Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (88% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 27 days.
Experience vibrant living at Lake Park Senior Living in Oakland, CA, where personalized care meets endless opportunities for joy and independence. Specializing in assisted living, independent living, and respite care, this community features 55+ active adult apartments, including an entire floor dedicated to assisted living. Residents can choose from spacious one- and two-bedroom apartments, as well as cozy alcoves, ensuring a perfect fit for every lifestyle.
With a serene and inspiring indoor setting, you’ll have endless options to have fun, make friends, and relax. The best part? You or your loved one can rest easy, knowing there’s a plan in place in case their needs change in the future. This community offers the perfect balance of independence and support, ensuring residents can manage daily activities with dignity and ease. With a wide array of services and amenities, life here is enjoyable, fulfilling, active, and worry-free.
Lake Park Senior Living is legally operated by Lake Merritt Senior Living LLC and Calson Care Oakland, and administered by Kirsten Korfhage.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
| 22 | 10 | This facility has 120% more total citations than a typical California nursing home (22 vs. CA avg 10).↑ 120% worse |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
| 0 | 3 | This facility has 100% fewer serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (0 vs. CA avg 3).↓ 100% better Rank #1 / 1434 Serious citations (Type A) — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1st out of 1,434 homes we track in California for # of serious citations. Shows this facility's # of serious citations compared to the California average among 1434 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
| 22 | 4 | This facility has 450% more moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (22 vs. CA avg 4).↑ 450% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
| 0.4 | 3.3 | This facility has 88% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.4 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 88% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 62 | 16 | This facility has had 288% more total inspections than the California average (62 vs. CA avg 16). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 288% more |
|
Complaint visits
| 39 | 13 | This facility has had 200% more complaint visits than the California average (39 vs. CA avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 200% more Rank #1307 / 1388 Complaint visits — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1307th out of 1,388 homes we track in California for # of complaint visits. Shows this facility's # of complaint visits compared to the California average among 1388 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in California that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Other visits
| 21 | 7 | This facility has had 200% more other visits than the California average (21 vs. CA avg 7). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 200% more |
|
Official inspections
| 2 | 4 | This facility has had 50% fewer official inspections than the California average (2 vs. CA avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 50% fewer |
|
Complaint investigations
| 31 | 10 | This facility has had 210% more complaint investigations than the California average (31 vs. CA avg 10). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 210% more |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
California average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Nov 2024
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 18 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 18 resulted from complaint investigations.
California average: 0.4
California average: 1
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Total hours from contractors
1,438 contractor hours this quarter
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 20 | 46 | 66 | 6,964 | 92 | 100% | 8.3 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 6 | 25 | 31 | 2,670 | 92 | 100% | 8.2 |
| Registered Nurse | 4 | 9 | 13 | 1,687 | 92 | 100% | 8 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,019 | 66 | 72% | 7.8 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 3 | 0 | 3 | 981 | 77 | 84% | 8.1 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 2 | 0 | 2 | 419 | 56 | 61% | 7.5 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 419 | 60 | 65% | 7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 380 | 62 | 67% | 6.1 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 3 | 0 | 3 | 316 | 39 | 42% | 7 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 192 | 24 | 26% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 87 | 11 | 12% | 7.9 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
88% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
12% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Historical financial and operational data for Lake Park Senior Living from 2012–2022, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2022 — the home's most recent complete cost report, an older period than most facilities report.
Based on the home's most recent complete CMS SNF Cost Report — fiscal year ending in 12/2022. This is an older period than most facilities report, so compare with that in mind.
Minimum Age: 55 Years Old
Pets Allowed
Housing Options: Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: High-rise
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (88% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 27 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Oakland's city center to Lake Park Senior Living's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the state average. See the benchmark below for the typical score in this state; higher is better.
This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level D or higher — meaning actual harm occurred or residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The California average is: 61.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakland Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation | AL HOS MC NH RC SNF | Oakland | 48
Facility
48
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1,159 / 1,646 |
85.4%
Facility
85.4%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#443 / 1,492 | +16% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#99 / 289 | -57% | +2% | $7.4k
Facility
$7.4k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#182 / 294 | - | 21
Facility
21
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#38 / 291 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#217 / 291 | - | 41 | A | 57 | Andrew Chua | $10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#181 / 260 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#217 / 260 | 47.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
47.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
61.1%
Rank
#220 / 260 | 555570 | ||||
| Piedmont Gardens | AL IL MC NH SNF | Oakland | 321
Facility
321
CA AVG
104
Rank
#50 / 1,646 |
77.3%
Facility
77.3%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#734 / 1,492 | +5% | 4.54
Facility
4.54
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#73 / 289 | +22% | +8% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 294 | 94
Facility
94
CA AVG
81
Rank
#212 / 1,475 | 13
Facility
13
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#14 / 291 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#76 / 291 | - | 248 | - |
99
Facility
99
CA AVG
59
Rank
#2 / 2,058 | Jana Gesinger | $35.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$35.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#5 / 260 | $17.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$17.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#15 / 260 | 49%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
49%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
61.1%
Rank
#205 / 260 | 56096 | ||||
| St. Paul’s Towers | AL HOS IL MC NH SNF | Oakland (Adams Point) | 320
Facility
320
CA AVG
104
Rank
#51 / 1,646 |
74.7%
Facility
74.7%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#819 / 1,492 | +1% | 4.65
Facility
4.65
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#53 / 289 | -12% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 294 | 88
Facility
88
CA AVG
81
Rank
#563 / 1,475 | 20
Facility
20
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#34 / 291 | 6.7
Facility
6.7
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#261 / 291 | - | 239 | A |
96
Facility
96
CA AVG
59
Rank
#43 / 2,058 | Front Porch Communities And Services | $6.0MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$6.0MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#249 / 260 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#93 / 260 | 160%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
160%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
CA AVG
61.1%
Rank
#6 / 260 | 55156 | ||||
| Bellaken Garden | AL NH PC RC SNF | Oakland (Saint Elizabeth) | 58
Facility
58
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1,095 / 1,646 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#1 / 1,492 | +35% | 3.97
Facility
3.97
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#151 / 289 | -34% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 294 | 95
Facility
95
CA AVG
81
Rank
#123 / 1,475 | 16
Facility
16
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#21 / 291 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#217 / 291 | - | 58 | A+ |
95
Facility
95
CA AVG
59
Rank
#66 / 2,058 | Bellaken Health Group, Inc | $13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#138 / 260 | $6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#171 / 260 | 49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
61.1%
Rank
#190 / 260 | 555767 | ||||
| Lake Park Senior Living | AL NH IL RC | Oakland | 275
Facility
275
CA AVG
104
Rank
#70 / 1,646 |
47.3%
Facility
47.3%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#1,360 / 1,492 | -36% | 3.99
Facility
3.99
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#151 / 289 | +17% | -5% | $40.2k
Facility
$40.2k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#241 / 294 | 72
Facility
72
CA AVG
81
Rank
#1,068 / 1,475 | 18
Facility
18
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#28 / 291 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#175 / 291 | 1 | 130 | - |
97
Facility
97
CA AVG
59
Rank
#29 / 2,058 | Lake Merritt Senior Living LLC And Calson Care Oakland | $2.0M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $6.0M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 299.8%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 555113 |
Lake Park Senior Living is located in Oakland, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Lake Park Senior Living is legally operated by Lake Merritt Senior Living LLC and Calson Care Oakland, and administered by Kirsten Korfhage.
Lake Park Senior Living has a walk score of 97. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Lake Park Senior Living's occupancy is 47%.
Lake Park Senior Living has been operating for approximately 3 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Yes, Lake Park Senior Living allows residents to bring their pets.
Lake Park Senior Living is registered as a for-profit in CA.
Kirsten Korfhage is the administrator of Lake Park Senior Living.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance