Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
81
80 employees · 1 contractor · 29 on an average day Westminster Village – Spanish Fort
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Home Care, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Spanish Fort, AL
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Home Care, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Spanish Fort, AL
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Westminster Village – Spanish Fort
Acts Retirement Services has run Westminster Village – Spanish Fort for 47 years now, out of a three-story building at 500 Spanish Fort Blvd in the Bridgehead neighborhood of Spanish Fort, Alabama. Joseph Meadows is the Executive Director. This isn’t a single-purpose nursing home. It’s part of a continuing care retirement community, which means nursing home care, assisted living, memory care, hospice, home care, and independent living all live under the same organization.
Don’t expect to walk to much because the Walk Score is 27. That is somewhat walkable at best, and most errands here mean getting in a car.
Average length of stay runs about 107 days, closer to four months than a permanent placement, and the community accepts both Medicare and private pay, the two payment paths that fit a short-term rehab stay best. Nursing staff provide close to 5 hours and 49 minutes of total nursing care per resident each day. On-site, residents have access to licensed therapists, a nurse practitioner wellness center, and round-the-clock medical oversight, plus respite care and short-term rehab for people who need a defined recovery window rather than an open-ended stay.
Occupancy sits at 65% in a 60-bed building with studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom options. Residents also have an Active Resident Council, a standing group that meets to weigh in on policy and daily life rather than just live with whatever’s decided for them. State inspections here have tended to focus on routine areas like dietary and food service and resident rights and protections, the kind of themes that come up across nursing homes broadly.
Nearly five decades in the same location, paired with a rehabilitation-heavy care model and a resident group with an actual say in how things run, makes Westminster Village read less like a long-term holding facility and more like a structured stop on the way back to independence for a lot of residents.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 121 nursing homes we track in Alabama for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 49m
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 121 nursing homes we track in Alabama for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 49mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +260% above Alabama average
1 of 5 metrics below Alabama average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 1.6-hour shifts
1h 42m
↑ 127% · AL 45mThis facility: 1h 42m per resident per day, 127% above the Alabama average of 45m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 1.6-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 1.5-hour shifts
40m
↓ 24% · AL 53mThis facility: 40m per resident per day, 24% below the Alabama average of 53m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 1.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 1.4-hour shifts
3h 26m
↑ 23% · AL 2h 48mThis facility: 3h 26m per resident per day, 23% above the Alabama average of 2h 48m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 1.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
50m
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 29m
↑ 47% · AL 3h 43mThis facility: 5h 29m per resident per day, 47% above the Alabama average of 3h 43m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 20m
↑ 260% · AL 22mThis facility: 1h 20m per resident per day, 260% above the Alabama average of 22m (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
81
80 employees · 1 contractor · 29 on an average day
81 total staff / 23 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.52 : 1
↑ 123% · AL 1.58This facility: 3.52 staff per resident, 123% above the Alabama average of 1.58 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
81 staff ÷ 23 residents
See full Alabama ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
1.8 h
↓ 78% · AL 8 hThis facility: 1.8 h, 78% below the Alabama average of 8 h (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
4,777 staff hours this quarter
See full Alabama ranking →99.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Alabama average: 95% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #119 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 119th out of 133 nursing homes we track in Alabama for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Alabama facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #119 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 119th out of 133 nursing homes we track in Alabama for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Alabama facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #6 / 28Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 28 nursing homes we track in Alabama for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Alabama facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #6 / 28Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 28 nursing homes we track in Alabama for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Alabama facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
47
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #90 / 124Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 90th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Alabama for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Alabama facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #90 / 124Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 90th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Alabama for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Alabama facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
27
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
6
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
63
days
About This Community
CMS Certification Number015381
Resident Council
Accept Medicare
Short-Term Rehab
On-Site Licensed Therapists
Nurse Practitioner Wellness Center
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Transportation
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Supportive Specialists
Touring HoursMon–Fri, 9 a.m.– 5 p.m.
Building Type3-story
Room Sizes
555 sq. ft
600 - 675 sq. ft
720 sq. ft
955 sq. ft
Room Types
Studio
1 Bed
2 Bed
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
3
↑ 7% · AL 2.8This facility: 3, 7% above the Alabama average of 2.8 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
10
Rank #67 / 122Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Alabama for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Alabama State average, with a ranking across all 122 AL facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 2% · AL 10.2This facility: 10, 2% below the Alabama average of 10.2 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.33
Rank #61 / 122Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 122 nursing homes we track in Alabama for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Alabama mean across 122 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 6% · AL 3.54This facility: 3.33, 6% below the Alabama average of 3.54 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
10 of 10 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AL 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Alabama average of 0.6 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · AL 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Alabama average of 0.2 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
9
≈ 0% · AL 9This facility: 9, level with the Alabama average of 9 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 150% · AL 0.4This facility: 1, 150% above the Alabama average of 0.4 (among Alabama facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 08, 2021 · 1 citation (Nutrition, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Nutrition & Dietary, 3 of 10 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 08, 2021
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 14, 2019
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 01, 2018
8 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 10 citations
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (30%)
Administration
3 deficiencies (30%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (10%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (10%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 10 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
AL avg $81KAlabama average: $81,109. Average among the 37 Alabama facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
AL avg 1.76Alabama average: 1.76. Average among the 37 Alabama facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AL avg 0.38Alabama average: 0.38. Average among the 37 Alabama facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Alabama average.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 31% · AL 7.2This facility: 5.0, 31% below the AL average of 7.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.2 long-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse
3 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 2 measures
Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.0%
↑ 55% · AL 3.2This facility: 5.0, 55% above the AL average of 3.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.0%
↑ 55% · AL 3.2This facility: 5.0, 55% above the AL average of 3.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · AL 92.8This facility: 100.0, 8% above the AL average of 92.8 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · AL 92.8This facility: 100.0, 8% above the AL average of 92.8 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.7%
↑ 143% · AL 1.9This facility: 4.7, 143% above the AL average of 1.9 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.7%
↑ 143% · AL 1.9This facility: 4.7, 143% above the AL average of 1.9 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.4%
↑ 8% · AL 85.6This facility: 92.4, 8% above the AL average of 85.6 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.4%
↑ 8% · AL 85.6This facility: 92.4, 8% above the AL average of 85.6 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.6%
↑ 14% · AL 82.2This facility: 93.6, 14% above the AL average of 82.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.6%
↑ 14% · AL 82.2This facility: 93.6, 14% above the AL average of 82.2 (among AL facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 118 Alabama nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
6.6% operating margin
+29.7 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 1 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.9M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Alabama homes
52.2% payroll share of revenue
AL average 53.9%Rank #64 / 116Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Alabama for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $2.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Alabama homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | AL median | Compared with AL homesRank in AL | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $16.9M | +$2.0M | Trend 20152024 | AL median $10.5M | Rank in AL Rank #19 / 118Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Above AL median Higher net patient revenue than 85% of AL homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.8M | −$2.6M | Trend 20152024 | AL median $10.6M | Rank in AL Rank #23 / 118Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Alabama homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 81% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.1M | +$4.6M | Trend 20152024 | AL median $0.0M | Rank in AL Rank #13 / 118Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Alabama homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 6.6% | +29.7 pts | Trend 20152024 | AL median 0.3% | Rank in AL Rank #22 / 118Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Alabama homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 82% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.8M | — | Trend — | AL median $0.1M | Rank in AL Rank #12 / 117Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Alabama for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Alabama homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.9M | +$3.3M | Trend — | AL median $0.3M | Rank in AL Rank #10 / 118Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Alabama homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 92% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Alabama homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | AL median | Compared with AL homesRank in AL | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.8M | +$0.2M | Trend 20152024 | AL median $5.5M | Rank in AL Rank #18 / 118Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 118 nursing homes we track in Alabama for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Above AL median Higher payroll than 85% of AL homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 52.2% | −5.3 pts | Trend 20152024 | AL median 52.7% | Rank in AL Rank #64 / 116Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Alabama for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Alabama average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alabama that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 45% of homes | Near AL average The AL average is 53.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2024 2 charts · AL benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Alabama payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AL payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017no report | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023no report | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $12.9M | $13.5M | $13.7M | $14.0M | $12.6M | $13.4M | $14.9M | $16.9M | ||
| Operating expenses | $16.3M | $16.6M | $14.9M | $16.0M | $16.6M | $16.6M | $18.4M | $15.8M | ||
| Net patient income | −$3.3M | −$3.1M | −$1.2M | −$2.0M | −$4.0M | −$3.2M | −$3.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Operating margin | −25.7% | −23.3% | −8.5% | −14.2% | −31.9% | −23.9% | −23.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Net income | −$0.7M | $0.7M | $0.4M | −$0.4M | −$1.8M | −$1.4M | −$1.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Payroll costs | $7.2M | $7.0M | $7.5M | $8.3M | $8.4M | $8.1M | $8.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 55.6% | 51.8% | 54.3% | 59.4% | 66.4% | 60.7% | 57.5% | 52.2% | ||
| Beds | 88 | 88 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | ||
| Gross revenue | $12.7M | $13.4M | $15.2M | $15.1M | $13.3M | $14.3M | $16.1M | $18.8M | ||
| Salaries | $6.1M | $5.9M | $6.3M | $7.0M | $7.0M | $6.7M | $7.2M | $7.3M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Contract labor | — | — | $0.2M | — | $0.0M | — | $0.2M | $0.0M | ||
| Other operating costs | $9.1M | $9.7M | $7.5M | $7.7M | $8.3M | $8.4M | $9.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $453 | $451 | $750 | $741 | $920 | $1,101 | $993 | $1,200 | ||
| Cost per day | $569 | $556 | $814 | $846 | $1,214 | $1,364 | $1,223 | $1,121 | ||
| Average length of stay | 101.1 days | 94.3 days | 112.8 days | 133.3 days | 151.1 days | 146.5 days | 135.0 days | 62.5 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
78 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
36 · 46%
Medicaid
1 · 1%
Private pay & other
41 · 53%
Resident snapshot
23 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
6 · 26%
Medicaid
3 · 13%
Private pay & other
14 · 61%
Leaving
72 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
35 · 49%
Medicaid
1 · 1%
Private pay & other
36 · 50%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Westminster Village – Spanish Fort
Places of interest near Westminster Village – Spanish Fort
0.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Spanish Fort's city center to Westminster Village – Spanish Fort's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Westminster Village – Spanish Fort
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Mobile
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AL Dept. of Public Health (ADPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Alabama average is: 53.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Gardens Health and Rehabilitation, LLC | NH PC SNF | Mobile (South Crichton) | 100
Facility
100
AL AVG
118
Rank
#79 / 133 |
90.9%
Facility
90.9%
AL AVG
85%
Rank
#38 / 106 | +7% | 4.36
Facility
4.36
AL AVG
4.44
Rank
#56 / 121 | +23% | -2% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 4
Facility
4
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#15 / 122 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#83 / 122 | - | 91 | - |
46
Facility
46
AL AVG
42
Rank
#61 / 124 | Jeanne Freeman | $10.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#57 / 118 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#67 / 118 | 49.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
49.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#78 / 116 | 015403 | ||||
| Crowne Health Care of Springhill | NH RC SNF | Mobile (College Park) | 46
Facility
46
AL AVG
118
Rank
#127 / 133 |
91.1%
Facility
91.1%
AL AVG
85%
Rank
#36 / 106 | +7% | 4.90
Facility
4.90
AL AVG
4.44
Rank
#30 / 121 | +7% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 2
Facility
2
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#3 / 122 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#1 / 122 | - | 42 | - |
49
Facility
49
AL AVG
42
Rank
#52 / 124 | Amber Detamore | $6.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#112 / 118 | $2.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$2.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#115 / 118 | 45.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
45.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#94 / 116 | 015426 | ||||
| Kensington Health and Rehabilitation | NH PC SNF | Mobile | 120
Facility
120
AL AVG
118
Rank
#59 / 133 |
93.5%
Facility
93.5%
AL AVG
85%
Rank
#15 / 106 | +10% | 3.93
Facility
3.93
AL AVG
4.44
Rank
#89 / 121 | +58% | -11% | $4.6k
Facility
$4.6k
AL AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#104 / 123 | 9
Facility
9
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#51 / 122 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#96 / 122 | - | 112 | - | - | Wellington Healthcare Services LP | $13.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$13.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#40 / 118 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#40 / 118 | 52.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
52.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#62 / 116 | 015429 | ||||
| Twin Oaks Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | NH SNF | Mobile (Gorgas) | 131
Facility
131
AL AVG
118
Rank
#47 / 133 |
93.4%
Facility
93.4%
AL AVG
85%
Rank
#16 / 106 | +10% | 3.51
Facility
3.51
AL AVG
4.44
Rank
#112 / 121 | -4% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 6
Facility
6
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#31 / 122 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#15 / 122 | 1 | 122 | - |
29
Facility
29
AL AVG
42
Rank
#86 / 124 | Lawrence King | $13.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$13.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#38 / 118 | $7.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#34 / 118 | 52.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
52.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#65 / 116 | 015211 | ||||
| Westminster Village – Spanish Fort | NH AL CCRC HC HOS IL MC PC SNF | Spanish Fort (Bridgehead) | 60
Facility
60
AL AVG
118
Rank
#119 / 133 | - | - | 5.81
Facility
5.81
AL AVG
4.44
Rank
#4 / 121 | +140% | +31% | $0
Facility
$0
AL AVG
$85.7k
Rank
#1 / 123 | 10
Facility
10
AL AVG
10.2
Rank
#67 / 122 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
AL AVG
3.5
Rank
#61 / 122 | - | 6 | - |
27
Facility
27
AL AVG
42
Rank
#90 / 124 | Acts Retirement Services, Inc | $16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AL AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#19 / 118 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AL AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#18 / 118 | 52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AL AVG
53.9%
Rank
#64 / 116 | 015381 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AL nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Alabama
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort is located in Spanish Fort, Alabama.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Alabama.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Westminster Village – Spanish Fort
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Westminster Village – Spanish Fort in?
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort is in the Bridgehead neighborhood of Spanish Fort.
02 Is Westminster Village – Spanish Fort in a walkable area?
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort has a walk score of 27. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Westminster Village – Spanish Fort?
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort's occupancy is 64.1%.
04 How long has Westminster Village – Spanish Fort been in business?
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort has been operating for approximately 47 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at Westminster Village – Spanish Fort?
No, Westminster Village – Spanish Fort has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Westminster Village – Spanish Fort operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort is registered as a non-profit in AL.
07 What is the overall rating for Westminster Village – Spanish Fort?
Westminster Village – Spanish Fort received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
