Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (76% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
St. Joseph of Harahan is a skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility at 405 Folse Street in Harahan, Louisiana. Serving Jefferson Parish, the community is operated by Plantation Management Company, LLC and accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Total adjusted nursing hours are 3 hours and 18 minutes per resident per day, which is 21% below the Louisiana average. RN coverage is 6 minutes per day, 68% below the state average, though LPN hours run 10% above the state benchmark. The facility carries a 1-star overall CMS rating, with 1-star sub-ratings for staffing and quality measures.
The Louisiana Department of Health, Health Standards Section, oversees facility inspections. St. Joseph of Harahan holds a 1-star health inspection sub-rating and maintains a citations-per-inspection rate of 10.0. Current occupancy is 85.1%, which is above the state average of 71.8%. Financial records show $19.5 million in annual revenue, the 5th highest among reported Louisiana skilled nursing facilities.
Service programs include long-term skilled nursing, memory care, and both inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation. The facility primarily serves short-stay residents, with 76% of new admissions categorized as private pay. Since specific monthly rates are not included in public records, families should request a current fee schedule directly from the facility.
Families seeking a facility with high occupancy and a private-pay orientation may find this environment appropriate. Those prioritizing staffing levels and CMS quality benchmarks should review the facility’s ratings in detail and consider on-site visits before making a placement decision.
In Louisiana, the Department of Health, Health Standards Section performs unannounced onsite surveys to verify that healthcare providers meet both state licensing and federal safety rules.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | LA Average | vs. LA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 63 | 32 | This facility has 97% more total deficiencies than a typical Louisiana nursing home (63 vs. LA avg 32).↑ 97% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 3.9 | 4.6 | This facility has 15% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Louisiana nursing home (3.9 vs. LA avg 4.6).↓ 15% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | LA Average | vs. LA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 16 | 7 | This facility has had 129% more total inspections than the Louisiana average (16 vs. LA avg 7). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 129% more |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
14% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
76% of new residents, often for short stays.
10% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (76% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Harahan's city center to St Joseph of Harahan's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the LA Dept. of Health (LDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Louisiana average is: 47.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audubon Retirement Village | NH SNF | New Orleans (Audubon) | 142
Facility
142
LA AVG
113
Rank
#69 / 259 |
79.5%
Facility
79.5%
LA AVG
72.4
Rank
#65 / 169 | +10% | 5.18
Facility
5.18
LA AVG
4.14
Rank
#9 / 192 | -6% | +25% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$107.9k
Rank
#1 / 199 | 8
Facility
8
LA AVG
25.7
Rank
#7 / 199 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
LA AVG
3.9
Rank
#30 / 199 | - | 113 | - |
73
Facility
73
LA AVG
40
Rank
#20 / 343 | Ayame Dinkler | $14.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#25 / 192 | $0.0kFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$0.0kFiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#192 / 192 | 0%Fiscal year ending 12/2023 | 195638 | ||||
| Old Brownlee Community Care Center | NH SNF | Bossier City | 89
Facility
89
LA AVG
113
Rank
#190 / 259 |
93.0%
Facility
93.0%
LA AVG
72.4
Rank
#17 / 169 | +28% | 5.53
Facility
5.53
LA AVG
4.14
Rank
#4 / 192 | +5% | +33% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$107.9k
Rank
#1 / 199 | 8
Facility
8
LA AVG
25.7
Rank
#7 / 199 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
LA AVG
3.9
Rank
#2 / 199 | - | 83 | - |
5
Facility
5
LA AVG
40
Rank
#331 / 343 | - | $10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
LA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#56 / 192 | $5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$5.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
LA AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#35 / 192 | 50.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
50.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
LA AVG
47.9%
Rank
#51 / 191 | 195363 | ||||
| Marrero Healthcare Center | NH SNF | Marrero (Walkertown) | 105
Facility
105
LA AVG
113
Rank
#151 / 259 |
79.5%
Facility
79.5%
LA AVG
72.4
Rank
#65 / 169 | +10% | 3.25
Facility
3.25
LA AVG
4.14
Rank
#149 / 192 | -34% | -21% | $46.3k
Facility
$46.3k
LA AVG
$107.9k
Rank
#139 / 199 | 17
Facility
17
LA AVG
25.7
Rank
#49 / 199 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
LA AVG
3.9
Rank
#69 / 199 | 2 | 84 | - |
46
Facility
46
LA AVG
40
Rank
#122 / 343 | Phillip Sweeney | $9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#87 / 192 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#116 / 192 | 40.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
40.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
47.9%
Rank
#153 / 191 | 195336 | ||||
| The Gardens Assisted Living | NH AL SNF | Lake Charles | 60
Facility
60
LA AVG
113
Rank
#226 / 259 |
70.8%
Facility
70.8%
LA AVG
72.4
Rank
#101 / 169 | -2% | 5.44
Facility
5.44
LA AVG
4.14
Rank
#6 / 192 | -66% | +31% | $0
Facility
$0
LA AVG
$107.9k
Rank
#1 / 199 | 16
Facility
16
LA AVG
25.7
Rank
#43 / 199 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
LA AVG
3.9
Rank
#30 / 199 | 1 | 43 | A+ |
14
Facility
14
LA AVG
40
Rank
#301 / 343 | Justin Wilcoxon | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#137 / 192 | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#149 / 192 | 41.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
41.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
LA AVG
47.9%
Rank
#143 / 191 | 195636 |
St Joseph of Harahan is in the Jefferson Parish neighborhood of Harahan.
St Joseph of Harahan has a walk score of 47. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
St Joseph of Harahan's occupancy is 85%.
No, St Joseph of Harahan has a no-pet policy.
St Joseph of Harahan is registered as a for-profit in LA.
St Joseph of Harahan received a 1-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
St Joseph of Harahan has 206 beds.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance