We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Windemere Park of Warren is a haven that goes above and beyond to provide security, tranquility, and an exceptional senior living experience. This lush and serene community sets the bar high when it comes to meeting and exceeding expectations. The home offers a comprehensive range of services, including independent living, assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing rehabilitation, respite care, and hospice care. Regardless of the unique needs of residents, the community is professionally equipped to provide tailored and personalized care.
The beautifully landscaped courtyard serves as a picturesque oasis, inviting residents to unwind and enjoy the natural surroundings. In addition to the exceptional care, Windemere Park of Warren boasts a variety of amenities that cater to residents’ diverse interests. From the chapel for spiritual solace to the game room for entertainment, and the library for intellectual stimulation, every aspect of residents’ well-being is considered. Convenient transportation services ensure easy access to nearby attractions and events. Furthermore, the on-site medical center is a testament to the community’s commitment to providing comprehensive care and peace of mind for residents.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 44th out of 133 homes in Michigan. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
|
32m per day | ▼ 30% State avg: 46m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
|
1h 24m per day | ▲ 58% State avg: 53m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
|
2h 3m per day | ▼ 14% State avg: 2h 23m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
|
3h 52m per day | ▲ 10% State avg: 3h 31m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
|
1m per day | ▼ 75% State avg: 4m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
|
18m per day | ▼ 38% State avg: 29m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
In Michigan, the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) conducts unannounced inspections and investigations to ensure long-term care facilities comply with state health codes.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Michigan state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
|
This Facility | MI Average | vs. MI Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
|
28 | 8 | This facility has 250% more total deficiencies than a typical Michigan nursing home (28 vs. MI avg 8).↑ 250% worse |
|
Deficiencies per year
Average deficiencies per year since 2023.
|
9.3 | 2.7 | This facility has 244% more deficiencies per year than a typical Michigan nursing home (9.3 vs. MI avg 2.7).↑ 244% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
The most recent inspection on April 30, 2025, found deficiencies related to therapeutic diet compliance, food storage safety, and call light accessibility. Earlier inspections showed a pattern of issues including medication management, infection control, physical plant maintenance, and food service sanitation. Complaint investigations substantiated failures in scheduling required medical follow-up and controlling narcotic medication misuse, resulting in the suspension of the Director of Nursing. Enforcement actions such as fines or license suspensions were not listed in the available reports. The facility’s inspection history indicates ongoing challenges with regulatory compliance, with deficiencies persisting across multiple areas over time.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsMichigan average 6.5
Last Health inspection on Apr 2025
Michigan average 33.5
Michigan average 5.18
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
14 of 22 citations resulted from standard inspections; 3 of 22 resulted from complaint investigations; and 5 of 22 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 0.3
100% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 1.9
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
18% better than Michigan average
0% compared with Michigan average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.4 hours
No contractors work on this role.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.1 hours
No contractors work on this role.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hours
No contractors work on this role.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
1,290 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 42 | 0 | 42 | 10,631 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 23 | 0 | 23 | 7,335 | 92 | 100% | 9.1 |
| Registered Nurse | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,807 | 90 | 98% | 9.4 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 5 | 0 | 5 | 603 | 78 | 85% | 5.1 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 531 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 3 | 3 | 520 | 66 | 72% | 7.7 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 520 | 66 | 72% | 7.9 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 2 | 0 | 2 | 496 | 59 | 64% | 8.4 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 470 | 63 | 68% | 7.5 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 2 | 2 | 467 | 64 | 70% | 7.3 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 251 | 45 | 49% | 5.6 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 4 | 4 | 124 | 41 | 45% | 2.7 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 3 | 3 | 96 | 30 | 33% | 3.1 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 49 | 15 | 16% | 3.3 |
| Feeding Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 9 | 10% | 2.1 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 9% | 2 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
16.9
101% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 8.4
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
33.2
104% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 16.3
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
29.1%
133% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 12.5%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
41.8%
173% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 15.3%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.7%
37% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 21.0%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.0%
121% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 3.2%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.9%
50% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 5.7%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
36% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 5.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.9%
104% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 3.9%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.0%
34% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 15.0%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.8%
11% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 94.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.7%
19% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 95.0%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.3%
25% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 82.5%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
79% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 1.4%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.4%
13% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 79.5%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
26.6%
10% worse than Michigan average
Michigan average: 24.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
2.6%
77% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 11.5%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
77.3%
44% better than Michigan average
Michigan average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
50.7%
In line with Michigan average
Michigan average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
28% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
58% of new residents, often for short stays.
14% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
49
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Windemere Park of Warren based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #104 / 134Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 104th out of 134 homes in Michigan. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Michigan average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
1.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Warren's city center to Windemere Park of Warren's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 7.08 miles to nearest hospital (Corewell Health Beaumont Troy Hospital)
Add your location
Windemere Park of Warren is located in Warren, Michigan.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Michigan.
Windemere Park of Warren has a walk score of 48. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Yes — there are 16 photos of Windemere Park of Warren in the photo gallery on this page.
(586) 751-5800 will put you in contact with the team at Windemere Park of Warren.
Yes — Windemere Park of Warren is a CMS-certified provider of Medicare and Medicaid.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
