Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
122
97 employees · 25 contractors · 55 on an average day Old Brownlee Community Care Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Bossier City, LA
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Old Brownlee Community Care Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Bossier City, LA
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Old Brownlee Community Care Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Old Brownlee Community Care Center
Located in Bossier City, Louisiana, Old Brownlee Community Care Center is a cutting-edge skilled nursing and rehabilitation center that redefines the standard of care by embracing a philosophy that cherishes individuality and personal choices. The resident takes center stage in both design and philosophy. Staff members are wholeheartedly dedicated to the households, actively engaging with residents. This includes sharing meals and participating in activities like cooking beloved dishes. This close interaction fosters a familial atmosphere where the staff becomes an extended family, truly getting to know each resident, their preferences, and any changes in their well-being. Staff at Old Brownlee continually receive education on culture change, with a strong focus on respecting individual choices in daily activities, whether related to dining, natural awakening, or bath times. The center remains dedicated to its ongoing journey towards enhancing resident-centered care, inviting all to join them on this quest for excellence.
Upon stepping into Old Brownlee Community Care Center, visitors quickly recognize that this facility is unlike any other. However, what truly sets it apart goes beyond its physical structure. It embodies a distinctive philosophy of person-centered care that places the resident at its core. Old Brownlee features three unique households, each complete with a kitchen, dining area, living space, and outdoor environment. These spaces are thoughtfully designed to revolve around the residents, providing them easy access to various amenities. Private rooms with individual bathrooms surround the common area, creating an environment prioritizing resident comfort and convenience. From intimate nooks to spacious areas, Old Brownlee Community Care Center boasts a variety of common spaces.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 186 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 36m
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 186 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 36mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +60% above Louisiana average
1 of 6 metrics below Louisiana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
20m
↑ 4% · LA 19mThis facility: 20m per resident per day, 4% above the Louisiana average of 19m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
1h 47m
↑ 51% · LA 1h 11mThis facility: 1h 47m per resident per day, 51% above the Louisiana average of 1h 11m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 47 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
47 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
3h 29m
↑ 50% · LA 2h 20mThis facility: 3h 29m per resident per day, 50% above the Louisiana average of 2h 20m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 47 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
47 staff · 8.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↑ 60% · LA 3mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 60% above the Louisiana average of 3m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 33m
↑ 39% · LA 3h 16mThis facility: 4h 33m per resident per day, 39% above the Louisiana average of 3h 16m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
11m
↓ 17% · LA 13mThis facility: 11m per resident per day, 17% below the Louisiana average of 13m (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
122
97 employees · 25 contractors · 55 on an average day
122 total staff / 83 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.47 : 1
↑ 1% · LA 1.45This facility: 1.47 staff per resident, 1% above the Louisiana average of 1.45 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
122 staff ÷ 83 residents
See full Louisiana ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
≈ 0% · LA 8.2 hThis facility: 8.2 h, level with the Louisiana average of 8.2 h (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
41,354 staff hours this quarter
See full Louisiana ranking →92.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Louisiana average: 90.1% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (6), Physical Therapy Assistant (5), Physical Therapy Aide (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Qualified Social Worker (3), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
89
Rank #152 / 180Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 152nd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Louisiana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
89
Rank #152 / 180Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 152nd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Louisiana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #191 / 201Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 191st out of 201 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Louisiana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #191 / 201Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 191st out of 201 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Louisiana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
5
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #16 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Louisiana average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #16 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Louisiana average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
92%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 89 beds.
Higher than the Louisiana average: 72.6%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
82
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
95
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Beauty Salon
Kitchen
Dining Area
Household Living Area
Outdoor Space/Front Porch per Household
Activities
Cooking Favorite Dishes with Staff
Highlights
- Café with coffee, cappuccino, beverages, and soft-serve ice cream
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Old Brownlee Community Care Center.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Old Brownlee Community Care Center.- Bistro / café on site.
Room Types
Private Room
In-Room Features
Private Bathroom In Each Resident Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
15 points above the Louisiana average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
23 severity-weighted points (8 deficiencies) · 3× lower than the typical CMS-certified LA facility (median: 61)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
24 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified LA facility (median: 31)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 35% · LA 6.2This facility: 4, 35% below the Louisiana average of 6.2 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
8
Rank #6 / 192Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Louisiana State average, with a ranking across all 192 LA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 68% · LA 24.9This facility: 8, 68% below the Louisiana average of 24.9 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #5 / 192Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Louisiana mean across 192 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 50% · LA 4This facility: 2, 50% below the Louisiana average of 4 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
8 of 8 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · LA 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Louisiana average of 0.8 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · LA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Louisiana average of 0.4 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
8
↓ 66% · LA 23.3This facility: 8, 66% below the Louisiana average of 23.3 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · LA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Louisiana average of 0.4 (among Louisiana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 09, 2025 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 2 of 8 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 09, 2025
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 02, 2025
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 24, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 19, 2023
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 8 citations
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (25%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (25%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (25%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (13%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (13%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
5 of 8 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 8 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
LA avg $92KLouisiana average: $92,470. Average among the 135 Louisiana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
LA avg 1.76Louisiana average: 1.76. Average among the 135 Louisiana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
LA avg 0.33Louisiana average: 0.33. Average among the 135 Louisiana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Louisiana average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 125% · LA 2.2This facility: 5.0, 125% above the LA average of 2.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 101% · LA 2.0This facility: 4.0, 101% above the LA average of 2.0 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 32% · LA 10.0This facility: 6.8, 32% below the LA average of 10.0 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 32% · LA 17.2This facility: 11.7, 32% below the LA average of 17.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 12 better, 1 worse
8 short-stay measures: 5 better, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
↓ 49% · LA 17.8This facility: 9.0, 49% below the LA average of 17.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
↓ 49% · LA 17.8This facility: 9.0, 49% below the LA average of 17.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.7%
↓ 18% · LA 17.9This facility: 14.7, 18% below the LA average of 17.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.7%
↓ 18% · LA 17.9This facility: 14.7, 18% below the LA average of 17.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.5%
↓ 27% · LA 15.8This facility: 11.5, 27% below the LA average of 15.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.5%
↓ 27% · LA 15.8This facility: 11.5, 27% below the LA average of 15.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
↓ 63% · LA 2.1This facility: 0.8, 63% below the LA average of 2.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
↓ 63% · LA 2.1This facility: 0.8, 63% below the LA average of 2.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.2%
↓ 36% · LA 3.5This facility: 2.2, 36% below the LA average of 3.5 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.2%
↓ 36% · LA 3.5This facility: 2.2, 36% below the LA average of 3.5 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
↑ 14% · LA 5.6This facility: 6.4, 14% above the LA average of 5.6 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
↑ 14% · LA 5.6This facility: 6.4, 14% above the LA average of 5.6 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8%
↓ 66% · LA 5.2This facility: 1.8, 66% below the LA average of 5.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8%
↓ 66% · LA 5.2This facility: 1.8, 66% below the LA average of 5.2 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · LA 2.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the LA average of 2.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · LA 2.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the LA average of 2.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.9%
↓ 87% · LA 22.7This facility: 2.9, 87% below the LA average of 22.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.9%
↓ 87% · LA 22.7This facility: 2.9, 87% below the LA average of 22.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · LA 93.4This facility: 100.0, 7% above the LA average of 93.4 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · LA 93.4This facility: 100.0, 7% above the LA average of 93.4 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · LA 94.9This facility: 100.0, 5% above the LA average of 94.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · LA 94.9This facility: 100.0, 5% above the LA average of 94.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.26
↓ 13% · LA 2.61This facility: 2.26, 13% below the LA average of 2.61 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.26
↓ 13% · LA 2.61This facility: 2.26, 13% below the LA average of 2.61 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.25
↓ 55% · LA 2.77This facility: 1.25, 55% below the LA average of 2.77 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.25
↓ 55% · LA 2.77This facility: 1.25, 55% below the LA average of 2.77 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
66.7%
↑ 24% · US 53.7This facility: 66.7, 24% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
66.7%
↑ 24% · US 53.7This facility: 66.7, 24% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.3%
↑ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 54.3, 7% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.3%
↑ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 54.3, 7% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · LA 3.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the LA average of 3.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · LA 3.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the LA average of 3.1 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 16% · LA 85.9This facility: 100.0, 16% above the LA average of 85.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 16% · LA 85.9This facility: 100.0, 16% above the LA average of 85.9 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 31% · LA 76.3This facility: 100.0, 31% above the LA average of 76.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 31% · LA 76.3This facility: 100.0, 31% above the LA average of 76.3 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.2%
↓ 24% · LA 27.8This facility: 21.2, 24% below the LA average of 27.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.2%
↓ 24% · LA 27.8This facility: 21.2, 24% below the LA average of 27.8 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.9%
↓ 26% · LA 14.7This facility: 10.9, 26% below the LA average of 14.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.9%
↓ 26% · LA 14.7This facility: 10.9, 26% below the LA average of 14.7 (among LA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Old Brownlee Community Care Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 192 Louisiana nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−0.9% operating margin
+3.8 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.1M) trims the net loss to −$0.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Louisiana homes
50.2% payroll share of revenue
LA average 47.3%Rank #44 / 190Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 190 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.5M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Louisiana homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | LA median | Compared with LA homesRank in LA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $11.4M | +$0.5M | Trend 20182025 | LA median $10.0M | Rank in LA Rank #70 / 192Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 70th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 64% of homes | Above LA median Higher net patient revenue than 64% of LA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.5M | +$0.1M | Trend 20182025 | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.1M | +$0.4M | Trend 20182025 | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −0.9% | +3.8 pts | Trend 20182025 | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.0M | +$0.4M | Trend — | LA median — | Rank in LA Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Louisiana homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | LA median | Compared with LA homesRank in LA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.7M | +$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | LA median $4.6M | Rank in LA Rank #51 / 192Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 192 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 74% of homes | Above LA median Higher payroll than 74% of LA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 50.2% | −0.4 pts | Trend 20182025 | LA median 44.9% | Rank in LA Rank #44 / 190Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 190 nursing homes we track in Louisiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Louisiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Louisiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 77% of homes | Near LA average The LA average is 47.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · LA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Louisiana payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin LA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.1M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $6.2M | $8.7M | $9.7M | $10.9M | $11.4M |
| Operating expenses | $4.3M | $4.5M | $4.7M | $7.3M | $9.6M | $10.7M | $11.4M | $11.5M |
| Net patient income | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$0.1M | −$1.1M | −$0.9M | −$1.0M | −$0.5M | −$0.1M |
| Operating margin | −4.0% | −3.1% | −2.6% | −17.8% | −10.0% | −10.5% | −4.7% | −0.9% |
| Net income | −$0.1M | −$0.1M | −$0.1M | −$1.3M | −$0.8M | $0.2M | −$0.4M | −$0.0M |
| Payroll costs | $2.2M | $2.3M | $2.6M | $3.8M | $4.3M | $4.8M | $5.5M | $5.7M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 53.0% | 53.8% | 56.5% | 60.3% | 49.3% | 49.4% | 50.6% | 50.2% |
| Beds | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 |
| Gross revenue | $5.0M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $6.6M | $8.6M | $10.3M | $12.1M | $13.5M |
| Salaries | $1.8M | $1.9M | $2.1M | $3.2M | $3.6M | $4.1M | $4.7M | $4.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $3.6M | $5.3M | $5.9M | $5.9M | $5.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $199 | $210 | $221 | $271 | $308 | $330 | $360 | $375 |
| Cost per day | $207 | $216 | $227 | $319 | $339 | $364 | $377 | $378 |
| Average length of stay | 260.5 days | 405.3 days | 532.9 days | 3,830.0 days | 192.6 days | 95.5 days | 102.2 days | 94.8 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
286 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
128 · 45%
Medicaid
2 · 1%
Private pay & other
156 · 55%
Resident snapshot
83 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
18 · 22%
Medicaid
53 · 64%
Private pay & other
12 · 14%
Leaving
321 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
114 · 36%
Medicaid
22 · 7%
Private pay & other
185 · 58%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Old Brownlee Community Care Center
5.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bossier City's city center to Old Brownlee Community Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 2.6 miles to nearest hospital (Willis Knighton Bossier)
Calculate Travel Distance to Old Brownlee Community Care Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Bossier City
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the LA Dept. of Health (LDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Louisiana average is: 47.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old Brownlee Community Care Center | NH SNF | Bossier City | 89
Facility
89
LA AVG
126
Rank
#152 / 180 | A+ |
92.0%
Facility
92.0%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#16 / 167 | +27% | 5.60
Facility
5.60
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#4 / 186 | +5% | +36% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#1 / 192 | 8
Facility
8
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#6 / 192 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#5 / 192 | - | 82 | - |
5
Facility
5
LA AVG
39
Rank
#191 / 201 | - | $11.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$11.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#70 / 192 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#51 / 192 | 50.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
50.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#44 / 190 | 195363 | ||||
| Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Bossier City | 142
Facility
142
LA AVG
126
Rank
#62 / 180 | A+ |
97.7%
Facility
97.7%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#57 / 167 | +34% | 4.01
Facility
4.01
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#87 / 186 | +64% | -3% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#1 / 192 | 9
Facility
9
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#11 / 192 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#38 / 192 | - | 139 | A+ |
17
Facility
17
LA AVG
39
Rank
#170 / 201 | Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | $18.4MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$18.4MFiscal year ending 03/2025
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#14 / 192 | $8.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$8.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#12 / 192 | 43.9%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
43.9%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#106 / 190 | 195452 | ||||
| Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Bossier City | 155
Facility
155
LA AVG
126
Rank
#34 / 180 | D- |
76.8%
Facility
76.8%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#71 / 167 | +6% | 3.06
Facility
3.06
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#165 / 186 | -34% | -26% | $186.3k
Facility
$186.3k
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#179 / 192 | 22
Facility
22
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#87 / 192 | 3.1
Facility
3.1
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#49 / 192 | 6 | 119 | A+ |
67
Facility
67
LA AVG
39
Rank
#23 / 201 | James Almond | $15.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#22 / 192 | $4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#99 / 192 | 29.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
29.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#189 / 190 | 195594 | ||||
| Colonial Oaks Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Bossier City | 120
Facility
120
LA AVG
126
Rank
#98 / 180 | C- |
69.3%
Facility
69.3%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#133 / 167 | -5% | 3.22
Facility
3.22
LA AVG
4.13
Rank
#165 / 186 | -70% | -22% | $66.2k
Facility
$66.2k
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#145 / 192 | 21
Facility
21
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#78 / 192 | 4.2
Facility
4.2
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#109 / 192 | 3 | 83 | - |
29
Facility
29
LA AVG
39
Rank
#125 / 201 | Pmg Opco-Colonial LLC | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#97 / 192 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#154 / 192 | 32.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
32.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#185 / 190 | 195604 | ||||
| Heritage Manor of Bossier | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Bossier City | 64
Facility
64
LA AVG
126
Rank
#168 / 180 | C |
84.1%
Facility
84.1%
LA AVG
72.6%
Rank
#42 / 167 | +16% | - | -2% | - | $73.5k
Facility
$73.5k
LA AVG
$96.0k
Rank
#149 / 192 | 68
Facility
68
LA AVG
24.9
Rank
#187 / 192 | 5.2
Facility
5.2
LA AVG
4.0
Rank
#159 / 192 | 2 | 54 | - |
67
Facility
67
LA AVG
39
Rank
#23 / 201 | Centennial Healthcare Holding Co. LLC | $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#176 / 192 | $2.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#185 / 192 | 38.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
38.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
LA AVG
47.3%
Rank
#170 / 190 | 195323 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other LA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Louisiana
Old Brownlee Community Care Center is located in Bossier City, Louisiana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Louisiana.
Frequently Asked Questions about Old Brownlee Community Care Center
Is Old Brownlee Community Care Center in a walkable area?
Old Brownlee Community Care Center has a walk score of 5. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the occupancy rate at Old Brownlee Community Care Center?
Old Brownlee Community Care Center's occupancy is 92%.
Are pets allowed at Old Brownlee Community Care Center?
No, Old Brownlee Community Care Center has a no-pet policy.
Does Old Brownlee Community Care Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Old Brownlee Community Care Center is registered as a non-profit.
What is the overall rating for Old Brownlee Community Care Center?
Old Brownlee Community Care Center received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Old Brownlee Community Care Center have?
Old Brownlee Community Care Center has 89 beds.
Are there photos of Old Brownlee Community Care Center?
Yes — there are 6 photos of Old Brownlee Community Care Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
