Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
87
86 employees · 1 contractor · 32 on an average day Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Bismarck, ND
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 2 points above the North Dakota average for CMS-certified facilities (86/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 2 points above the North Dakota average for CMS-certified facilities (86/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Bismarck, ND
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 2 points above the North Dakota average for CMS-certified facilities (86/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 2 points above the North Dakota average for CMS-certified facilities (86/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Providing both short-term rehabilitation and long-term skilled nursing care, Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place is a 48-bed community in Bismarck, North Dakota, owned by Peter Troy. It has served the area for 21 years and accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, giving families multiple payment options. Residents stay an average of 133 days, reflecting a combination of post-hospital recovery and ongoing nursing care.
Studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom residences offer a variety of living arrangements for older adults. Nursing care averages 4 hours and 43 minutes per resident each day, delivered by registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and nurse aides. Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation services further support those recovering from surgery, injury, or hospitalization.
Daily amenities include a wellness center, salon, whirlpool, chapel, library, community room, and dining room, promoting comfort and engagement. Located on Lorrain Drive, the community has a walkability score of 16, so most errands, appointments, and family visits require transportation.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 19 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 43m
This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 19 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 43mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +153% above North Dakota average
0 of 6 metrics below North Dakota average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
1h 6m
↑ 20% · ND 55mThis facility: 1h 6m per resident per day, 20% above the North Dakota average of 55m (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 8.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 8-hour shifts
34m
↑ 15% · ND 30mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 15% above the North Dakota average of 30m (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 10 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
10 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 37 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
37 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
3h 3m
↑ 2% · ND 3h 0mThis facility: 3h 3m per resident per day, 2% above the North Dakota average of 3h 0m (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 37 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
37 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↑ 153% · ND 2mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 153% above the North Dakota average of 2m (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 58m
↑ 5% · ND 3h 46mThis facility: 3h 58m per resident per day, 5% above the North Dakota average of 3h 46m (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
38m
↑ 8% · ND 35mThis facility: 38m per resident per day, 8% above the North Dakota average of 35m (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
87
86 employees · 1 contractor · 32 on an average day
87 total staff / 48 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.81 : 1
↓ 4% · ND 1.88This facility: 1.81 staff per resident, 4% below the North Dakota average of 1.88 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
87 staff ÷ 48 residents
See full North Dakota ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.3 h
↓ 8% · ND 7.9 hThis facility: 7.3 h, 8% below the North Dakota average of 7.9 h (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
21,553 staff hours this quarter
See full North Dakota ranking →99.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
North Dakota average: 84.6% · Contractors this quarter: Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
48
Rank #14 / 23Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 23 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other North Dakota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
48
Rank #14 / 23Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 23 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other North Dakota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
21
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #26 / 29Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 29 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across North Dakota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #26 / 29Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 29 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across North Dakota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
16
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #2 / 11Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 11 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the North Dakota average, with its Statewide rank out of 11. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #2 / 11Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 11 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the North Dakota average, with its Statewide rank out of 11. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
97.3%
This home is often near full
Based on residents per day and 48 beds.
Higher than the North Dakota average: 89.5%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
47
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
141
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$175 - $4,434/Month
Resident Council
Inpatient Rehabilitation
Outpatient Rehabilitation
Transportation
Pets not allowed
Library
Beauty Salon
Wellness Center
Whirlpool
Chapel
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Sizes
368 - 864 sq.ft
Room Types
Studio
1 Bed
2 Bed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
88 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
2 points above the North Dakota average for CMS-certified facilities (86/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
24 severity-weighted points (13 deficiencies) · 3× lower than the typical CMS-certified ND facility (median: 67)
Enforcement
Concern
2 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified ND facility (median: 0) · $16,036 in fines
Persistence
Typical
35 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified ND facility (median: 29)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 9% · ND 4.4This facility: 4, 9% below the North Dakota average of 4.4 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
13
Rank #8 / 18Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 18 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the North Dakota State average, with a ranking across all 18 ND facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 23% · ND 16.8This facility: 13, 23% below the North Dakota average of 16.8 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.25
Rank #9 / 18Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 18 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the North Dakota mean across 18 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 15% · ND 3.84This facility: 3.25, 15% below the North Dakota average of 3.84 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
13 of 13 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · ND 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the North Dakota average of 0.4 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 100% · ND 1This facility: 2, 100% above the North Dakota average of 1 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
11
↓ 27% · ND 15.1This facility: 11, 27% below the North Dakota average of 15.1 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · ND 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the North Dakota average of 0.2 (among North Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 30, 2025 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 4 of 13 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 30, 2025
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 01, 2024
1 citation
Pharmacy serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 09, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 18, 2024
7 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 13 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (31%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (23%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (23%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (15%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (8%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
7 of 13 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 13 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 13 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Aug 1, 2024 · $8,018 civil money penalty
Aug 1, 2024 · $8,018 civil money penalty
May 9, 2024 · $8,018 civil money penalty
Total fines
$16,036
↓ 66% · ND $47KThis facility: $16,036, 66% below the North Dakota average of $46,825. Average among the 42 North Dakota facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #12 / 19Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 19 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the North Dakota average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 19 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 18% · ND 1.69This facility: 2, 18% above the North Dakota average of 1.69. Average among the 42 North Dakota facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
ND avg 0.07North Dakota average: 0.07. Average among the 42 North Dakota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Aug 1, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018
May 9, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018Fine amount comparison
This facility
$16,036
North Dakota average
$46,825
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. North Dakota and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the North Dakota average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
≈ 0% · ND 3.0This facility: 3.0, level with the ND average of 3.0 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 122% · ND 2.3This facility: 5.0, 122% above the ND average of 2.3 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.9
Score · lower is better
↑ 50% · ND 10.6This facility: 15.9, 50% above the ND average of 10.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
28.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 38% · ND 20.8This facility: 28.7, 38% above the ND average of 20.8 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 3 better, 8 worse, 2 near ND average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 2 worse, 1 near ND average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
32.2%
↑ 63% · ND 19.8This facility: 32.2, 63% above the ND average of 19.8 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
32.2%
↑ 63% · ND 19.8This facility: 32.2, 63% above the ND average of 19.8 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
27.4%
↑ 56% · ND 17.6This facility: 27.4, 56% above the ND average of 17.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
27.4%
↑ 56% · ND 17.6This facility: 27.4, 56% above the ND average of 17.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.6%
↑ 7% · ND 24.9This facility: 26.6, 7% above the ND average of 24.9 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.6%
↑ 7% · ND 24.9This facility: 26.6, 7% above the ND average of 24.9 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
↑ 10% · ND 2.6This facility: 2.9, 10% above the ND average of 2.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
↑ 10% · ND 2.6This facility: 2.9, 10% above the ND average of 2.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.7%
↑ 71% · ND 5.1This facility: 8.7, 71% above the ND average of 5.1 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.7%
↑ 71% · ND 5.1This facility: 8.7, 71% above the ND average of 5.1 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
↓ 40% · ND 4.9This facility: 3.0, 40% below the ND average of 4.9 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
↓ 40% · ND 4.9This facility: 3.0, 40% below the ND average of 4.9 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.4%
↑ 46% · ND 5.8This facility: 8.4, 46% above the ND average of 5.8 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.4%
↑ 46% · ND 5.8This facility: 8.4, 46% above the ND average of 5.8 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.5%
↑ 118% · ND 4.4This facility: 9.5, 118% above the ND average of 4.4 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.5%
↑ 118% · ND 4.4This facility: 9.5, 118% above the ND average of 4.4 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.7%
↑ 9% · ND 22.7This facility: 24.7, 9% above the ND average of 22.7 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.7%
↑ 9% · ND 22.7This facility: 24.7, 9% above the ND average of 22.7 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 1% · ND 98.6This facility: 99.4, 1% above the ND average of 98.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 1% · ND 98.6This facility: 99.4, 1% above the ND average of 98.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.9%
↓ 1% · ND 98.8This facility: 97.9, 1% below the ND average of 98.8 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.9%
↓ 1% · ND 98.8This facility: 97.9, 1% below the ND average of 98.8 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.60
↓ 59% · ND 1.48This facility: 0.60, 59% below the ND average of 1.48 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.60
↓ 59% · ND 1.48This facility: 0.60, 59% below the ND average of 1.48 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.99
↓ 48% · ND 1.90This facility: 0.99, 48% below the ND average of 1.90 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.99
↓ 48% · ND 1.90This facility: 0.99, 48% below the ND average of 1.90 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
25.0%
↓ 53% · US 53.7This facility: 25.0, 53% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
25.0%
↓ 53% · US 53.7This facility: 25.0, 53% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
35.6%
↓ 30% · US 50.6This facility: 35.6, 30% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
35.6%
↓ 30% · US 50.6This facility: 35.6, 30% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · ND 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ND average of 1.5 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · ND 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ND average of 1.5 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.4%
↓ 5% · ND 92.3This facility: 87.4, 5% below the ND average of 92.3 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.4%
↓ 5% · ND 92.3This facility: 87.4, 5% below the ND average of 92.3 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.6%
↓ 28% · ND 88.3This facility: 63.6, 28% below the ND average of 88.3 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.6%
↓ 28% · ND 88.3This facility: 63.6, 28% below the ND average of 88.3 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.6%
↑ 3% · ND 20.9This facility: 21.6, 3% above the ND average of 20.9 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.6%
↑ 3% · ND 20.9This facility: 21.6, 3% above the ND average of 20.9 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
0.0%
↓ 100% · ND 10.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ND average of 10.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
0.0%
↓ 100% · ND 10.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ND average of 10.6 (among ND facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 17 North Dakota nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
2.5% operating margin
−2.4 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.4M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with North Dakota homes
63.9% payroll share of revenue
ND average 61.6%Rank #7 / 17Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 17 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the North Dakota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with North Dakota homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | ND median | Compared with ND homesRank in ND | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.7M | +$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | ND median $15.1M | Rank in ND Rank #16 / 17Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 17 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the North Dakota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 6% of homes | Below ND median Higher net patient revenue than 6% of ND homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.5M | +$0.4M | Trend 20182025 | ND median — | Rank in ND Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.2M | −$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | ND median — | Rank in ND Not ranked | Profit, shrinking Resident care made money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 2.5% | −2.4 pts | Trend 20182025 | ND median — | Rank in ND Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | ND median — | Rank in ND Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.4M | −$0.2M | Trend — | ND median — | Rank in ND Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with North Dakota homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | ND median | Compared with ND homesRank in ND | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.5M | +$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | ND median $9.8M | Rank in ND Rank #15 / 17Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 17 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the North Dakota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 13% of homes | Below ND median Higher payroll than 13% of ND homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 63.9% | +1.2 pts | Trend 20182025 | ND median 61.8% | Rank in ND Rank #7 / 17Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 17 nursing homes we track in North Dakota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the North Dakota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in North Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 63% of homes | Near ND average The ND average is 61.6% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · ND benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the North Dakota payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin ND payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.3M | $7.4M | $7.6M | $7.6M | $7.7M | $7.8M | $8.5M | $8.7M |
| Operating expenses | $7.5M | $7.4M | $7.2M | $7.0M | $7.4M | $7.6M | $8.1M | $8.5M |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | $0.1M | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.3M | $0.2M | $0.4M | $0.2M |
| Operating margin | −3.8% | 0.7% | 5.0% | 7.7% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 4.9% | 2.5% |
| Net income | −$0.4M | $0.1M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.4M |
| Payroll costs | $4.4M | $4.4M | $4.7M | $4.8M | $5.1M | $5.0M | $5.3M | $5.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 60.1% | 59.1% | 61.8% | 63.1% | 66.1% | 64.5% | 62.7% | 63.9% |
| Beds | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 |
| Gross revenue | $8.5M | $8.4M | $8.4M | $8.2M | $9.0M | $9.4M | $9.9M | $10.0M |
| Salaries | $3.7M | $3.6M | $3.9M | $4.1M | $4.3M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $4.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.2M | — | — | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M |
| Other operating costs | $3.2M | $3.0M | $2.5M | $2.2M | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.8M | $2.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $264 | $267 | $271 | $286 | $313 | $349 | $303 | $364 |
| Cost per day | $274 | $265 | $258 | $264 | $301 | $338 | $288 | $355 |
| Average length of stay | 102.6 days | 92.3 days | 177.5 days | 311.6 days | 126.8 days | 101.5 days | 133.4 days | 141.5 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
122 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
32 · 26%
Medicaid
40 · 33%
Private pay & other
50 · 41%
Resident snapshot
48 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
8 · 17%
Medicaid
28 · 58%
Private pay & other
12 · 25%
Leaving
123 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
21 · 17%
Medicaid
46 · 37%
Private pay & other
56 · 46%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place
Places of interest near Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place
3.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bismarck's city center to Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Bismarck
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the ND Dept. of Health & Human Services (NDHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The North Dakota average is: 61.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place | NH AL IL SNF | Bismarck | 48
Facility
48
ND AVG
73
Rank
#14 / 23 | B+ |
97.3%
Facility
97.3%
ND AVG
89.5%
Rank
#2 / 11 | +9% | 4.72
Facility
4.72
ND AVG
5.23
Rank
#14 / 19 | -13% | -10% | $16.0k
Facility
$16.0k
ND AVG
$46.8k
Rank
#12 / 19 | 13
Facility
13
ND AVG
16.8
Rank
#8 / 18 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
ND AVG
3.8
Rank
#9 / 18 | 2 | 47 | A+ |
16
Facility
16
ND AVG
44
Rank
#26 / 29 | Peter Troy | $8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$16.0M
Rank
#16 / 17 | $5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#15 / 17 | 63.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
63.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
61.6%
Rank
#7 / 17 | 355125 | ||||
| Missouri Slope | NH AL HC SNF | Bismarck | 192
Facility
192
ND AVG
73
Rank
#1 / 23 | B+ |
97.5%
Facility
97.5%
ND AVG
89.5%
Rank
#4 / 11 | +9% | 5.77
Facility
5.77
ND AVG
5.23
Rank
#3 / 19 | -46% | +10% | $39.4k
Facility
$39.4k
ND AVG
$46.8k
Rank
#15 / 19 | 20
Facility
20
ND AVG
16.8
Rank
#13 / 18 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
ND AVG
3.8
Rank
#12 / 18 | 2 | 187 | - |
11
Facility
11
ND AVG
44
Rank
#27 / 29 | Steve Andrist | $36.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$36.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$16.0M
Rank
#1 / 17 | $22.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$22.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#1 / 17 | 60.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
60.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
61.6%
Rank
#11 / 17 | 355128 | ||||
| Benedictine Living Community-Bismarck | NH ADC AL HC MC RC SNF | Bismarck | 56
Facility
56
ND AVG
73
Rank
#13 / 23 | ? | - | - | 4.69
Facility
4.69
ND AVG
5.23
Rank
#16 / 19 | -13% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
ND AVG
$46.8k
Rank
#1 / 19 | 13
Facility
13
ND AVG
16.8
Rank
#8 / 18 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
ND AVG
3.8
Rank
#9 / 18 | - | 70 | - |
22
Facility
22
ND AVG
44
Rank
#22 / 29 | St. Gabriel\'S Community Skille | $11.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$11.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$16.0M
Rank
#11 / 17 | $7.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#11 / 17 | 64.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
64.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
61.6%
Rank
#6 / 17 | 355126 | ||||
| Baptist Health & Rehab | NH AL HOS SNF | Bismarck | 140
Facility
140
ND AVG
73
Rank
#3 / 23 | C- |
97.1%
Facility
97.1%
ND AVG
89.5%
Rank
#8 / 11 | +9% | 5.15
Facility
5.15
ND AVG
5.23
Rank
#9 / 19 | -35% | -2% | $35.3k
Facility
$35.3k
ND AVG
$46.8k
Rank
#13 / 19 | 14
Facility
14
ND AVG
16.8
Rank
#11 / 18 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
ND AVG
3.8
Rank
#6 / 18 | 4 | 136 | - |
6
Facility
6
ND AVG
44
Rank
#28 / 29 | Cassia Services | $22.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$22.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
ND AVG
$16.0M
Rank
#4 / 17 | $13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
ND AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#3 / 17 | 61.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
61.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
ND AVG
61.6%
Rank
#10 / 17 | 355058 | ||||
| Missouri Slope Assisted Living | NH AL HC SNF | Bismarck | 64
Facility
64
ND AVG
73
Rank
#11 / 23 | ? | - | - | 6.42
Facility
6.42
ND AVG
5.23
Rank
#2 / 19 | -17% | +23% | $0
Facility
$0
ND AVG
$46.8k
Rank
#1 / 19 | - | - | - | 31 | - |
85
Facility
85
ND AVG
44
Rank
#1 / 29 | Steve Andrist | $8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$16.0M
Rank
#15 / 17 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#16 / 17 | 55.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
55.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
ND AVG
61.6%
Rank
#15 / 17 | 355059 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other ND nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in North Dakota
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place is located in Bismarck, North Dakota.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in North Dakota.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place in a walkable area?
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place has a walk score of 16. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place?
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place's occupancy is 97.3%.
03 How long has Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place been in business?
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place has been operating for approximately 21 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
04 Does Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place have different floorplan options?
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place on this page.
05 Are pets allowed at Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place?
No, Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place is registered as a non-profit in ND.
07 What is the overall rating for Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place?
Good Samaritan Society – Augusta Place received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
