Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
348
127 employees · 221 contractors · 58 on an average day Mary Wade Home
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Residential Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · New Haven, CT
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Mary Wade Home
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Residential Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · New Haven, CT
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Mary Wade Home accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Mary Wade Home offers nursing home, skilled nursing, assisted living, adult day care, hospice care, residential care, and respite care in New Haven, CT. Nursing home and skilled nursing provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while assisted living helps with daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medication while a resident maintains a private living space. Adult day care provides daytime care for someone who lives elsewhere, hospice care supports a resident at the end of life, and respite care provides a short stay when a usual caregiver needs time away. Residential care provides ongoing living arrangements with support available in the setting.
The combination of assisted living, nursing home, and skilled nursing can suit a resident whose needs may grow over time without requiring a move to another community. Mary Wade Home also provides rehabilitation services, including short term rehab for someone who needs a temporary period of rehabilitation. The home has 45 beds, placing it in the smaller-community range where staff and residents can get to know each other. Total nurse staffing is 5 hours and 26 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident.
A private room starts at $183 per day, and payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. Mary Wade Home is in the Fair Haven neighborhood, and its Walk Score is 84, meaning the area is very walkable and most errands can be done on foot. A resident who no longer drives can still reach nearby errands independently, while community transportation provides an option when a ride is needed. Mary Wade Home may be a good fit for someone whose care needs could change over time and who may benefit from several care settings in one community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 26m
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 26mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +66% above Connecticut average
2 of 6 metrics below Connecticut average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 33 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 22 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
46m
↑ 9% · CT 42mThis facility: 46m per resident per day, 9% above the Connecticut average of 42m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 33 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 22 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 87 total: 40 of the facility's own employees and 47 agency contractors.
87 staff · 7.4-hour shifts
1h 23m
↑ 66% · CT 50mThis facility: 1h 23m per resident per day, 66% above the Connecticut average of 50m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 87 total: 40 of the facility's own employees and 47 agency contractors.
87 staff · 7.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 193 total: 60 of the facility's own employees and 133 agency contractors.
193 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
3h 18m
↑ 44% · CT 2h 17mThis facility: 3h 18m per resident per day, 44% above the Connecticut average of 2h 17m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 193 total: 60 of the facility's own employees and 133 agency contractors.
193 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
4m
↓ 29% · CT 5mThis facility: 4m per resident per day, 29% below the Connecticut average of 5m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 42m
↑ 37% · CT 3h 25mThis facility: 4h 42m per resident per day, 37% above the Connecticut average of 3h 25m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
25m
↓ 11% · CT 28mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 11% below the Connecticut average of 28m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
348
127 employees · 221 contractors · 58 on an average day
348 total staff / 88 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.95 : 1
↑ 115% · CT 1.84This facility: 3.95 staff per resident, 115% above the Connecticut average of 1.84 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
348 staff ÷ 88 residents
See full Connecticut ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 3% · CT 7.6 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 3% below the Connecticut average of 7.6 h (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
39,357 staff hours this quarter
See full Connecticut ranking →77% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Connecticut average: 89.9% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (133), Licensed Practical Nurse (47), Registered Nurse (22), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Other Physician (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (2), Nurse Practitioner (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Physician Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
45
Rank #61 / 68Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 68 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Connecticut facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
45
Rank #61 / 68Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 68 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Connecticut facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #6 / 56Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Connecticut facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #6 / 56Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Connecticut facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
18
years
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #4 / 76Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 76 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Connecticut facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #4 / 76Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 76 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Connecticut facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
84
/ 100
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
152
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$183/Day
IssuanceJanuary 7, 2008
License Number1665RC
CMS Certification Number075325
Safe Transitions ProgramA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Resident Council
Admin
2 FTE
Licensed Practical Nurse
1 FTE
Dietary
1 FTE
Other Staff
20 FTE
Short-Term Rehab
Short Term Rehabilitation
Outpatient Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech TherapyListed as: Speech/language therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Pain Management
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Adult Day Center
Medical Appointment Coordination
Family Caregiver Support
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
TransportationListed as: Handicapped accessible transportation · Curb-to-curb medical transportation · Handicapped accessible vans
Pets not allowed
Garden
Beauty Salon
Cable, Wi-Fi, and Telephone
Activities
Exercise Classes
Tai Chi
Arts and Crafts
Discussion Groups
Intergenerational Programs
Live Music
Field Trips
Games and Puzzles
Bingo
Shopping Trips
Restaurant Outings
Musical Performances
Therapeutic Recreation
- Alzheimer's and dementia caregivers support group
Touring Hours8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday – Friday; 9:00 a.m – 2:00 p.m. Saturday – Sunday
Room Types
Private Room
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Connecticut, the Department of Public Health, Facility Licensing and Investigations Section conducts mandatory inspections and unannounced surveys to monitor the quality of care in long-term facilities.
Since 2020 · 6 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 deficiencies 1 inspection
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 deficiencies 1 inspection
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Connecticut state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2020 vs. Connecticut state average
Overall vs. CT average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 Better
Metrics better than Connecticut average:
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | CT Average | vs. CT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 0 | 18.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Connecticut nursing home (0 vs. CT avg 18).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | CT Average | vs. CT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 1 | 13.0 | This facility has had 92% fewer total inspections than the Connecticut average (1 vs. CT avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 92% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
12
↑ 58% · CT 7.6This facility: 12, 58% above the Connecticut average of 7.6 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
51
Rank #55 / 63Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Connecticut State average, with a ranking across all 63 CT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 39% · CT 36.6This facility: 51, 39% above the Connecticut average of 36.6 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.25
Rank #28 / 63Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Connecticut mean across 63 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 16% · CT 5.04This facility: 4.25, 16% below the Connecticut average of 5.04 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
51 of 51 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · CT 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Connecticut average of 0.4 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
≈ 0% · CT 1This facility: 1, level with the Connecticut average of 1 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
47
↑ 44% · CT 32.7This facility: 47, 44% above the Connecticut average of 32.7 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
3
↑ 20% · CT 2.5This facility: 3, 20% above the Connecticut average of 2.5 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 10, 2026 · 1 citation (Care Planning, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 13 of 51 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 10, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 13, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 27, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 06, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 11, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 25, 2025
15 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 09, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 25, 2024
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 15, 2024
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 01, 2023
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 04, 2023
19 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 06, 2020
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 51 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 51 citations
Quality of Life & Care
13 deficiencies (25%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
11 deficiencies (22%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
8 deficiencies (16%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (10%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (6%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (6%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
36 of 51 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 15 of 51 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 25, 2025 · $12,701 civil money penalty
Feb 25, 2025 · $12,701 civil money penalty
Nov 1, 2023 · $7,443 civil money penalty
Total fines
$20,144
↓ 52% · CT $42KThis facility: $20,144, 52% below the Connecticut average of $41,646. Average among the 108 Connecticut facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #48 / 64Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 64 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Connecticut average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 64 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 24% · CT 1.61This facility: 2, 24% above the Connecticut average of 1.61. Average among the 108 Connecticut facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CT avg 0.12Connecticut average: 0.12. Average among the 108 Connecticut facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Feb 25, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$12,701
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$12,701
Nov 1, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$7,443
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$7,443Fine amount comparison
This facility
$20,144
Connecticut average
$41,646
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Connecticut and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Connecticut average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 10% · CT 3.4This facility: 3.0, 10% below the CT average of 3.4 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 47% · CT 3.4This facility: 5.0, 47% above the CT average of 3.4 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.2
Score · lower is better
↑ 7% · CT 9.6This facility: 10.2, 7% above the CT average of 9.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 5% · CT 19.7This facility: 20.7, 5% above the CT average of 19.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 5 better, 6 worse, 2 near CT average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.6%
↓ 13% · CT 18.0This facility: 15.6, 13% below the CT average of 18.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.6%
↓ 13% · CT 18.0This facility: 15.6, 13% below the CT average of 18.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.1%
↑ 11% · CT 16.4This facility: 18.1, 11% above the CT average of 16.4 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.1%
↑ 11% · CT 16.4This facility: 18.1, 11% above the CT average of 16.4 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.3%
↑ 15% · CT 24.7This facility: 28.3, 15% above the CT average of 24.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.3%
↑ 15% · CT 24.7This facility: 28.3, 15% above the CT average of 24.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
↑ 12% · CT 1.5This facility: 1.6, 12% above the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
↑ 12% · CT 1.5This facility: 1.6, 12% above the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 1% · CT 3.5This facility: 3.5, 1% above the CT average of 3.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 1% · CT 3.5This facility: 3.5, 1% above the CT average of 3.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
↑ 45% · CT 4.0This facility: 5.8, 45% above the CT average of 4.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
↑ 45% · CT 4.0This facility: 5.8, 45% above the CT average of 4.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2%
↑ 27% · CT 6.5This facility: 8.2, 27% above the CT average of 6.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2%
↑ 27% · CT 6.5This facility: 8.2, 27% above the CT average of 6.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4%
↓ 98% · CT 22.3This facility: 0.4, 98% below the CT average of 22.3 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4%
↓ 98% · CT 22.3This facility: 0.4, 98% below the CT average of 22.3 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.9%
↑ 23% · CT 17.8This facility: 21.9, 23% above the CT average of 17.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.9%
↑ 23% · CT 17.8This facility: 21.9, 23% above the CT average of 17.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.5%
↑ 8% · CT 88.6This facility: 95.5, 8% above the CT average of 88.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.5%
↑ 8% · CT 88.6This facility: 95.5, 8% above the CT average of 88.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.5%
↑ 3% · CT 93.5This facility: 96.5, 3% above the CT average of 93.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.5%
↑ 3% · CT 93.5This facility: 96.5, 3% above the CT average of 93.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.65
↓ 21% · CT 2.10This facility: 1.65, 21% below the CT average of 2.10 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.65
↓ 21% · CT 2.10This facility: 1.65, 21% below the CT average of 2.10 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.04
↓ 32% · CT 1.53This facility: 1.04, 32% below the CT average of 1.53 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.04
↓ 32% · CT 1.53This facility: 1.04, 32% below the CT average of 1.53 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
51.8%
↓ 4% · US 53.7This facility: 51.8, 4% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
51.8%
↓ 4% · US 53.7This facility: 51.8, 4% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.8%
↑ 26% · US 50.6This facility: 63.8, 26% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.8%
↑ 26% · US 50.6This facility: 63.8, 26% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 58% · CT 1.5This facility: 0.6, 58% below the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 58% · CT 1.5This facility: 0.6, 58% below the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
58.0%
↓ 19% · CT 71.8This facility: 58.0, 19% below the CT average of 71.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
58.0%
↓ 19% · CT 71.8This facility: 58.0, 19% below the CT average of 71.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.8%
↓ 24% · CT 69.7This facility: 52.8, 24% below the CT average of 69.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.8%
↓ 24% · CT 69.7This facility: 52.8, 24% below the CT average of 69.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
29.1%
↑ 16% · CT 25.0This facility: 29.1, 16% above the CT average of 25.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
29.1%
↑ 16% · CT 25.0This facility: 29.1, 16% above the CT average of 25.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.2%
↓ 44% · CT 11.1This facility: 6.2, 44% below the CT average of 11.1 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.2%
↓ 44% · CT 11.1This facility: 6.2, 44% below the CT average of 11.1 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Mary Wade Home’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 59 Connecticut nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−22.2% operating margin
+3.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($2.7M) trims the net loss to −$0.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Connecticut homes
74.1% payroll share of revenue
CT average 66.2%Rank #7 / 59Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.9M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Connecticut homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CT median | Compared with CT homesRank in CT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $15.1M | +$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | CT median $17.1M | Rank in CT Rank #37 / 59Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 38% of homes | Below CT median Higher net patient revenue than 38% of CT homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $18.5M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$3.4M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −22.2% | +3.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $2.7M | — | Trend — | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.7M | −$0.3M | Trend — | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Connecticut homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CT median | Compared with CT homesRank in CT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $11.2M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | CT median $10.3M | Rank in CT Rank #21 / 59Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Above CT median Higher payroll than 66% of CT homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 74.1% | −3.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | CT median 59.3% | Rank in CT Rank #7 / 59Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | 7.9 pts over CT average The CT average is 66.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · CT benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Connecticut payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CT payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $13.1M | $12.5M | $13.4M | $12.5M | $12.1M | $13.8M | $14.3M | $15.1M |
| Operating expenses | $15.0M | $15.0M | $15.6M | $15.8M | $16.2M | $17.9M | $17.9M | $18.5M |
| Net patient income | −$1.9M | −$2.5M | −$2.1M | −$3.3M | −$4.1M | −$4.1M | −$3.6M | −$3.4M |
| Operating margin | −14.4% | −19.8% | −15.9% | −26.3% | −34.0% | −29.7% | −25.3% | −22.2% |
| Net income | −$0.6M | −$1.1M | −$0.8M | −$1.4M | −$0.4M | −$0.9M | −$0.4M | −$0.7M |
| Payroll costs | $8.4M | $8.4M | $8.7M | $9.6M | $9.8M | $10.8M | $11.0M | $11.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 64.4% | 67.4% | 64.4% | 76.3% | 81.4% | 78.8% | 77.1% | 74.1% |
| Beds | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 |
| Gross revenue | $18.2M | $18.1M | $19.6M | $18.3M | $18.4M | $20.1M | $20.7M | $21.9M |
| Salaries | $7.3M | $7.3M | $7.5M | $8.2M | $8.4M | $9.3M | $9.4M | $9.5M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.5M | $1.6M | $1.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $1.0M | $1.2M |
| Other operating costs | $6.6M | $6.6M | $6.9M | $6.3M | $6.4M | $7.0M | $6.9M | $7.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $272 | $265 | $278 | $290 | $283 | $306 | $317 | $332 |
| Cost per day | $311 | $317 | $322 | $367 | $379 | $397 | $397 | $406 |
| Average length of stay | 146.1 days | 119.2 days | 128.1 days | 121.2 days | 129.7 days | 127.1 days | 138.5 days | 151.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
212 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
62 · 29%
Medicaid
65 · 31%
Private pay & other
85 · 40%
Resident snapshot
88 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 8%
Medicaid
65 · 74%
Private pay & other
16 · 18%
Leaving
209 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
68 · 33%
Medicaid
60 · 29%
Private pay & other
81 · 39%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
David V. Hunter is the President and CEO of Mary Wade and its subsidiaries. Since 1981, he has led the organization through multiple expansions, including Home & Community Based Services such as Outpatient Rehabilitation, Adult Day Health Center, Primary Care Office, and Transportation Services. He is a certified Connecticut Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and Executive Director.
Places of interest near Mary Wade Home
1.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from New Haven's city center to Mary Wade Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Mary Wade Home
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around New Haven
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CT Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Connecticut average is: 66.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Willows | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Woodbridge | 90
Facility
90
CT AVG
128
Rank
#47 / 68 |
94.9%
Facility
94.9%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#24 / 64 | +10% | 3.27
Facility
3.27
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#38 / 63 | -76% | -18% | $0
Facility
$0
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#1 / 64 | 25
Facility
25
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#23 / 63 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#41 / 63 | - | 85 | - |
48
Facility
48
CT AVG
38
Rank
#24 / 76 | Kc Derby Ct Al Opco Jv LLC | $13.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#41 / 59 | $2.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#56 / 59 | 15.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
15.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#56 / 59 | 075331 | ||||
| Leeway | NH AL PC RESC SNF | New Haven (East Rock) | 30
Facility
30
CT AVG
128
Rank
#65 / 68 |
93.3%
Facility
93.3%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#21 / 64 | +8% | 5.06
Facility
5.06
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#62 / 63 | +104% | +26% | $0
Facility
$0
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#1 / 64 | 23
Facility
23
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#19 / 63 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#49 / 63 | - | 28 | - |
23
Facility
23
CT AVG
38
Rank
#52 / 76 | Jay Katz | $7.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#54 / 59 | $4.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#52 / 59 | 57.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
57.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#35 / 59 | 075408 | ||||
| Whispering Pines Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | East Haven (Momauguin) | 90
Facility
90
CT AVG
128
Rank
#47 / 68 |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#54 / 64 | +6% | 3.71
Facility
3.71
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#34 / 63 | -25% | -7% | $0
Facility
$0
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#1 / 64 | 34
Facility
34
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#37 / 63 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#9 / 63 | 1 | 82 | - |
21
Facility
21
CT AVG
38
Rank
#56 / 76 | Michael Bartolotta | $11.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#47 / 59 | $7.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#44 / 59 | 65.5%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
65.5%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#17 / 59 | 075294 | ||||
| Advanced Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH SNF | New Haven (The Hill) | 226
Facility
226
CT AVG
128
Rank
#6 / 68 |
89.4%
Facility
89.4%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#37 / 64 | +4% | 3.97
Facility
3.97
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#25 / 63 | +38% | -1% | $72.5k
Facility
$72.5k
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#60 / 64 | 72
Facility
72
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#61 / 63 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#34 / 63 | 3 | 202 | A+ |
85
Facility
85
CT AVG
38
Rank
#3 / 76 | Esther Gewirtz | $30.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$30.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#8 / 59 | $15.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#11 / 59 | 49.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
49.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#43 / 59 | 075348 | ||||
| Mary Wade Home | NH ADC AL HOS RESC RC SNF | New Haven (Fair Haven) | 45
Facility
45
CT AVG
128
Rank
#61 / 68 | - | - | 5.44
Facility
5.44
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#7 / 63 | -12% | +36% | $20.1k
Facility
$20.1k
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#48 / 64 | 51
Facility
51
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#55 / 63 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#28 / 63 | 1 | 81 | A+ |
84
Facility
84
CT AVG
38
Rank
#4 / 76 | Barbara Adams | $15.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$15.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#37 / 59 | $11.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#21 / 59 | 74.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
74.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#7 / 59 | 075325 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other CT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Connecticut
Mary Wade Home is located in New Haven, Connecticut.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Connecticut.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Mary Wade Home
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Mary Wade Home in?
Mary Wade Home is in the Fair Haven neighborhood of New Haven.
02 Is Mary Wade Home in a walkable area?
Mary Wade Home has a walk score of 84. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
03 What is the license number of Mary Wade Home?
According to CT state health department records, Mary Wade Home's license number is 1665RC.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Mary Wade Home?
Mary Wade Home's occupancy is 89.7%.
05 How long has Mary Wade Home been in business?
Mary Wade Home has been operating for approximately 18 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Mary Wade Home?
No, Mary Wade Home has a no-pet policy.
07 Does Mary Wade Home operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Mary Wade Home is registered as a non-profit in CT.
Updated on
