Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
113
81 employees · 32 contractors · 42 on an average day Meadow Ridge
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · West Redding, CT
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadow Ridge
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · West Redding, CT
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadow Ridge accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Meadow Ridge
Meadow Ridge is a continuing care retirement community in West Redding, CT, with independent living, assisted living, memory care, nursing home and skilled nursing care. Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living helps with tasks such as bathing, dressing and medication. Memory care offers a secured setting with supervision, and skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Several care levels in one community can suit a resident whose needs may grow over time without requiring a move elsewhere. Meadow Ridge may be a good fit for someone who wants access to both independent living and higher levels of care in the same setting. At 59 beds, it is a smaller community where residents and staff can become familiar with one another.
Housing includes studios, one-bedroom units and two-bedroom units, giving residents a choice between a single living space and a larger layout. Starting rates are $625 per day for a private room and $263 per day for a semi-private room, with the room type determining the daily starting amount. Medicare and private pay are accepted: Medicare is relevant to short-term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay means the family pays directly. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 50 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily nursing time allocated per resident. An indoor pool provides an on-site place for swimming, and rehabilitation services support short-term rehab without requiring a separate community. Respite care provides a short stay when a usual caregiver needs to travel or recover. Pets are allowed, and educational programs, family workshops and events are available for residents and their families.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 50m
This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 50mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +137% above Connecticut average
0 of 6 metrics below Connecticut average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 16 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
16 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
1h 14m
↑ 76% · CT 42mThis facility: 1h 14m per resident per day, 76% above the Connecticut average of 42m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 16 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
16 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 20 total: 16 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
20 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
56m
↑ 11% · CT 50mThis facility: 56m per resident per day, 11% above the Connecticut average of 50m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 20 total: 16 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
20 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 51 total: 39 of the facility's own employees and 12 agency contractors.
51 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
2h 41m
↑ 17% · CT 2h 17mThis facility: 2h 41m per resident per day, 17% above the Connecticut average of 2h 17m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 51 total: 39 of the facility's own employees and 12 agency contractors.
51 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
12m
↑ 137% · CT 5mThis facility: 12m per resident per day, 137% above the Connecticut average of 5m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 24m
↑ 29% · CT 3h 25mThis facility: 4h 24m per resident per day, 29% above the Connecticut average of 3h 25m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
57m
↑ 105% · CT 28mThis facility: 57m per resident per day, 105% above the Connecticut average of 28m (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
113
81 employees · 32 contractors · 42 on an average day
113 total staff / 45 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.51 : 1
↑ 36% · CT 1.84This facility: 2.51 staff per resident, 36% above the Connecticut average of 1.84 (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
113 staff ÷ 45 residents
See full Connecticut ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.5 h
↓ 1% · CT 7.6 hThis facility: 7.5 h, 1% below the Connecticut average of 7.6 h (among Connecticut facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
29,052 staff hours this quarter
See full Connecticut ranking →84.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Connecticut average: 89.9% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (12), Respiratory Therapy Technician (5), Licensed Practical Nurse (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Registered Nurse (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
59
Rank #57 / 68Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Connecticut facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
59
Rank #57 / 68Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Connecticut facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #3 / 56Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 56 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Connecticut facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #3 / 56Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 56 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Connecticut facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
29
years
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #55 / 64Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 64 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Connecticut average, with its Statewide rank out of 64. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #55 / 64Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 64 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Connecticut average, with its Statewide rank out of 64. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
84.1%
This home usually has availability
Similar to the Connecticut average: 86.2%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
50
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
36
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$5,375/Month
Facility TypeChronic & Convalescent Nursing Home
IssuanceJanuary 10, 2008
License Number2266
CMS Certification Number075429
U.S. News & World Report Best Senior LivingU.S. News rates communities from independent surveys of residents and their families (the 2025 edition analyzed ~450,000 responses across 3,800+ communities) covering safety, caregiving, activities, dining, management and value. Only communities meeting its data thresholds earn a Best designation for that year.
Resident Council
French
Spanish
Admin
3 FTE
Registered Nurse
7 FTE
Licensed Practical Nurse
7 FTE
Nursing Assistant
25 FTE
Recreation
3 FTE
Social Services
2 FTE
Food Service Supervisor
1 FTE
Physical Therapy
5 FTE
Occupational Therapy
4 FTE
Speech Therapy
1 FTE
Dietary
7 FTE
Other Staff
3 FTE
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Massage Services
Concierge
HousekeepingListed as: Weekly housekeeping and flat linen service
Laundry & Linen
MaintenanceListed as: Community and apartment home maintenance · Lawn care and maintenance
TransportationListed as: Regularly scheduled local transportation
Emergency Call SystemListed as: 24-hour emergency call and response system
Utilities IncludedListed as: Utilities (electricity, heating, water, sewer, internet, cable TV)
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Clinical Research SiteConducts clinical research trials to develop and test new treatments.
Swimming Pool
Spa
Dog Park
Beauty Salon
General Store
Putting Green
Fitness Center
Walking Paths
Library
Auditorium
Three-Story AtriumA large open lobby, often with a skylight.
Golf Simulator (Ridge Range)
Sauna and Sun Deck
Croquet Courts
Resident Gardens (Laurel Gardens)
Closed Circuit Tv with Streaming Content
Private Dining Room
Activities
Water Aerobics
Pickleball
Tennis
Croquet
Gardening
Bird Watching
Walking, Hiking, Biking
Concerts and Performances
Group Trips and Outings
Social Events and Happy Hours
Movie Screenings and Discussions
Meadow Ridge University Lecture Series
Group Discussions and Lectures
Art Classes
Language Classes
Clubs and Committees
Exercise Classes
Golf Simulator Use
Partnership Programs with Mark Twain Library
Personal Training
Bocce Ball
Bible Study
Religious AffiliationNo Affiliation
Religious ServicesCatholic, Jewish, Protestant
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Meadow Ridge.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Meadow Ridge.- Private dining room for family events.
- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
- Outdoor dining option.
Building TypeMid-rise
Studio
561 sq ft
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Avon (850 sq ft) · Essex (1,050 sq ft) · Fairfield (1,250 sq ft) · Assisted Living One Bedroom with Patio Deck (680 sq ft) · Assisted Living One Bedroom (690 sq ft)
Floor plans: Avon, Essex, Fairfield, Patio Deck
680–1,250 sq ft
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Greenwich (1,350 sq ft) · Saugatuck (1,550 sq ft) · Windsor (2,600 sq ft) · Assisted Living Two Bedroom (940 sq ft) · Assisted Living Deluxe Two-Bedroom (1,350 sq ft) · Assisted Living Deluxe Two-Bedroom with Den (1,550 sq ft)
Floor plans: Greenwich, Saugatuck, Windsor, Deluxe
940–2,600 sq ft
Cottage / Villa
In-Room Features
In-Unit Fireplace
Walk-In Closets In Residences
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Connecticut, the Department of Public Health, Facility Licensing and Investigations Section conducts mandatory inspections and unannounced surveys to monitor the quality of care in long-term facilities.
Since 2018 · 8 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 13 deficiencies 10 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 13 deficiencies 10 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Connecticut state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2018 vs. Connecticut state average
Overall vs. CT average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Connecticut average:
• Total deficiencies (28% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (19% below)
• Total deficiencies (28% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (19% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | CT Average | vs. CT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 13 | 18.0 | This facility has 28% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Connecticut nursing home (13 vs. CT avg 18).↓ 28% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.3 | 1.6 | This facility has 19% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Connecticut nursing home (1.3 vs. CT avg 1.6).↓ 19% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | CT Average | vs. CT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 10 | 13.0 | This facility has had 23% fewer total inspections than the Connecticut average (10 vs. CT avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 23% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
7
↓ 8% · CT 7.6This facility: 7, 8% below the CT average of 7.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
18
Rank #9 / 63Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Connecticut State average, with a ranking across all 63 CT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 51% · CT 36.6This facility: 18, 51% below the CT average of 36.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.57
Rank #4 / 63Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Connecticut mean across 63 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 49% · CT 5.04This facility: 2.57, 49% below the CT average of 5.04 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
18 of 18 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · CT 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the CT average of 0.4 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · CT 1This facility: 0, 100% below the CT average of 1 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
17
↓ 48% · CT 32.7This facility: 17, 48% below the CT average of 32.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↓ 60% · CT 2.5This facility: 1, 60% below the CT average of 2.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 07, 2026 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 5 of 18 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 07, 2026
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 01, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 24, 2025
5 citations
Pharmacy minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 26, 2024
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 16, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 27, 2022
6 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 13, 2020
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 18 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (28%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (22%)
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (22%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (11%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
12 of 18 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 6 of 18 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
CT avg $42KConnecticut average: $41,646. Average among the 108 Connecticut facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
CT avg 1.61Connecticut average: 1.61. Average among the 108 Connecticut facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CT avg 0.12Connecticut average: 0.12. Average among the 108 Connecticut facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Connecticut average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 49% · CT 3.4This facility: 5.0, 49% above the CT average of 3.4 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 12% · CT 3.4This facility: 3.0, 12% below the CT average of 3.4 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 41% · CT 9.6This facility: 5.7, 41% below the CT average of 9.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 29% · CT 19.7This facility: 14.1, 29% below the CT average of 19.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 8 better, 2 worse
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.1%
↓ 49% · CT 18.0This facility: 9.1, 49% below the CT average of 18.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.1%
↓ 49% · CT 18.0This facility: 9.1, 49% below the CT average of 18.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.1%
↓ 23% · CT 24.7This facility: 19.1, 23% below the CT average of 24.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.1%
↓ 23% · CT 24.7This facility: 19.1, 23% below the CT average of 24.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 6% · CT 1.5This facility: 1.4, 6% below the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 6% · CT 1.5This facility: 1.4, 6% below the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 13% · CT 3.5This facility: 4.0, 13% above the CT average of 3.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 13% · CT 3.5This facility: 4.0, 13% above the CT average of 3.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.6%
↓ 61% · CT 4.0This facility: 1.6, 61% below the CT average of 4.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.6%
↓ 61% · CT 4.0This facility: 1.6, 61% below the CT average of 4.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.1%
↑ 26% · CT 6.5This facility: 8.1, 26% above the CT average of 6.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.1%
↑ 26% · CT 6.5This facility: 8.1, 26% above the CT average of 6.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
↓ 62% · CT 22.3This facility: 8.6, 62% below the CT average of 22.3 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
↓ 62% · CT 22.3This facility: 8.6, 62% below the CT average of 22.3 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.0%
↓ 16% · CT 17.8This facility: 15.0, 16% below the CT average of 17.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.0%
↓ 16% · CT 17.8This facility: 15.0, 16% below the CT average of 17.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · CT 88.6This facility: 100.0, 13% above the CT average of 88.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · CT 88.6This facility: 100.0, 13% above the CT average of 88.6 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · CT 93.5This facility: 100.0, 7% above the CT average of 93.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · CT 93.5This facility: 100.0, 7% above the CT average of 93.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
55.8%
↑ 4% · US 53.7This facility: 55.8, 4% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
55.8%
↑ 4% · US 53.7This facility: 55.8, 4% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
66.0%
↑ 31% · US 50.6This facility: 66.0, 31% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
66.0%
↑ 31% · US 50.6This facility: 66.0, 31% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 14% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 14% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 14% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 14% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 39% · CT 1.5This facility: 0.9, 39% below the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 39% · CT 1.5This facility: 0.9, 39% below the CT average of 1.5 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 38% · CT 71.8This facility: 99.0, 38% above the CT average of 71.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 38% · CT 71.8This facility: 99.0, 38% above the CT average of 71.8 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↑ 38% · CT 69.7This facility: 96.4, 38% above the CT average of 69.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↑ 38% · CT 69.7This facility: 96.4, 38% above the CT average of 69.7 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
34.0%
↑ 36% · CT 25.0This facility: 34.0, 36% above the CT average of 25.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
34.0%
↑ 36% · CT 25.0This facility: 34.0, 36% above the CT average of 25.0 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.0%
↑ 53% · CT 11.1This facility: 17.0, 53% above the CT average of 11.1 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.0%
↑ 53% · CT 11.1This facility: 17.0, 53% above the CT average of 11.1 (among CT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Meadow Ridge’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 59 Connecticut nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
0.5% operating margin
+6.6 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 1 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.3M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Connecticut homes
38.6% payroll share of revenue
CT average 66.2%Rank #51 / 59Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.7M while revenue rose $7.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Connecticut homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CT median | Compared with CT homesRank in CT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $49.4M | +$7.2M | Trend 20172024 | CT median $17.1M | Rank in CT Rank #2 / 59Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Top 2% in CT Higher net patient revenue than 98% of CT homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $49.1M | +$4.4M | Trend 20172024 | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.2M | +$2.8M | Trend 20172024 | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 0.5% | +6.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $1.0M | — | Trend — | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.3M | +$3.4M | Trend — | CT median — | Rank in CT Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Connecticut homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CT median | Compared with CT homesRank in CT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $19.1M | +$2.7M | Trend 20172024 | CT median $10.3M | Rank in CT Rank #6 / 59Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | Top 9% in CT by size Higher payroll than 91% of CT homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 38.6% | −0.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | CT median 59.3% | Rank in CT Rank #51 / 59Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 59 nursing homes we track in Connecticut for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Connecticut average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Connecticut that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | 27.6 pts under CT average The CT average is 66.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · CT benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Connecticut payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CT payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.8M | $6.8M | $8.5M | $6.5M | $8.4M | $7.6M | $42.1M | $49.4M |
| Operating expenses | $31.0M | $34.6M | $35.6M | $34.2M | $38.4M | $30.6M | $44.7M | $49.1M |
| Net patient income | −$26.2M | −$27.8M | −$27.1M | −$27.7M | −$30.0M | −$22.9M | −$2.6M | $0.2M |
| Operating margin | −542.7% | −410.9% | −319.0% | −426.1% | −356.4% | −300.7% | −6.1% | 0.5% |
| Net income | −$2.8M | −$4.5M | −$4.6M | −$1.6M | −$4.5M | $4.9M | −$2.1M | $1.3M |
| Payroll costs | $11.5M | $12.4M | $12.8M | $12.3M | $13.0M | $14.2M | $16.4M | $19.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 238.6% | 183.6% | 151.2% | 189.3% | 154.0% | 185.5% | 38.8% | 38.6% |
| Beds | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 |
| Gross revenue | $11.0M | $14.5M | $14.0M | $12.1M | $11.1M | $9.8M | $44.2M | $51.4M |
| Salaries | $9.8M | $10.6M | $10.8M | $10.4M | $11.2M | $12.3M | $14.0M | $16.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.7M | $1.8M | $2.0M | $1.9M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $2.4M | $2.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.6M | $1.4M | $0.0M | — | — | — | $1.7M | $1.6M |
| Other operating costs | $19.5M | $22.2M | $22.8M | $21.9M | $25.5M | $16.4M | $28.3M | $30.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $280 | $378 | $458 | $399 | $501 | $520 | $2,829 | $2,966 |
| Cost per day | $1,800 | $1,931 | $1,918 | $2,097 | $2,288 | $2,085 | $3,002 | $2,952 |
| Average length of stay | 63.6 days | 49.0 days | 49.0 days | 52.2 days | 49.9 days | 47.0 days | 35.9 days | 36.3 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
488 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
275 · 56%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
213 · 44%
Resident snapshot
45 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
18 · 40%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
27 · 60%
Leaving
459 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
257 · 56%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
202 · 44%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Meadow Ridge
4.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from West Redding's city center to Meadow Ridge's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Meadow Ridge
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CT Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Connecticut average is: 66.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency House Of Wallingford I | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Wallingford (Wallingford Center) | 130
Facility
130
CT AVG
128
Rank
#30 / 68 |
95.2%
Facility
95.2%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#17 / 64 | +10% | 3.49
Facility
3.49
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#48 / 63 | -1% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#1 / 64 | 16
Facility
16
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#5 / 63 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#20 / 63 | - | 124 | - |
39
Facility
39
CT AVG
38
Rank
#30 / 76 | Barry Bokow 2012 Family Trust | $20.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$20.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#21 / 59 | $11.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#19 / 59 | 55%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
55%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#41 / 59 | 075261 | ||||
| Bradley Home & Pavilion | NH AL RESC RC SNF | Meriden | 30
Facility
30
CT AVG
128
Rank
#65 / 68 |
94.7%
Facility
94.7%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#4 / 64 | +10% | 4.57
Facility
4.57
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#9 / 63 | +73% | +14% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#39 / 64 | 18
Facility
18
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#9 / 63 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#12 / 63 | 1 | 28 | - |
56
Facility
56
CT AVG
38
Rank
#20 / 76 | The Bradley Home | $6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#57 / 59 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#50 / 59 | 73.5%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
73.5%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#8 / 59 | 075439 | ||||
| The Suffield House | NH AL | Suffield | 128
Facility
128
CT AVG
128
Rank
#31 / 68 |
96.6%
Facility
96.6%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#6 / 64 | +12% | 3.64
Facility
3.64
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#38 / 63 | -87% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#1 / 64 | 18
Facility
18
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#9 / 63 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#3 / 63 | 1 | 124 | - |
2
Facility
2
CT AVG
38
Rank
#76 / 76 | Suffield Snf Operations Holdings LLC | $18.8M*Fiscal year ending 12/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $11.8M*Fiscal year ending 12/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 62.7%*Fiscal year ending 12/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 075347 | ||||
| Meadow Ridge | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | West Redding | 59
Facility
59
CT AVG
128
Rank
#57 / 68 |
84.1%
Facility
84.1%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#55 / 64 | -2% | 4.84
Facility
4.84
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#13 / 63 | +32% | +21% | $0
Facility
$0
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#1 / 64 | 18
Facility
18
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#9 / 63 | 2.6
Facility
2.6
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#4 / 63 | - | 50 | A | - | Georgetown Meadows LLC | $49.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$49.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#2 / 59 | $19.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#6 / 59 | 38.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
38.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#51 / 59 | 075429 | ||||
| Connecticut Baptist Homes | NH AL IL RESC SNF | Meriden | 60
Facility
60
CT AVG
128
Rank
#55 / 68 |
97.7%
Facility
97.7%
CT AVG
86.2%
Rank
#4 / 64 | +13% | 4.27
Facility
4.27
CT AVG
4.00
Rank
#18 / 63 | +4% | +7% | $83.9k
Facility
$83.9k
CT AVG
$41.4k
Rank
#61 / 64 | 20
Facility
20
CT AVG
36.6
Rank
#14 / 63 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
CT AVG
5.0
Rank
#41 / 63 | 3 | 59 | - |
14
Facility
14
CT AVG
38
Rank
#62 / 76 | Frank Amazeen | $6.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#56 / 59 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#51 / 59 | 71.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
71.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CT AVG
66.2%
Rank
#10 / 59 | 075352 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other CT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Meadow Ridge
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What languages are spoken at Meadow Ridge?
The team at Meadow Ridge speaks French and Spanish.
02 What is the license number of Meadow Ridge?
According to CT state health department records, Meadow Ridge's license number is 2266.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Meadow Ridge?
Meadow Ridge's occupancy is 84.1%.
04 How long has Meadow Ridge been in business?
Meadow Ridge has been operating for approximately 29 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at Meadow Ridge?
Yes, Meadow Ridge allows residents to bring their pets.
06 Does Meadow Ridge operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Meadow Ridge is registered as a for-profit in CT.
07 What is the overall rating for Meadow Ridge?
Meadow Ridge received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
