Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
92
46 employees · 46 contractors · 27 on an average day Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Abbeville, SC
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Abbeville, SC
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is a nursing home in Abbeville, SC offering hospice care and skilled nursing. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while hospice care supports residents who need care at the end of life. The community may be a good fit for someone who needs ongoing nursing oversight or hospice support within a nursing home setting.
Established in 1968, Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has 94 beds. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families several ways to cover care. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 28 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time assigned to each resident.
Rehabilitation services are available on site, so residents can receive therapy without arranging transportation elsewhere. An on-site beauty and barber shop provides grooming services within the community, while regular religious services offer a scheduled faith-based activity. Lisa D. Reavis serves as administrator, and Self Regional Healthcare operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 28m
This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 28mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +96% above South Carolina average
1 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 6 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
6 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
54m
↑ 41% · SC 38mThis facility: 54m per resident per day, 41% above the South Carolina average of 38m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 6 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
6 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 16 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
16 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
1h 9m
↑ 12% · SC 1h 1mThis facility: 1h 9m per resident per day, 12% above the South Carolina average of 1h 1m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 16 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
16 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 50 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 30 agency contractors.
50 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
2h 25m
↑ 9% · SC 2h 13mThis facility: 2h 25m per resident per day, 9% above the South Carolina average of 2h 13m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 50 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 30 agency contractors.
50 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 96% · SC 5mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 96% below the South Carolina average of 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 53m
↑ 16% · SC 3h 21mThis facility: 3h 53m per resident per day, 16% above the South Carolina average of 3h 21m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
47m
↑ 96% · SC 24mThis facility: 47m per resident per day, 96% above the South Carolina average of 24m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
92
46 employees · 46 contractors · 27 on an average day
92 total staff / 44 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.09 : 1
↑ 18% · SC 1.77This facility: 2.09 staff per resident, 18% above the South Carolina average of 1.77 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
92 staff ÷ 44 residents
See full South Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
↑ 4% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 8.2 h, 4% above the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
20,045 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →86.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (30), Registered Nurse (4), Licensed Practical Nurse (4), Medical Director (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
94
Rank #78 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
94
Rank #78 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
42
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
186
days
About This Community
Facility TypeHL- Nursing Home
CountyAbbeville
License NumberNCF-1102
certified activity managementA credential from the National Certification Council for Activity Professionals (NCCAP) showing staff training to lead resident activities and support physical, cognitive, and social well-being.
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Self Regional Healthcare, and administered by Lisa D Reavis.
Owner NameSelf Regional Healthcare
Institutional Nursing Home
94 units
Total beds
94 units
Resident Council
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Doctor on Staff
Dentistry
Pain Management
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Housekeeping
Pets not allowed
Beauty Salon
Porch
Wi-Fi
Activities
- Weekly outside entertainment and social events
Religious AffiliationYes
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
1
↓ 73% · SC 3.7This facility: 1, 73% below the SC average of 3.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
2
Rank #1 / 116Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the South Carolina State average, with a ranking across all 116 SC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 84% · SC 12.7This facility: 2, 84% below the SC average of 12.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #15 / 116Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the South Carolina mean across 116 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 41% · SC 3.4This facility: 2, 41% below the SC average of 3.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
2 of 2 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
2
↓ 83% · SC 11.6This facility: 2, 83% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 17, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 1 of 2 citations · 2 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 17, 2025
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 2 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (50%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (50%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 2 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
SC avg $28KSouth Carolina average: $28,139. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
SC avg 2.03South Carolina average: 2.03. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
SC avg 0.1South Carolina average: 0.1. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.2
Score · lower is better
↑ 105% · SC 7.4This facility: 15.2, 105% above the SC average of 7.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
23.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 75% · SC 13.5This facility: 23.6, 75% above the SC average of 13.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 3 better, 7 worse, 3 near SC average
1 short-stay measure: 1 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
21.9%
↑ 88% · SC 11.6This facility: 21.9, 88% above the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
21.9%
↑ 88% · SC 11.6This facility: 21.9, 88% above the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
35.3%
↑ 199% · SC 11.8This facility: 35.3, 199% above the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
35.3%
↑ 199% · SC 11.8This facility: 35.3, 199% above the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.7%
↓ 16% · SC 16.2This facility: 13.7, 16% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.7%
↓ 16% · SC 16.2This facility: 13.7, 16% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
↑ 98% · SC 1.2This facility: 2.4, 98% above the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
↑ 98% · SC 1.2This facility: 2.4, 98% above the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.2%
↑ 127% · SC 3.2This facility: 7.2, 127% above the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.2%
↑ 127% · SC 3.2This facility: 7.2, 127% above the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
↑ 17% · SC 4.9This facility: 5.8, 17% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
↑ 17% · SC 4.9This facility: 5.8, 17% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
↓ 1% · SC 6.1This facility: 6.0, 1% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
↓ 1% · SC 6.1This facility: 6.0, 1% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1%
↓ 36% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.1, 36% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1%
↓ 36% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.1, 36% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8%
↑ 41% · SC 15.4This facility: 21.8, 41% above the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8%
↑ 41% · SC 15.4This facility: 21.8, 41% above the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.0%
↑ 2% · SC 91.8This facility: 94.0, 2% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.0%
↑ 2% · SC 91.8This facility: 94.0, 2% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · SC 92.5This facility: 100.0, 8% above the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · SC 92.5This facility: 100.0, 8% above the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.03
≈ 0% · SC 2.03This facility: 2.03, level with the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.03
≈ 0% · SC 2.03This facility: 2.03, level with the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.25
↑ 18% · SC 1.91This facility: 2.25, 18% above the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.25
↑ 18% · SC 1.91This facility: 2.25, 18% above the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 1 measures
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.1%
↑ 5% · SC 81.9This facility: 86.1, 5% above the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.1%
↑ 5% · SC 81.9This facility: 86.1, 5% above the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Fiscal 2024 adds up two reports filed back to back, usually after a change of operator.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−38.6% operating margin
+7.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most South Carolina homes
69.5% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #17 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue rose $0.6M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.6M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #100 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 4% of homes | Below SC median Higher net patient revenue than 4% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.4M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $12.9M | Rank in SC Rank #98 / 104Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 6% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.8M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Rank #86 / 104Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −38.6% | +7.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 1.2% | Rank in SC Rank #92 / 104Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $4.0M | +$5.0M | Trend — | SC median $0.3M | Rank in SC Rank #4 / 103Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 103 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 97% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.2M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #99 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 99th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 5% of homes | Below SC median Higher payroll than 5% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 69.5% | −8.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #17 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 84% of homes | 8.7 pts over SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.3M | $5.8M | $6.2M | $6.0M | $5.0M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.6M |
| Operating expenses | $5.3M | $5.6M | $6.2M | $6.4M | $6.1M | $5.9M | $5.9M | $6.4M |
| Net patient income | $0.0M | $0.1M | −$0.0M | −$0.4M | −$1.2M | −$1.6M | −$1.9M | −$1.8M |
| Operating margin | 0.2% | 2.1% | −0.4% | −6.1% | −23.7% | −39.1% | −45.7% | −38.6% |
| Net income | $0.0M | $0.1M | −$0.0M | $0.1M | $0.3M | $0.0M | −$1.0M | $4.0M |
| Payroll costs | $3.0M | $3.2M | $3.5M | $3.8M | $3.5M | $3.1M | $3.2M | $3.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 57.3% | 56.1% | 56.0% | 63.9% | 71.0% | 73.7% | 77.9% | 69.5% |
| Beds | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| Gross revenue | $5.9M | $6.7M | $7.3M | $7.0M | $5.8M | $5.0M | $4.6M | $4.5M |
| Salaries | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.8M | $3.1M | $2.8M | $2.6M | $2.6M | $2.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.4M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $2.3M | $2.4M | $2.7M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $3.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $177 | $187 | $204 | $203 | $209 | $213 | $231 | $259 |
| Cost per day | $176 | $183 | $205 | $216 | $259 | $296 | $336 | $360 |
| Average length of stay | 327.8 days | 358.2 days | 409.9 days | 422.2 days | 359.0 days | 324.2 days | 401.6 days | 199.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
70 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
10 · 14%
Medicaid
50 · 71%
Private pay & other
10 · 14%
Resident snapshot
44 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
1 · 2%
Medicaid
36 · 82%
Private pay & other
7 · 16%
Leaving
70 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
10 · 14%
Medicaid
50 · 71%
Private pay & other
10 · 14%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
83 Thomson Cir, Abbeville, SC 29620-5652
Calculate Travel Distance to Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Oak Manor Lancaster | NH SNF | Lancaster | 132
Facility
132
SC AVG
109
Rank
#29 / 133 |
91.3%
Facility
91.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#55 / 87 | +2% | 4.32
Facility
4.32
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#37 / 118 | -59% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 121 | - |
8
Facility
8
SC AVG
33
Rank
#39 / 46 | Nhc Healthcare/Lancaster LLC | $11.9M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $8.4M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 71%*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425017 | ||||
| Veterans Victory House | NH SNF | Walterboro | 220
Facility
220
SC AVG
109
Rank
#3 / 133 |
86.5%
Facility
86.5%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#68 / 87 | -4% | 4.62
Facility
4.62
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#31 / 118 | +50% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 4
Facility
4
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#11 / 116 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#15 / 116 | - | 190 | - | - | South Carolina Department Of Veterans Affairs | $22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#12 / 104 | $12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#7 / 104 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#63 / 104 | 425386 | ||||
| Rock Hill Post Acute Care Center | NH SNF | Rock Hill | 99
Facility
99
SC AVG
109
Rank
#74 / 133 |
86.3%
Facility
86.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#69 / 87 | -4% | 3.77
Facility
3.77
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#69 / 118 | -21% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 85 | - | - | Rock Hill Healthcare LLC | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#54 / 104 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#58 / 104 | 58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#43 / 104 | 425159 | ||||
| The Palms at Florence | NH RC SNF | Florence | 163
Facility
163
SC AVG
109
Rank
#16 / 133 |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#23 / 87 | +5% | 4.16
Facility
4.16
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#43 / 118 | -34% | +1% | $32.9k
Facility
$32.9k
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#61 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#44 / 116 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#59 / 116 | 2 | 154 | - | - | Commander Operator LLC | $19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#15 / 104 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#26 / 104 | 46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#97 / 104 | 425119 | ||||
| Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS SNF | Abbeville | 94
Facility
94
SC AVG
109
Rank
#78 / 133 | - | - | 4.46
Facility
4.46
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#34 / 118 | -29% | +8% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 2
Facility
2
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#1 / 116 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#15 / 116 | - | 42 | - | - | Self Regional Healthcare | $4.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#100 / 104 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#99 / 104 | 69.5%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
69.5%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#17 / 104 | 425057 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Self Regional Healthcare, and administered by Lisa D Reavis.
02 What is the license number of Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
According to SC state health department records, Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's license number is NCF-1102.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 50.5%.
04 Are pets allowed at Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
No, Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
05 Is Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center a government-operated facility?
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is a government-operated nursing facility in SC.
06 Who is the administrator of Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
Lisa D Reavis is the administrator of Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center.
07 What is the overall rating for Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
Lakelands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
