Located in Greeley, Colorado, The Bridge at Greeley is a senior living community offering nursing home care, assisted living, and skilled nursing services. The community is about 3 miles from downtown Greeley and has been serving residents for 25 years. Its long history reflects an established community with years of experience providing care and meeting state requirements.
Residents can choose from studio and one-bedroom residences ranging from about 336 to nearly 580 square feet, providing flexibility for different space preferences. The neighborhood has a Walk Score of 59, which is moderately walkable. Some nearby shops and services can be reached on foot, while other errands and outings require a short drive.
Daily life is centered on comfort and familiar routines. Amenities on-site include a library, a craft room, a landscaped courtyard, an on-site hair salon, and a barbershop. Restaurant-style dining is available each day. An ice cream parlor offers a regular gathering place for residents. A fireplace and scenic views add to the warm, residential atmosphere throughout the community’s shared spaces.
Transportation services, fitness and recreation programs. The community is pet-friendly, allowing residents to stay active while keeping a companion animal if they choose. Families considering The Bridge at Greeley should ask about current apartment availability, staffing levels, and the range of care services available, as those details can change over time.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #142 / 256Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 142nd out of 256 homes we track in Colorado for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Colorado facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
Pets Allowed
Room Sizes: 336 / 403 / 486 / 576 sq. ft
Housing Options: Studio / 1 Bed
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
3.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Greeley's city center to The Bridge at Greeley's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Colorado average is: 63.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Pointe Senior Care Community | NH AL IL MC | Greeley (Cedarwoods) | 53
Facility
53
CO AVG
93
Rank
#199 / 233 |
58.5%
Facility
58.5%
CO AVG
73.3%
Rank
#108 / 140 | -20% | 4.91
Facility
4.91
CO AVG
3.86
Rank
#21 / 203 | +37% | +27% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$39.2k
Rank
#1 / 211 | 11
Facility
11
CO AVG
24.8
Rank
#59 / 205 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
CO AVG
5.2
Rank
#70 / 205 | 1 | 31 | A+ |
35
Facility
35
CO AVG
59
Rank
#211 / 256 | Mountain States Health Properties, LLC | $12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#44 / 180 | $6.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#59 / 180 | 57.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
57.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
63.5%
Rank
#108 / 180 | 65397 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Greeley | NH SNF | Greeley | 124
Facility
124
CO AVG
93
Rank
#41 / 233 |
55.7%
Facility
55.7%
CO AVG
73.3%
Rank
#113 / 140 | -24% | 3.79
Facility
3.79
CO AVG
3.86
Rank
#78 / 203 | +2% | -2% | $12.3k
Facility
$12.3k
CO AVG
$39.2k
Rank
#107 / 211 | 6
Facility
6
CO AVG
24.8
Rank
#7 / 205 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
CO AVG
5.2
Rank
#6 / 205 | 3 | 69 | - |
56
Facility
56
CO AVG
59
Rank
#151 / 256 | Weld Ltc Investors LLC | $10.3MFiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 05/2024
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#71 / 180 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 05/2024
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#77 / 180 | 60.1%Fiscal year ending 05/2024
Facility
60.1%Fiscal year ending 05/2024
CO AVG
63.5%
Rank
#85 / 180 | 65368 | ||||
| Fairacres Manor | NH MC RC SNF | Greeley | 116
Facility
116
CO AVG
93
Rank
#56 / 233 |
91.7%
Facility
91.7%
CO AVG
73.3%
Rank
#26 / 140 | +25% | 3.80
Facility
3.80
CO AVG
3.86
Rank
#78 / 203 | +27% | -2% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$39.2k
Rank
#1 / 211 | 17
Facility
17
CO AVG
24.8
Rank
#59 / 205 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
CO AVG
5.2
Rank
#129 / 205 | 1 | 106 | - |
57
Facility
57
CO AVG
59
Rank
#148 / 256 | Fairacres Manor, Inc | $13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#29 / 180 | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#26 / 180 | 63.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
63.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
63.5%
Rank
#57 / 180 | 65211 | ||||
| Broadview Health and Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Greeley | 100
Facility
100
CO AVG
93
Rank
#98 / 233 |
91.3%
Facility
91.3%
CO AVG
73.3%
Rank
#29 / 140 | +25% | - | -37% | - | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$39.2k
Rank
#1 / 211 | 15
Facility
15
CO AVG
24.8
Rank
#45 / 205 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
CO AVG
5.2
Rank
#10 / 205 | 1 | 91 | - |
76
Facility
76
CO AVG
59
Rank
#73 / 256 | Dexter Creek Healthcare, Inc | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#91 / 180 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#133 / 180 | 45.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
45.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CO AVG
63.5%
Rank
#163 / 180 | 65219 |
Rank badges are statewide: each nursing home is ranked against every CO nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
The Bridge at Greeley is located in Greeley, Colorado.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Colorado.
The Bridge at Greeley has a walk score of 59. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
The Bridge at Greeley has been operating for approximately 25 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Yes, The Bridge at Greeley allows residents to bring their pets.
Yes — there are 5 photos of The Bridge at Greeley in the photo gallery on this page.
The Bridge at Greeley is located at 4750 W 25Th St, Greeley, CO 80634.
(970) 339-0022 will put you in contact with the team at The Bridge at Greeley.
The Bridge at Greeley is not currently listed as a CMS-certified provider of Medicare or Medicaid.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
