Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
131
67 employees · 64 contractors · 29 on an average day Good Shepherd Services, Ltd
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Residential Care & Skilled Nursing · Seymour, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Residential Care & Skilled Nursing · Seymour, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Good Shepherd Services
Good Shepherd Services is a nursing home in Seymour, Wisconsin, providing assisted living, residential care, and skilled nursing. Assisted living supports residents with daily needs while they maintain their own living space. Skilled nursing and nursing home care provide licensed nursing support for people who need a higher level of medical care. With several care levels on one campus, Good Shepherd Services may be a good fit for a resident whose needs could grow over time without requiring a move to a different community.
The community has 50 beds, placing it among smaller communities where staff and residents can get to know each other. Total nurse staffing is 5h 4m per resident/day, representing the daily nursing time allocated to each resident. Rehabilitation services are available for residents recovering function or working to maintain it.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted. Medicare covers short-term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long-term residence, while Medicaid can help cover care when personal savings do not cover a long stay. Private pay allows families to use their own funds. Brandon Morgan serves as the administrator.
A Walk Score of 36 / 100 means the area is dependent on cars, so most errands require a car or a ride. The campus also includes Meadow Wood Apartments, CBRFs, and Cedar Lane Rehab Suites.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 4m
This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 4mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +65% above Wisconsin average
3 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 9 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
12 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
51m
↓ 12% · WI 58mThis facility: 51m per resident per day, 12% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 9 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
12 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 22 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 14 agency contractors.
22 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
1h 3m
↑ 65% · WI 38mThis facility: 1h 3m per resident per day, 65% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 22 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 14 agency contractors.
22 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 64 total: 37 of the facility's own employees and 27 agency contractors.
64 staff · 6.4-hour shifts
3h 10m
↑ 22% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 3h 10m per resident per day, 22% above the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 64 total: 37 of the facility's own employees and 27 agency contractors.
64 staff · 6.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 2 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
2 staff · 2.8-hour shifts
2m
↓ 46% · WI 4mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 46% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 2 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
2 staff · 2.8-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 11m
↑ 12% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 4h 11m per resident per day, 12% above the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
39m
↓ 2% · WI 40mThis facility: 39m per resident per day, 2% below the Wisconsin average of 40m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
131
67 employees · 64 contractors · 29 on an average day
131 total staff / 26 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
5.04 : 1
↑ 110% · WI 2.40This facility: 5.04 staff per resident, 110% above the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
131 staff ÷ 26 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6 h
↓ 18% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 6 h, 18% below the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
15,852 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →80% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (27), Licensed Practical Nurse (14), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Registered Nurse (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Clinical Nurse Specialist (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Nurse Practitioner (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #114 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #114 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #131 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 131st out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #131 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 131st out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
36
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #139 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 139th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #139 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 139th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
56.8%
This home usually has availability
Based on 28.4 residents and 50 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Wisconsin average: 72.1%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
128
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyOutagamie
CMS Certification Number525509
Certification TypeTitle 18 SNF Title 19 NF
Corporate Compliance ProgramA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd is administered by Brandon Morgan.
Owner NameGood Shepherd Services Ltd
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
Fax(920) 833-1846
Pets not allowed
Cedar Lane Rehab Suites
Room Types
1 Bedroom
Private Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
36 severity-weighted points (14 deficiencies) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 76)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
25 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
5
↓ 19% · WI 6.2This facility: 5, 19% below the WI average of 6.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
15
Rank #48 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 47% · WI 28.3This facility: 15, 47% below the WI average of 28.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3
Rank #37 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 29% · WI 4.24This facility: 3, 29% below the WI average of 4.24 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
15 of 15 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the WI average of 0.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
14
↓ 46% · WI 25.8This facility: 14, 46% below the WI average of 25.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the WI average of 0.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 26, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation, 4 of 15 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 26, 2026
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 21, 2026
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2026
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 29, 2025
7 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 11, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 15 citations
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
4 deficiencies (27%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (20%)
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (7%)
Administration
1 deficiency (7%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
11 of 15 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 15 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
WI avg $107KWisconsin average: $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
WI avg 2.03Wisconsin average: 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WI avg 0.71Wisconsin average: 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 1% · WI 3.0This facility: 3.0, 1% below the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 44% · WI 9.0This facility: 5.1, 44% below the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
25.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 35% · WI 18.9This facility: 25.5, 35% above the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 5 better, 3 worse, 2 near WI average
4 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.5%
↓ 8% · WI 15.8This facility: 14.5, 8% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.5%
↓ 8% · WI 15.8This facility: 14.5, 8% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.4%
↑ 55% · WI 23.6This facility: 36.4, 55% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.4%
↑ 55% · WI 23.6This facility: 36.4, 55% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6%
↑ 106% · WI 2.7This facility: 5.6, 106% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6%
↑ 106% · WI 2.7This facility: 5.6, 106% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
↓ 67% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.1, 67% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
↓ 67% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.1, 67% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2%
↓ 35% · WI 4.9This facility: 3.2, 35% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2%
↓ 35% · WI 4.9This facility: 3.2, 35% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.5%
↓ 71% · WI 4.9This facility: 1.5, 71% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.5%
↓ 71% · WI 4.9This facility: 1.5, 71% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 6.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 6.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6%
↑ 80% · WI 15.9This facility: 28.6, 80% above the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6%
↑ 80% · WI 15.9This facility: 28.6, 80% above the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.3%
↓ 3% · WI 95.6This facility: 92.3, 3% below the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.3%
↓ 3% · WI 95.6This facility: 92.3, 3% below the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 4 measures
Daily care & independence
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
57.1%
↑ 13% · US 50.6This facility: 57.1, 13% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
57.1%
↑ 13% · US 50.6This facility: 57.1, 13% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.9%
↑ 7% · WI 86.9This facility: 92.9, 7% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.9%
↑ 7% · WI 86.9This facility: 92.9, 7% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4%
↑ 16% · WI 82.2This facility: 95.4, 16% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4%
↑ 16% · WI 82.2This facility: 95.4, 16% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2023. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2023
Latest cost report is for the fiscal year ending December 2023, older than most Wisconsin homes. Rankings are not shown because peers report different years.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−13.5% operating margin
+0.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($6.3M) turns it into a net profit to $0.6M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
76.0% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%
Payroll fell $0.1M while revenue fell $4.3M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2023 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2023 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.4M | −$4.3M | Trend 20162023 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.0M | −$4.9M | Trend 20162023 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.6M | +$0.6M | Trend 20162023 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −13.5% | +0.1 pts | Trend 20162023 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $6.3M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.6M | +$1.4M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.3M | −$0.1M | Trend 20162023 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 76.0% | +36.2 pts | Trend 20162023 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Not ranked | 17.3 pts over WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2023 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2016–2023 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.5M | $8.9M | $8.7M | $9.0M | $8.6M | $8.0M | $8.7M | $4.4M |
| Operating expenses | $8.7M | $8.5M | $9.0M | $9.0M | $9.5M | $9.7M | $9.9M | $5.0M |
| Net patient income | −$0.1M | $0.3M | −$0.3M | −$0.0M | −$0.9M | −$1.7M | −$1.2M | −$0.6M |
| Operating margin | −1.5% | 3.6% | −3.3% | −0.3% | −10.4% | −21.5% | −13.5% | −13.5% |
| Net income | $0.1M | $0.6M | −$0.3M | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.1M | −$0.8M | $0.6M |
| Payroll costs | $2.8M | $3.0M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.2M | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 33.2% | 33.4% | 35.3% | 34.1% | 36.9% | 42.9% | 39.8% | 76.0% |
| Beds | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Gross revenue | $8.6M | $8.9M | $8.7M | $9.0M | $9.3M | $8.5M | $9.1M | $4.4M |
| Salaries | $2.4M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.6M | $2.7M | $2.9M | $3.0M | $2.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.4M |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.0M | $0.2M |
| Other operating costs | $5.8M | $5.6M | $5.9M | $6.0M | $6.3M | $6.3M | $6.4M | $1.6M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $588 | $573 | $671 | $674 | $699 | $689 | $765 | $384 |
| Cost per day | $596 | $552 | $693 | $676 | $772 | $837 | $868 | $436 |
| Average length of stay | 123.3 days | 140.7 days | 88.1 days | 106.9 days | 131.3 days | 106.8 days | 100.7 days | 128.0 days |
Showing 2023–2021 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2023
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
93 admissions · FY2023
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
14 · 15%
Medicaid
9 · 10%
Private pay & other
70 · 75%
Resident snapshot
26 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
5 · 19%
Medicaid
14 · 54%
Private pay & other
7 · 27%
Leaving
89 discharges · FY2023
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
11 · 12%
Medicaid
20 · 22%
Private pay & other
58 · 65%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Good Shepherd Services, Ltd
3.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Seymour's city center to Good Shepherd Services, Ltd's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Good Shepherd Services, Ltd
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Shepherd Services, Ltd | NH AL RESC SNF | Seymour | - | 50
Facility
50
WI AVG
78
Rank
#114 / 197 | - |
36
Facility
36
WI AVG
48
Rank
#131 / 191 | - |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Beloit | NH AL HOS PC RC SNF | Beloit | - | 120
Facility
120
WI AVG
78
Rank
#23 / 197 | - |
62
Facility
62
WI AVG
48
Rank
#60 / 191 | - |
| New Glarus Home, Inc | NH AL IL MC RESC RC SNF | New Glarus | - | 100
Facility
100
WI AVG
78
Rank
#51 / 197 | A+ |
69
Facility
69
WI AVG
48
Rank
#41 / 191 | - |
| St Camillus | NH AL HOS IL MC SNF | Wauwatosa | - | 86
Facility
86
WI AVG
78
Rank
#79 / 197 | - |
12
Facility
12
WI AVG
48
Rank
#174 / 191 | - |
| Sheboygan Senior Community Inc | NH AL RC SNF | Y Sheboygan | - | 31
Facility
31
WI AVG
78
Rank
#179 / 197 | - | - | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Good Shepherd Services, Ltd
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Good Shepherd Services, Ltd in a walkable area?
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd has a walk score of 36. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Good Shepherd Services, Ltd?
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd's occupancy is 56.8%.
03 Are pets allowed at Good Shepherd Services, Ltd?
No, Good Shepherd Services, Ltd has a no-pet policy.
04 What is the best email address for Good Shepherd Services, Ltd?
The team at Good Shepherd Services, Ltd can be reached at cmoeller@gssltd.org.
05 Does Good Shepherd Services, Ltd operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd is registered as a non-profit in WI.
06 Who is the administrator of Good Shepherd Services, Ltd?
Brandon Morgan is the administrator of Good Shepherd Services, Ltd.
07 What is the overall rating for Good Shepherd Services, Ltd?
Good Shepherd Services, Ltd received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
