1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Sharon Care Center has been running skilled nursing at 8167 W 3rd St in Los Angeles for 19 years, and at 87.2% occupancy across 86 beds, it’s clearly not sitting empty. The average stay is 96 days, which is the clearest signal of what this place actually is: a post-acute facility where most people come to recover and move on, not a place most residents stay permanently.
The neighborhood scores a 95 on the Walk Score scale, which in LA terms is genuinely rare. Walker’s paradise means pharmacies, food, and daily errands are all on foot; no circling for parking, no rideshare wait, which matters more than it sounds when you’re visiting someone in a nursing facility regularly.
Staffing runs 3 hours and 45 minutes of total nursing care per resident per day, split across registered nurses, LPNs, LVNs, and nurse aides. Ms. Larisa Machneva is the administrator. The care model covers skilled nursing, hospice, and respite stays, so the facility handles both people who are recovering from something acute and people who are at end of life; different populations, same building.
Sharon Care Center takes Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, which covers the main financial pathways families are usually working with when a hospital discharge is driving the timeline.
Taken together, 87.2% occupancy, a 96-day average stay, and all three major payment types accepted show this is a facility that sees steady use and is financially reachable across most coverage situations. For a short-term skilled nursing placement in central LA, the practical barriers here are low.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 201st out of 293 homes in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 23m per day | ▼ 41% State avg: 39m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 59m per day | ▼ 20% State avg: 1h 13m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 28m per day | ▼ 7% State avg: 2h 39m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 31m per day | ▼ 14% State avg: 4h 5m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 9m per day | ▲ 87% State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 19m per day | ▼ 37% State avg: 30m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
California average 12.5
Last Health inspection on Nov 2025
California average 50.2
California average 4.65
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
46 of 111 citations resulted from standard inspections; 50 of 111 resulted from complaint investigations; and 15 of 111 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
150% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 0.4
300% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
10% more staff per resident than California average
6% worse than California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 11 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
11
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.1 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 16 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
16
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.9 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 64 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
64
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.2 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
3,835 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 64 | 0 | 64 | 17,958 | 92 | 100% | 7.2 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 16 | 0 | 16 | 5,561 | 92 | 100% | 7.9 |
| Registered Nurse | 11 | 0 | 11 | 2,333 | 92 | 100% | 7.1 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,585 | 70 | 76% | 8.1 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 7 | 7 | 1,138 | 91 | 99% | 6.4 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,124 | 85 | 92% | 6.8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 5 | 5 | 975 | 78 | 85% | 6.9 |
| Dental Services Staff | 2 | 0 | 2 | 966 | 69 | 75% | 7.9 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 4 | 4 | 535 | 71 | 77% | 7.5 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 4 | 4 | 498 | 63 | 68% | 7.7 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 480 | 60 | 65% | 8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 472 | 59 | 64% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 7 | 7 | 405 | 62 | 67% | 4.9 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 2 | 2 | 137 | 20 | 22% | 6.8 |
| Other Physician | 0 | 2 | 2 | 60 | 21 | 23% | 2.2 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 7 | 8% | 7.3 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 36 | 12 | 13% | 3 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1% | 8 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
10% lower than California averageCalifornia average: $55K
58% fewer fines than California averageCalifornia average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than California averageCalifornia average: 0.5
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Oct 6, 2023 · $49K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Oct 6, 2023Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
5.6
15% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
12.5
11% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.4%
42% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.7%
35% better than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.4%
108% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.1%
83% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
19% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
52.0%
677% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.0%
70% better than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.8%
14% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.3%
43% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.88
16% better than California averageCalifornia average: 2.25
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.72
55% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.59
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.8%
32% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.6%
50% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
25.9%
12% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 23.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.9%
15% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.2%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
70.0%
30% better than California averageCalifornia average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
42.2%
17% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
38% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
36% of new residents, often for short stays.
25% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
70Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Sharon Care Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #217 / 295Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 217th out of 295 homes in California for payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #197 / 295Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 197th out of 295 homes in California for payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the California average. Well-run California facilities typically land around 56–67% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
No pets allowed
Housing Options: Semi-Private Rooms
Building Type: Single-story
On-site Medical Care and Health Services
Exercise Programs
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
New residents most often arrive under Medicare (38% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
7.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Los Angeles's city center to Sharon Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 4.55 miles to nearest hospital (Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
| Angels Nursing Center | NH SNF | Los Angeles (Westlake) | 41
Facility
41
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1194 / 1644 |
90.2%
Facility
90.2%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#338 / 1492 | +22% | 4.73
Facility
4.73
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#56 / 293 | -54% | +12% | $71.6k
Facility
$71.6k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#271 / 298 | 60
Facility
60
CA AVG
81
Rank
#1294 / 1400 | 42
Facility
42
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#151 / 293 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#130 / 293 | 4 | 37 | A+ |
92
Facility
92
CA AVG
57
Rank
#137 / 2087 | Aret Akian | $5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#292 / 295 | $3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#283 / 295 | 65.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
65.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#5 / 295 | 55704 | ||||
| Palazzo Post Acute | NH SNF | Los Angeles (East Hollywood) | 99
Facility
99
CA AVG
104
Rank
#724 / 1644 |
94.0%
Facility
94.0%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#237 / 1492 | +27% | 4.46
Facility
4.46
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#76 / 293 | -25% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | - | 47
Facility
47
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#173 / 293 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#29 / 293 | 1 | 93 | A+ |
91
Facility
91
CA AVG
57
Rank
#155 / 2087 | Serrano Licensee 1 LLC | $13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#134 / 295 | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#152 / 295 | 65.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
65.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#187 / 295 | 56456 | ||||
| Hollenbeck Palms | NH AL IL MC SNF | Los Angeles (Central La) | 185
Facility
185
CA AVG
104
Rank
#196 / 1644 |
85.4%
Facility
85.4%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#443 / 1492 | +16% | 4.84
Facility
4.84
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#47 / 293 | -11% | +15% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | 89
Facility
89
CA AVG
81
Rank
#461 / 1400 | 39
Facility
39
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#137 / 293 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#257 / 293 | 1 | 158 | - |
62
Facility
62
CA AVG
57
Rank
#980 / 2087 | Casey Adams | $21.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$21.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#77 / 295 | $15.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$15.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#20 / 295 | 73.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
73.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#44 / 295 | 55115 | ||||
| Fountainview at Eisenberg Village | NH AL IL SNF | Reseda | 216
Facility
216
CA AVG
104
Rank
#127 / 1644 |
48.1%
Facility
48.1%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#1350 / 1492 | -35% | 2.96
Facility
2.96
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#291 / 293 | +1% | -30% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 298 | 89
Facility
89
CA AVG
81
Rank
#461 / 1400 | 66
Facility
66
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#237 / 293 | 3.9
Facility
3.9
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#137 / 293 | - | 104 | - |
49
Facility
49
CA AVG
57
Rank
#1368 / 2087 | Karen Pham | $16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#128 / 295 | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#131 / 295 | 50.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
50.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#173 / 295 | 555716 | ||||
| Sharon Care Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Los Angeles (Central La) | 86
Facility
86
CA AVG
104
Rank
#874 / 1644 | - | - | 3.74
Facility
3.74
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#201 / 293 | -11% | -11% | $49.2k
Facility
$49.2k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#256 / 298 | - | 111
Facility
111
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#285 / 293 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#105 / 293 | 5 | 2 | - |
95
Facility
95
CA AVG
57
Rank
#66 / 2087 | Summit Care LLC | $12.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#188 / 295 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#217 / 295 | 53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#197 / 295 | 55755 |
Sharon Care Center is located in Los Angeles, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Sharon Care Center is in the Central LA neighborhood of Los Angeles.
Sharon Care Center has a walk score of 95. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Sharon Care Center's occupancy is 87.2%.
Sharon Care Center has been operating for approximately 19 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, Sharon Care Center has a no-pet policy.
Sharon Care Center is registered as a for-profit in CA.
Yes — there are 5 photos of Sharon Care Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
