5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
RiverSpring Residences, located on Palisade Avenue in the Riverdale area of the Bronx, is managed by The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale. This 69-bed facility provides many types of care in one spot: nursing home help, assisted living, independent living, memory care, home care, hospice, and palliative care. Having all these options is a big plus for families who want a place that can adjust as health needs change. They accept Medicaid, Medicare, and private payments.
Right now, 63 out of 69 beds are filled, which is a 91% occupancy rate. The average resident stays for about 153 days, covering both those there for quick recovery and those living there long-term. Riverdale has a Walk Score of 56, which means you can walk to some places, but having a car is usually a good idea for getting around.
Registered nurses spend about 53 minutes a day with each resident, and the total nursing care from all staff adds up to about 3 hours and 17 minutes daily per person. They offer specific programs like Independent Living 65+, Assisted Living Medicaid, Certified Home Health Aide services, Licensed Home Care, and Geriatric Care Management.
The facility has nice apartments, dining that feels like a restaurant, a gym, a hair salon, 24-hour front desk help, and planned bus rides. Residents also have plenty of daily activities and community events to choose from.
The New York Department of Health regularly checks the facility. Previous inspections mentioned some issues with how care plans and paperwork are handled. If you take a tour, it is a good idea to ask the staff how they create and update each person’s specific care plan to make sure everyone gets exactly what they need.
RiverSpring Residences is a very complete choice for senior care in the Bronx. With its 69 beds, seven different types of care, clear staffing numbers, and acceptance of Medicaid and Medicare, it is a strong option for families looking for a place that can handle many different health situations as they evolve.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs New York averages
Total nursing care
This home is ranked 213th out of 395 homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 10m
12% below state avg
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
4 of 6 metrics below state avg
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
This scorecard compares key inspection, violation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 2 | 9 | This facility has had 78% fewer total inspections than the New York average (2 vs. NY avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 78% fewer |
|
Inspections with violations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory violation.
| 1 | 4 | This facility has 75% fewer inspections with violations than a typical New York assisted living residence (1 vs. NY avg 4).↓ 75% better |
|
Inspection violation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one violation.
| 50% | 44% | This facility has 6 percentage points higher inspection violation rate than a typical New York assisted living residence (50% vs. NY avg 44%).↑ 6% worse Rank #160 / 316 Inspection violation rate — State benchmarked This home is ranked 160th out of 316 homes we track in New York for % of inspections with violations. Shows this facility's % of inspections with violations compared to the New York average among 316 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Inspections with violations
Inspections that uncovered at least one regulatory violation.
| 1 | 4 | This facility has 75% fewer inspections with violations than a typical New York assisted living residence (1 vs. NY avg 4).↓ 75% better |
|
Inspection violation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one violation.
| 50% | 44% | This facility has 6 percentage points higher inspection violation rate than a typical New York assisted living residence (50% vs. NY avg 44%).↑ 6% worse Rank #160 / 316 Inspection violation rate — State benchmarked This home is ranked 160th out of 316 homes we track in New York for % of inspections with violations. Shows this facility's % of inspections with violations compared to the New York average among 316 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 0 | 6 | This facility has had 100% fewer complaint visits than the New York average (0 vs. NY avg 6). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 100% fewer Rank #1 / 316 Complaint visits — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1st out of 316 homes we track in New York for complaint-related visits. Shows this facility's complaint-related visits compared to the New York average among 316 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Violations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total violations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 1 | 21 | This facility has 95% fewer total violations than a typical New York assisted living residence (1 vs. NY avg 21).↓ 95% better Rank #31 / 316 Total violations — State benchmarked This home is ranked 31st out of 316 homes we track in New York for violations. Shows this facility's violations compared to the New York average among 316 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Violations per inspection
Average violations per inspection.
| 0.5 | 2.3 | This facility has 78% fewer violations per inspection than a typical New York assisted living residence (0.5 vs. NY avg 2.3).↓ 78% better Rank #76 / 316 Violations per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 76th out of 316 homes we track in New York for violations per inspection. Shows this facility's violations per inspection compared to the New York average among 316 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Per-category split of the 1 violations recorded across all inspections. Counts are compared against the New York state average for each category. A green dot means this facility is below the state average for that category; an amber dot means it is above.
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
New York average 3.6
Last Health inspection on May 2024
New York average 18.5
New York average 5.05
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
12 of 13 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 13 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
477% more staff per resident than New York average
14% worse than New York average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
90 total: 83 full-time employees and 7 contractors.
90
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
6.8 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
26 total: 24 full-time employees and 2 contractors.
26
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
225 total: 203 full-time employees and 22 contractors.
225
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
6.4 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
15,140 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 203 | 22 | 225 | 73,914 | 92 | 100% | 6.4 |
| Registered Nurse | 83 | 7 | 90 | 22,112 | 92 | 100% | 6.8 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 24 | 2 | 26 | 9,276 | 92 | 100% | 7 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 25 | 0 | 25 | 6,989 | 92 | 100% | 6.8 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 14 | 0 | 14 | 3,403 | 67 | 73% | 7 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 8 | 8 | 2,654 | 89 | 97% | 7.2 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 8 | 8 | 2,562 | 92 | 100% | 7.2 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 8 | 8 | 2,052 | 90 | 98% | 7.8 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1,324 | 65 | 71% | 6.3 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 8 | 8 | 1,062 | 78 | 85% | 6.6 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 4 | 4 | 877 | 74 | 80% | 6.5 |
| Administrator | 2 | 0 | 2 | 789 | 62 | 67% | 6.9 |
| Other Physician | 3 | 0 | 3 | 560 | 64 | 70% | 7 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 0 | 1 | 1 | 502 | 66 | 72% | 7.6 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 406 | 58 | 63% | 7 |
| Medical Director | 1 | 0 | 1 | 329 | 47 | 51% | 7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 10 | 0 | 10 | 127 | 4 | 4% | 6.4 |
| Dental Services Staff | 5 | 0 | 5 | 89 | 3 | 3% | 6.9 |
| Dietitian | 2 | 0 | 2 | 42 | 3 | 3% | 7 |
| Other Social Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 3 | 3% | 7 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
6.5
34% better than New York averageNew York average: 9.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
12.2
33% better than New York averageNew York average: 18.1
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
57% better than New York averageNew York average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
23% better than New York averageNew York average: 16.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.8%
21% better than New York averageNew York average: 21.4%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
62% better than New York averageNew York average: 3.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 7.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
46% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5%
26% better than New York averageNew York average: 6.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.4%
76% better than New York averageNew York average: 18.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.1%
35% better than New York averageNew York average: 12.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.6%
10% worse than New York averageNew York average: 91.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.2%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 95.2%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.5%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 76.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
63% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 78.8%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
47% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
49% of new residents, often for short stays.
4% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
442Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for RiverSpring Residences from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #9 / 383Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 9th out of 383 homes we track in New York. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #80 / 382Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 80th out of 382 homes we track in New York. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in New York that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Pets Allowed
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
New residents most often arrive under private pay (49% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 5 - 6 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
5901 Palisade Avenue, New York, NY 10471
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 55.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam Nursing Home | NH SNF | New York (Manhattan) | 409
Facility
409
NY AVG
160
Rank
#23 / 736 |
98.0%
Facility
98.0%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#61 / 392 | +8% | 3.13
Facility
3.13
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#249 / 395 | +5% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 14
Facility
14
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#146 / 397 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#326 / 397 | - | 401 | - |
93
Facility
93
NY AVG
64
Rank
#191 / 1,150 | Judith Fenster | $81.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$81.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#10 / 383 | $30.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$30.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#35 / 383 | 37.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
37.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#336 / 382 | 335570 | ||||
| Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH PC SNF | New York (Manhattan) | 499
Facility
499
NY AVG
160
Rank
#14 / 736 |
92.0%
Facility
92.0%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#257 / 392 | +1% | 2.65
Facility
2.65
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#341 / 395 | +85% | -26% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 9
Facility
9
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#57 / 397 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#59 / 397 | - | 459 | - |
97
Facility
97
NY AVG
64
Rank
#80 / 1,150 | Celma Dumaguing | $88.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$88.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#8 / 383 | $30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$30.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#36 / 383 | 33.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
33.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#361 / 382 | 335232 | ||||
| Dry Harbor Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center | NH SNF | Middle Village (Flushing) | 360
Facility
360
NY AVG
160
Rank
#34 / 736 |
98.0%
Facility
98.0%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#61 / 392 | +8% | 3.50
Facility
3.50
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#139 / 395 | +66% | -2% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 15
Facility
15
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#164 / 397 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#211 / 397 | - | 35 | - |
86
Facility
86
NY AVG
64
Rank
#358 / 1,150 | Jonathan Strasser | $65.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$65.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#23 / 383 | $26.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$26.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#48 / 383 | 40.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
40.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#312 / 382 | 335416 | ||||
| ArchCare at Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home & Rehabilitation Center | NH MC RC SNF | New York (Manhattan) | 360
Facility
360
NY AVG
160
Rank
#34 / 736 |
91.1%
Facility
91.1%
NY AVG
90.6%
Rank
#268 / 392 | +1% | 3.34
Facility
3.34
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#189 / 395 | +81% | -7% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 14
Facility
14
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#146 / 397 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#97 / 397 | - | 328 | - |
98
Facility
98
NY AVG
64
Rank
#46 / 1,150 | Catholic Healthcare Systems | $68.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$68.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#21 / 383 | $33.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$33.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#28 / 383 | 49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#224 / 382 | 335050 | ||||
| RiverSpring Residences | NH AL HC HOS IL MC PC SNF | New York | 69
Facility
69
NY AVG
160
Rank
#612 / 736 | - | - | 3.17
Facility
3.17
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#213 / 395 | +59% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 398 | 13
Facility
13
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#124 / 397 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#149 / 397 | - | 365 | - |
56
Facility
56
NY AVG
64
Rank
#736 / 1,150 | Lawrence Burian | $81.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$81.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$29.2M
Rank
#9 / 383 | $53.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$53.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$15.4M
Rank
#9 / 383 | 65.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
65.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
55.8%
Rank
#80 / 382 | 335020 |
RiverSpring Residences is located in New York City, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York City.
RiverSpring Residences is legally operated by The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale.
RiverSpring Residences has a walk score of 56. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
According to NY state health department records, RiverSpring Residences's license number is 020-S-007.
RiverSpring Residences's occupancy is 91.2%.
Yes — see the floorplan options available at RiverSpring Residences on this page.
Yes, RiverSpring Residences allows residents to bring their pets.
RiverSpring Residences is registered as a non-profit in NY.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
