Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
112
87 employees · 25 contractors · 47 on an average day Pasadena Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Pasadena, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pasadena Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Pasadena, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pasadena Nursing Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Pasadena Nursing Center, located in Pasadena, CA, is a skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility providing a range of services from rehabilitation, a variety of therapy services, adult care, psychiatric care, respite care, and skilled nursing services. Their convalescent home provides residents with 24/7 skilled nursing care, wound and pain management, medication management and administration assistance, as well as assistance with daily living activities and mobility.
This skilled nursing center boasts of their quality care as well as amenities and non-medical related services; from meal provisions to physical fitness programs, the residents are well taken care of until they feel better or good enough to start living independently again.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 131st out of 291 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 9m
This nursing home is ranked 131st out of 291 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 9mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +18% above California average
3 of 6 metrics below California average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
15 staff · 8-hour shifts
43m
↑ 11% · CA 39mThis facility: 43m per resident per day, 11% above the California average of 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
15 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 18 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
18 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
51m
↓ 30% · CA 1h 13mThis facility: 51m per resident per day, 30% below the California average of 1h 13m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 18 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
18 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 46 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
46 staff · 7.4-hour shifts
2h 35m
↓ 3% · CA 2h 39mThis facility: 2h 35m per resident per day, 3% below the California average of 2h 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 46 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
46 staff · 7.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↑ 10% · CA 5mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 10% above the California average of 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 41m
↓ 10% · CA 4h 5mThis facility: 3h 41m per resident per day, 10% below the California average of 4h 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
35m
↑ 18% · CA 30mThis facility: 35m per resident per day, 18% above the California average of 30m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
112
87 employees · 25 contractors · 47 on an average day
112 total staff / 77 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.45 : 1
↓ 17% · CA 1.75This facility: 1.45 staff per resident, 17% below the California average of 1.75 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
112 staff ÷ 77 residents
See full California ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.6 h
↓ 1% · CA 7.7 hThis facility: 7.6 h, 1% below the California average of 7.7 h (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
32,408 staff hours this quarter
See full California ranking →90.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
California average: 95.5% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (7), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Clinical Nurse Specialist (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Occupational Therapy Assistant (2), Administrator (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Registered Nurse (1), Other Social Services Staff (1), Medical Director (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
207
Rank #80 / 344Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
207
Rank #80 / 344Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
99 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 108 state-licensed beds.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #122 / 198Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 122nd out of 198 nursing homes we track in California for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other California facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #122 / 198Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 122nd out of 198 nursing homes we track in California for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other California facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
18
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #169 / 343Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 169th out of 343 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #169 / 343Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 169th out of 343 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
64
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #224 / 302Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 224th out of 302 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 302. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #224 / 302Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 224th out of 302 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 302. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
75%
This home usually has availability
Lower than the California average: 82.2%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
238
days
About This Community
Facility TypeResidential Care Elderly
IssuanceApril 30, 2008
CountyLos Angeles
CMS Certification Number555213
Pasadena Nursing Center is legally operated by Gardena Retirement Center, Inc., and administered by Susana Fuentes.
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Pain Management
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Psychiatric Care
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Pets not allowed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
ALM Inspection Grade
74 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
California inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 48% of the grade
C- · 70/100
12 points below the California average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100).
99 certified beds, 48% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Concern
222 severity-weighted points (90 citations) · 2× higher than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 95)
Enforcement
Typical
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 0) · $9,113 in fines
Persistence
Typical
22 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 25)
California state-licensed beds · 52% of the grade
C+ · 78/100
5 points below the California average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
108 licensed beds, 52% of the grade. Graded with California state-licensed facilities on the California scale.
Serious citations
Typical
4 serious citations in 97 inspections
Moderate citations
Typical
0.24 moderate citations per inspection (23 in 97 inspections) · 54% more than the typical state-licensed CA facility (median: 0.15)
Complaint visits
Concern
78 complaint visits per 100 resident beds (84 across 108 beds) · 10× more than the typical state-licensed CA facility (median: 7.9)
How the final grade is calculated
C · 74/100
70 × 48% + 78 × 52% = 74 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 99 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (48%) and 108 California state-licensed beds (52%). The result, 74 out of 100, is a C on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. CA average
3 Worse
Metrics worse than California average:
• Total citations (286% above)
• Serious citations (Type A) (33% above)
• Moderate citations (Type B) (475% above) 1 Better Metrics better than California average:
• Citations per inspection (40% below)
• Total citations (286% above)
• Serious citations (Type A) (33% above)
• Moderate citations (Type B) (475% above) 1 Better Metrics better than California average:
• Citations per inspection (40% below)
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 27 | 7.0 | This facility has 286% more total citations than a typical California nursing home (27 vs. CA avg 7).↑ 286% worse |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Citations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 4 | 3.0 | This facility has 33% more serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (4 vs. CA avg 3).↑ 33% worse Rank #165 / 294 Serious citations (Type A) — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 165th out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for # of serious citations. Shows this facility's # of serious citations compared to the California average among the 294 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Citations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 23 | 4.0 | This facility has 475% more moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (23 vs. CA avg 4).↑ 475% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.3 | 0.5 | This facility has 40% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.3 vs. CA avg 0.5).↓ 40% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of official scheduled inspections, complaint visits and other regulatory visits. California counts each evaluation report, so one trip can count twice when it serves two purposes.
| 97 | 19.0 | This facility has had 411% more total inspections than the California average (97 vs. CA avg 19). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 411% more |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 84 | 6.0 | This facility has had 1300% more complaint visits than the California average (84 vs. CA avg 6). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 1300% more |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 8 | 5.0 | This facility has had 60% more other visits than the California average (8 vs. CA avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 60% more |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 5 | 4.0 | This facility has had 25% more official inspections than the California average (5 vs. CA avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 25% more |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 67 | 8.0 | This facility has had 738% more complaint investigations than the California average (67 vs. CA avg 8). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 738% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
24
↑ 100% · CA 12This facility: 24, 100% above the California average of 12 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
89
Rank #270 / 294Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 270th out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the California State average, with a ranking across all 294 CA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 79% · CA 49.7This facility: 89, 79% above the California average of 49.7 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.71
Rank #102 / 294Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 102nd out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the California mean across 294 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 22% · CA 4.77This facility: 3.71, 22% below the California average of 4.77 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
89 of 89 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 233% · CA 0.3This facility: 1, 233% above the California average of 0.3 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 11% · CA 0.9This facility: 1, 11% above the California average of 0.9 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
87
↑ 85% · CA 47.1This facility: 87, 85% above the California average of 47.1 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · CA 1.5This facility: 0, 100% below the California average of 1.5 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 26, 2026 · 17 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 25 of 89 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 26, 2026
17 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 06, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 23, 2026
2 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 14, 2026
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 23, 2025
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 19, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 09, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 26, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 28, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 15, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 30, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 23, 2025
15 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 19, 2025
2 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 01, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 25, 2025
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 13, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 05, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 89 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 89 citations
Quality of Life & Care
25 deficiencies (28%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
15 deficiencies (17%)
Pharmacy Services
15 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Rights
12 deficiencies (13%)
Nutrition & Dietary
6 deficiencies (7%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
6 deficiencies (7%)
Infection Control
5 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
3 deficiencies (3%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
58 of 89 citations resulted from standard inspections; 30 of 89 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 89 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Apr 19, 2025 · $9,113 civil money penalty
Apr 19, 2025 · $9,113 civil money penalty
Total fines
$9,113
↓ 84% · CA $57KThis facility: $9,113, 84% below the California average of $56,949. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #200 / 296Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 200th out of 296 nursing homes we track in California for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the California average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 296 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 46% · CA 1.85This facility: 1, 46% below the California average of 1.85. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CA avg 0.59California average: 0.59. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Apr 19, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,113
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,113Fine amount comparison
This facility
$9,113
California average
$56,949
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. California and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the California average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 18% · CA 4.2This facility: 5.0, 18% above the CA average of 4.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 13% · CA 3.5This facility: 4.0, 13% above the CA average of 3.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 38% · CA 5.7This facility: 3.5, 38% below the CA average of 5.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 47% · CA 9.5This facility: 5.1, 47% below the CA average of 9.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 9 better, 2 worse, 2 near CA average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.6%
↓ 25% · CA 10.2This facility: 7.6, 25% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.6%
↓ 25% · CA 10.2This facility: 7.6, 25% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.0%
↓ 55% · CA 8.9This facility: 4.0, 55% below the CA average of 8.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.0%
↓ 55% · CA 8.9This facility: 4.0, 55% below the CA average of 8.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.7%
↓ 63% · CA 9.8This facility: 3.7, 63% below the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.7%
↓ 63% · CA 9.8This facility: 3.7, 63% below the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7%
↑ 125% · CA 1.2This facility: 2.7, 125% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7%
↑ 125% · CA 1.2This facility: 2.7, 125% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 1.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 1.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
↑ 12% · CA 4.3This facility: 4.8, 12% above the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
↑ 12% · CA 4.3This facility: 4.8, 12% above the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 66% · CA 4.1This facility: 1.4, 66% below the CA average of 4.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 66% · CA 4.1This facility: 1.4, 66% below the CA average of 4.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 7.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 7.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 7.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 7.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
↓ 67% · CA 12.3This facility: 4.1, 67% below the CA average of 12.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
↓ 67% · CA 12.3This facility: 4.1, 67% below the CA average of 12.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 1% · CA 98.7This facility: 100.0, 1% above the CA average of 98.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 1% · CA 98.7This facility: 100.0, 1% above the CA average of 98.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · CA 97.9This facility: 100.0, 2% above the CA average of 97.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · CA 97.9This facility: 100.0, 2% above the CA average of 97.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.53
↓ 32% · CA 2.25This facility: 1.53, 32% below the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.53
↓ 32% · CA 2.25This facility: 1.53, 32% below the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.76
↓ 52% · CA 1.59This facility: 0.76, 52% below the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.76
↓ 52% · CA 1.59This facility: 0.76, 52% below the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
57.8%
↑ 8% · US 53.7This facility: 57.8, 8% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
57.8%
↑ 8% · US 53.7This facility: 57.8, 8% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
39.5%
↓ 22% · US 50.6This facility: 39.5, 22% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
39.5%
↓ 22% · US 50.6This facility: 39.5, 22% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 4% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 4% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 4% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 4% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7%
↑ 27% · CA 1.3This facility: 1.7, 27% above the CA average of 1.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7%
↑ 27% · CA 1.3This facility: 1.7, 27% above the CA average of 1.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · CA 94.6This facility: 100.0, 6% above the CA average of 94.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · CA 94.6This facility: 100.0, 6% above the CA average of 94.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · CA 93.1This facility: 100.0, 7% above the CA average of 93.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · CA 93.1This facility: 100.0, 7% above the CA average of 93.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.3%
↑ 5% · CA 23.2This facility: 24.3, 5% above the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.3%
↑ 5% · CA 23.2This facility: 24.3, 5% above the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.8%
↓ 39% · CA 11.2This facility: 6.8, 39% below the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.8%
↓ 39% · CA 11.2This facility: 6.8, 39% below the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Pasadena Nursing Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 289 California nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−3.9% operating margin
+22.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most California homes
54.6% payroll share of revenue
CA average 61.6%Rank #133 / 289Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 133rd out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue rose $1.6M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with California homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.8M | +$1.6M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $15.3M | Rank in CA Rank #255 / 289Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 255th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Below CA median Higher net patient revenue than 12% of CA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $9.2M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $16.0M | Rank in CA Rank #256 / 289Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 256th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 11% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.3M | +$1.6M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $0.5M | Rank in CA Rank #191 / 289Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 191st out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −3.9% | +22.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median 3.3% | Rank in CA Rank #202 / 289Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 202nd out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 30% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | CA median $0.1M | Rank in CA Rank #183 / 283Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 183rd out of 283 nursing homes we track in California for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 35% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.3M | +$0.5M | Trend — | CA median $1.1M | Rank in CA Rank #221 / 289Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 221st out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most California homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.8M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $8.8M | Rank in CA Rank #262 / 289Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 262nd out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 9% of homes | Below CA median Higher payroll than 9% of CA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 54.6% | −6.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median 53.8% | Rank in CA Rank #133 / 289Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 133rd out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 54% of homes | 7.0 pts under CA average The CA average is 61.6% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · CA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the California payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.3M | $6.5M | $7.2M | $7.0M | $6.0M | $6.2M | $7.2M | $8.8M |
| Operating expenses | $7.0M | $7.4M | $8.0M | $8.7M | $7.7M | $8.1M | $9.1M | $9.2M |
| Net patient income | −$0.7M | −$0.8M | −$0.8M | −$1.7M | −$1.7M | −$1.9M | −$1.9M | −$0.3M |
| Operating margin | −11.9% | −12.8% | −11.5% | −23.8% | −28.7% | −30.4% | −26.8% | −3.9% |
| Net income | −$0.7M | −$0.8M | −$0.8M | −$1.1M | −$0.5M | −$1.5M | −$0.8M | −$0.3M |
| Payroll costs | $3.7M | $4.1M | $4.2M | $4.5M | $3.9M | $4.2M | $4.4M | $4.8M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 58.9% | 62.1% | 58.8% | 64.2% | 65.3% | 67.4% | 61.3% | 54.6% |
| Beds | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
| Gross revenue | $6.8M | $7.4M | $8.4M | $8.2M | $6.6M | $7.2M | $7.8M | $8.2M |
| Salaries | $3.2M | $3.5M | $3.6M | $3.9M | $3.3M | $3.6M | $3.8M | $4.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.7M |
| Other operating costs | $3.3M | $3.3M | $3.8M | $4.2M | $3.8M | $3.9M | $4.7M | $4.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $214 | $232 | $257 | $284 | $327 | $336 | $356 | $394 |
| Cost per day | $239 | $261 | $286 | $352 | $421 | $438 | $451 | $409 |
| Average length of stay | 281.7 days | 183.6 days | 362.4 days | 476.3 days | 205.7 days | 173.5 days | 160.5 days | 238.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
100 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
9 · 9%
Medicaid
53 · 53%
Private pay & other
38 · 38%
Resident snapshot
77 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
10 · 13%
Medicaid
52 · 68%
Private pay & other
15 · 19%
Leaving
94 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
12 · 13%
Medicaid
60 · 64%
Private pay & other
22 · 23%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Pasadena Nursing Center
2.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Pasadena's city center to Pasadena Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 4.82 miles to nearest hospital (Adventist Health Glendale)
Calculate Travel Distance to Pasadena Nursing Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Pasadena
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The California average is: 61.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villa Gardens | NH SNF | Pasadena | 394
Facility
394
CA AVG
178
Rank
#37 / 344 | C | - | - | 5.45
Facility
5.45
CA AVG
4.36
Rank
#24 / 291 | -34% | +25% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$60.0k
Rank
#1 / 296 | 29
Facility
29
CA AVG
49.7
Rank
#103 / 294 | 7.3
Facility
7.3
CA AVG
4.8
Rank
#242 / 294 | - | 19 | - |
92
Facility
92
CA AVG
60
Rank
#23 / 343 | Front Porch Communities And Services | $10.7MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$10.7MFiscal year ending 03/2025
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#230 / 289 | $14.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$14.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#47 / 289 | 131.1%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
131.1%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
CA AVG
61.6%
Rank
#11 / 289 | 555429 | ||||
| St. Vincent Health Care | NH SNF | Pasadena (North Central) | 78
Facility
78
CA AVG
178
Rank
#267 / 344 | A |
98.1%
Facility
98.1%
CA AVG
82.2%
Rank
#9 / 302 | +19% | 3.78
Facility
3.78
CA AVG
4.36
Rank
#206 / 291 | -60% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$60.0k
Rank
#1 / 296 | 50
Facility
50
CA AVG
49.7
Rank
#191 / 294 | 16.7
Facility
16.7
CA AVG
4.8
Rank
#294 / 294 | - | 77 | - |
62
Facility
62
CA AVG
60
Rank
#184 / 343 | Robert Barrett | $9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#242 / 289 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#257 / 289 | 53.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
61.6%
Rank
#142 / 289 | 555119 | ||||
| Foothill Heights Care Center | NH ADC AL RC SNF | Pasadena (North Central) | 49
Facility
49
CA AVG
178
Rank
#316 / 344 | B- |
94.9%
Facility
94.9%
CA AVG
82.2%
Rank
#49 / 302 | +15% | 4.36
Facility
4.36
CA AVG
4.36
Rank
#106 / 291 | -73% | 0% | $9.4k
Facility
$9.4k
CA AVG
$60.0k
Rank
#205 / 296 | 60
Facility
60
CA AVG
49.7
Rank
#226 / 294 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
CA AVG
4.8
Rank
#81 / 294 | - | 47 | A+ |
69
Facility
69
CA AVG
60
Rank
#135 / 343 | Foothill Heights Care Center LLC | $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#264 / 289 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#277 / 289 | 49.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
49.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
61.6%
Rank
#200 / 289 | 555894 | ||||
| Brighton Care Center | NH SNF | Pasadena (North Central) | 99
Facility
99
CA AVG
178
Rank
#196 / 344 | B- |
88.2%
Facility
88.2%
CA AVG
82.2%
Rank
#149 / 302 | +7% | 3.68
Facility
3.68
CA AVG
4.36
Rank
#220 / 291 | -51% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$60.0k
Rank
#1 / 296 | 75
Facility
75
CA AVG
49.7
Rank
#249 / 294 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
CA AVG
4.8
Rank
#112 / 294 | 1 | 87 | - |
62
Facility
62
CA AVG
60
Rank
#184 / 343 | Rachel Rodriquez | $13.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#170 / 289 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#205 / 289 | 49.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
49.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
61.6%
Rank
#204 / 289 | 555338 | ||||
| Pasadena Nursing Center | NH ADC RC SNF | Pasadena (North Central) | 207
Facility
207
CA AVG
178
Rank
#80 / 344 | C |
75.0%
Facility
75.0%
CA AVG
82.2%
Rank
#224 / 302 | -9% | 4.15
Facility
4.15
CA AVG
4.36
Rank
#131 / 291 | +46% | -5% | $9.1k
Facility
$9.1k
CA AVG
$60.0k
Rank
#200 / 296 | 89
Facility
89
CA AVG
49.7
Rank
#270 / 294 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
CA AVG
4.8
Rank
#102 / 294 | 2 | 81 | - |
64
Facility
64
CA AVG
60
Rank
#169 / 343 | Gardena Retirement Center, Inc | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#255 / 289 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#262 / 289 | 54.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
54.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
61.6%
Rank
#133 / 289 | 555213 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other CA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in California
Pasadena Nursing Center is located in Pasadena, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Pasadena Nursing Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Pasadena Nursing Center in?
Pasadena Nursing Center is in the North Central neighborhood of Pasadena.
02 Who is the owner of Pasadena Nursing Center?
Pasadena Nursing Center is legally operated by Gardena Retirement Center, Inc., and administered by Susana Fuentes.
03 Is Pasadena Nursing Center in a walkable area?
Pasadena Nursing Center has a walk score of 64. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Pasadena Nursing Center?
Pasadena Nursing Center's occupancy is 75%.
05 How long has Pasadena Nursing Center been in business?
Pasadena Nursing Center has been operating for approximately 18 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Pasadena Nursing Center?
No, Pasadena Nursing Center has a no-pet policy.
07 Does Pasadena Nursing Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Pasadena Nursing Center is registered as a for-profit in CA.
Updated on
