Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
123
105 employees · 18 contractors · 53 on an average day Woodland Village Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Diamondhead, MS
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Woodland Village Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Diamondhead, MS
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Woodland Village Nursing Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Woodland Village Nursing Center
Woodland Village Nursing Center is a gem in the picturesque Diamond Head, Mississippi. Privately owned and locally operated, this center boasts 134 beds and offers exceptional services. It is a haven for senior living and home to specialized memory care communities. With a certified Alzheimer’s dementia unit, Woodland Village provides tailored support and a nurturing environment for residents requiring memory care. The district also caters to seniors seeking independent living options. From skilled nursing to rehabilitation services, residents can experience top-tier care supported by a team who partook in memory care training, ensuring the utmost attention and support they deserve.
On a sprawling 19-acre property, Woodland Village offers residents easy access to the beautiful coast, fostering a sense of serenity and exploration. The community exudes a warm and family-friendly atmosphere, where lively events and activities bring the community to life. Caregivers at Woodland Village undergo extensive memory care training, equipping them with the skills and knowledge to provide specialized support. This dedication to memory care is a testament to the commitment of Woodland Village to creating an ideal environment where residents can thrive and enjoy their golden years to the fullest.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 6m
This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 6mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +82% above Mississippi average
3 of 6 metrics below Mississippi average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 11.2-hour shifts
18m
↓ 53% · MS 38mThis facility: 18m per resident per day, 53% below the Mississippi average of 38m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 11.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 10.9-hour shifts
2h 0m
↑ 82% · MS 1h 6mThis facility: 2h 0m per resident per day, 82% above the Mississippi average of 1h 6m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 10.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 48 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
48 staff · 10.5-hour shifts
2h 48m
↑ 13% · MS 2h 29mThis facility: 2h 48m per resident per day, 13% above the Mississippi average of 2h 29m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 48 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
48 staff · 10.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 47% · MS 2mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 47% below the Mississippi average of 2m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 4m
↑ 16% · MS 3h 31mThis facility: 4h 4m per resident per day, 16% above the Mississippi average of 3h 31m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
11m
↓ 49% · MS 22mThis facility: 11m per resident per day, 49% below the Mississippi average of 22m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
123
105 employees · 18 contractors · 53 on an average day
123 total staff / 111 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.11 : 1
↓ 33% · MS 1.66This facility: 1.11 staff per resident, 33% below the Mississippi average of 1.66 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
123 staff ÷ 111 residents
See full Mississippi ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9.6 h
↑ 20% · MS 8 hThis facility: 9.6 h, 20% above the Mississippi average of 8 h (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
46,259 staff hours this quarter
See full Mississippi ranking →92.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Mississippi average: 89.4% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (4), Qualified Social Worker (3), Occupational Therapy Aide (3), Feeding Assistant (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Diagnostic X-ray Services Staff (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
132
Rank #14 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
132
Rank #14 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #67 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #67 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
40
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #103 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 103rd out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #103 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 103rd out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
77.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 102 residents and 132 beds. Source: state inspection report (May 2026)
Lower than the Mississippi average: 86.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
162
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home Facility
CountyHancock
Woodland Village Nursing Center is legally operated by Woodland Village Nursing, and administered by Rhonda Nettles.
Resident Council
Transportation
Pets not allowed
Personalized Care
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Types
Private Rooms
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Mississippi, the State Department of Health, Bureau of Health Facilities Licensure conducts unannounced surveys to monitor facility compliance with health, safety, and resident rights laws.
Since 2019 · 7 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 36 deficiencies 39 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 36 deficiencies 39 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Mississippi state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2019 vs. Mississippi state average
Overall vs. MS average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Mississippi average:
• Total deficiencies (20% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (36% below)
• Total deficiencies (20% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (36% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MS Average | vs. MS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 36 | 45.0 | This facility has 20% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Mississippi nursing home (36 vs. MS avg 45).↓ 20% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 0.9 | 1.4 | This facility has 36% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Mississippi nursing home (0.9 vs. MS avg 1.4).↓ 36% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | MS Average | vs. MS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 39 | 31.0 | This facility has had 26% more total inspections than the Mississippi average (39 vs. MS avg 31). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 26% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
3
↓ 36% · MS 4.7This facility: 3, 36% below the Mississippi average of 4.7 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
17
Rank #54 / 114Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Mississippi State average, with a ranking across all 114 MS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 8% · MS 18.4This facility: 17, 8% below the Mississippi average of 18.4 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.67
Rank #98 / 114Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Mississippi mean across 114 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 44% · MS 3.95This facility: 5.67, 44% above the Mississippi average of 3.95 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
17 of 17 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Mississippi average of 0.8 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MS 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Mississippi average of 1.2 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
17
↑ 5% · MS 16.2This facility: 17, 5% above the Mississippi average of 16.2 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Mississippi average of 0.3 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 26, 2025 · 7 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Nutrition & Dietary, 4 of 17 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 26, 2025
7 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 29, 2024
8 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 28, 2022
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 17 citations
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (24%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (12%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (12%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (12%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (6%)
Administration
1 deficiency (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (6%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
13 of 17 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 17 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 17 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
MS avg $30KMississippi average: $29,592. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MS avg 2.11Mississippi average: 2.11. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MS avg 0.18Mississippi average: 0.18. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Mississippi average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 1% · MS 2.0This facility: 2.0, 1% below the MS average of 2.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 48% · MS 1.9This facility: 1.0, 48% below the MS average of 1.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 8% · MS 10.8This facility: 9.9, 8% below the MS average of 10.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
19.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 2% · MS 19.4This facility: 19.7, 2% above the MS average of 19.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 5 better, 5 worse, 3 near MS average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near MS average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.6%
↓ 18% · MS 20.3This facility: 16.6, 18% below the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.6%
↓ 18% · MS 20.3This facility: 16.6, 18% below the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.0%
↓ 18% · MS 18.3This facility: 15.0, 18% below the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.0%
↓ 18% · MS 18.3This facility: 15.0, 18% below the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.5%
↑ 39% · MS 19.9This facility: 27.5, 39% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.5%
↑ 39% · MS 19.9This facility: 27.5, 39% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
↓ 1% · MS 2.5This facility: 2.5, 1% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
↓ 1% · MS 2.5This facility: 2.5, 1% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1%
↑ 31% · MS 3.1This facility: 4.1, 31% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1%
↑ 31% · MS 3.1This facility: 4.1, 31% above the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.2%
↑ 65% · MS 6.2This facility: 10.2, 65% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.2%
↑ 65% · MS 6.2This facility: 10.2, 65% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 45% · MS 6.3This facility: 3.5, 45% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 45% · MS 6.3This facility: 3.5, 45% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4%
↑ 246% · MS 1.6This facility: 5.4, 246% above the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4%
↑ 246% · MS 1.6This facility: 5.4, 246% above the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.0%
↑ 10% · MS 21.8This facility: 24.0, 10% above the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.0%
↑ 10% · MS 21.8This facility: 24.0, 10% above the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · MS 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · MS 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MS 97.3This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MS 97.3This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.44
≈ 0% · MS 2.44This facility: 2.44, level with the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.44
≈ 0% · MS 2.44This facility: 2.44, level with the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.63
↓ 9% · MS 2.88This facility: 2.63, 9% below the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.63
↓ 9% · MS 2.88This facility: 2.63, 9% below the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
59.6%
↑ 11% · US 53.7This facility: 59.6, 11% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
59.6%
↑ 11% · US 53.7This facility: 59.6, 11% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
55.8%
↑ 10% · US 50.6This facility: 55.8, 10% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
55.8%
↑ 10% · US 50.6This facility: 55.8, 10% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
↑ 9% · MS 2.4This facility: 2.6, 9% above the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
↑ 9% · MS 2.4This facility: 2.6, 9% above the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.8%
↑ 12% · MS 89.0This facility: 99.8, 12% above the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.8%
↑ 12% · MS 89.0This facility: 99.8, 12% above the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 17% · MS 85.0This facility: 99.0, 17% above the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 17% · MS 85.0This facility: 99.0, 17% above the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.1%
↓ 3% · MS 27.9This facility: 27.1, 3% below the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.1%
↓ 3% · MS 27.9This facility: 27.1, 3% below the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.2%
↓ 27% · MS 15.3This facility: 11.2, 27% below the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.2%
↓ 27% · MS 15.3This facility: 11.2, 27% below the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Woodland Village Nursing Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 108 Mississippi nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−2.7% operating margin
−2.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.1M) trims the net loss to −$0.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Mississippi homes
48.4% payroll share of revenue
MS average 49.5%Rank #45 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.5M while revenue fell $0.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Mississippi homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $14.2M | −$0.1M | Trend 20152024 | MS median $8.2M | Rank in MS Rank #8 / 108Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Top 7% in MS Higher net patient revenue than 93% of MS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.6M | +$0.2M | Trend 20152024 | MS median $8.4M | Rank in MS Rank #7 / 108Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 94% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.4M | −$0.3M | Trend 20152024 | MS median $0.4M | Rank in MS Rank #91 / 108Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 91st out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 16% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −2.7% | −2.2 pts | Trend 20152024 | MS median 5.2% | Rank in MS Rank #87 / 108Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 87th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | MS median $0.1M | Rank in MS Rank #34 / 108Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.3M | −$0.3M | Trend — | MS median $0.5M | Rank in MS Rank #92 / 108Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 15% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Mississippi homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.9M | +$1.5M | Trend 20152024 | MS median $4.1M | Rank in MS Rank #7 / 108Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 94% of homes | Top 6% in MS by size Higher payroll than 94% of MS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 48.4% | +10.9 pts | Trend 20152024 | MS median 47.0% | Rank in MS Rank #45 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 59% of homes | Near MS average The MS average is 49.5% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2024 2 charts · MS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Mississippi payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MS payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019no report | 2020no report | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $10.4M | $10.7M | $11.9M | $11.7M | $10.3M | $12.5M | $14.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Operating expenses | $9.8M | $10.9M | $11.9M | $11.3M | $14.1M | $13.8M | $14.4M | $14.6M | ||
| Net patient income | $0.6M | −$0.1M | −$0.0M | $0.4M | −$3.8M | −$1.3M | −$0.1M | −$0.4M | ||
| Operating margin | 5.6% | −1.1% | −0.1% | 3.7% | −36.6% | −10.7% | −0.5% | −2.7% | ||
| Net income | $0.7M | −$0.0M | $0.1M | $0.5M | −$3.6M | −$1.2M | $0.1M | −$0.3M | ||
| Payroll costs | $5.0M | $5.3M | $5.6M | $5.7M | $5.1M | $5.5M | $5.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 47.9% | 49.6% | 47.0% | 48.6% | 49.9% | 44.3% | 37.5% | 48.4% | ||
| Beds | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | ||
| Gross revenue | $11.3M | $12.8M | $14.2M | $13.6M | $9.7M | $11.1M | $13.8M | $15.1M | ||
| Salaries | $4.3M | $4.5M | $4.7M | $4.9M | $4.2M | $4.3M | $4.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $1.3M | $1.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Contract labor | $0.6M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $3.3M | — | ||
| Other operating costs | $4.8M | $5.5M | $6.3M | $5.6M | $8.9M | $8.3M | $9.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $247 | $240 | $253 | $255 | $289 | $320 | $350 | $338 | ||
| Cost per day | $233 | $243 | $253 | $246 | $394 | $354 | $352 | $348 | ||
| Average length of stay | 183.2 days | 165.1 days | 183.4 days | 188.5 days | 219.1 days | 153.4 days | 183.2 days | 162.2 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
176 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
48 · 27%
Medicaid
4 · 2%
Private pay & other
124 · 70%
Resident snapshot
111 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
5 · 5%
Medicaid
82 · 74%
Private pay & other
24 · 22%
Leaving
259 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
46 · 18%
Medicaid
21 · 8%
Private pay & other
192 · 74%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Woodland Village Nursing Center
1.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Diamondhead's city center to Woodland Village Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 4.52 miles to nearest hospital (Ochsner Medical Center - Hancock)
Calculate Travel Distance to Woodland Village Nursing Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Gulfport
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MS State Dept. of Health (MSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Mississippi average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunbar Village Terrace | NH MC SNF | Bay St Louis | 60
Facility
60
MS AVG
88
Rank
#67 / 124 |
91.7%
Facility
91.7%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#35 / 116 | +6% | 4.30
Facility
4.30
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#67 / 113 | -41% | -13% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#56 / 115 | 12
Facility
12
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#32 / 114 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#28 / 114 | 1 | 55 | - |
39
Facility
39
MS AVG
39
Rank
#73 / 122 | Dunbar Village Terrace Amy | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#52 / 108 | $3.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#73 / 108 | 39.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
39.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#93 / 108 | 255322 | ||||
| Driftwood Nursing Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Gulfport | 151
Facility
151
MS AVG
88
Rank
#7 / 124 |
61.5%
Facility
61.5%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#113 / 116 | -29% | 5.55
Facility
5.55
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#18 / 113 | +5% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 11
Facility
11
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#24 / 114 | 2.2
Facility
2.2
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#11 / 114 | - | 93 | - |
47
Facility
47
MS AVG
39
Rank
#48 / 122 | - | $9.7M*Fiscal year ending 2018These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $4.2M*Fiscal year ending 2018These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 43.5%*Fiscal year ending 2018These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 255290 | ||||
| Lakeview Nursing Center | NH SNF | Gulfport | 105
Facility
105
MS AVG
88
Rank
#35 / 124 |
81.0%
Facility
81.0%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#91 / 116 | -7% | 4.45
Facility
4.45
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#61 / 113 | -17% | -10% | $12.2k
Facility
$12.2k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#80 / 115 | 23
Facility
23
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#78 / 114 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#82 / 114 | 2 | 85 | - |
4
Facility
4
MS AVG
39
Rank
#118 / 122 | Brian Cain | $9.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#42 / 108 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#30 / 108 | 53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#25 / 108 | 255182 | ||||
| Woodland Village Nursing Center | NH CCRC HOS IL MC PC RC SNF | Diamondhead | 132
Facility
132
MS AVG
88
Rank
#14 / 124 |
77.3%
Facility
77.3%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#103 / 116 | -11% | 5.10
Facility
5.10
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#29 / 113 | -50% | +3% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 17
Facility
17
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#54 / 114 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#98 / 114 | - | 102 | - |
40
Facility
40
MS AVG
39
Rank
#67 / 122 | Woodland Village Nursing | $14.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$14.2MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#8 / 108 | $6.9MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#7 / 108 | 48.4%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
48.4%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#45 / 108 | 255163 | ||||
| Gulfport Care Center | NH HOS MC SNF | Gulfport | 90
Facility
90
MS AVG
88
Rank
#52 / 124 |
77.8%
Facility
77.8%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#99 / 116 | -10% | 4.56
Facility
4.56
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#49 / 113 | -37% | -8% | $24.3k
Facility
$24.3k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#92 / 115 | 24
Facility
24
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#76 / 114 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#113 / 114 | 5 | 70 | - |
9
Facility
9
MS AVG
39
Rank
#111 / 122 | Gulfport Healthcare, LLC | $4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#104 / 108 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#56 / 108 | 83.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
83.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#3 / 108 | 255341 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Mississippi
Woodland Village Nursing Center is located in Diamondhead, Mississippi.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Mississippi.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Woodland Village Nursing Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Woodland Village Nursing Center?
Woodland Village Nursing Center is legally operated by Woodland Village Nursing, and administered by Rhonda Nettles.
02 Is Woodland Village Nursing Center in a walkable area?
Woodland Village Nursing Center has a walk score of 40. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Woodland Village Nursing Center?
Woodland Village Nursing Center's occupancy is 77.3%.
04 Are pets allowed at Woodland Village Nursing Center?
No, Woodland Village Nursing Center has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Woodland Village Nursing Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Woodland Village Nursing Center is registered as a for-profit in MS.
06 Who is the administrator of Woodland Village Nursing Center?
Rhonda Nettles is the administrator of Woodland Village Nursing Center.
07 What is the overall rating for Woodland Village Nursing Center?
Woodland Village Nursing Center received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
