4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The Vosswood Nursing Center is a skilled nursing and rehabilitation center in Houston. The upscale nursing home aims to change the meaning of skilled nursing and rehabilitation for seniors through their exceptional level of care that is delivered by their patient-friendly staff as an approach to offer the best care possible for their residents. The Vosswood Nursing Center can be trusted as a safe and secure community that cares for every patients’ needs.
Convenience and hassle-free living are the center of Vosswood’s services: medication management, post surgical care, wound care; as well as their 24-hour skilled nursing care services provide compassionate care as it is their utmost priority. Other services include 247 easy admission, fall prevention, IV therapy, discharge planning, and case management.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 4 | 8 | This facility has 50% fewer total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (4 vs. TX avg 8).↓ 50% better |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 4 | 2 | This facility has 100% more health citations than a typical Texas nursing home (4 vs. TX avg 2).↑ 100% worse |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 4 | 6 | This facility has 33% fewer life safety citations than a typical Texas nursing home (4 vs. TX avg 6).↓ 33% better |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Texas average 7.4
Last Health inspection on Jun 2023
Texas average 25.9
Texas average 3.67
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
2 of 9 citations resulted from standard inspections; 6 of 9 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 9 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 2
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 0.4
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
11% better than Texas averageTexas average: 90.4%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 1.4%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
62.3%
23% better than Texas averageTexas average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
33% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
67% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
25Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for The Vosswood Nursing Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #186 / 218Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 186th out of 218 homes we track in Texas. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #34 / 199Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 34th out of 199 homes we track in Texas. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (67% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 27 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
7.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Houston's city center to The Vosswood Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 6.87 miles to nearest hospital (Kindred Hospital Houston Medical Center)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TX Health & Human Services Commission (HHSC), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Texas average is: 71.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Manor of CyFair | NH SNF | Houston (White Oak Bend) | 120
Facility
120
TX AVG
78
Rank
#192 / 980 |
90.4%
Facility
90.4%
TX AVG
71.2%
Rank
#20 / 163 | +27% | 3.07
Facility
3.07
TX AVG
3.63
Rank
#161 / 234 | +82% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$81.8k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 7
Facility
7
TX AVG
25.9
Rank
#11 / 234 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
TX AVG
3.7
Rank
#38 / 234 | - | 109 | - |
55
Facility
55
TX AVG
42
Rank
#384 / 1,345 | Hmg Park Manor Of Cyfair, L.l.c | $9.7MFiscal year ending 08/2024
Facility
$9.7MFiscal year ending 08/2024
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#77 / 218 | $4.4MFiscal year ending 08/2024
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 08/2024
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#127 / 218 | 45.1%Fiscal year ending 08/2024
Facility
45.1%Fiscal year ending 08/2024
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#169 / 199 | 675818 | ||||
| Caraday of Houston | NH MC RC SNF | Houston | 150
Facility
150
TX AVG
78
Rank
#58 / 980 | - | - | 4.01
Facility
4.01
TX AVG
3.63
Rank
#57 / 234 | -32% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$81.8k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 15
Facility
15
TX AVG
25.9
Rank
#52 / 234 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
TX AVG
3.7
Rank
#163 / 234 | - | 12 | - |
41
Facility
41
TX AVG
42
Rank
#709 / 1,345 | E&R Cunningham Investments, LP | $2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#214 / 218 | $1.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$1.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#198 / 218 | 66.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
66.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#60 / 199 | 676470 | ||||
| Buckner Parkway Place | NH AL IL MC RC | Houston (Energy Corridor) | 42
Facility
42
TX AVG
78
Rank
#716 / 980 |
93.1%
Facility
93.1%
TX AVG
71.2%
Rank
#13 / 163 | +31% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
TX AVG
3.63
Rank
#39 / 234 | +2% | +18% | $45.7k
Facility
$45.7k
TX AVG
$81.8k
Rank
#161 / 237 | 17
Facility
17
TX AVG
25.9
Rank
#72 / 234 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
TX AVG
3.7
Rank
#136 / 234 | 3 | 39 | - |
81
Facility
81
TX AVG
42
Rank
#30 / 1,345 | Buckner Retirement Services Inc | $5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#184 / 218 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#38 / 218 | 132%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
132%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#9 / 199 | 675777 | ||||
| Brazos Tower at Bayou Manor | NH AL IL MC SNF | Houston (Braeswood) | 33
Facility
33
TX AVG
78
Rank
#756 / 980 | - | - | 5.38
Facility
5.38
TX AVG
3.63
Rank
#13 / 234 | -37% | +48% | $46.6k
Facility
$46.6k
TX AVG
$81.8k
Rank
#164 / 237 | 5
Facility
5
TX AVG
25.9
Rank
#6 / 234 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
TX AVG
3.7
Rank
#8 / 234 | - | 34 | - |
64
Facility
64
TX AVG
42
Rank
#209 / 1,345 | Sharon Darden | $4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#197 / 218 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#39 / 218 | 151%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
151%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#8 / 199 | 676282 | ||||
| The Vosswood Nursing Center | NH | Houston (Westside) | 224
Facility
224
TX AVG
78
Rank
#9 / 980 | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$81.8k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 9
Facility
9
TX AVG
25.9
Rank
#17 / 234 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
TX AVG
3.7
Rank
#195 / 234 | - | - | - |
53
Facility
53
TX AVG
42
Rank
#430 / 1,345 | Cassity Jones | $3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#206 / 218 | $2.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$2.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#186 / 218 | 74.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
74.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#34 / 199 | 675080 |
The Vosswood Nursing Center is located in Houston, Texas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Texas.
The Vosswood Nursing Center is in the Westside neighborhood of Houston.
The Vosswood Nursing Center is legally operated by Four Star Medical Investors LLC.
The Vosswood Nursing Center has a walk score of 53. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
No, The Vosswood Nursing Center has a no-pet policy.
The Vosswood Nursing Center is registered as a for-profit in TX.
The Vosswood Nursing Center has had 4 reported citations since 2021 according to records from Texas Health and Human Services (HHSC).
Yes — there are 7 photos of The Vosswood Nursing Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
