We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Ivy Park at Simi Valley is an assisted living and memory care community in Simi Valley, CA, that offers personal care and specialized care. Here, older adults can live the retirement of their dreams, especially with its resort-style setting. Residents also experience maintenance-free living, with restaurant-style dining, medication management, and in-house rehabilitation. Personalized care plans are also provided around the clock to improve residents’ quality of life.
Light physical activities, social events, and recreational activities provide residents with more opportunities to explore new interests and stay active. A full-service salon, a hydro spa, beautifully landscaped gardens, and walking paths are also available for residents’ leisure and wellness. Set in the thriving residential area of Simi Valley, near public transportation, the community ensures residents have easy access to their needs. As one of the finest options for senior living in California, this assisted living and memory care community has high standards of care and well-maintained amenities.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 289th out of 346 homes in California. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Nursing (Weekend)
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 34m per day |
Similar to the California average: 72.8%Ivy Park at Simi Valley is legally operated by Well Oak Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, and administrated by Lea Bogoyevac.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 5 | 10 | This facility has 50% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (5 vs. CA avg 10).↓ 50% better |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Violations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 3 | 3 | This facility has serious citations (type a) in line with the California average (3 vs. CA avg 3).— At avg |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Violations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 2 | 4 | This facility has 50% fewer moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (2 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 50% better |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2023.
| 1.7 | 3.3 | This facility has 48% fewer citations per year than a typical California nursing home (1.7 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 48% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.2 | 3.3 | This facility has 94% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.2 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 94% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of complaint visits, other regulatory visits, and official scheduled inspections.
| 33 | 16 | This facility has 106% more total visits than a typical California nursing home (33 vs. CA avg 16).↑ 106% worse |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 25 | 13 | This facility has 92% more complaint visits than a typical California nursing home (25 vs. CA avg 13).↑ 92% worse |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 5 | 7 | This facility has 29% fewer other visits than a typical California nursing home (5 vs. CA avg 7).↓ 29% better |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 3 | 4 | This facility has 25% fewer official inspections than a typical California nursing home (3 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 25% better |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 19 | 10 | This facility has 90% more complaint investigations than a typical California nursing home (19 vs. CA avg 10).↑ 90% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
This facility’s inspection record is mixed, with several substantiated deficiencies primarily around medication management, resident supervision, and residents’ personal rights. The most recent inspection on January 16, 2026, found no deficiencies, but prior visits cited issues including failure to timely replace a pain patch in May 2025 and staff yelling in residents’ presence in May 2025. Multiple complaint investigations between 2024 and 2025 found many allegations unsubstantiated, indicating some improvement but persistent concerns in care and documentation.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsCalifornia average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Aug 2025
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
39 of 56 citations resulted from standard inspections; 16 of 56 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 56 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.4
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
1868032% better than California average
0% compared with California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.8 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
4,197 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 68 | 0 | 68 | 22,094 | 92 | 100% | 7 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 37 | 0 | 37 | 10,750 | 92 | 100% | 7.8 |
| Registered Nurse | 20 | 2 | 22 | 5,664 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| Qualified Activities Professional | 16 | 0 | 16 | 3,378 | 92 | 100% | 8.4 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1,426 | 67 | 73% | 8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,238 | 92 | 100% | 7 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 3 | 3 | 923 | 70 | 76% | 6.3 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 615 | 63 | 68% | 9.3 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 1 | 0 | 1 | 580 | 64 | 70% | 9.1 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 540 | 75 | 82% | 7.1 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Dental Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 473 | 61 | 66% | 7.8 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 4 | 4 | 459 | 63 | 68% | 4.4 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 137 | 30 | 33% | 4.6 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 80 | 10 | 11% | 8 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 63 | 7 | 8% | 9 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 13 | 14% | 3 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 5 | 5% | 5.2 |
Includes penalties issued in 2025
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
85% lower than California averageCalifornia average: $55K
58% fewer fines than California averageCalifornia average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than California averageCalifornia average: 0.5
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Jun 30, 2025 · $8K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Jun 30, 2025Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
4.7
30% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
7.0
39% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.6%
13% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.2%
65% better than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.1%
37% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
8% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
39% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.8%
80% better than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.3%
54% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.3%
51% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
6% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.2%
123% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
7% better than California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
29% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
3% of new residents, often for short stays.
68% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
91Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Family members meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of family members that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, resident care, and activities.
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Ivy Park at Simi Valley based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #120 / 347Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 120th out of 347 homes in California. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Pets Allowed
Room Sizes: 304 / 365 / 444 / 467 sq. ft
Housing Options: Studio / Suite / 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: Two-story
Dining Services
Beauty Services
Transportation Services
Housekeeping Services
Social and Recreational Activities
Exercise Programs
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Lee serves as the Executive Director at Ivy Park at Simi Valley, providing thorough, kind, and helpful leadership. Lee is recognized by families for her dedication and supportive approach, ensuring the community offers a warm and well-managed environment for residents and their loved ones.
6.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Simi Valley's city center to Ivy Park at Simi Valley's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 5.8 miles to nearest hospital (UCLA West Valley Medical Center)
Add your location
Ivy Park at Simi Valley is located in Simi Valley, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Ivy Park at Simi Valley is in the Tradewinds Club neighborhood of Simi Valley.
The legal owner and operator of Ivy Park at Simi Valley is Well Oak Tenant Llc;Oakmont Management Group Llc.
Ivy Park at Simi Valley has a walk score of 59. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Ivy Park at Simi Valley's occupancy is 74%.
Lea Bogoyevac is the administrator of Ivy Park at Simi Valley.
Ivy Park at Simi Valley has 175 beds.
Ivy Park at Simi Valley has had 5 recently reported deficiencies.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
