Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
72
30 employees · 42 contractors · 21 on an average day Mirabella at ASU
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Tempe, AZ
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Mirabella at ASU
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Tempe, AZ
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Mirabella at ASU accepts Medicare and private pay.
Mirabella at Asu is a continuing care retirement community in Tempe, AZ offering assisted living, memory care, nursing home, and skilled nursing care. Assisted living provides help with daily tasks while a resident maintains an apartment. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision, while skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Having several care levels in one community may suit a resident whose needs grow over time, because care can continue without moving to a different community. Mirabella at Asu has 47 beds, making it a smaller community where staff and residents get to know each other. Housing includes one bedroom and two bedroom options, with a two bedroom layout able to suit a couple moving together.
Rehabilitation services are available for residents who need therapy as part of their care. Total nurse staffing is 7 hours 48 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time allocated to each resident. Medicare and private pay are accepted: Medicare can cover short term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay means the resident or family pays directly.
A Walk Score of 91 places the area in the walker’s paradise band, meaning daily errands do not require a car and a resident who no longer drives can still get out independently. Scarlett Huang serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 60 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
7h 48m
This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 60 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
7h 48mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +378% above Arizona average
0 of 6 metrics below Arizona average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
12 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
2h 17m
↑ 219% · AZ 43mThis facility: 2h 17m per resident per day, 219% above the Arizona average of 43m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 5 agency contractors.
12 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 9 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
9 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
1h 18m
↑ 26% · AZ 1h 2mThis facility: 1h 18m per resident per day, 26% above the Arizona average of 1h 2m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 9 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
9 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 29 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 17 agency contractors.
29 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
4h 12m
↑ 78% · AZ 2h 22mThis facility: 4h 12m per resident per day, 78% above the Arizona average of 2h 22m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 29 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 17 agency contractors.
29 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
29m
↑ 378% · AZ 6mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 378% above the Arizona average of 6m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
6h 47m
↑ 88% · AZ 3h 37mThis facility: 6h 47m per resident per day, 88% above the Arizona average of 3h 37m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 5m
↑ 109% · AZ 31mThis facility: 1h 5m per resident per day, 109% above the Arizona average of 31m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
72
30 employees · 42 contractors · 21 on an average day
72 total staff / 16 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
4.50 : 1
↑ 170% · AZ 1.67This facility: 4.50 staff per resident, 170% above the Arizona average of 1.67 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
72 staff ÷ 16 residents
See full Arizona ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.5 h
↓ 12% · AZ 8.5 hThis facility: 7.5 h, 12% below the Arizona average of 8.5 h (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
14,364 staff hours this quarter
See full Arizona ranking →73% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Arizona average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (17), Registered Nurse (5), Licensed Practical Nurse (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medication Aide/Technician (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
47
Rank #62 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
47
Rank #62 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #43 / 53Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 53 nursing homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #43 / 53Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 53 nursing homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
5
years
Walk Score
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #1 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #1 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
91
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #20 / 55Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 55 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #20 / 55Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 55 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
86.2%
This home usually has limited availability
Higher than the Arizona average: 75.4%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
18
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
22
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$5,541/Month
Entrance FeeA one-time fee paid when moving in, common at continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). Depending on the contract, part of it may be refundable.
$710,200
Facility TypeOutpatient Treatment Center
StatusActive
IssuanceDecember 1, 2025
ExpirationNovember 30, 2026 Expires in 23 days
License NumberOTC20325
QualificationHealth Care
Mirabella at ASU is administered by Thomas Dorough.
OwnerMirabella At Asu, Inc.
Primary Care Through Pine Park HealthA geriatric primary-care practice whose doctors and clinicians visit senior living communities. It provides routine, preventive, chronic-condition, and urgent medical care in residents’ homes.
Catering Services
Valet Parking
ASU Lifelong Engagement Team Support
Housekeeping
Laundry & LinenListed as: Flat-linen laundry service
MaintenanceListed as: Building and yard maintenance
ConciergeListed as: Concierge relocation services
TransportationListed as: Town car service/shuttle
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Fitness Center
Workshop
Library
Auditorium
Movie Theater
Garden Terrace and Outdoor Spaces
Meeting Room
Activities
Remote and In-Person Classes Through Asu
Auditing Asu Courses (10,000+ Classes)
Lectures
On-Site Performances by Artists-In-Residence
Shows at Asu Gammage Auditorium
Yoga Classes
Arts & Crafts
- Free and discounted tickets to ASU sporting events
- Student mentoring and intergenerational programs
Highlights
- Campus recreation at Mona Plummer Aquatics Complex
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Mirabella at ASU.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Mirabella at ASU.- Vegetarian options.
- Low-sodium / heart-healthy options.
- Gluten-free options.
- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
Building TypeHigh-rise
1 Bedroom
Floor plans: Indigo II
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Falcon II · Aspen II · Palo Verde
Floor plans: Falcon II, Aspen II, Palo Verde
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
The figures below cover one inspection, recorded on December 1, 2025.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. AZ average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 Better
Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 0 | 10.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (0 vs. AZ avg 10).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 1 | 5.0 | This facility has had 80% fewer total inspections than the Arizona average (1 vs. AZ avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 80% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4
↓ 40% · AZ 6.7This facility: 4, 40% below the Arizona average of 6.7 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
11
Rank #16 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Arizona State average, with a ranking across all 61 AZ facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 48% · AZ 21.2This facility: 11, 48% below the Arizona average of 21.2 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.75
Rank #24 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Arizona mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 18% · AZ 3.34This facility: 2.75, 18% below the Arizona average of 3.34 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
11 of 11 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.5 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
11
↓ 47% · AZ 20.6This facility: 11, 47% below the Arizona average of 20.6 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 14, 2025 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 3 of 11 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 14, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 08, 2025
6 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 29, 2023
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 13, 2022
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 11 citations
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (27%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (18%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (18%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (18%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (9%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
9 of 11 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 11 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 11 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
AZ avg $32KArizona average: $31,656. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
AZ avg 1.58Arizona average: 1.58. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AZ avg 0.1Arizona average: 0.1. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Arizona average.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.2
Score · lower is better
↑ 53% · AZ 6.7This facility: 10.2, 53% above the AZ average of 6.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.6 long-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 1 near AZ average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse, 3 near AZ average, 2 compared with US only, 1 without a benchmark
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 6 measures
Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 77% · AZ 2.3This facility: 4.0, 77% above the AZ average of 2.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 77% · AZ 2.3This facility: 4.0, 77% above the AZ average of 2.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6%
↑ 55% · AZ 4.3This facility: 6.6, 55% above the AZ average of 4.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6%
↑ 55% · AZ 4.3This facility: 6.6, 55% above the AZ average of 4.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
20.0%
↑ 269% · AZ 5.4This facility: 20.0, 269% above the AZ average of 5.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
20.0%
↑ 269% · AZ 5.4This facility: 20.0, 269% above the AZ average of 5.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 3.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 3.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 3.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 3.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · AZ 96.8This facility: 100.0, 3% above the AZ average of 96.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · AZ 96.8This facility: 100.0, 3% above the AZ average of 96.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
64.3%
↑ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 64.3, 20% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
64.3%
↑ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 64.3, 20% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.4%
↑ 25% · US 50.6This facility: 63.4, 25% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.4%
↑ 25% · US 50.6This facility: 63.4, 25% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
4.2%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
4.2%
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
↓ 26% · AZ 1.1This facility: 0.8, 26% below the AZ average of 1.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
↓ 26% · AZ 1.1This facility: 0.8, 26% below the AZ average of 1.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.6%
↓ 16% · AZ 92.6This facility: 77.6, 16% below the AZ average of 92.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.6%
↓ 16% · AZ 92.6This facility: 77.6, 16% below the AZ average of 92.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.4%
↑ 2% · AZ 87.9This facility: 89.4, 2% above the AZ average of 87.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.4%
↑ 2% · AZ 87.9This facility: 89.4, 2% above the AZ average of 87.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
25.6%
↑ 4% · AZ 24.6This facility: 25.6, 4% above the AZ average of 24.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
25.6%
↑ 4% · AZ 24.6This facility: 25.6, 4% above the AZ average of 24.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.0%
↑ 3% · AZ 10.7This facility: 11.0, 3% above the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.0%
↑ 3% · AZ 10.7This facility: 11.0, 3% above the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Mirabella at ASU’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 61 Arizona nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−697.3% operating margin
+748.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 2 of the last 2 reported years. Other income ($21.6M) trims the net loss to −$14.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Arizona homes
214.1% payroll share of revenue
AZ average 63.3%Rank #1 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.1M while revenue rose $2.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Arizona homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2023 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.1M | +$2.4M | Trend 20232024 | AZ median $13.7M | Rank in AZ Rank #59 / 61Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Below AZ median Higher net patient revenue than 3% of AZ homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $40.6M | −$0.5M | Trend 20232024 | AZ median $14.6M | Rank in AZ Rank #4 / 61Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 95% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$35.5M | +$3.0M | Trend 20232024 | AZ median −$0.0M | Rank in AZ Rank #60 / 61Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 2% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −697.3% | +748.1 pts | Trend 20232024 | AZ median 0.0% | Rank in AZ Rank #61 / 61Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $21.6M | — | Trend — | AZ median $0.0M | Rank in AZ Rank #4 / 58Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 58 nursing homes we track in Arizona for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 95% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$14.0M | +$20.9M | Trend — | AZ median $0.6M | Rank in AZ Rank #61 / 61Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Arizona homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2023 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $10.9M | +$1.1M | Trend 20232024 | AZ median $7.5M | Rank in AZ Rank #14 / 61Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 78% of homes | Above AZ median Higher payroll than 78% of AZ homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 214.1% | −153.7 pts | Trend 20232024 | AZ median 55.2% | Rank in AZ Rank #1 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | 150.8 pts over AZ average The AZ average is 63.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2023–2024 2 charts · AZ benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Arizona payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AZ payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2023–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $2.7M | $5.1M |
| Operating expenses | $41.1M | $40.6M |
| Net patient income | −$38.5M | −$35.5M |
| Operating margin | −1,445.4% | −697.3% |
| Net income | −$34.9M | −$14.0M |
| Payroll costs | $9.8M | $10.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 367.8% | 214.1% |
| Beds | 58 | 58 |
| Gross revenue | $4.1M | $6.3M |
| Salaries | $8.1M | $9.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.7M | $1.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.6M |
| Other operating costs | $31.4M | $29.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $233 | $1,048 |
| Cost per day | $3,606 | $8,357 |
| Average length of stay | 20.6 days | 21.5 days |
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
228 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
107 · 47%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
121 · 53%
Resident snapshot
16 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
2 · 13%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
14 · 88%
Leaving
226 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
104 · 46%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
122 · 54%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Mirabella at ASU
0.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Tempe's city center to Mirabella at ASU's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Mirabella at ASU
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Tempe
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 63.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tempe Post Acute | NH SNF | Tempe (Kiwanis Park) | 74
Facility
74
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#51 / 80 |
68.9%
Facility
68.9%
AZ AVG
75.4%
Rank
#38 / 55 | -9% | 3.49
Facility
3.49
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#42 / 60 | +12% | -14% | $13.1k
Facility
$13.1k
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 8
Facility
8
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#7 / 61 | 1.6
Facility
1.6
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#3 / 61 | 1 | 51 | - |
65
Facility
65
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#13 / 82 | Western Canal Healthcare LLC | $9.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#46 / 61 | $5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#49 / 61 | 55%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#32 / 61 | 035106 | ||||
| Mirabella at ASU | NH AL CCRC MC SNF | Tempe | 47
Facility
47
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#62 / 80 |
86.2%
Facility
86.2%
AZ AVG
75.4%
Rank
#20 / 55 | +14% | 7.80
Facility
7.80
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#1 / 60 | +57% | +91% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 11
Facility
11
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#16 / 61 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#24 / 61 | - | 18 | - |
91
Facility
91
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#1 / 82 | Mirabella At Asu, Inc | $5.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#59 / 61 | $10.9MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 09/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#14 / 61 | 214.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
214.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#1 / 61 | 035300 | ||||
| Friendship Village Tempe | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Tempe | 128
Facility
128
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#20 / 80 |
43.6%
Facility
43.6%
AZ AVG
75.4%
Rank
#53 / 55 | -42% | 6.04
Facility
6.04
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#7 / 60 | +112% | +48% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 21
Facility
21
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#33 / 61 | 4.2
Facility
4.2
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#46 / 61 | - | 56 | A+ |
28
Facility
28
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#62 / 82 | Friendship Village Of Tempe | $72.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$72.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#1 / 61 | $31.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$31.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#1 / 61 | 44.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#54 / 61 | 035074 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AZ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Arizona
Mirabella at ASU is located in Tempe, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Mirabella at ASU
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Mirabella at ASU in a walkable area?
Mirabella at ASU has a walk score of 91. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
02 What is the license number of Mirabella at ASU?
According to AZ state health department records, Mirabella at ASU's license number is OTC20325.
03 When does Mirabella at ASU's license expire?
According to AZ state health department records, Mirabella at ASU's license expires on November 30, 2026.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Mirabella at ASU?
Mirabella at ASU's occupancy is 86.2%.
05 How long has Mirabella at ASU been in business?
Mirabella at ASU has been operating for approximately 5 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Mirabella at ASU?
No, Mirabella at ASU has a no-pet policy.
07 What is the best email address for Mirabella at ASU?
The team at Mirabella at ASU can be reached at Updates@mirabellaasu.org.
Updated on
