We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
2
Ranked on Data, Not Dollars
We rank communities on objective measures like inspection records, quality scores, and care data, so you can find trusted options without the guesswork.
3
Personalized Guidance
From lifestyle matching to help with insurance and financial assistance, we make sure the community is the right fit
Heisinger Bluffs
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Jefferson City, MO
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Jefferson City, MO
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Heisinger Bluffs accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Heisinger Bluffs
Located in Jefferson City, Missouri, Heisinger Bluffs offers a versatile spectrum of living options, from independent living to assisted living with memory care, catering to diverse needs and preferences. This community has garnered a well-deserved reputation for excellence, consistently earning accolades for its exceptional standards over the years. At Heisinger Bluffs, they recognize the profound impact of cultivating an environment that promotes well-being. Heisinger Bluffs boasts a dedicated team available round-the-clock, guaranteeing seniors have access to unwavering support whenever it’s needed. Residents enjoy the autonomy to choose from a selection of comfortable living spaces, including studios, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom apartments, tailored to accommodate their unique preferences. The heartbeat of the community lies in its engaging daily activities, fostering connections and keeping seniors active and involved. The shared areas within the facility are thoughtfully furnished, creating an inviting atmosphere that encourages camaraderie and comfort. Whether strolling along picturesque walking paths or unwinding in the welcoming common spaces, such as the open and airy dining room, Heisinger Bluffs encompasses an ambiance of tranquility.
Measured by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Overall ratingThe Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Health InspectionBased on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
StaffingMeasures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Quality MeasuresBased on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
StaffingData period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 203rd out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
This facility
MO avg 3h 38m
↓ 17% · MO 3h 38mThis facility: 3h 0m per resident per day, 17% below the Missouri average of 3h 38m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rank#203 / 267Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 203rd out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Missouri average, with a ranking across 267 Missouri facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 203rd out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Missouri average, with a ranking across 267 Missouri facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
3h 0m
6 of 6 metrics below Missouri average
Daily care time per resident, by role
MO average · US = national average
Registered nurse (RN) RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.7 staff · 10-hour shifts
25m↓ 9% · MO 28mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 9% below the Missouri average of 28m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 41m
LPN / LVN Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.8 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
23m↓ 44% · MO 41mThis facility: 23m per resident per day, 44% below the Missouri average of 41m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 52m
Certified nursing assistant Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 23 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.23 staff · 7.4-hour shifts
2h 12m↓ 6% · MO 2h 20mThis facility: 2h 12m per resident per day, 6% below the Missouri average of 2h 20m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 2h 21m
Physical therapist Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m↓ 100% · MO 2mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 100% below the Missouri average of 2m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 4m
Total nursing, weekends Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 43m↓ 11% · MO 3h 3mThis facility: 2h 43m per resident per day, 11% below the Missouri average of 3h 3m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 3h 26m
RN, weekends Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.Sat–Sun
18m↓ 10% · MO 20mThis facility: 18m per resident per day, 10% below the Missouri average of 20m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 29m
Headcount
Total staffEvery person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.64
60 employees · 4 contractors · 26 on an average day Staff per resident64 total staff / 56 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.1.14 : 1↓ 31% · MO 1.66This facility: 1.14 staff per resident, 31% below the Missouri average of 1.66 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
64 staff ÷ 56 residents See full Missouri ranking →Average shiftAverage hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.7.9 h↓ 2% · MO 8.1 hThis facility: 7.9 h, 2% below the Missouri average of 8.1 h (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
18,913 staff hours this quarter See full Missouri ranking →
99.3%
of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Missouri average: 92.5% · Contractors this quarter: Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Other Physician (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.111Rank#137 / 288Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 137th out of 288 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 137th out of 288 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Medium-capacity home
· Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.Rank#229 / 296Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 229th out of 296 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 229th out of 296 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
32/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.Rank#228 / 272Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 228th out of 272 nursing homes we track in Missouri for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Missouri average, with its Statewide rank out of 272. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 228th out of 272 nursing homes we track in Missouri for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Missouri average, with its Statewide rank out of 272. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
42.3%This home usually has availability
Based on 47 residents and 111 beds. Source: state inspection report (Mar 2023)
Lower than the Missouri average: 67.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
51days
About This Community
License Details
CountyCole
Ownership & Operating Entity
Heisinger Bluffs is legally operated by Heisinger Bluffs Opco LLC, and administered by Ashley Drewel.
Corporate EntityHEISINGER BLUFFS OPCO LLC
Therapy & Rehabilitation
2 services
Short-Term Rehab
Short Term Rehabilitation
Additional Policies & Features
Pets not allowed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the
figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file —
covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this
home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification
surveys.
Inspection History
In Missouri, the Department of Health and Senior Services, Division of Regulation and Licensure performs the inspections and unannounced surveys required for all long-term care providers.
Since 2018 · 8 years of dataThese figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability. Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.16 deficiencies6 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Missouri state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2018 vs. Missouri state average
Overall vs. MO average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Missouri average:
• Total deficiencies (75% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (46% below)
Deficiencies Deficiencies are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.
This Facility
MO Average
vs. MO Avg
Total deficiencies Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
16
64.0
This facility has 75% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Missouri nursing home (16 vs. MO avg 64).↓ 75% better
Deficiencies per inspection Average deficiencies per inspection.
2.7
5.0
This facility has 46% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Missouri nursing home (2.7 vs. MO avg 5).↓ 46% better
Inspections State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.
This Facility
MO Average
vs. MO Avg
Total inspections Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
6
12.0
This facility has had 50% fewer total inspections than the Missouri average (6 vs. MO avg 12). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 50% fewer
Since 2023 · 3 years of data · Last health inspection Mar 2025
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or
Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4↓ 39% · MO 6.6This facility: 4, 39% below the Missouri average of 6.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
18Rank#62 / 274Health citations — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 274 nursing homes we track in Missouri for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Missouri State average, with a ranking across all 274 MO facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Health citations — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 274 nursing homes we track in Missouri for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Missouri State average, with a ranking across all 274 MO facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 50% · MO 36.1This facility: 18, 50% below the Missouri average of 36.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.5Rank#97 / 274Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 97th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Missouri for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Missouri mean across 274 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 97th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Missouri for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Missouri mean across 274 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 20% · MO 5.6This facility: 4.5, 20% below the Missouri average of 5.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
18 of 18 citations corrected
Bar = mix of this home's 18 citations, not a state comparison
Moderate (D–F, no harm, more than minimal risk): 18 citations, corrected
Lighter shade = corrected
CriticalJ–L
0↓ 100% · MO 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Missouri average of 0.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
SeriousG–I
0↓ 100% · MO 1.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Missouri average of 1.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
ModerateD–F
18↓ 46% · MO 33.3This facility: 18, 46% below the Missouri average of 33.3 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
MinorA–C
0↓ 100% · MO 1.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Missouri average of 1.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal risk
Latest inspection: Mar 28, 2025 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Nutrition & Dietary, 5 of 18 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 28, 20254 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Jul 03, 20241 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Mar 22, 20246 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Mar 03, 20237 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 18 citations
Nutrition & Dietary5 deficiencies (28%)
Infection Control3 deficiencies (17%)
Pharmacy Services3 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Rights2 deficiencies (11%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning2 deficiencies (11%)
Quality of Life & Care1 deficiency (6%)
Administration1 deficiency (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 18 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 18 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious).
Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Clean record
Aug 2023202420252026Aug 2026
Total fines
$0MO avg $81KMissouri average: $81,235. Average among the 220 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0MO avg 1.93Missouri average: 1.93. Average among the 220 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0MO avg 0.7Missouri average: 0.7. Average among the 220 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Missouri average.
Data as of Aug 2026 · CMS Care Compare
Long-stay quality ratingCMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.5/ 5★★★★★Significantly above averageHigh-risk clinical eventsAverage of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.6.7Score · lower is better↓ 31% · MO 9.8This facility: 6.7, 31% below the MO average of 9.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Functional declineAverage of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.16.7Score · lower is better↓ 6% · MO 17.8This facility: 16.7, 6% below the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
13 long-stay measures:10 better, 3 worse
5 short-stay measures:2 better, 1 worse, 2 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
MO average
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activitiesPercent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased15.3%↓ 15% · MO 18.1This facility: 15.3, 15% below the MO average of 18.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsenedPercent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened7.0%↓ 60% · MO 17.4This facility: 7.0, 60% below the MO average of 17.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder27.6%↑ 56% · MO 17.8This facility: 27.6, 56% above the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infectionPercent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%↓ 59% · MO 2.3This facility: 1.0, 59% below the MO average of 2.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injuryPercent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury3.7%↓ 8% · MO 4.1This facility: 3.7, 8% below the MO average of 4.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers2.1%↓ 55% · MO 4.5This facility: 2.1, 55% below the MO average of 4.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Physical & mental health
Lost too much weightPercent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%↑ 5% · MO 5.3This facility: 5.5, 5% above the MO average of 5.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptomsPercent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms35.2%↑ 90% · MO 18.5This facility: 35.2, 90% above the MO average of 18.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic usePercent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication12.5%↓ 47% · MO 23.5This facility: 12.5, 47% below the MO average of 23.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccinePercent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine93.0%↑ 11% · MO 84.1This facility: 93.0, 11% above the MO average of 84.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccinePercent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine100.0%↑ 10% · MO 90.9This facility: 100.0, 10% above the MO average of 90.9 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 daysNumber of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.1.37↓ 34% · MO 2.08This facility: 1.37, 34% below the MO average of 2.08 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 daysNumber of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.2.02↓ 14% · MO 2.35This facility: 2.02, 14% below the MO average of 2.35 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 5 measures
MO or US average
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at dischargePercentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.52.4%↓ 2% · US 53.7This facility: 52.4, 2% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.0.0%↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medicationPercent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication8.3%↑ 276% · MO 2.2This facility: 8.3, 276% above the MO average of 2.2 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccinePercent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine91.9%↑ 40% · MO 65.7This facility: 91.9, 40% above the MO average of 65.7 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccinePercent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine100.0%↑ 58% · MO 63.5This facility: 100.0, 58% above the MO average of 63.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Breakdown by payment type
Medicare
43% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
Typical stay3 days
Private pay
56% of new residents, often for short stays.
Typical stay1 - 2 months
Medicaid
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Typical stay6 - 7 years
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics
(Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents56
Medicaid
38
67.9% of residents
Private pay or other
18
32.1% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Nurse Aide Training
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
CCRC
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Financials
Money and staffing.
Heisinger Bluffs’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 267 Missouri nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−0.5% operating margin
+18.7 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Missouri homes
58.5% payroll share of revenue
MO average 54.9%Rank#90 / 267Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 90th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 90th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.1M while revenue rose $1.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
60 beds · 267 Missouri peers
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Missouri homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
Metric
FY 2024
vs prior year
Trend 2016 → 2024Trend
MO median
Compared with MO homesRank in MO
In short
Net patient revenueWhat the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt.
$5.9M
+$1.0M
Trend20162024
MO median $6.2M
Rank in MORank#149 / 267Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 149th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 149th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Higher than 44% of homes
Below MO medianHigher net patient revenue than 44% of MO homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is.
Operating expensesEverything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin.
$5.9M
+$0.1M
Trend20162024
MO median —
Rank in MONot ranked
Exceeds revenueOperating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss.
Net patient incomeRevenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money.
−$0.0M
+$0.9M
Trend20162024
MO median —
Rank in MONot ranked
Loss, narrowingResident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report.
Operating marginNet patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal.
−0.5%
+18.7 pts
Trend20162024
MO median —
Rank in MONot ranked
LossA negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns.
Other incomeMoney not from resident care: investments, grants, services.
$0.0M
—
Trend
—
MO median —
Rank in MONot ranked
Offsets part of the lossIncome from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care.
Net incomeThe bottom line after other income.
−$0.0M
+$0.9M
Trend
—
MO median —
Rank in MONot ranked
LossThe bottom line is below zero even after other income.
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Missouri homes
Metric
FY 2024
vs prior year
Trend 2016 → 2024Trend
MO median
Compared with MO homesRank in MO
In short
Payroll costsSalaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor.
$3.4M
−$0.1M
Trend20162024
MO median $3.5M
Rank in MORank#136 / 267Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 136th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 136th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Higher than 49% of homes
Below MO medianHigher payroll than 49% of MO homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels.
Payroll share of revenuePayroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident.
58.5%
−13.6 pts
Trend20162024
MO median 52.9%
Rank in MORank#90 / 267Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 90th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 90th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Higher than 67% of homes
3.6 pts over MO averageThe MO average is 54.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average.
Charts, 2016–20242 charts · MO benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and incomeWhat the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenueOperating expensesNet patient incomeNo report
Where revenue goesBoth lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Missouri payroll average.
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
Metric
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022no report
2023
2024
Net patient revenue
$3.5M
$3.7M
$3.6M
$3.7M
$3.8M
$3.9M
$4.9M
$5.9M
Operating expenses
$10.1M
$11.1M
$11.0M
$10.8M
$11.7M
$11.4M
$5.9M
$5.9M
Net patient income
−$6.5M
−$7.4M
−$7.3M
−$7.1M
−$7.8M
−$7.5M
−$0.9M
−$0.0M
Operating margin
−185.3%
−199.8%
−202.3%
−190.5%
−203.2%
−195.3%
−19.2%
−0.5%
Net income
−$1.3M
−$1.7M
−$1.5M
−$0.7M
−$0.9M
−$0.3M
−$0.9M
−$0.0M
Payroll costs
$4.3M
$4.7M
$5.3M
$5.4M
$5.9M
$5.9M
$3.5M
$3.4M
Payroll share of revenue
122.1%
126.3%
145.4%
144.7%
153.4%
153.8%
72.1%
58.5%
Beds
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Gross revenue
$3.8M
$3.9M
$3.8M
$4.0M
$4.2M
$4.1M
$5.4M
$6.6M
Salaries
$3.8M
$4.2M
$4.4M
$4.6M
$5.0M
$5.2M
$3.0M
$3.0M
Wage-related costs
$0.5M
$0.5M
$0.9M
$0.8M
$0.9M
$0.8M
$0.5M
$0.5M
Contract labor
$0.2M
$0.2M
$0.3M
$0.1M
$0.2M
$0.3M
$0.2M
—
Other operating costs
$5.8M
$6.4M
$5.7M
$5.4M
$5.8M
$5.5M
$2.3M
$2.5M
Net patient revenue per day
$201
$207
$214
$217
$231
$234
$270
$307
Cost per day
$572
$620
$646
$629
$700
$692
$322
$308
Average length of stay
29.0 days
31.0 days
—
—
—
—
404.4 days
51.5 days
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
How we calculate these figures
We use the home's most recent CMS SNF Cost Report — the annual financial statement every Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home is required to file — to show how it earns and spends on resident care.
This includes
Net patient revenue — what the home collects for resident care after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts.
Payroll — staff salaries plus wage-related benefits. Contract and agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Net patient income — what's left after the home's total operating expenses.
How we calculate net patient income and payroll %
Net patient income is net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. Payroll % is payroll divided by net patient revenue — the share of each revenue dollar that goes to staff pay.
Net patient revenue vs. other income
Net patient revenue is money earned from resident care only. Anything the home earns outside of care — investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources — is reported separately as other income. Other income is not part of net patient revenue, and it is not included in net patient income.
Certification details
CMS Certification Number:265794
Rural vs. Urban:Urban
County:Cole
Type of Control:For-profit — Operated by a limited liability company.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and State data
Who this home usually serves
TYPE OF STAY
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (56% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Admissions
377 total
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Medicare43%
Private pay56%
Medicaid1%
Discharges
373 total
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Medicare5%
Private pay94%
Medicaid1%
How we assess these insights
We analyze official CMS data on admissions and discharges to understand the types of residents a nursing home most often serves.
This includes
Medicare, Medicaid, and private-pay admissions and discharges
Number of nights covered by each payment type
Typical length of stay
How length of stay is calculated
Average length of stay comes from the facility's Medicare cost report: total resident days in the year divided by total discharges, across all residents and payment types. Homes that mostly provide long-term care show long averages, because few residents leave in a given year.
Managed by Joe Schepers
Administrator for Independent Living
Over 20 years of experience
Places of interest near Heisinger Bluffs
0.9 miles from city center Estimated distance in miles from Jefferson City's city center to Heisinger Bluffs's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Quick search
Calculate Travel Distance to Heisinger Bluffs
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Jefferson City
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MO Dept. of Health & Senior Services (DHSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This TableAL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Missouri average is: 54.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MO nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
64
60 employees · 4 contractors · 26 on an average day 
100% corrected 
