3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Situated in the heart of Sacramento, California, Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven is dedicated to providing rehabilitation and skilled nursing care within a warm, dignified, and respectful environment. Their primary aim is to ensure each resident’s experience is positive and productive. With 24/7 skilled nursing, restorative therapy, personalized care, and thoughtful engagement, this assisted living community is devoted to enhancing the physical, spiritual, and emotional well-being of its residents. Moreover, they extend their support to caregiving families by offering short-term stays when needed.
Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven takes pride in their innovative programs and the expertise of their multidisciplinary teams. Embracing a person-centered approach, the center strives to create a holistic healing environment for individuals on their journey to recovery and those requiring long-term care. Their commitment to compassionate care and nurturing interactions sets them apart, making them a trusted destination for comprehensive and exceptional healthcare services.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 65th out of 327 homes in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 34m per day | ▼ 14% State avg: 39m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 12m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 1h 13m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 44m per day | ▲ 3% State avg: 2h 39m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 7m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 4h 5m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 5m per day | ▲ 6% State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 26m per day | ▼ 13% State avg: 30m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
0% compared with California average
6% worse than California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 21 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
21
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 49 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
49
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 118 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
118
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.2 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
974 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 118 | 0 | 118 | 35,173 | 92 | 100% | 7.2 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 49 | 0 | 49 | 12,826 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| Registered Nurse | 21 | 0 | 21 | 5,704 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2,560 | 83 | 90% | 7.8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 9 | 0 | 9 | 1,778 | 88 | 96% | 7 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 11 | 0 | 11 | 1,311 | 84 | 91% | 5.5 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,231 | 92 | 100% | 7.9 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 10 | 0 | 10 | 1,142 | 92 | 100% | 6.3 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,016 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 8 | 0 | 8 | 991 | 92 | 100% | 5.3 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 3 | 3 | 974 | 61 | 66% | 7.3 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 4 | 0 | 4 | 931 | 78 | 85% | 6.1 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 2 | 0 | 2 | 679 | 62 | 67% | 7.6 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Other Social Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 504 | 63 | 68% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 160 | 21 | 23% | 7.6 |
| Qualified Activities Professional | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1% | 1 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
7.9
19% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
12.9
14% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.5%
41% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.1%
67% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.1%
7% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
22% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.9%
99% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
58% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7%
59% better than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3%
95% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.2%
19% better than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.68
19% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 2.25
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.34
47% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.59
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.9%
6% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
30% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.8%
7% better than California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
30.7%
32% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 23.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
16.4%
46% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.2%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.5%
13% better than California averageCalifornia average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
75.5%
49% better than California averageCalifornia average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
18% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
77% of new residents, often for short stays.
5% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
134Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven from 2011–2022, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2022 — the home's most recent complete cost report, an older period than most facilities report.
Based on the home's most recent complete CMS SNF Cost Report — fiscal year ending in 12/2022. This is an older period than most facilities report, so compare with that in mind.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #32 / 327Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 32nd out of 327 homes in California for payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #6 / 327Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 6th out of 327 homes in California for payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the California average. Well-run California facilities typically land around 56–67% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (77% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 19 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
5.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Sacramento's city center to Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 5.55 miles to nearest hospital (UC Davis Health)
Add your location
The information below is reported by the California Department of Social Services and Department of Public Health.
| Advanced Health Care of Sacramento | NH SNF | Sacramento (North Sacramento) | 40
Facility
40
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1198 / 1644 |
98.3%
Facility
98.3%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#158 / 1492 | +33% | 4.52
Facility
4.52
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#88 / 327 | +54% | +7% | $7.4k
Facility
$7.4k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#205 / 334 | - | 26
Facility
26
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#79 / 327 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#22 / 327 | 1 | 39 | - |
55
Facility
55
CA AVG
57
Rank
#1213 / 2087 | Ashkan Javaheri | $13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#171 / 327 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#250 / 327 | 42.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
42.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#283 / 327 | 555913 | ||||
| Woodside Healthcare Center | NH RC SNF | Sacramento (Arden-Arcade) | 58
Facility
58
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1093 / 1644 |
94.8%
Facility
94.8%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#216 / 1492 | +28% | 4.46
Facility
4.46
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#88 / 327 | -16% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 334 | - | 21
Facility
21
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#42 / 327 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#301 / 327 | - | 55 | - |
78
Facility
78
CA AVG
57
Rank
#485 / 2087 | - | $10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#295 / 327 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#261 / 327 | 51%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
51%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#23 / 327 | 555798 | ||||
| Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven | NH RC SNF | Sacramento (Southwestern Sacramento) | 148
Facility
148
CA AVG
104
Rank
#381 / 1644 |
94.8%
Facility
94.8%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#216 / 1492 | +28% | 4.75
Facility
4.75
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#65 / 327 | -6% | +13% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 334 | - | 61
Facility
61
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#250 / 327 | 2.2
Facility
2.2
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#12 / 327 | - | 140 | - |
70
Facility
70
CA AVG
57
Rank
#739 / 2087 | - | $13.9M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Facility
$13.9M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#146 / 327 | $12.0M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Facility
$12.0M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#32 / 327 | 85.8%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Facility
85.8%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#6 / 327 | 555098 | ||||
| Asbury Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | NH SNF | Sacramento | 139
Facility
139
CA AVG
104
Rank
#443 / 1644 |
96.4%
Facility
96.4%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#180 / 1492 | +31% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#116 / 327 | -10% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 334 | - | 50
Facility
50
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#206 / 327 | 2.9
Facility
2.9
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#54 / 327 | 1 | 134 | - |
77
Facility
77
CA AVG
57
Rank
#509 / 2087 | Doug Hawkins | $23.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$23.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#107 / 327 | $12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#47 / 327 | 50.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
50.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#65 / 327 | 555673 | ||||
| Windsor Care Center of Sacramento | NH | Sacramento (North Sacramento) | 128
Facility
128
CA AVG
104
Rank
#505 / 1644 |
97.7%
Facility
97.7%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#162 / 1492 | +32% | 6.73
Facility
6.73
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#5 / 327 | +12% | +59% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 334 | - | 60
Facility
60
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#248 / 327 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#58 / 327 | 1 | 125 | - |
60
Facility
60
CA AVG
57
Rank
#1048 / 2087 | - | $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#196 / 327 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#180 / 327 | 57.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
57.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#139 / 327 | 555717 |
Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven is located in Sacramento, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven is in the Southwestern Sacramento neighborhood.
Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven has a walk score of 70. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven's occupancy is 86.6%.
No, Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven has a no-pet policy.
Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven is registered as a for-profit.
Yes — there are 3 photos of Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven in the photo gallery on this page.
Eskaton Care Center Greenhaven is located at 455 Florin Rd, Sacramento, CA 95831.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
