Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
120
120 employees · 0 contractors · 56 on an average day Green Meadow Haven
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Coushatta, LA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Green Meadow Haven
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Coushatta, LA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Green Meadow Haven accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Green Meadow Haven
Green Meadow Haven provides nursing home, hospice care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Coushatta, LA. Skilled nursing and nursing home services include licensed nursing care on site, while hospice supports residents receiving end of life care. Respite care provides a short term stay when someone’s usual caregiver needs time to travel, recover, or manage other responsibilities.
Located in the Red River Parish area, Green Meadow Haven has 157 beds. That places it among larger communities, with more residents, staff, and usually programming. Semi private and private rooms are available, so a resident can share a room or have one to themselves. The community may be a good fit for someone who needs skilled nursing, hospice support, or short term respite within a larger care setting.
Physical, occupational, and speech therapy are available for rehabilitation. Residents can receive these services within the community instead of arranging care elsewhere. Additional services include wound care, restorative therapy, laboratory services, dental services, and pharmacy services. An Alzheimer’s unit provides a designated setting for residents living with Alzheimer’s disease or another form of dementia.
Hydro bathing systems support bathing care, and an activity director leads resident activities. Green Meadow Haven accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, giving families those payment methods to consider for covered or privately funded care. Total nurse staffing is 5 hours and 11 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily nursing time allocated to each resident. CLD operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 186 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 11m
This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 186 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 11mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +57% above Louisiana average
3 of 6 metrics below Louisiana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
14m
↓ 28% · LA 19mThis facility: 14m per resident per day, 28% below the Louisiana average of 19m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 8-hour shifts
1h 19m
↑ 11% · LA 1h 11mThis facility: 1h 19m per resident per day, 11% above the Louisiana average of 1h 11m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 66 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
66 staff · 7.4-hour shifts
3h 39m
↑ 57% · LA 2h 19mThis facility: 3h 39m per resident per day, 57% above the Louisiana average of 2h 19m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 66 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
66 staff · 7.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
0m
↓ 100% · LA 3mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 100% below the Louisiana average of 3m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 28m
↑ 37% · LA 3h 16mThis facility: 4h 28m per resident per day, 37% above the Louisiana average of 3h 16m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
8m
↓ 41% · LA 13mThis facility: 8m per resident per day, 41% below the Louisiana average of 13m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
120
120 employees · 0 contractors · 56 on an average day
120 total staff / 81 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.48 : 1
↑ 2% · LA 1.45This facility: 1.48 staff per resident, 2% above the Louisiana average of 1.45 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
120 staff ÷ 81 residents
See full Louisiana ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 10% · LA 8.2 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 10% below the Louisiana average of 8.2 h (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
38,375 staff hours this quarter
See full Louisiana ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Louisiana average: 90.1% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
157
Rank #32 / 180Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Louisiana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
157
Rank #32 / 180Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Louisiana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #153 / 201Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 153rd out of 201 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Louisiana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #153 / 201Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 153rd out of 201 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Louisiana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
21
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #147 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Louisiana average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #147 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Louisiana average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
52%
This home usually has availability
Based on 81.6 residents and 157 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Lower than the Louisiana average: 72.6%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
251
days
About This Community
Facility TypeMedicare And Medicaid
CountyRed River
CMS Certification Number195562
Reliant Rehab in-house therapy program — Reliant RehabA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Owner NameCld Inc
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Family Council
CNA Training Program
In-House Rehabilitation (Reliant Rehab)A therapy program managed by Reliant Rehabilitation inside a senior-living or skilled-nursing setting, providing physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapy to help residents regain or maintain daily function.
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Laboratory Services
Dental Services
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Regular Health and Wellness Assessments
Physicians On Call
DietitianListed as: Nutritious meals including specialized diets approved by a licensed dietician
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Pets not allowed
Suites for Couples
Secure Fenced Walking Paths
Activities
Bingo
Elvis Entertainment
- Individual and group activities led by certified activity director
- Alzheimer's unit cognitive stimulation activity programs
Bible Study
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
Suite
In-Room Features
Wall-Mounted Cable Connections In Every Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
85 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
3 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
53 severity-weighted points (11 deficiencies) · 13% lower than the typical CMS-certified LA facility (median: 61)
Enforcement
Concern
2 enforcement actions · 2× more than the typical CMS-certified LA facility (median: 1) · $8,278 in fines
Persistence
Concern
40 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified LA facility (median: 31)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 35% · LA 6.2This facility: 4, 35% below the LA average of 6.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
11
Rank #17 / 192Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Louisiana State average, with a ranking across all 192 LA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 56% · LA 24.9This facility: 11, 56% below the LA average of 24.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.75
Rank #23 / 192Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Louisiana mean across 192 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 31% · LA 4This facility: 2.75, 31% below the LA average of 4 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
11 of 11 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · LA 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the LA average of 0.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 150% · LA 0.4This facility: 1, 150% above the LA average of 0.4 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
10
↓ 57% · LA 23.3This facility: 10, 57% below the LA average of 23.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · LA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the LA average of 0.4 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 20, 2025 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 3 of 11 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 20, 2025
6 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 24, 2024
2 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 15, 2023
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 28, 2023
2 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 11 citations
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (27%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (18%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (9%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (9%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (9%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
10 of 11 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 11 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Aug 20, 2025 · $8,278 civil money penalty
Aug 20, 2025 · $8,278 civil money penalty
Aug 20, 2025 · 9-day payment denial
Total fines
$8,278
↓ 91% · LA $92KThis facility: $8,278, 91% below the Louisiana average of $92,470. Average among the 135 Louisiana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #94 / 192Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 94th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Louisiana average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 192 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 43% · LA 1.76This facility: 1, 43% below the Louisiana average of 1.76. Average among the 135 Louisiana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
9 days
↑ 207% · LA 0.33This facility: 1, 207% above the Louisiana average of 0.33. Average among the 135 Louisiana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Aug 20, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278
Aug 20, 2025
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
9 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
9 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$8,278
Louisiana average
$92,470
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Louisiana and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Louisiana average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 10% · LA 2.2This facility: 2.0, 10% below the LA average of 2.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↑ 1% · LA 2.0This facility: 2.0, 1% above the LA average of 2.0 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 22% · LA 10.0This facility: 7.8, 22% below the LA average of 10.0 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 37% · LA 17.2This facility: 10.8, 37% below the LA average of 17.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 3 worse, 3 near LA average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 near LA average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.7%
↓ 23% · LA 17.8This facility: 13.7, 23% below the LA average of 17.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.7%
↓ 23% · LA 17.8This facility: 13.7, 23% below the LA average of 17.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
↓ 29% · LA 17.9This facility: 12.8, 29% below the LA average of 17.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
↓ 29% · LA 17.9This facility: 12.8, 29% below the LA average of 17.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.9%
↓ 63% · LA 15.8This facility: 5.9, 63% below the LA average of 15.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.9%
↓ 63% · LA 15.8This facility: 5.9, 63% below the LA average of 15.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
↑ 80% · LA 2.1This facility: 3.8, 80% above the LA average of 2.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
↑ 80% · LA 2.1This facility: 3.8, 80% above the LA average of 2.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
↓ 55% · LA 3.5This facility: 1.6, 55% below the LA average of 3.5 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
↓ 55% · LA 3.5This facility: 1.6, 55% below the LA average of 3.5 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9%
↓ 12% · LA 5.6This facility: 4.9, 12% below the LA average of 5.6 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9%
↓ 12% · LA 5.6This facility: 4.9, 12% below the LA average of 5.6 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
↑ 15% · LA 5.2This facility: 6.0, 15% above the LA average of 5.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
↑ 15% · LA 5.2This facility: 6.0, 15% above the LA average of 5.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4%
↓ 83% · LA 2.3This facility: 0.4, 83% below the LA average of 2.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4%
↓ 83% · LA 2.3This facility: 0.4, 83% below the LA average of 2.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6%
↑ 4% · LA 22.7This facility: 23.6, 4% above the LA average of 22.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6%
↑ 4% · LA 22.7This facility: 23.6, 4% above the LA average of 22.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · LA 93.4This facility: 100.0, 7% above the LA average of 93.4 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · LA 93.4This facility: 100.0, 7% above the LA average of 93.4 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↑ 2% · LA 94.9This facility: 96.4, 2% above the LA average of 94.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↑ 2% · LA 94.9This facility: 96.4, 2% above the LA average of 94.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.47
↑ 33% · LA 2.61This facility: 3.47, 33% above the LA average of 2.61 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.47
↑ 33% · LA 2.61This facility: 3.47, 33% above the LA average of 2.61 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.73
↓ 1% · LA 2.77This facility: 2.73, 1% below the LA average of 2.77 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.73
↓ 1% · LA 2.77This facility: 2.73, 1% below the LA average of 2.77 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
77.2%
↑ 44% · US 53.7This facility: 77.2, 44% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
77.2%
↑ 44% · US 53.7This facility: 77.2, 44% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
44.8%
↓ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 44.8, 12% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
44.8%
↓ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 44.8, 12% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.3%
↑ 195% · US 0.8This facility: 2.3, 195% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.3%
↑ 195% · US 0.8This facility: 2.3, 195% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.0%
↓ 3% · LA 3.1This facility: 3.0, 3% below the LA average of 3.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.0%
↓ 3% · LA 3.1This facility: 3.0, 3% below the LA average of 3.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 10% · LA 85.9This facility: 94.6, 10% above the LA average of 85.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 10% · LA 85.9This facility: 94.6, 10% above the LA average of 85.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.5%
↑ 19% · LA 76.3This facility: 90.5, 19% above the LA average of 76.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.5%
↑ 19% · LA 76.3This facility: 90.5, 19% above the LA average of 76.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
26.8%
↓ 4% · LA 27.8This facility: 26.8, 4% below the LA average of 27.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
26.8%
↓ 4% · LA 27.8This facility: 26.8, 4% below the LA average of 27.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.3%
↓ 30% · LA 14.7This facility: 10.3, 30% below the LA average of 14.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.3%
↓ 30% · LA 14.7This facility: 10.3, 30% below the LA average of 14.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Green Meadow Haven’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 192 Louisiana nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
4.4% operating margin
−10.8 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.8M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Louisiana homes
45.0% payroll share of revenue
LA average 47.3%Rank #93 / 190Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 93rd out of 190 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $0.8M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Louisiana homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | LA median | Compared with LA homesRank in LA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.6M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | LA median $10.0M | Rank in LA Rank #130 / 192Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 130th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 32% of homes | Below LA median Higher net patient revenue than 32% of LA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.2M | +$1.6M | Trend 20172024 | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.4M | −$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Profit, shrinking Resident care made money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 4.4% | −10.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.4M | — | Trend — | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.8M | −$0.9M | Trend — | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Louisiana homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | LA median | Compared with LA homesRank in LA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.9M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | LA median $4.6M | Rank in LA Rank #133 / 192Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 133rd out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 31% of homes | Below LA median Higher payroll than 31% of LA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 45.0% | −1.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | LA median 44.9% | Rank in LA Rank #93 / 190Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 93rd out of 190 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Near LA average The LA average is 47.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · LA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Louisiana payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin LA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.2M | $7.1M | $7.9M | $8.3M | $7.9M | $7.8M | $7.8M | $8.6M |
| Operating expenses | $5.5M | $5.9M | $6.0M | $6.0M | $6.6M | $6.7M | $6.6M | $8.2M |
| Net patient income | $1.8M | $1.2M | $2.0M | $2.3M | $1.3M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $0.4M |
| Operating margin | 24.3% | 17.4% | 24.7% | 27.8% | 17.0% | 13.7% | 15.2% | 4.4% |
| Net income | $2.5M | $1.7M | $2.4M | $3.6M | $1.8M | $2.0M | $1.7M | $0.8M |
| Payroll costs | $3.0M | $2.7M | $2.8M | $2.9M | $3.0M | $3.4M | $3.6M | $3.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 41.3% | 37.6% | 34.6% | 34.4% | 37.7% | 43.9% | 46.2% | 45.0% |
| Beds | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 |
| Gross revenue | $7.2M | $6.9M | $7.9M | $8.0M | $8.5M | $8.5M | $8.4M | $8.6M |
| Salaries | $2.2M | $2.4M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.7M | $3.1M | $3.2M | $3.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $2.5M | $3.2M | $3.2M | $3.1M | $3.6M | $3.3M | $3.0M | $4.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $215 | $208 | $224 | $254 | $254 | $256 | $258 | $284 |
| Cost per day | $162 | $172 | $168 | $184 | $211 | $221 | $219 | $272 |
| Average length of stay | 234.0 days | 218.2 days | 236.7 days | 259.8 days | 224.8 days | 216.9 days | 222.7 days | 251.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
118 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
81 · 69%
Medicaid
26 · 22%
Private pay & other
11 · 9%
Resident snapshot
81 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
11 · 14%
Medicaid
70 · 86%
Private pay & other
0 · 0%
Leaving
120 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
41 · 34%
Medicaid
60 · 50%
Private pay & other
19 · 16%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Green Meadow Haven
1.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Coushatta's city center to Green Meadow Haven's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Green Meadow Haven
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the LA Dept. of Health (LDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Louisiana average is: 47.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audubon Retirement Village | NH SNF | New Orleans (Audubon) | 142
Facility
142
LA AVG
126
Rank
#62 / 180 | A |
79.9%
Facility
79.9%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#64 / 167 | +10% | 5.45
Facility
5.45
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#9 / 186 | -6% | +32% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#1 / 192 | 6
Facility
6
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#3 / 192 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#38 / 192 | - | 113 | - |
73
Facility
73
LA AVG
39
Rank
#13 / 201 | Ayame Dinkler | $14.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#27 / 192 | $0.0kFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$0.0kFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#192 / 192 | 0%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 195638 | ||||
| Chateau Terrebonne Health Care Center | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Houma (Terrebonne Parish) | 197
Facility
197
LA AVG
126
Rank
#11 / 180 | A |
73.5%
Facility
73.5%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#85 / 167 | +1% | 2.96
Facility
2.96
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#169 / 186 | +13% | -28% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#1 / 192 | 9
Facility
9
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#11 / 192 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#38 / 192 | - | 145 | - |
51
Facility
51
LA AVG
39
Rank
#51 / 201 | Scc Of Houma LLC | $20.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#2 / 192 | $8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#11 / 192 | 40.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
40.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#157 / 190 | 195602 | ||||
| Old Brownlee Community Care Center | NH SNF | Bossier City | 89
Facility
89
LA AVG
126
Rank
#152 / 180 | A+ |
92.0%
Facility
92.0%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#16 / 167 | +27% | 5.60
Facility
5.60
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#4 / 186 | +5% | +36% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#1 / 192 | 8
Facility
8
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#6 / 192 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#5 / 192 | - | 82 | - |
5
Facility
5
LA AVG
39
Rank
#191 / 201 | - | $11.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$11.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#70 / 192 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#51 / 192 | 50.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
50.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#44 / 190 | 195363 | ||||
| The Lodge at Lane | NH AL MC SNF | Zachary | 39
Facility
39
LA AVG
126
Rank
#178 / 180 | A- |
92.6%
Facility
92.6%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#24 / 167 | +27% | 5.36
Facility
5.36
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#12 / 186 | -42% | +30% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#1 / 192 | 3
Facility
3
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#1 / 192 | 1.5
Facility
1.5
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#1 / 192 | - | 36 | A+ |
33
Facility
33
LA AVG
39
Rank
#112 / 201 | Lane Senior Care LLC | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#158 / 192 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#156 / 192 | 45.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
45.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#87 / 190 | 195617 | ||||
| Green Meadow Haven | NH HOS RC SNF | Coushatta (Red River Parish) | 157
Facility
157
LA AVG
126
Rank
#32 / 180 | B |
52.0%
Facility
52.0%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#147 / 167 | -28% | 5.19
Facility
5.19
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#19 / 186 | +43% | +26% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#94 / 192 | 11
Facility
11
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#17 / 192 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#23 / 192 | 1 | 82 | - |
21
Facility
21
LA AVG
39
Rank
#153 / 201 | Cld Inc | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#130 / 192 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#133 / 192 | 45%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
45%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#93 / 190 | 195562 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other LA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Green Meadow Haven
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Green Meadow Haven in?
Green Meadow Haven is in the Red River Parish neighborhood of Coushatta.
02 Who is the owner of Green Meadow Haven?
Green Meadow Haven is legally operated by Cld Inc.
03 Is Green Meadow Haven in a walkable area?
Green Meadow Haven has a walk score of 21. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Green Meadow Haven?
Green Meadow Haven's occupancy is 52%.
05 Are pets allowed at Green Meadow Haven?
No, Green Meadow Haven has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Green Meadow Haven operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Green Meadow Haven is registered as a for-profit in LA.
07 What is the overall rating for Green Meadow Haven?
Green Meadow Haven received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
