Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
62
31 employees · 31 contractors · 22 on an average day Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Sister Bay, WI
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Sister Bay, WI
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, nursing home care, hospice care, palliative care, and skilled nursing in Sister Bay, Wisconsin. The range may suit a resident whose needs change over time and who may be able to remain in the same community as care needs grow. Independent living provides private living without daily care, while assisted living adds help with bathing, dressing, medication, and other daily tasks.
Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. Nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Hospice and palliative care address end of life and comfort focused needs, including care centered on comfort when treatment is no longer the main goal.
The community has 50 beds, placing it in the mid sized range rather than clearly at either a small or large community scale. Its Long Term Care & Post Acute Rehab program includes rehabilitation services for residents receiving ongoing care or recovering after a hospital stay. A doctor is on staff, and 24 hour staffing is available.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 8 minutes per resident per day, representing the recorded daily nursing time assigned per resident. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted. Katherine Casey serves as administrator, and Sister Bay Snf Opco operates the community. A Walk Score of 44 places the area in a car dependent setting, so most errands require a car or a ride.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 8m
This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 8mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +99% above Wisconsin average
4 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 7 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
7 staff · 10.3-hour shifts
55m
↓ 6% · WI 58mThis facility: 55m per resident per day, 6% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 7 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
7 staff · 10.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 9 total: 3 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
9 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
54m
↑ 42% · WI 38mThis facility: 54m per resident per day, 42% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 9 total: 3 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
9 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 31 total: 13 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
31 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
2h 20m
↓ 10% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 2h 20m per resident per day, 10% below the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 31 total: 13 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
31 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
8m
↑ 99% · WI 4mThis facility: 8m per resident per day, 99% above the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 22m
↓ 9% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 3h 22m per resident per day, 9% below the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
29m
↓ 28% · WI 40mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 28% below the Wisconsin average of 40m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
62
31 employees · 31 contractors · 22 on an average day
62 total staff / 37 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.68 : 1
↓ 31% · WI 2.42This facility: 1.68 staff per resident, 31% below the Wisconsin average of 2.42 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
62 staff ÷ 37 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.8 h
↑ 21% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 8.8 h, 21% above the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
17,839 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →41.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.1% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (18), Licensed Practical Nurse (6), Registered Nurse (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #114 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #114 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #109 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #109 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
44
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #41 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #41 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
77%
This home usually has availability
Based on 38.5 residents and 50 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Higher than the Wisconsin average: 71.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
162
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyDoor
CMS Certification Number525494
Certification TypeTitle 18 SNF Title 19 NF
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village is administered by Katherine Casey.
Owner NameSister Bay Snf Opco LLC
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Accept Medicare
Respiratory Therapy
Outpatient Therapy
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Doctor on Staff
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Diabetes Management
Infectious Disease Management
Nurse Practitioner On-Site Five Days a Week
24-Hour Physician On-Call
Central Lines
IV Antibiotics
Oxygen Management
Gastrostomy Tube Feeding
CPAP/BIPAP Support
Hospice and Palliative Care
HousekeepingListed as: Light housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
TransportationListed as: Medical transport · Private transportation services
Fax(920) 854-9529
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Courtyard
Walking Paths
Beauty Salon
Library
Garden
Outdoor Pavilion
Spacious Living Areas with Large Windows
Private Dining Room
Emergency Call System
Pet Therapy
Activities
Movies
Local Gallery Visits
Live Music
Outdoor Excursions To State Parks and Beaches
Worship Space
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village.- Private dining room for family events.
Room Types
1 Bedroom
Private Room
Cottage / Villa
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
5
↓ 18% · WI 6.1This facility: 5, 18% below the WI average of 6.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
48
Rank #135 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 71% · WI 28This facility: 48, 71% above the WI average of 28 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
9.6
Rank #164 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 164th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 126% · WI 4.24This facility: 9.6, 126% above the WI average of 4.24 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
48 of 48 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the WI average of 0.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 9% · WI 1.1This facility: 1, 9% below the WI average of 1.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
45
↑ 76% · WI 25.5This facility: 45, 76% above the WI average of 25.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 300% · WI 0.5This facility: 2, 300% above the WI average of 0.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 03, 2026 · 13 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 12 of 48 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 03, 2026
13 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 10, 2026
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 07, 2025
11 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 17, 2024
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 24, 2024
18 citations
Administration minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 48 citations
Quality of Life & Care
12 deficiencies (25%)
Resident Rights
10 deficiencies (21%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
8 deficiencies (17%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
5 deficiencies (10%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (10%)
Infection Control
4 deficiencies (8%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
37 of 48 citations resulted from standard inspections; 7 of 48 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 48 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 10, 2026 · 131-day payment denial
Feb 10, 2026 · 131-day payment denial
Total fines
$0
WI avg $95KWisconsin average: $94,855. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #1 / 168Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Wisconsin average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 168 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
0
WI avg 2.02Wisconsin average: 2.02. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
131 days
↑ 44% · WI 0.7This facility: 1, 44% above the Wisconsin average of 0.7. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Feb 10, 2026
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
131 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
131 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$0
Wisconsin average
$94,855
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 34% · WI 3.0This facility: 2.0, 34% below the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 74% · WI 2.9This facility: 5.0, 74% above the WI average of 2.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 22% · WI 9.4This facility: 11.4, 22% above the WI average of 9.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
24.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 24% · WI 19.8This facility: 24.6, 24% above the WI average of 19.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 4 better, 7 worse, 2 near WI average
6 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 worse, 2 near WI average, 1 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
24.6%
↑ 53% · WI 16.1This facility: 24.6, 53% above the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
24.6%
↑ 53% · WI 16.1This facility: 24.6, 53% above the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.3%
↓ 6% · WI 18.4This facility: 17.3, 6% below the WI average of 18.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.3%
↓ 6% · WI 18.4This facility: 17.3, 6% below the WI average of 18.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.8%
↑ 29% · WI 24.6This facility: 31.8, 29% above the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.8%
↑ 29% · WI 24.6This facility: 31.8, 29% above the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 48% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.4, 48% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 48% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.4, 48% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8%
↑ 45% · WI 3.3This facility: 4.8, 45% above the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8%
↑ 45% · WI 3.3This facility: 4.8, 45% above the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6%
↑ 32% · WI 5.0This facility: 6.6, 32% above the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6%
↑ 32% · WI 5.0This facility: 6.6, 32% above the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
↓ 22% · WI 5.1This facility: 4.0, 22% below the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
↓ 22% · WI 5.1This facility: 4.0, 22% below the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
24.5%
↑ 330% · WI 5.7This facility: 24.5, 330% above the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
24.5%
↑ 330% · WI 5.7This facility: 24.5, 330% above the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.3%
↑ 60% · WI 15.8This facility: 25.3, 60% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.3%
↑ 60% · WI 15.8This facility: 25.3, 60% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.3%
↑ 2% · WI 95.7This facility: 97.3, 2% above the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.3%
↑ 2% · WI 95.7This facility: 97.3, 2% above the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
↑ 2% · WI 95.0This facility: 96.9, 2% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
↑ 2% · WI 95.0This facility: 96.9, 2% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.58
↓ 64% · WI 1.61This facility: 0.58, 64% below the WI average of 1.61 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.58
↓ 64% · WI 1.61This facility: 0.58, 64% below the WI average of 1.61 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
4.07
↑ 86% · WI 2.19This facility: 4.07, 86% above the WI average of 2.19 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
4.07
↑ 86% · WI 2.19This facility: 4.07, 86% above the WI average of 2.19 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 6 measures
Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.1%
≈ 0% · WI 86.5This facility: 86.1, level with the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.1%
≈ 0% · WI 86.5This facility: 86.1, level with the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7%
↓ 19% · WI 82.2This facility: 66.7, 19% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7%
↓ 19% · WI 82.2This facility: 66.7, 19% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.4%
↓ 32% · WI 22.7This facility: 15.4, 32% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.4%
↓ 32% · WI 22.7This facility: 15.4, 32% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.5%
↑ 3% · WI 15.0This facility: 15.5, 3% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.5%
↑ 3% · WI 15.0This facility: 15.5, 3% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending 2022. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY 2022
Latest cost report is for the fiscal year ending 2022, older than most Wisconsin homes. Rankings are not shown because peers report different years.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−28.7% operating margin
−15.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
52.6% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%
Payroll fell $0.6M while revenue fell $0.0M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2022 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2022 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2022 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2022Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.7M | −$0.0M | Trend 20152022 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.7M | +$1.0M | Trend 20152022 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.9M | −$1.0M | Trend 20152022 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −28.7% | −15.2 pts | Trend 20152022 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.1M | −$1.8M | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2022 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2022Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.5M | −$0.6M | Trend 20152022 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 52.6% | −9.2 pts | Trend 20152022 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Not ranked | 6.1 pts under WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2022 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2015–2022 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.3M | $5.9M | $5.6M | $6.1M | $6.8M | $6.6M | $6.8M | $6.7M |
| Operating expenses | $6.6M | $6.8M | $7.0M | $7.3M | $7.3M | $7.4M | $7.7M | $8.7M |
| Net patient income | −$1.3M | −$1.0M | −$1.4M | −$1.1M | −$0.6M | −$0.8M | −$0.9M | −$1.9M |
| Operating margin | −25.0% | −16.3% | −24.6% | −18.2% | −8.2% | −11.5% | −13.5% | −28.7% |
| Net income | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $1.1M | $0.8M | $0.3M | $0.7M | −$1.1M |
| Payroll costs | $3.9M | $4.1M | $4.2M | $4.2M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.2M | $3.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 73.2% | 69.3% | 74.4% | 68.3% | 61.6% | 61.4% | 61.8% | 52.6% |
| Beds | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 |
| Gross revenue | $6.3M | $6.7M | $6.7M | $7.5M | $7.9M | $7.8M | $8.0M | $7.7M |
| Salaries | $3.3M | $3.4M | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.5M | $3.4M | $3.4M | $2.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.6M | $2.0M |
| Other operating costs | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.3M | $3.5M | $5.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $205 | $227 | $223 | $249 | $150 | $161 | $176 | $168 |
| Cost per day | $256 | $264 | $278 | $294 | $162 | $180 | $200 | $217 |
| Average length of stay | 133.4 days | 138.6 days | 96.7 days | 70.4 days | 149.1 days | 249.5 days | 284.3 days | 354.3 days |
Showing 2022–2020 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
71 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
22 · 31%
Medicaid
3 · 4%
Private pay & other
46 · 65%
Resident snapshot
37 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 11%
Medicaid
20 · 54%
Private pay & other
13 · 35%
Leaving
64 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
13 · 20%
Medicaid
8 · 13%
Private pay & other
43 · 67%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Sister Bay's city center to Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harbor Haven Health & Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC PC SNF | Fond Du Lac | - | 85
Facility
85
WI AVG
78
Rank
#81 / 197 | - |
57
Facility
57
WI AVG
48
Rank
#69 / 191 | Private / Semi-Private Rooms |
| Shady Lane Nursing Care Center | NH AL MC RC SNF | Manitowoc | - | 50
Facility
50
WI AVG
78
Rank
#114 / 197 | A+ |
75
Facility
75
WI AVG
48
Rank
#29 / 191 | - |
| St Camillus | NH AL HOS IL MC SNF | Wauwatosa | - | 86
Facility
86
WI AVG
78
Rank
#79 / 197 | - |
12
Facility
12
WI AVG
48
Rank
#174 / 191 | - |
| Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village | NH AL HOS IL MC PC SNF | Sister Bay | - | 50
Facility
50
WI AVG
78
Rank
#114 / 197 | - |
44
Facility
44
WI AVG
48
Rank
#109 / 191 | - |
| Sheboygan Senior Community Inc | NH AL RC SNF | Y Sheboygan | - | 31
Facility
31
WI AVG
78
Rank
#179 / 197 | - | - | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village
Who is the owner of Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village?
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village is legally operated by Sister Bay Snf Opco LLC, and administered by Katherine Casey.
Is Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village in a walkable area?
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village has a walk score of 44. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village?
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village's occupancy is 77%.
Are pets allowed at Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village?
No, Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village?
The team at Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village can be reached at info@scandiasl.com.
Does Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village is registered as a for-profit in WI.
Who is the administrator of Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village?
Katherine Casey is the administrator of Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
