Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
285
208 employees · 77 contractors · 107 on an average day Traceway Retirement Community
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Tupelo, MS
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Traceway Retirement Community
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Tupelo, MS
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Traceway Retirement Community in Tupelo, Mississippi, offers nursing home, skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living, and memory care. It has 140 beds, including private rooms, semi-private rooms, cottages, and one-bedroom apartments. A private room is for one resident, while a semi-private room places residents together.
Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care. Assisted living adds help with bathing, dressing, and medication, while memory care offers a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, so a resident whose needs grow over time may be able to move between care levels without leaving the community. Starting monthly prices are $1,205 for independent living and $3,440 for assisted living, with the assisted living rate covering its added daily-task support.
Total nurse staffing is 5 hours and 36 minutes per resident per day, representing the nursing time available to each resident across a day. A Walk Score of 43 places the area in a car-dependent setting, so most errands require a car or a ride. Methodist Senior Services owns the community, pets are allowed, and United Methodist religious services are available for residents who wish to participate.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 36m
This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 36mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +26% above Mississippi average
4 of 6 metrics below Mississippi average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 18 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
18 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
42m
↓ 7% · MS 45mThis facility: 42m per resident per day, 7% below the Mississippi average of 45m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 18 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
18 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 38 total: 29 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
38 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
1h 14m
↓ 4% · MS 1h 17mThis facility: 1h 14m per resident per day, 4% below the Mississippi average of 1h 17m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 38 total: 29 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
38 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 187 total: 142 of the facility's own employees and 45 agency contractors.
187 staff · 6-hour shifts
3h 40m
↑ 26% · MS 2h 55mThis facility: 3h 40m per resident per day, 26% above the Mississippi average of 2h 55m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 187 total: 142 of the facility's own employees and 45 agency contractors.
187 staff · 6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 27% · MS 2mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 27% below the Mississippi average of 2m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 3m
↑ 23% · MS 4h 6mThis facility: 5h 3m per resident per day, 23% above the Mississippi average of 4h 6m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
13m
↓ 46% · MS 23mThis facility: 13m per resident per day, 46% below the Mississippi average of 23m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
285
208 employees · 77 contractors · 107 on an average day
285 total staff / 135 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.11 : 1
↑ 27% · MS 1.66This facility: 2.11 staff per resident, 27% above the Mississippi average of 1.66 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
285 staff ÷ 135 residents
See full Mississippi ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.8 h
↓ 15% · MS 8 hThis facility: 6.8 h, 15% below the Mississippi average of 8 h (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
65,960 staff hours this quarter
See full Mississippi ranking →91.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Mississippi average: 89.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (45), Licensed Practical Nurse (9), Respiratory Therapy Technician (6), Qualified Social Worker (6), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Registered Nurse (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
140
Rank #10 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
140
Rank #10 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #58 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #58 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
43
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #31 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #31 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
92.9%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 140 beds.
Higher than the Mississippi average: 86.8%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
130
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
198
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$1,205/Month
Assisted Living
$3,440/Month
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Chronic Disease Management
Lab Work and Mobile X-Rays
In-House Pharmacy (Senior Rx)An in-house pharmacy fills and manages residents’ prescriptions, often providing medication reviews, specialized packaging, and delivery to help reduce errors and simplify care.
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Meals On Wheels Delivery
Transportation
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Religious AffiliationUnited Methodist
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Types
1 Bedroom
Cottage / VillaFloor plans as listed by the community: One-Bedroom Cottage · Two-Bedroom Cottage · Three-Bedroom Cottage
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
6
↑ 28% · MS 4.7This facility: 6, 28% above the MS average of 4.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
17
Rank #54 / 114Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Mississippi State average, with a ranking across all 114 MS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 8% · MS 18.4This facility: 17, 8% below the MS average of 18.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.83
Rank #21 / 114Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Mississippi mean across 114 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 28% · MS 3.95This facility: 2.83, 28% below the MS average of 3.95 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
94% corrected
16 of 17 citations corrected · 1 still open
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 25% · MS 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the MS average of 0.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
0% corrected · 1 open
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MS 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 1.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
16
↓ 1% · MS 16.2This facility: 16, 1% below the MS average of 16.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 0.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 20, 2025 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 4 of 17 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 20, 2025
4 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 22, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
May 05, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 08, 2024
6 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 01, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 13, 2023
4 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 17 citations
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (24%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (18%)
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (18%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (12%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (12%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (12%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
14 of 17 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 17 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Oct 22, 2025 · $16,153 civil money penalty
Oct 22, 2025 · $16,153 civil money penalty
Total fines
$16,153
↓ 45% · MS $30KThis facility: $16,153, 45% below the Mississippi average of $29,592. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #83 / 115Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 115 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Mississippi average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 115 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 53% · MS 2.11This facility: 1, 53% below the Mississippi average of 2.11. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MS avg 0.18Mississippi average: 0.18. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Oct 22, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,153
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,153Fine amount comparison
This facility
$16,153
Mississippi average
$29,592
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Mississippi and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Mississippi average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 7% · MS 10.8This facility: 11.5, 7% above the MS average of 10.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
24.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 26% · MS 19.4This facility: 24.4, 26% above the MS average of 19.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 4 better, 5 worse, 2 near MS average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
24.4%
↑ 20% · MS 20.3This facility: 24.4, 20% above the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
24.4%
↑ 20% · MS 20.3This facility: 24.4, 20% above the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.7%
↑ 19% · MS 18.3This facility: 21.7, 19% above the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.7%
↑ 19% · MS 18.3This facility: 21.7, 19% above the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.0%
↑ 36% · MS 19.9This facility: 27.0, 36% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.0%
↑ 36% · MS 19.9This facility: 27.0, 36% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
↓ 42% · MS 2.5This facility: 1.5, 42% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
↓ 42% · MS 2.5This facility: 1.5, 42% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8%
↑ 85% · MS 3.1This facility: 5.8, 85% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8%
↑ 85% · MS 3.1This facility: 5.8, 85% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.5%
↓ 76% · MS 6.2This facility: 1.5, 76% below the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.5%
↓ 76% · MS 6.2This facility: 1.5, 76% below the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4%
↓ 31% · MS 6.3This facility: 4.4, 31% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4%
↓ 31% · MS 6.3This facility: 4.4, 31% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.0%
↓ 35% · MS 1.6This facility: 1.0, 35% below the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.0%
↓ 35% · MS 1.6This facility: 1.0, 35% below the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.9%
↑ 14% · MS 21.8This facility: 24.9, 14% above the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.9%
↑ 14% · MS 21.8This facility: 24.9, 14% above the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.2%
↓ 3% · MS 95.3This facility: 92.2, 3% below the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.2%
↓ 3% · MS 95.3This facility: 92.2, 3% below the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.1%
↑ 2% · MS 97.3This facility: 99.1, 2% above the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.1%
↑ 2% · MS 97.3This facility: 99.1, 2% above the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
↓ 27% · MS 2.4This facility: 1.8, 27% below the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
↓ 27% · MS 2.4This facility: 1.8, 27% below the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.7%
↑ 9% · MS 89.0This facility: 96.7, 9% above the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.7%
↑ 9% · MS 89.0This facility: 96.7, 9% above the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
↑ 15% · MS 85.0This facility: 97.3, 15% above the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
↑ 15% · MS 85.0This facility: 97.3, 15% above the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Traceway Retirement Community’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 108 Mississippi nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
0.9% operating margin
+14.8 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 1 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.1M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Mississippi homes
48.3% payroll share of revenue
MS average 49.5%Rank #47 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue rose $2.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Mississippi homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $18.7M | +$2.4M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $8.2M | Rank in MS Rank #3 / 108Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Top 2% in MS Higher net patient revenue than 98% of MS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $18.5M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $8.4M | Rank in MS Rank #2 / 108Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 99% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.2M | +$2.4M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $0.4M | Rank in MS Rank #78 / 108Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 0.9% | +14.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | MS median 5.2% | Rank in MS Rank #80 / 108Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $1.0M | — | Trend — | MS median $0.1M | Rank in MS Rank #3 / 108Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.1M | +$2.7M | Trend — | MS median $0.5M | Rank in MS Rank #15 / 108Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 87% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Mississippi homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $9.0M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | MS median $4.1M | Rank in MS Rank #3 / 108Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Top 2% in MS by size Higher payroll than 98% of MS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 48.3% | −6.3 pts | Trend 20172024 | MS median 47.0% | Rank in MS Rank #47 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 57% of homes | Near MS average The MS average is 49.5% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Mississippi payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $14.2M | $14.2M | $14.5M | $14.0M | $13.6M | $14.5M | $16.3M | $18.7M |
| Operating expenses | $14.4M | $14.9M | $15.4M | $15.7M | $15.6M | $16.0M | $18.6M | $18.5M |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | −$0.6M | −$0.9M | −$1.7M | −$2.0M | −$1.5M | −$2.3M | $0.2M |
| Operating margin | −1.9% | −4.4% | −6.4% | −12.2% | −14.5% | −10.4% | −14.0% | 0.9% |
| Net income | $0.3M | −$0.0M | −$0.4M | −$0.2M | $0.7M | −$0.9M | −$1.5M | $1.1M |
| Payroll costs | $7.7M | $8.1M | $8.3M | $8.5M | $8.0M | $8.0M | $8.9M | $9.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 54.3% | 57.1% | 57.4% | 61.0% | 58.9% | 55.4% | 54.6% | 48.3% |
| Beds | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 |
| Gross revenue | $18.1M | $18.4M | $18.8M | $17.3M | $16.9M | $17.3M | $21.2M | $23.1M |
| Salaries | $5.8M | $6.1M | $6.3M | $6.7M | $6.3M | $6.4M | $6.9M | $7.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.9M | $2.0M | $2.0M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $1.6M | $1.9M | $2.0M |
| Contract labor | $1.5M | $1.6M | $1.7M | $1.6M | $1.7M | $2.0M | $2.7M | $2.2M |
| Other operating costs | $6.7M | $6.7M | $7.1M | $7.1M | $7.6M | $8.0M | $9.7M | $9.5M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $286 | $289 | $295 | $303 | $319 | $342 | $346 | $384 |
| Cost per day | $291 | $302 | $313 | $340 | $365 | $377 | $394 | $381 |
| Average length of stay | 206.7 days | 211.6 days | 178.4 days | 212.3 days | 205.5 days | 203.5 days | 210.0 days | 197.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Resident snapshot
135 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
25 · 19%
Medicaid
82 · 61%
Private pay & other
28 · 21%
Leaving
246 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
246 · 100%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
0 · 0%
Places of interest near Traceway Retirement Community
3.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Tupelo's city center to Traceway Retirement Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Traceway Retirement Community
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MS State Dept. of Health (MSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Mississippi average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Care Center of Aberdeen | NH HOS MC SNF | Aberdeen | 105
Facility
105
MS AVG
88
Rank
#35 / 124 |
85.7%
Facility
85.7%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#72 / 116 | -1% | 4.42
Facility
4.42
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#61 / 113 | +54% | -11% | $10.4k
Facility
$10.4k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#73 / 115 | 21
Facility
21
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#69 / 114 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#41 / 114 | 1 | 90 | A+ |
53
Facility
53
MS AVG
39
Rank
#32 / 122 | Allison Knight | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#90 / 108 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#25 / 108 | 83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#2 / 108 | 255097 | ||||
| Traceway Retirement Community | NH AL IL MC SNF | Tupelo | 140
Facility
140
MS AVG
88
Rank
#10 / 124 |
92.9%
Facility
92.9%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#31 / 116 | +7% | 5.60
Facility
5.60
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#13 / 113 | -36% | +13% | $16.2k
Facility
$16.2k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#83 / 115 | 17
Facility
17
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#54 / 114 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#21 / 114 | 1 | 130 | - |
43
Facility
43
MS AVG
39
Rank
#58 / 122 | United Methodist Senior Services Health Care, Inc | $18.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#3 / 108 | $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#3 / 108 | 48.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
48.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#47 / 108 | 255309 | ||||
| Plaza Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Pascagoula | 100
Facility
100
MS AVG
88
Rank
#43 / 124 |
83.0%
Facility
83.0%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#85 / 116 | -4% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#67 / 113 | +58% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 26
Facility
26
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#90 / 114 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#108 / 114 | 4 | 83 | A+ |
61
Facility
61
MS AVG
39
Rank
#14 / 122 | Clc Of Pascagoula LLC | $8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#46 / 108 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#34 / 108 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#19 / 108 | 255207 | ||||
| Courtyards Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Fulton | 66
Facility
66
MS AVG
88
Rank
#65 / 124 |
95.5%
Facility
95.5%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#18 / 116 | +10% | 4.22
Facility
4.22
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#81 / 113 | +10% | -15% | $117.7k
Facility
$117.7k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#112 / 115 | 42
Facility
42
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#108 / 114 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#109 / 114 | 11 | 63 | A+ |
50
Facility
50
MS AVG
39
Rank
#39 / 122 | Clc Of Fulton, LLC | $6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#92 / 108 | $3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#79 / 108 | 53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#26 / 108 | 255212 | ||||
| Madison County Nursing Home | NH AL MC SNF | Trustees Canton | 95
Facility
95
MS AVG
88
Rank
#51 / 124 |
97.9%
Facility
97.9%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#11 / 116 | +13% | 4.82
Facility
4.82
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#34 / 113 | -4% | -3% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#61 / 115 | 14
Facility
14
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#40 / 114 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#51 / 114 | 2 | 93 | - |
67
Facility
67
MS AVG
39
Rank
#8 / 122 | Daniel Logan | $11.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#20 / 108 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#9 / 108 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#19 / 108 | 255329 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Traceway Retirement Community
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Traceway Retirement Community in a walkable area?
Traceway Retirement Community has a walk score of 43. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Traceway Retirement Community?
Traceway Retirement Community's occupancy is 92.9%.
03 Are pets allowed at Traceway Retirement Community?
Yes, Traceway Retirement Community allows residents to bring their pets.
04 What is the best email address for Traceway Retirement Community?
The team at Traceway Retirement Community can be reached at info@mss.org.
05 Does Traceway Retirement Community operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Traceway Retirement Community is registered as a non-profit.
06 What is the overall rating for Traceway Retirement Community?
Traceway Retirement Community received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Traceway Retirement Community have?
Traceway Retirement Community has 140 beds.
Updated on
