4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Eastcastle Place is a continuing care retirement community in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, offering independent living, assisted living, memory care, nursing home care and skilled nursing. Independent living provides a private residence with community services and no daily care, while assisted living adds help with bathing, dressing and medication. Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision, and skilled nursing includes licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Several care levels are available here. Eastcastle Place may be a good fit for a resident whose needs grow over time and who may want to remain in the same community. The community has 18 beds, creating a smaller setting where staff and residents can get to know each other.
Residents can choose studio, one bedroom or two bedroom housing. The larger layouts may suit a couple moving together. Monthly rates range from $5,134 to $7,789, giving families a defined range for planning monthly costs.
Medicare and private pay are accepted. Eligible residents may use Medicare, while others can pay directly. Total nurse staffing is 5 hours and 29 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time allocated to each resident.
Rehabilitation services are available through the community, so residents can receive rehabilitation as part of the care offered. Pets are allowed, which means a resident may keep a pet when moving into the community. With a Walk Score of 92, the area is a walker’s paradise, so daily errands do not require a car and a resident who no longer drives can still get out independently. Tyler Gudex serves as the administrator.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 29mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +124% above Wisconsin average
1 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 14 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
14 staff · 6.2-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 17 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
17 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 168 total: 57 of the facility's own employees and 111 agency contractors.
168 staff · 6.7-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
239
92 employees · 147 contractors · 39 on an average day
239 total staff / 38 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
6.29 : 1
↑ 160% · WI 2.42This facility: 6.29 staff per resident, 160% above the Wisconsin average of 2.42 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
239 staff ÷ 38 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.6 h
↓ 10% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 6.6 h, 10% below the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
23,697 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →78.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.1% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (111), RN Director of Nursing (13), Respiratory Therapy Technician (5), Registered Nurse (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Licensed Practical Nurse (2), Qualified Social Worker (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Diagnostic X-ray Services Staff (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
18
Rank #195 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 195th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #3 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #67 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 14 residents and 18 beds. Source: state inspection report (Oct 2025)
Higher than the Wisconsin average: 71.7%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
The below pricing was updated on
Eastcastle Place is legally operated by Eastcastle Place, and administered by Tyler Gudex.
Sourced directly from the team at Eastcastle Place.This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In Wisconsin, the Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance performs unannounced onsite surveys to ensure that long-term care facilities meet health and safety laws.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Wisconsin state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | WI Average | vs. WI Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 3 | 7.0 | This facility has 57% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Wisconsin nursing home (3 vs. WI avg 7).↓ 57% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.0 | 1.2 | This facility has 17% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Wisconsin nursing home (1 vs. WI avg 1.2).↓ 17% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | WI Average | vs. WI Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 3 | 4.0 | This facility has had 25% fewer total inspections than the Wisconsin average (3 vs. WI avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 25% fewer |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
100% corrected
16 of 16 citations corrected Latest inspection: Feb 18, 2026 · 13 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 4 of 16 citations · 8 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
15 of 16 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 16 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
14 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 20, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,814
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,545
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,235
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$10,586Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 32% · WI 3.0This facility: 4.0, 32% above the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 39% · WI 2.9This facility: 4.0, 39% above the WI average of 2.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 47% · WI 9.4This facility: 4.9, 47% below the WI average of 9.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 4% · WI 19.8This facility: 20.7, 4% above the WI average of 19.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 6 better, 2 worse, 2 near WI average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.5%
↓ 66% · WI 16.1This facility: 5.5, 66% below the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.9%
↑ 46% · WI 24.6This facility: 35.9, 46% above the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
↓ 2% · WI 2.7This facility: 2.6, 2% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 3.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.6%
↑ 152% · WI 5.0This facility: 12.6, 152% above the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6%
↓ 68% · WI 5.1This facility: 1.6, 68% below the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.0%
↓ 47% · WI 5.7This facility: 3.0, 47% below the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.4%
↓ 40% · WI 15.8This facility: 9.4, 40% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.7%
↑ 3% · WI 95.7This facility: 98.7, 3% above the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.0This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
63.5%
↑ 18% · US 53.7This facility: 63.5, 18% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
58.0%
↑ 15% · US 50.6This facility: 58.0, 15% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 64% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.4, 64% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 16% · WI 86.5This facility: 100.0, 16% above the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 22% · WI 82.2This facility: 100.0, 22% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.0%
↓ 16% · WI 22.7This facility: 19.0, 16% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
24.1%
↑ 61% · WI 15.0This facility: 24.1, 61% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
36% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
64% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
38Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Eastcastle Place’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−118.2% operating margin
−4.3 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($12.9M) turns it into a net profit to $2.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
97.6% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #7 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $1.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.1M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #67 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 60% of homes | Above WI median Higher net patient revenue than 60% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $19.9M | +$2.4M | Trend 20172024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$10.8M | −$1.5M | Trend 20172024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −118.2% | −4.3 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $12.9M | — | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $2.1M | +$5.3M | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.9M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #22 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 87% of homes | Above WI median Higher payroll than 87% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 97.6% | −2.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #7 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 96% of homes | 38.9 pts over WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $3.7M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $4.6M | $4.4M | $5.2M | $8.2M | $9.1M |
| Operating expenses | $13.2M | $15.1M | $14.6M | $14.6M | $15.2M | $16.4M | $17.5M | $19.9M |
| Net patient income | −$9.5M | −$10.1M | −$9.7M | −$10.0M | −$10.8M | −$11.2M | −$9.3M | −$10.8M |
| Operating margin | −255.3% | −202.7% | −194.6% | −219.2% | −247.0% | −215.7% | −113.9% | −118.2% |
| Net income | −$0.2M | −$1.6M | −$0.8M | −$0.7M | $0.4M | −$2.9M | −$3.1M | $2.1M |
| Payroll costs | $6.0M | $6.7M | $6.9M | $7.2M | $7.7M | $8.1M | $8.2M | $8.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 161.5% | 135.5% | 138.2% | 157.1% | 175.6% | 155.8% | 100.3% | 97.6% |
| Beds | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 74 | 74 |
| Gross revenue | $6.1M | $7.5M | $7.7M | $6.8M | $6.4M | $7.1M | $9.6M | $10.3M |
| Salaries | $5.0M | $5.7M | $5.8M | $6.1M | $6.5M | $6.8M | $7.0M | $7.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.0M | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.2M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.9M |
| Other operating costs | $7.2M | $8.3M | $7.8M | $7.4M | $7.5M | $8.3M | $9.3M | $11.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $416 | $460 | $443 | $438 | $442 | $436 | $342 | $372 |
| Cost per day | $1,478 | $1,394 | $1,306 | $1,399 | $1,534 | $1,378 | $732 | $811 |
| Average length of stay | 33.8 days | 34.4 days | 32.4 days | 31.6 days | 26.3 days | 37.1 days | 46.5 days | 44.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (64% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 3 - 4 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Lindsey Viegut serves as the Executive Director at Eastcastle Place, overseeing day-to-day operations and financial management of the community. She has over 9 years of senior living administration experience and has been with Eastcastle Place for more than 6 years. Lindsey previously served as the community's Administrator, bringing strong leadership and expertise to her role.
2.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Milwaukee's city center to Eastcastle Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.19 miles to nearest hospital (Ascension Columbia St. Mary's Hospital - Milwaukee Campus)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Ann Health and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Milwaukee | - | 50
Facility
50
WI AVG
78
Rank
#114 / 197 | A- |
84
Facility
84
WI AVG
48
Rank
#16 / 191 | - |
| Eastcastle Place | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Milwaukee (Murray Hill) | $5,134 - $7,789 | 18
Facility
18
WI AVG
78
Rank
#195 / 197 | - |
92
Facility
92
WI AVG
48
Rank
#3 / 191 | Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed |
| Milwaukee Catholic Home | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Milwaukee (Northpoint) | $1,140 - $5,570 | 107
Facility
107
WI AVG
78
Rank
#43 / 197 | A+ |
83
Facility
83
WI AVG
48
Rank
#18 / 191 | 1 Bed / 2 Bed |
| Saint Johns on the Lake Central Tower | NH AL IL MC SNF | Milwaukee | - | 110
Facility
110
WI AVG
78
Rank
#35 / 197 | - |
87
Facility
87
WI AVG
48
Rank
#6 / 191 | - |
| Sunrise Health Services | NH SNF | Milwaukee (Alverno) | - | 99
Facility
99
WI AVG
78
Rank
#58 / 197 | - |
48
Facility
48
WI AVG
48
Rank
#98 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Eastcastle Place is located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Eastcastle Place is in the Murray Hill neighborhood of Milwaukee.
Eastcastle Place has a walk score of 92. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Eastcastle Place's occupancy is 77.8%.
Yes, Eastcastle Place allows residents to bring their pets.
Eastcastle Place is registered as a non-profit in WI.
Tyler Gudex is the administrator of Eastcastle Place.
Eastcastle Place received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
