Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
234
100 employees · 134 contractors · 63 on an average day Prince George Healthcare Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Georgetown, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 7 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 7 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Prince George Healthcare Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Georgetown, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 7 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 7 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Prince George Healthcare Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Prince George Healthcare Center is a 148 bed nursing home in Georgetown, SC, offering skilled nursing with licensed nurses on site around the clock. The community may be a good fit for someone who needs ongoing nursing oversight rather than help with daily tasks alone.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families payment options based on eligibility or their payment arrangement. Nurse staffing totals 3 hours and 17 minutes per resident per day, which represents the daily hands on nursing time assigned to each resident. Helen L. Cribb serves as administrator, and Palmetto Prince George Operating operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 17m
This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 17mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +6% above South Carolina average
5 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 30 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
30 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
32m
↓ 18% · SC 40mThis facility: 32m per resident per day, 18% below the South Carolina average of 40m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 30 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
30 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 45 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 25 agency contractors.
45 staff · 8.7-hour shifts
46m
↓ 30% · SC 1h 5mThis facility: 46m per resident per day, 30% below the South Carolina average of 1h 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 45 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 25 agency contractors.
45 staff · 8.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 125 total: 53 of the facility's own employees and 72 agency contractors.
125 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
1h 59m
↓ 16% · SC 2h 23mThis facility: 1h 59m per resident per day, 16% below the South Carolina average of 2h 23m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 125 total: 53 of the facility's own employees and 72 agency contractors.
125 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 68% · SC 5mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 68% below the South Carolina average of 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 52m
↓ 20% · SC 3h 34mThis facility: 2h 52m per resident per day, 20% below the South Carolina average of 3h 34m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
26m
↑ 6% · SC 24mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 6% above the South Carolina average of 24m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
234
100 employees · 134 contractors · 63 on an average day
234 total staff / 137 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.71 : 1
↓ 4% · SC 1.77This facility: 1.71 staff per resident, 4% below the South Carolina average of 1.77 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
234 staff ÷ 137 residents
See full South Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
↑ 4% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 8.2 h, 4% above the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
47,011 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →84.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (72), Licensed Practical Nurse (25), Registered Nurse (18), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Physical Therapy Aide (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #21 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #21 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #8 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #8 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
95.9%
This home is often near full
Based on 141.9 residents and 148 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the South Carolina average: 89.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
451
days
About This Community
Facility TypeHL- Nursing Home
StatusActive
CountyGeorgetown
License NumberNCF-0930
Business TypeLtd. Liability
CMS Certification Number425295
Prince George Healthcare Center is legally operated by Palmetto Prince George Operating LLC, and administered by Helen L Cribb.
Owner NamePalmetto Prince George Operating LLC
Institutional Nursing Home
148 units
Total beds
148 units
Resident Council
Email
helen.cribb@palmltc.com
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
88 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
7 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
51 severity-weighted points (15 deficiencies) · 21% higher than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 42)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
20 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 19% · SC 3.7This facility: 3, 19% below the SC average of 3.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
13
Rank #78 / 116Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the South Carolina State average, with a ranking across all 116 SC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 2% · SC 12.7This facility: 13, 2% above the SC average of 12.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.33
Rank #94 / 116Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 94th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the South Carolina mean across 116 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 27% · SC 3.4This facility: 4.33, 27% above the SC average of 3.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
13 of 13 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
13
↑ 12% · SC 11.6This facility: 13, 12% above the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 30, 2026 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 4 of 13 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 30, 2026
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 10, 2025
4 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 06, 2023
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 13 citations
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (31%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (23%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (15%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (8%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (8%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (8%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (8%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
9 of 13 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 13 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
SC avg $28KSouth Carolina average: $28,139. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
SC avg 2.03South Carolina average: 2.03. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
SC avg 0.1South Carolina average: 0.1. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 24% · SC 3.9This facility: 3.0, 24% below the SC average of 3.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 9% · SC 2.8This facility: 3.0, 9% above the SC average of 2.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 9% · SC 7.4This facility: 8.1, 9% above the SC average of 7.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 7% · SC 13.5This facility: 12.6, 7% below the SC average of 13.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 3 worse, 1 near SC average, 1 without a benchmark
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.3%
↑ 23% · SC 11.6This facility: 14.3, 23% above the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.3%
↑ 23% · SC 11.6This facility: 14.3, 23% above the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.7%
↓ 1% · SC 11.8This facility: 11.7, 1% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.7%
↓ 1% · SC 11.8This facility: 11.7, 1% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.8%
↓ 27% · SC 16.2This facility: 11.8, 27% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.8%
↓ 27% · SC 16.2This facility: 11.8, 27% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 68% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.4, 68% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 68% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.4, 68% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
↓ 21% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.5, 21% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
↓ 21% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.5, 21% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.0%
↑ 41% · SC 4.9This facility: 7.0, 41% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.0%
↑ 41% · SC 4.9This facility: 7.0, 41% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3%
↓ 14% · SC 6.1This facility: 5.3, 14% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3%
↓ 14% · SC 6.1This facility: 5.3, 14% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.3%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.3%
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.1%
↑ 50% · SC 15.4This facility: 23.1, 50% above the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.1%
↑ 50% · SC 15.4This facility: 23.1, 50% above the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · SC 91.8This facility: 100.0, 9% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · SC 91.8This facility: 100.0, 9% above the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.3%
↑ 7% · SC 92.5This facility: 99.3, 7% above the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.3%
↑ 7% · SC 92.5This facility: 99.3, 7% above the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 21% · SC 81.9This facility: 99.3, 21% above the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 21% · SC 81.9This facility: 99.3, 21% above the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.0%
↑ 19% · SC 79.0This facility: 94.0, 19% above the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.0%
↑ 19% · SC 79.0This facility: 94.0, 19% above the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Prince George Healthcare Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
3.3% operating margin
+8.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.9M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most South Carolina homes
57.5% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #53 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue rose $1.4M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $13.8M | +$1.4M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #37 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 65% of homes | Above SC median Higher net patient revenue than 65% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $13.3M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $12.9M | Rank in SC Rank #47 / 104Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.5M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Rank #34 / 104Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 68% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 3.3% | +8.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 1.2% | Rank in SC Rank #38 / 104Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 64% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.4M | — | Trend — | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Rank #30 / 100Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 100 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 71% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.9M | +$0.7M | Trend — | SC median $0.3M | Rank in SC Rank #40 / 103Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 103 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other South Carolina homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 62% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.9M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #37 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 65% of homes | Above SC median Higher payroll than 65% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 57.5% | −5.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #53 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 50% of homes | 3.3 pts under SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $10.7M | $10.9M | $10.5M | $12.0M | $11.7M | $12.5M | $12.4M | $13.8M |
| Operating expenses | $10.8M | $11.1M | $10.3M | $11.1M | $11.9M | $12.4M | $13.0M | $13.3M |
| Net patient income | −$0.1M | −$0.1M | $0.2M | $0.9M | −$0.2M | $0.1M | −$0.6M | $0.5M |
| Operating margin | −0.8% | −1.3% | 1.6% | 7.8% | −1.7% | 1.0% | −4.8% | 3.3% |
| Net income | −$0.0M | −$0.1M | $0.4M | $1.4M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.2M | $0.9M |
| Payroll costs | $5.9M | $5.9M | $5.7M | $6.3M | $6.9M | $7.5M | $7.8M | $7.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 55.0% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 52.9% | 58.7% | 59.5% | 62.7% | 57.5% |
| Beds | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| Gross revenue | $13.5M | $13.1M | $13.1M | $13.7M | $14.8M | $15.1M | $15.8M | $18.5M |
| Salaries | $5.0M | $5.0M | $4.9M | $5.5M | $5.9M | $6.3M | $6.6M | $6.7M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | — | — | $0.8M | $0.6M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $1.0M |
| Other operating costs | $4.9M | $5.1M | $4.6M | $4.7M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.2M | $5.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $219 | $223 | $232 | $244 | $237 | $250 | $249 | $269 |
| Cost per day | $220 | $226 | $228 | $225 | $241 | $247 | $261 | $260 |
| Average length of stay | 367.9 days | 412.0 days | 237.0 days | 223.0 days | 219.3 days | 204.0 days | 239.0 days | 450.5 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
107 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
38 · 36%
Medicaid
12 · 11%
Private pay & other
57 · 53%
Resident snapshot
137 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
9 · 7%
Medicaid
112 · 82%
Private pay & other
16 · 12%
Leaving
114 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
43 · 38%
Medicaid
31 · 27%
Private pay & other
40 · 35%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Prince George Healthcare Center
901 Maple St, Georgetown, SC 29440-4333
Calculate Travel Distance to Prince George Healthcare Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Oak Manor Lancaster | NH SNF | Lancaster | 132
Facility
132
SC AVG
109
Rank
#29 / 133 | A |
91.3%
Facility
91.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#55 / 87 | +2% | 4.32
Facility
4.32
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#37 / 118 | -59% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 121 | - |
8
Facility
8
SC AVG
33
Rank
#39 / 46 | Nhc Healthcare/Lancaster LLC | $11.9M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $8.4M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 71%*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425017 | ||||
| Veterans Victory House | NH SNF | Walterboro | 220
Facility
220
SC AVG
109
Rank
#3 / 133 | A- |
86.5%
Facility
86.5%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#68 / 87 | -4% | 4.62
Facility
4.62
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#31 / 118 | +50% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 4
Facility
4
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#11 / 116 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#15 / 116 | - | 190 | - | - | South Carolina Department Of Veterans Affairs | $22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#12 / 104 | $12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#7 / 104 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#63 / 104 | 425386 | ||||
| Rock Hill Post Acute Care Center | NH SNF | Rock Hill | 99
Facility
99
SC AVG
109
Rank
#74 / 133 | A |
86.3%
Facility
86.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#69 / 87 | -4% | 3.77
Facility
3.77
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#69 / 118 | -21% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 85 | - | - | Rock Hill Healthcare LLC | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#54 / 104 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#58 / 104 | 58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#43 / 104 | 425159 | ||||
| The Palms at Florence | NH RC SNF | Florence | 163
Facility
163
SC AVG
109
Rank
#16 / 133 | ? |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#23 / 87 | +5% | 4.16
Facility
4.16
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#43 / 118 | -34% | +1% | $32.9k
Facility
$32.9k
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#61 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#44 / 116 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#59 / 116 | 2 | 154 | - | - | Commander Operator LLC | $19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#15 / 104 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#26 / 104 | 46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#97 / 104 | 425119 | ||||
| Prince George Healthcare Center | NH SNF | Georgetown | 148
Facility
148
SC AVG
109
Rank
#21 / 133 | B+ |
95.9%
Facility
95.9%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#8 / 87 | +7% | 3.29
Facility
3.29
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#98 / 118 | +39% | -20% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 13
Facility
13
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#78 / 116 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#94 / 116 | - | 142 | - | - | Palmetto Prince George Operating LLC | $13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#37 / 104 | $7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#37 / 104 | 57.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
57.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#53 / 104 | 425295 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Prince George Healthcare Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Prince George Healthcare Center?
Prince George Healthcare Center is legally operated by Palmetto Prince George Operating LLC, and administered by Helen L Cribb.
02 What is the license number of Prince George Healthcare Center?
According to SC state health department records, Prince George Healthcare Center's license number is NCF-0930.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Prince George Healthcare Center?
Prince George Healthcare Center's occupancy is 95.9%.
04 Are pets allowed at Prince George Healthcare Center?
No, Prince George Healthcare Center has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Prince George Healthcare Center?
The team at Prince George Healthcare Center can be reached at prgeorgehealth@palmltc.com.
06 Does Prince George Healthcare Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Prince George Healthcare Center is registered as a for-profit in SC.
07 Who is the administrator of Prince George Healthcare Center?
Helen L Cribb is the administrator of Prince George Healthcare Center.
Updated on
