Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
89
26 employees · 63 contractors · 36 on an average day Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Wiggins, MS
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Wiggins, MS
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation is a nursing home in Wiggins, MS offering memory care and skilled nursing. Nursing care supports residents who need ongoing clinical attention, while memory care provides a dedicated setting for people living with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia. The community may be a good fit for someone recovering from an illness, surgery, or accident who needs short-term rehabilitation alongside skilled nursing care.
With 59 beds, Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation is a smaller community where staff and residents can get to know each other. Physical, occupational, and speech therapy are available for rehabilitation, and wound care, ostomy care, IV therapy and hydration, and therapeutic diet management address specific clinical needs. The total nurse staffing figure is 6 hours 5 minutes per resident per day, representing daily nursing time allocated to each resident.
Residents can take part in arts and crafts, social events, parties, bingo, other games, prayer services, and movie nights. An on-site salon and spa provides access to those services without leaving the community, while transportation is available for residents who need a ride. The area has a Walk Score of 47 and is car-dependent, so most errands require a car or a ride. Payment options include Medicare, which can cover short-term skilled care after a hospital stay, and private pay. Beth Gruzinskas serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 5m
This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 5mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +94% above Mississippi average
0 of 6 metrics below Mississippi average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 10 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
10 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
49m
↑ 13% · MS 43mThis facility: 49m per resident per day, 13% above the Mississippi average of 43m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 10 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
10 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 13 agency contractors.
18 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
1h 56m
↑ 53% · MS 1h 16mThis facility: 1h 56m per resident per day, 53% above the Mississippi average of 1h 16m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 13 agency contractors.
18 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 33 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 29 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
3h 20m
↑ 17% · MS 2h 51mThis facility: 3h 20m per resident per day, 17% above the Mississippi average of 2h 51m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 33 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 29 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↑ 94% · MS 2mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 94% above the Mississippi average of 2m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 3m
↑ 25% · MS 4h 2mThis facility: 5h 3m per resident per day, 25% above the Mississippi average of 4h 2m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
24m
↑ 4% · MS 23mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 4% above the Mississippi average of 23m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
89
26 employees · 63 contractors · 36 on an average day
89 total staff / 50 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.78 : 1
↑ 12% · MS 1.60This facility: 1.78 staff per resident, 12% above the Mississippi average of 1.60 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
89 staff ÷ 50 residents
See full Mississippi ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 8% · MS 8 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 8% below the Mississippi average of 8 h (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
24,478 staff hours this quarter
See full Mississippi ranking →42.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Mississippi average: 89.5% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (29), Licensed Practical Nurse (13), Registered Nurse (5), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), RN Director of Nursing (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Mental Health Service Worker (1), Other Social Services Staff (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
59
Rank #113 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 113th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
59
Rank #113 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 113th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #48 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #48 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
47
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #104 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 104th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #104 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 104th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
76.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 45 residents and 59 beds. Source: state inspection report (Jan 2024)
Lower than the Mississippi average: 86.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
91
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CountyStone
CMS Certification Number255308
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation is legally operated by Juanita Loreman, and administered by Beth Gruzinskas.
Ownership TypeProprietary
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Ostomy CareCare for a stoma and the attached pouch after surgery, such as for a colostomy or ileostomy. Proper care helps prevent skin problems and infection.
Therapeutic Diets
Noninvasive Vent Care
Bariatric CareSpecialized care for people with severe obesity, including safe transfers, equipment, mobility support, and management of related health needs.
TransportationListed as: Transportation for Dialysis Care
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Beauty Salon
Activities
Arts & Crafts
Bingo and Other Games
Prayer Services and Movie Nights
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Mississippi, the State Department of Health, Bureau of Health Facilities Licensure conducts unannounced surveys to monitor facility compliance with health, safety, and resident rights laws.
Since 2019 · 7 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 18 deficiencies 19 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 18 deficiencies 19 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Mississippi state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2019 vs. Mississippi state average
Overall vs. MS average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Mississippi average:
• Total deficiencies (60% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (36% below)
• Total deficiencies (60% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (36% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MS Average | vs. MS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 18 | 45.0 | This facility has 60% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Mississippi nursing home (18 vs. MS avg 45).↓ 60% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 0.9 | 1.4 | This facility has 36% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Mississippi nursing home (0.9 vs. MS avg 1.4).↓ 36% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | MS Average | vs. MS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 19 | 31.0 | This facility has had 39% fewer total inspections than the Mississippi average (19 vs. MS avg 31). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 39% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4
↓ 15% · MS 4.7This facility: 4, 15% below the MS average of 4.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
9
Rank #12 / 114Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Mississippi State average, with a ranking across all 114 MS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 50% · MS 18.1This facility: 9, 50% below the MS average of 18.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.25
Rank #12 / 114Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Mississippi mean across 114 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 41% · MS 3.83This facility: 2.25, 41% below the MS average of 3.83 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
9 of 9 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 0.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
4
↑ 233% · MS 1.2This facility: 4, 233% above the MS average of 1.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
5
↓ 68% · MS 15.7This facility: 5, 68% below the MS average of 15.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 0.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 29, 2025 · 1 citation (Nutrition, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 4 of 9 citations · 4 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 29, 2025
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 25, 2024
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 08, 2023
3 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 05, 2021
2 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 9 citations
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (44%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (22%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (22%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (11%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
6 of 9 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 9 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Sep 8, 2023 · $8,190 civil money penalty
Sep 8, 2023 · $8,190 civil money penalty
Sep 8, 2023 · 2-day payment denial
Total fines
$8,190
↓ 76% · MS $34KThis facility: $8,190, 76% below the Mississippi average of $33,848. Average among the 110 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #59 / 115Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 115 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Mississippi average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 115 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 51% · MS 2.05This facility: 1, 51% below the Mississippi average of 2.05. Average among the 110 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
2 days
↑ 400% · MS 0.2This facility: 1, 400% above the Mississippi average of 0.2. Average among the 110 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Sep 8, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,190
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,190
Sep 8, 2023
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
2 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
2 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$8,190
Mississippi average
$33,848
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Mississippi and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Mississippi average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 27% · MS 11.1This facility: 14.1, 27% above the MS average of 11.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
23.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 18% · MS 20.2This facility: 23.8, 18% above the MS average of 20.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 worse, 3 near MS average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
29.9%
↑ 46% · MS 20.5This facility: 29.9, 46% above the MS average of 20.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
29.9%
↑ 46% · MS 20.5This facility: 29.9, 46% above the MS average of 20.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.5%
≈ 0% · MS 19.6This facility: 19.5, level with the MS average of 19.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.5%
≈ 0% · MS 19.6This facility: 19.5, level with the MS average of 19.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.0%
↑ 6% · MS 20.7This facility: 22.0, 6% above the MS average of 20.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.0%
↑ 6% · MS 20.7This facility: 22.0, 6% above the MS average of 20.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5%
↑ 241% · MS 2.5This facility: 8.5, 241% above the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5%
↑ 241% · MS 2.5This facility: 8.5, 241% above the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9%
↑ 24% · MS 3.1This facility: 3.9, 24% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9%
↑ 24% · MS 3.1This facility: 3.9, 24% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5%
↑ 50% · MS 6.3This facility: 9.5, 50% above the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5%
↑ 50% · MS 6.3This facility: 9.5, 50% above the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8%
↑ 24% · MS 6.2This facility: 7.8, 24% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8%
↑ 24% · MS 6.2This facility: 7.8, 24% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.1%
↑ 281% · MS 1.6This facility: 6.1, 281% above the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.1%
↑ 281% · MS 1.6This facility: 6.1, 281% above the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
50.0%
↑ 131% · MS 21.7This facility: 50.0, 131% above the MS average of 21.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
50.0%
↑ 131% · MS 21.7This facility: 50.0, 131% above the MS average of 21.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · MS 95.4This facility: 97.7, 2% above the MS average of 95.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · MS 95.4This facility: 97.7, 2% above the MS average of 95.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3%
↓ 3% · MS 97.0This facility: 94.3, 3% below the MS average of 97.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3%
↓ 3% · MS 97.0This facility: 94.3, 3% below the MS average of 97.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7%
↓ 33% · MS 2.5This facility: 1.7, 33% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7%
↓ 33% · MS 2.5This facility: 1.7, 33% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.7%
↑ 9% · MS 88.5This facility: 96.7, 9% above the MS average of 88.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.7%
↑ 9% · MS 88.5This facility: 96.7, 9% above the MS average of 88.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
↑ 14% · MS 84.6This facility: 96.8, 14% above the MS average of 84.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
↑ 14% · MS 84.6This facility: 96.8, 14% above the MS average of 84.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 108 Mississippi nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−2.2% operating margin
+5.3 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Mississippi homes
30.5% payroll share of revenue
MS average 49.5%Rank #107 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.2M while revenue rose $0.4M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Mississippi homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.7M | +$0.4M | Trend 20152024 | MS median $8.2M | Rank in MS Rank #81 / 108Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 81st out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 25% of homes | Below MS median Higher net patient revenue than 25% of MS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.8M | +$0.1M | Trend 20152024 | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.1M | +$0.3M | Trend 20152024 | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −2.2% | +5.3 pts | Trend 20152024 | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.1M | +$0.3M | Trend — | MS median — | Rank in MS Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Mississippi homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.0M | −$0.2M | Trend 20152024 | MS median $4.1M | Rank in MS Rank #107 / 108Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | Below MS median Higher payroll than 1% of MS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 30.5% | −5.1 pts | Trend 20152024 | MS median 47.0% | Rank in MS Rank #107 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | 19.0 pts under MS average The MS average is 49.5% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2024 2 charts · MS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Mississippi payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MS payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019no report | 2020 | 2021 | 2022no report | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $3.4M | $3.6M | $4.4M | $5.8M | $5.1M | $4.7M | $6.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Operating expenses | $3.8M | $4.1M | $4.6M | $5.6M | $5.9M | $7.0M | $6.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Net patient income | −$0.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.2M | $0.2M | −$0.8M | −$2.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.1M | ||
| Operating margin | −10.5% | −14.1% | −4.8% | 3.1% | −16.4% | −51.0% | −7.5% | −2.2% | ||
| Net income | −$0.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.2M | $0.2M | −$0.5M | −$2.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.1M | ||
| Payroll costs | $1.9M | $2.1M | $2.2M | $2.5M | $3.2M | $3.3M | $2.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 56.3% | 58.4% | 49.7% | 42.7% | 63.6% | 70.7% | 35.6% | 30.5% | ||
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 59 | 59 | 59 | 59 | ||
| Gross revenue | $3.9M | $4.3M | $5.2M | $6.6M | $5.2M | $4.6M | $6.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Salaries | $1.7M | $1.8M | $1.9M | $2.2M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $1.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.3M | ||
| Contract labor | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $1.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Other operating costs | $1.9M | $2.0M | $2.4M | $3.2M | $2.7M | $3.7M | $4.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $254 | $240 | $271 | $333 | $306 | $324 | $368 | $399 | ||
| Cost per day | $281 | $273 | $284 | $323 | $356 | $489 | $396 | $408 | ||
| Average length of stay | 112.6 days | 125.1 days | 81.0 days | 63.8 days | 74.4 days | 67.5 days | 76.0 days | 90.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
178 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
68 · 38%
Medicaid
2 · 1%
Private pay & other
108 · 61%
Resident snapshot
50 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
13 · 26%
Medicaid
16 · 32%
Private pay & other
21 · 42%
Leaving
184 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
72 · 39%
Medicaid
6 · 3%
Private pay & other
106 · 58%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Wiggins's city center to Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MS State Dept. of Health (MSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Mississippi average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Care Center of Aberdeen | NH HOS MC SNF | Aberdeen | 105
Facility
105
MS AVG
88
Rank
#35 / 124 |
85.7%
Facility
85.7%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#71 / 116 | -1% | 4.42
Facility
4.42
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#59 / 113 | +97% | -9% | $10.4k
Facility
$10.4k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#73 / 115 | 20
Facility
20
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#69 / 114 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#41 / 114 | 1 | 90 | A+ |
53
Facility
53
MS AVG
39
Rank
#32 / 122 | Allison Knight | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#90 / 108 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#25 / 108 | 83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#2 / 108 | 255097 | ||||
| Plaza Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Pascagoula | 100
Facility
100
MS AVG
88
Rank
#43 / 124 |
83.0%
Facility
83.0%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#83 / 116 | -4% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#59 / 113 | +97% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 26
Facility
26
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#90 / 114 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#108 / 114 | 4 | 83 | A+ |
61
Facility
61
MS AVG
39
Rank
#14 / 122 | Clc Of Pascagoula LLC | $8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#46 / 108 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#34 / 108 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#19 / 108 | 255207 | ||||
| Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation | NH MC SNF | Wiggins | 59
Facility
59
MS AVG
88
Rank
#113 / 124 |
76.3%
Facility
76.3%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#104 / 116 | -12% | 6.08
Facility
6.08
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#9 / 113 | +19% | +26% | $8.2k
Facility
$8.2k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#59 / 115 | 9
Facility
9
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#12 / 114 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#12 / 114 | 4 | 45 | - |
47
Facility
47
MS AVG
39
Rank
#48 / 122 | Juanita Loreman | $6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#81 / 108 | $2.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#107 / 108 | 30.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
30.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#107 / 108 | 255308 | ||||
| Courtyards Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Fulton | 66
Facility
66
MS AVG
88
Rank
#65 / 124 |
95.5%
Facility
95.5%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#18 / 116 | +10% | 4.22
Facility
4.22
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#59 / 113 | -6% | -13% | $132.5k
Facility
$132.5k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#112 / 115 | 42
Facility
42
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#108 / 114 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#109 / 114 | 11 | 63 | A+ |
50
Facility
50
MS AVG
39
Rank
#39 / 122 | Clc Of Fulton, LLC | $6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#92 / 108 | $3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#79 / 108 | 53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#26 / 108 | 255212 | ||||
| Madison County Nursing Home | NH AL MC SNF | Trustees Canton | 95
Facility
95
MS AVG
88
Rank
#51 / 124 |
97.9%
Facility
97.9%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#12 / 116 | +13% | 4.82
Facility
4.82
MS AVG
4.85
Rank
#27 / 113 | -35% | -1% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#61 / 115 | 14
Facility
14
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#40 / 114 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#51 / 114 | 2 | 93 | - |
67
Facility
67
MS AVG
39
Rank
#8 / 122 | Daniel Logan | $11.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#20 / 108 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#9 / 108 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#19 / 108 | 255329 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation
Who is the owner of Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation?
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation is legally operated by Juanita Loreman, and administered by Beth Gruzinskas.
Is Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation has a walk score of 47. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation?
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation's occupancy is 76.3%.
Are pets allowed at Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation?
No, Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
Does Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit in MS.
Who is the administrator of Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation?
Beth Gruzinskas is the administrator of Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation.
What is the overall rating for Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation?
Stone County Nursing & Rehabilitation received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
