3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
At 141 Dosoris Lane in Glen Cove, Glengariff Operating LLC manages a large 262-bed nursing home structured primarily around short-stay Medicare rehabilitation (52% of admissions) and private-pay extended stays (38% of admissions), with Medicaid representing a smaller share at 9%. Typical stays reflect this model: Medicare residents remain one to two months, private-pay residents five to six months, and Medicaid residents two to three months. The facility offers orthopedic rehabilitation, dialysis services, amputee care, cardiopulmonary services, and operates an in-house kitchen with a staff dietitian and fresh ingredients. Since 2017, inspectors have documented 44 citations, more than three times the typical number for a nursing home, comprising 36 health violations and 8 life safety violations. The 151 complaints filed represent nearly double the state average, triggering 29 complaint investigations since 2017. Citations per year average 6.3, compared to the state mean of 1.9.
Three enforcement actions have been issued for resident rights, quality of care, and multiple deficiencies. A March 2025 complaint investigation substantiated physical abuse: a licensed practical nurse was caught on video pushing a resident in a wheelchair; the nurse was terminated. The September 2025 recertification survey identified insufficient nursing staff, especially on weekends, and the absence of a licensed nurse supervising all shifts.
Staffing hours in all categories run below state benchmarks: registered nurses provide 35 minutes per resident daily (17% below average), licensed practical nurses 42 minutes (9% below), and nursing aides 1 hour 54 minutes (13% below). Q4 2025 staffing included 54 RNs, 103 LPNs, and 166 CNAs across 393 total staff, with 15.7% of hours supplied by contractors.
Clinical quality measures, however, show paradoxically strong outcomes: long-stay residents have a 5-star quality rating, pressure ulcer rates run 19% better than state average, falls with major injury are 7% below average, and discharge success to home or community reaches 64.4%; 27% above state levels. A notable exception: depressive symptoms affect 37.6% of long-stay residents, double the state average. The facility currently occupies only approximately 13% of its 262 beds, a dramatic decline signaling operational stress and raising questions about sustainability.
The facility’s current operational status, characterized by low occupancy, staffing deficiencies, and recent abuse findings, makes it unsuitable as a reliable option for most resident profiles at this time.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs New York averages
Total nursing care
This home is ranked 388th out of 395 homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
2h 27m
32% below state avg
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
5 of 6 metrics below state avg
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center is legally operated by Glengariff Operating LLC (For Profit).
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
Enforcement actions are formal penalties or interventions imposed by New York regulators when a nursing home fails to meet state or federal care, safety, or regulatory standards. They may include directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
This facility has 3 enforcement actions. 33% of New York nursing homes have zero, and the statewide average is 1.6.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 44 | 21 | This facility has 110% more total citations than a typical New York nursing home (44 vs. NY avg 21).↑ 110% worse |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 36 | 20 | This facility has 80% more health citations than a typical New York nursing home (36 vs. NY avg 20).↑ 80% worse |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 8 | 4 | This facility has 100% more life safety citations than a typical New York nursing home (8 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 100% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 3.1 | 2.3 | This facility has 35% more citations per inspection than a typical New York nursing home (3.1 vs. NY avg 2.3).↑ 35% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 14 | 9 | This facility has had 56% more total inspections than the New York average (14 vs. NY avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 56% more |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 6 | 4 | This facility has 50% more inspections with citations than a typical New York nursing home (6 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 50% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 43% | 44% | This facility has 1 percentage point lower inspection citation rate than a typical New York nursing home (43% vs. NY avg 44%).↓ 1% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 151 | 79 | This facility has 91% more total complaints than a typical New York nursing home (151 vs. NY avg 79).↑ 91% worse |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2019.
| 21.6 | 11.3 | This facility has 91% more complaints per year than a typical New York nursing home (21.6 vs. NY avg 11.3).↑ 91% worse |
|
Complaints per bed
Size-adjusted complaint rate based on occupied beds.
| 0.63 | 0.50 | This facility has 26% more complaints per bed than a typical New York nursing home (0.63 vs. NY avg 0.5).↑ 26% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with New York regulators.
| 29 | 15 | This facility has had 93% more complaint investigations than the New York average (29 vs. NY avg 15). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 93% more |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
New York average 3.6
Last Health inspection on Sep 2024
New York average 18.5
New York average 5.05
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
15 of 26 citations resulted from standard inspections; 8 of 26 resulted from complaint investigations; and 3 of 26 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
How this facility protects residents through staff vaccination policies and immunization practices.
Percentage of facility employees vaccinated against influenza.
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
8
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
4
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
4
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2021
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026
Next scheduled court appearance on record across active cases.
Aug 25, 2026Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
843% more staff per resident than New York average
0% compared with New York average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
54 total: 40 full-time employees and 14 contractors.
54
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.9 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
103 total: 46 full-time employees and 57 contractors.
103
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.9 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
166 total: 117 full-time employees and 49 contractors.
166
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.2 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
13,792 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 117 | 49 | 166 | 41,268 | 92 | 100% | 7.2 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 46 | 57 | 103 | 14,084 | 92 | 100% | 7.9 |
| Registered Nurse | 40 | 14 | 54 | 10,463 | 92 | 100% | 7.9 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 9 | 0 | 9 | 3,153 | 92 | 100% | 6.5 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3,023 | 81 | 88% | 7.1 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 10 | 10 | 3,006 | 83 | 90% | 6.4 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 10 | 0 | 10 | 2,947 | 91 | 99% | 8.1 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 8 | 8 | 1,865 | 92 | 100% | 7.3 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,814 | 65 | 71% | 7.8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1,668 | 92 | 100% | 7.3 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1,426 | 73 | 79% | 7.8 |
| Administrator | 2 | 0 | 2 | 921 | 65 | 71% | 8.1 |
| Qualified Activities Professional | 2 | 0 | 2 | 794 | 78 | 85% | 7.9 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 5 | 5 | 677 | 60 | 65% | 7.4 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 440 | 55 | 60% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 280 | 35 | 38% | 8 |
| Other Social Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 84 | 11 | 12% | 7.6 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
9.3
In line with New York averageNew York average: 9.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
17.2
5% better than New York averageNew York average: 18.1
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.1%
14% better than New York averageNew York average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.4%
7% better than New York averageNew York average: 16.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.2%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 21.4%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
7% better than New York averageNew York average: 3.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
19% better than New York averageNew York average: 7.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7%
43% worse than New York averageNew York average: 6.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
37.6%
108% worse than New York averageNew York average: 18.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.7%
7% better than New York averageNew York average: 12.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.8%
5% better than New York averageNew York average: 91.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.6%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 95.2%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.48
13% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.71
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.07
21% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.35
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.6%
25% better than New York averageNew York average: 76.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.6%
16% better than New York averageNew York average: 78.8%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.0%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 20.6%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
5.9%
39% better than New York averageNew York average: 9.7%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
6% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.3%
6% worse than New York averageNew York average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
64.4%
27% better than New York averageNew York average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
52% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
38% of new residents, often for short stays.
9% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
238Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #88 / 383Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 88th out of 383 homes we track in New York. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #250 / 382Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 250th out of 382 homes we track in New York. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (52% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Glen Cove's city center to Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 55.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerge Nursing and Rehabilitation at Glen Cove | NH SNF | Glen Cove | 102
Facility
102
NY AVG
160
Rank
#492 / 736 |
89.2%
Facility
89.2%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#301 / 392 | -2% | 2.90
Facility
2.90
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#298 / 395 | -10% | -19% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 9
Facility
9
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#57 / 397 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#59 / 397 | - | 91 | - |
77
Facility
77
NY AVG
64
Rank
#500 / 1,150 | Advanced Nursing And Rehabilitation At Glen Cove LLC | $19.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$19.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#234 / 383 | $14.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#162 / 383 | 74.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
74.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#36 / 382 | 335141 | ||||
| Glen Cove Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Glen Cove | 154
Facility
154
NY AVG
160
Rank
#338 / 736 |
90.3%
Facility
90.3%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#280 / 392 | 0% | 3.36
Facility
3.36
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#164 / 395 | +12% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 10
Facility
10
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#75 / 397 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#37 / 397 | - | 139 | A+ |
77
Facility
77
NY AVG
64
Rank
#500 / 1,150 | Nathan Brach | $27.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$27.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#167 / 383 | $19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#80 / 383 | 71.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
71.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#43 / 382 | 335716 | ||||
| Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | NH SNF | Glen Cove | 262
Facility
262
NY AVG
160
Rank
#96 / 736 | - | - | 2.44
Facility
2.44
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#388 / 395 | +9% | -32% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 26
Facility
26
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#324 / 397 | 5.2
Facility
5.2
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#237 / 397 | - | 34 | - |
77
Facility
77
NY AVG
64
Rank
#500 / 1,150 | Akiva Rudner | $39.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$39.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#87 / 383 | $18.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$18.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#88 / 383 | 47.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
47.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#250 / 382 | 335211 |
Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center is located in Glen Cove, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York State.
Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center is legally operated by Glengariff Operating LLC (For Profit).
Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has a walk score of 77. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
According to NY state health department records, Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's license number is 2901306N.
Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's occupancy is 90.1%.
No, Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has a no-pet policy.
Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center is registered as a for-profit in NY.
Glengariff Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has 262 beds.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
