Nottingham Village Retirement Center
Providing long-term and short-term care, Nottingham Village Retirement Center is a nursing home in Northumberland, Pennsylvania. Located in a moderately walkable area on Neitz Road, where some daily errands can be completed on foot, the community currently serves 55 residents in a 90-bed setting. It also focuses on rehabilitation for older adults recovering from illness, injury, or surgery.
The dining program features scratch-made meals that incorporate local flavors and familiar favorites, supporting both nutrition and resident satisfaction. This approach allows meals to be adapted to a variety of dietary needs and personal preferences. A variety of activities and outings are also conducted to encourage engagement and social connection, including games, classes, picnics, parties, and community excursions.
Personal care assistance is available for daily living activities, with support tailored to each resident’s individual requirements. Therapeutic services support rehabilitation and wellness goals, while on-site medical and dental offices help reduce the need for outside appointments. Pharmacy delivery services assist with medication access, and a salon and barber shop provide convenient grooming services. Outdoor amenities such as a fishing pond and putting green also offer additional recreational opportunities.
Over the past five years, inspections have highlighted medication management, documentation procedures, and environmental cleanliness. Any identified concerns have been addressed through corrective action plans. Moreover, no fines or enforcement actions have been recorded.
Capacity and availability
About this community
Occupancy
Nottingham Village Retirement Center is legally operated by Leeds Health Care Services Inc.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
1vs 0.9 avg↑ 11% higher than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Inspection citation rate (at PA avg) 5 Better Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (62% below)
• Citations per inspection (21% below)
• Inspections with citations (50% below)
• Total complaints (75% below)
• Complaints per year (75% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
| 24 | 63 | This facility has 62% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (24 vs. PA avg 63).↓ 62% better Rank #140 / 478 Total citations — State benchmarked This home is ranked 140th out of 478 homes we track in Pennsylvania for total citations. Shows this facility's total citations compared to the Pennsylvania average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Citations per inspection
| 4.0 | 5.05 | This facility has 21% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (4 vs. PA avg 5.05).↓ 21% better Rank #245 / 478 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 245th out of 478 homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 6 | 11 | This facility has had 45% fewer total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (6 vs. PA avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 45% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
| 4 | 8 | This facility has 50% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (4 vs. PA avg 8).↓ 50% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
| 67% | 67% | This facility has inspection citation rate in line with the Pennsylvania average (67 vs. PA avg 67).— At avg Rank #214 / 478 Inspection citation rate — State benchmarked This home is ranked 214th out of 478 homes we track in Pennsylvania for % of inspections with citations. Shows this facility's % of inspections with citations compared to the Pennsylvania average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
| 1 | 4 | This facility has 75% fewer total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (1 vs. PA avg 4).↓ 75% better Rank #1 / 478 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1st out of 478 homes we track in Pennsylvania for complaint inspections. Shows this facility's complaint inspections compared to the Pennsylvania average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Complaints per year
| 0.2 | 0.8 | This facility has 75% fewer complaints per year than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (0.2 vs. PA avg 0.8).↓ 75% better |
Places of interest near Nottingham Village Retirement Center
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Northumberland's city center to Nottingham Village Retirement Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Nottingham Village Retirement Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 69.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Spot Village | NH ADC AL IL MC SNF | New Holland | 110
Facility
110
PA AVG
94
Rank
#164 / 552 |
56.4%
Facility
56.4%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#381 / 494 | -19% | 5.10
Facility
5.10
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#31 / 181 | +15% | +23% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#122 / 183 | 4
Facility
4
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#17 / 178 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#10 / 178 | 2 | 62 | - |
32
Facility
32
PA AVG
47
Rank
#444 / 657 | Donald Aldrich | $10.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$10.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#131 / 167 | $19.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$19.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#19 / 167 | 188%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
188%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#10 / 167 | 396079 | ||||
| Kendal-Crosslands Communities | NH AL IL MC SNF | Kennett Square | 51
Facility
51
PA AVG
94
Rank
#436 / 552 |
66.7%
Facility
66.7%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#291 / 494 | -4% | 6.94
Facility
6.94
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#6 / 181 | +49% | +67% | $12.7k
Facility
$12.7k
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#140 / 183 | 4
Facility
4
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#17 / 178 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#26 / 178 | 1 | 34 | - |
9
Facility
9
PA AVG
47
Rank
#602 / 657 | Catherine Emig | $25.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$25.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#33 / 167 | $16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#29 / 167 | 63%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
63%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#55 / 167 | 395388 | ||||
| Trillium Place | NH IL MC SNF | Lancaster | 85
Facility
85
PA AVG
94
Rank
#267 / 552 |
76.5%
Facility
76.5%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#196 / 494 | +10% | 5.10
Facility
5.10
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#31 / 181 | -28% | +23% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 183 | - | - | - | 65 | - |
52
Facility
52
PA AVG
47
Rank
#260 / 657 | Robert Bomberger | $47.3MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$47.3MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#3 / 167 | $22.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$22.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#7 / 167 | 47.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
47.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#115 / 167 | 395559 | ||||
| Dock Woods | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Lansdale | 80
Facility
80
PA AVG
94
Rank
#292 / 552 |
85.0%
Facility
85.0%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#102 / 494 | +22% | 4.81
Facility
4.81
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#50 / 181 | -6% | +16% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 183 | - | - | - | 68 | - |
21
Facility
21
PA AVG
47
Rank
#523 / 657 | Living Branches | $26.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$26.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#29 / 167 | $11.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$11.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#58 / 167 | 43.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
43.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#135 / 167 | 395557 |
Frequently Asked Questions about Nottingham Village Retirement Center
Who is the owner of Nottingham Village Retirement Center?
Nottingham Village Retirement Center is legally operated by Leeds Health Care Services Inc.
Is Nottingham Village Retirement Center in a walkable area?
Nottingham Village Retirement Center has a walk score of 60. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the license number of Nottingham Village Retirement Center?
According to PA state health department records, Nottingham Village Retirement Center's license number is 202130.
When does Nottingham Village Retirement Center's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, Nottingham Village Retirement Center's license expires on April 26, 2027.
What is the occupancy rate at Nottingham Village Retirement Center?
Nottingham Village Retirement Center's occupancy is 61%.
Are pets allowed at Nottingham Village Retirement Center?
No, Nottingham Village Retirement Center has a no-pet policy.
Does Nottingham Village Retirement Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Nottingham Village Retirement Center is registered as a for-profit in PA.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





