York State.
East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by East Side Opco LLC (For Profit).
No, East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has 80 beds.
East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has had 21 reported citations according to records from New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH).
Yes — there are 4 photos of East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in the photo gallery on this page.
East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center offers Nursing Home & Respite Care.
East Side Nursing & Rehabilitation Center is located at 62 Prospect St, Warsaw, NY 14569.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
