We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Cherish every moment of your best years with the renowned senior living community of Golden Living of Point Loma residing in the tranquil residential grounds of Duke Street, San Diego, CA which offers memory care, respite care, temporary stays, and hospice care. The community ensures seniors’ safety and comfort by providing emergency call systems, balconies, patios in each room, and security cameras all over the campus. A responsible and highly qualified team lends extra hands around the clock for seniors to flourish and live to their potential.
Participate in enriching activities and exciting programs to maintain an active and well-connected lifestyle. With dining handled by the community, residents enjoy mealtimes without hassles. Golden Living Point Loma is great for seniors seeking the finest care and assistance for their ever-changing needs.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 263rd out of 346 homes in California. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 29m per day |
Lower than the California average: 72.8%Golden Living Point Loma is legally operated by Golden Living Health Management, Inc., and administrated by Rocio Granda.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the California state average. See the nursing homes benchmark below for the typical California score; higher is better.
Well below the California average for nursing homes.
California nursing homes benchmark: C- 70/100
Inspection score: 53 out of 100. Letter grade F. Well below the California average for nursing homes.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 34 | 10 | This facility has 240% more total citations than a typical California nursing home (34 vs. CA avg 10).↑ 240% worse |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Violations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 12 | 3 | This facility has 300% more serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (12 vs. CA avg 3).↑ 300% worse |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Violations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 22 | 4 | This facility has 450% more moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (22 vs. CA avg 4).↑ 450% worse |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2020.
| 5.7 | 1.7 | This facility has 235% more citations per year than a typical California nursing home (5.7 vs. CA avg 1.7).↑ 235% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.4 | 3.3 | This facility has 88% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.4 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 88% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of complaint visits, other regulatory visits, and official scheduled inspections.
| 95 | 16 | This facility has 494% more total visits than a typical California nursing home (95 vs. CA avg 16).↑ 494% worse |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 62 | 13 | This facility has 377% more complaint visits than a typical California nursing home (62 vs. CA avg 13).↑ 377% worse |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 29 | 7 | This facility has 314% more other visits than a typical California nursing home (29 vs. CA avg 7).↑ 314% worse |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 4 | 4 | This facility has official inspections in line with the California average (4 vs. CA avg 4).— At avg |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 51 | 10 | This facility has 410% more complaint investigations than a typical California nursing home (51 vs. CA avg 10).↑ 410% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
This facility’s inspection record is mixed, showing repeated deficiencies in medication management, supervision, and documentation, alongside several substantiated neglect findings with civil penalties. The most recent inspection on March 23, 2026, found no deficiencies, but earlier investigations in 2026 and 2024 cited failures to report hospitalizations, allow unlicensed staff to work, and neglect resulting in serious injury and immediate health risks. Numerous complaint investigations over the past three years substantiated medication errors, inadequate supervision causing injuries, and failure to maintain safe conditions, though many other allegations were unsubstantiated.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsCalifornia average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Sep 2025
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
47 of 90 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 43 of 90 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.4
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: July 1 – September 30, 2025 (Q3 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
25% worse than California average
0% compared with California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering July 1 – September 30, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.5 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering July 1 – September 30, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
0 contractor hours this quarter
No contractor roles were reported this quarter.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering July 1 – September 30, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 102 | 0 | 102 | 24,397 | 92 | 100% | 7.7 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 29 | 0 | 29 | 11,452 | 92 | 100% | 8 |
| Registered Nurse | 10 | 0 | 10 | 2,773 | 92 | 100% | 7.5 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,797 | 90 | 98% | 7 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,496 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,433 | 91 | 99% | 7.5 |
| Dental Services Staff | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,024 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 2 | 0 | 2 | 953 | 78 | 85% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 2 | 0 | 2 | 887 | 69 | 75% | 7.8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 3 | 0 | 3 | 614 | 65 | 71% | 7.2 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 503 | 62 | 67% | 8.1 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 2 | 0 | 2 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 460 | 62 | 67% | 7.4 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 434 | 54 | 59% | 8 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 2 | 0 | 2 | 199 | 22 | 24% | 7.9 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
3.4
48% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
3.9
66% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.7%
39% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.0%
75% better than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
1.8%
84% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
26% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
60% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.5%
88% better than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.7%
30% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.7%
43% better than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.5%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
6% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
31% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.2%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
38% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
9% of new residents, often for short stays.
53% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
125Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Golden Living Point Loma based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #78 / 347Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 78th out of 347 homes in California. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Building Type: Two-story
Transportation Services
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
5.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from San Diego's city center to Golden Living Point Loma's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 3.05 miles to nearest hospital (Ucsd Medical Center Rad)
Add your location
Golden Living Point Loma is located in San Diego, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Golden Living Point Loma is in the Point Loma Heights neighborhood of San Diego.
The legal owner and operator of Golden Living Point Loma is Golden Living Health Management, Inc..
Golden Living Point Loma has a walk score of 72. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Golden Living Point Loma's occupancy is 64%.
Rocio Granda is the administrator of Golden Living Point Loma.
Golden Living Point Loma has 113 beds.
Golden Living Point Loma has had 36 recently reported deficiencies.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
