We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Welcome to Revere Court of Sacramento, an exceptional senior living community that offers compassionate care and a vibrant, enriching environment for older adults. This warm and inviting community boasts modern and comfortable accommodations, providing residents with spacious private apartments with their own bathrooms and kitchenettes. There is also a strong focus here on fostering independence and well-being, residents can enjoy a range of amenities and services tailored to their individual needs.
Revere Court of Sacramento’s culinary team also prepares scrumptious and nutritious meals, accommodating dietary preferences and requirements. Highly trained and dedicated staff members are available to provide personalized residential care, respite care, hospice care, and adult day care. From medication management to daily living activities, residents receive the support they require while preserving their dignity and autonomy. Engaging activities and social programs are designed to promote mental stimulation, physical health, and social interaction, encouraging a sense of belonging and fulfillment.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 25th out of 346 homes in California. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 52m per day |
Higher than the California average: 72.8%Revere Court of Sacramento is legally operated by Chancellor Health Care Of California Viii Inc, and administrated by Marina Smetyukh.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 3 | 10 | This facility has 70% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (3 vs. CA avg 10).↓ 70% better |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Violations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 0 | 3 | This facility has 100% fewer serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (0 vs. CA avg 3).↓ 100% better |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Violations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 3 | 4 | This facility has 25% fewer moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (3 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 25% better |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2021.
| 0.6 | 2 | This facility has 70% fewer citations per year than a typical California nursing home (0.6 vs. CA avg 2).↓ 70% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.2 | 3.3 | This facility has 94% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.2 vs. CA avg 3.3).↓ 94% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of complaint visits, other regulatory visits, and official scheduled inspections.
| 16 | 16 | This facility has total visits in line with the California average (16 vs. CA avg 16).— At avg |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 7 | 13 | This facility has 46% fewer complaint visits than a typical California nursing home (7 vs. CA avg 13).↓ 46% better |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 4 | 7 | This facility has 43% fewer other visits than a typical California nursing home (4 vs. CA avg 7).↓ 43% better |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more official inspections than a typical California nursing home (5 vs. CA avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 6 | 10 | This facility has 40% fewer complaint investigations than a typical California nursing home (6 vs. CA avg 10).↓ 40% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
This facility’s inspection record is mostly clean, with only a few minor deficiencies related to syringe disposal and dementia staff training cited on November 7, 2025. The most recent annual inspection found two deficiencies posing potential health risks but no immediate jeopardy or fines, and multiple complaint investigations since 2021 were unsubstantiated with no cited violations. The record shows consistent compliance with health and safety regulations, aside from a single 2024 incident involving an unsecured gate that was corrected without further enforcement.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsCalifornia average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Sep 2025
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
36 of 43 citations resulted from standard inspections; 5 of 43 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 43 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.4
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
46% better than California average
0% compared with California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.3 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
4,801 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 73 | 56 | 129 | 26,762 | 92 | 100% | 7.7 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 28 | 28 | 56 | 10,591 | 92 | 100% | 8.3 |
| Registered Nurse | 19 | 0 | 19 | 4,978 | 92 | 100% | 8 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2,017 | 66 | 72% | 8.5 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 2 | 0 | 2 | 984 | 80 | 87% | 7.9 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 5 | 5 | 510 | 29 | 32% | 7 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 7 | 7 | 459 | 30 | 33% | 6.9 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 3 | 3 | 442 | 27 | 29% | 6.5 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 1 | 0 | 1 | 414 | 55 | 60% | 7.5 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 216 | 27 | 29% | 8 |
| Dental Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 208 | 26 | 28% | 8 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 175 | 64 | 70% | 2.7 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 119 | 17 | 18% | 7 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 70 | 16 | 17% | 4.4 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 50 | 17 | 18% | 2.8 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023-2024
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
56% lower than California averageCalifornia average: $55K
154% more fines than California averageCalifornia average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than California averageCalifornia average: 0.5
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
6 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Feb 20, 2024
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Feb 12, 2024
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Jan 22, 2024
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Jan 8, 2024Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
11.5
74% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
17.5
55% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.5%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
24.3%
103% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.8%
49% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.9%
312% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.0%
62% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
49% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
64% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
83% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.9%
18% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.5%
5% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
62% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
5% better than California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
28% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
71% of new residents, often for short stays.
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
89Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Family members meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of family members that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, resident care, and activities.
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Revere Court of Sacramento based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #179 / 347Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 179th out of 347 homes in California. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
6.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Sacramento's city center to Revere Court of Sacramento's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 5.72 miles to nearest hospital (Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center)
Add your location
Revere Court of Sacramento is located in Sacramento, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Revere Court of Sacramento is in the Southwestern Sacramento neighborhood of Sacramento.
The legal owner and operator of Revere Court of Sacramento is Chancellor Health Care Of California Viii Inc.
Revere Court of Sacramento has a walk score of 51. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Revere Court of Sacramento's occupancy is 89%.
Marina Smetyukh is the administrator of Revere Court of Sacramento.
Revere Court of Sacramento has 72 beds.
Revere Court of Sacramento has had 3 recently reported deficiencies.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
