Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
111
107 employees · 4 contractors · 52 on an average day Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Rutland, VT
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 14 points above the Vermont average for CMS-certified facilities (75/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 14 points above the Vermont average for CMS-certified facilities (75/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Rutland, VT
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 14 points above the Vermont average for CMS-certified facilities (75/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 14 points above the Vermont average for CMS-certified facilities (75/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation, situated at 46 Nichols Street in Rutland, VT, is a distinguished Genesis HealthCare facility that specializes in providing exceptional short-stay care services. With a focus on rehabilitation, this center offers a wide range of programs and therapies to assist individuals in their short-term recovery journeys. The center holds an Average rating for its short-term rehabilitation services, as well as an Average rating for its long-term care services.
As a large facility with 123 beds, it remains dedicated to delivering comprehensive care to its residents. The center actively participates in Medicare and Medicaid, ensuring accessibility and support for a broader range of individuals in need of their services. With a commitment to excellence and a focus on holistic care, Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation strives to provide the highest quality of care to its residents.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 12 nursing homes we track in Vermont for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 51m
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 12 nursing homes we track in Vermont for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 51mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +10% above Vermont average
5 of 6 metrics below Vermont average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 12 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
12 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
36m
↓ 26% · VT 49mThis facility: 36m per resident per day, 26% below the Vermont average of 49m (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 12 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
12 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 22 total: 19 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
22 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
58m
↑ 10% · VT 53mThis facility: 58m per resident per day, 10% above the Vermont average of 53m (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 22 total: 19 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
22 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 52 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
52 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
2h 16m
↓ 12% · VT 2h 35mThis facility: 2h 16m per resident per day, 12% below the Vermont average of 2h 35m (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 52 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
52 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↓ 2% · VT 6mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 2% below the Vermont average of 6m (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 26m
↓ 7% · VT 3h 41mThis facility: 3h 26m per resident per day, 7% below the Vermont average of 3h 41m (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
26m
↓ 18% · VT 32mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 18% below the Vermont average of 32m (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
111
107 employees · 4 contractors · 52 on an average day
111 total staff / 86 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.29 : 1
↓ 21% · VT 1.63This facility: 1.29 staff per resident, 21% below the Vermont average of 1.63 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
111 staff ÷ 86 residents
See full Vermont ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.9 h
↓ 4% · VT 8.2 hThis facility: 7.9 h, 4% below the Vermont average of 8.2 h (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
37,405 staff hours this quarter
See full Vermont ranking →96.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Vermont average: 79.7% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
103
Rank #8 / 11Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Vermont facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
103
Rank #8 / 11Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Vermont facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #1 / 14Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 14 nursing homes we track in Vermont for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Vermont facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #1 / 14Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 14 nursing homes we track in Vermont for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Vermont facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
86
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #5 / 11Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Vermont average, with its Statewide rank out of 11. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #5 / 11Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Vermont average, with its Statewide rank out of 11. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
84.6%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 103 beds.
Similar to the Vermont average: 84.1%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
87
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
473
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CountyRutland
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Cardiac Care
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Fax802-773-2196
Pets not allowed
Wi-Fi
Cable Tv
Courtyard
Garden
Laundry
Computers
Spacious Lounges & Family Areas
Activities
Outings
Interfaith Chapel
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
89 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
14 points above the Vermont average for CMS-certified facilities (75/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
26 severity-weighted points (8 deficiencies) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified VT facility (median: 52)
Enforcement
Concern
2 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified VT facility (median: 0) · $32,708 in fines
Persistence
Typical
36 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified VT facility (median: 41)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 53% · VT 6.4This facility: 3, 53% below the Vermont average of 6.4 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
8
Rank #2 / 12Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 12 nursing homes we track in Vermont for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Vermont State average, with a ranking across all 12 VT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 71% · VT 27.8This facility: 8, 71% below the Vermont average of 27.8 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.67
Rank #2 / 12Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 12 nursing homes we track in Vermont for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Vermont mean across 12 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 36% · VT 4.2This facility: 2.67, 36% below the Vermont average of 4.2 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
8 of 8 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · VT 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Vermont average of 0.9 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 25% · VT 1.6This facility: 2, 25% above the Vermont average of 1.6 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 75% · VT 24.3This facility: 6, 75% below the Vermont average of 24.3 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · VT 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Vermont average of 0.9 (among Vermont facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 08, 2026 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 2 of 8 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 08, 2026
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 05, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 19, 2025
5 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 8 citations
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (25%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (13%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (13%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (13%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (13%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (13%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (13%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
7 of 8 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 8 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jun 19, 2025 · $8,788 civil money penalty
Jun 19, 2025 · $8,788 civil money penalty
Jun 19, 2025 · $23,920 civil money penalty
Total fines
$32,708
↓ 72% · VT $116KThis facility: $32,708, 72% below the Vermont average of $116,101. Average among the 25 Vermont facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #5 / 12Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 12 nursing homes we track in Vermont for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Vermont average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 12 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 22% · VT 1.64This facility: 2, 22% above the Vermont average of 1.64. Average among the 25 Vermont facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
VT avg 0.24Vermont average: 0.24. Average among the 25 Vermont facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jun 19, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,788
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,788
Jun 19, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$23,920
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$23,920Fine amount comparison
This facility
$32,708
Vermont average
$116,101
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Vermont and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Vermont average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 60% · VT 2.5This facility: 4.0, 60% above the VT average of 2.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
≈ 0% · VT 3.0This facility: 3.0, level with the VT average of 3.0 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 51% · VT 10.6This facility: 5.2, 51% below the VT average of 10.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 42% · VT 20.6This facility: 11.8, 42% below the VT average of 20.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 5 worse, 1 near VT average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse, 3 near VT average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.7%
↓ 61% · VT 19.8This facility: 7.7, 61% below the VT average of 19.8 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.7%
↓ 61% · VT 19.8This facility: 7.7, 61% below the VT average of 19.8 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.4%
↓ 61% · VT 16.4This facility: 6.4, 61% below the VT average of 16.4 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.4%
↓ 61% · VT 16.4This facility: 6.4, 61% below the VT average of 16.4 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
↓ 16% · VT 25.5This facility: 21.4, 16% below the VT average of 25.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
↓ 16% · VT 25.5This facility: 21.4, 16% below the VT average of 25.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6%
↓ 72% · VT 2.3This facility: 0.6, 72% below the VT average of 2.3 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6%
↓ 72% · VT 2.3This facility: 0.6, 72% below the VT average of 2.3 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
↓ 51% · VT 5.5This facility: 2.7, 51% below the VT average of 5.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
↓ 51% · VT 5.5This facility: 2.7, 51% below the VT average of 5.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
↓ 50% · VT 4.9This facility: 2.5, 50% below the VT average of 4.9 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
↓ 50% · VT 4.9This facility: 2.5, 50% below the VT average of 4.9 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8%
↑ 5% · VT 6.5This facility: 6.8, 5% above the VT average of 6.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8%
↑ 5% · VT 6.5This facility: 6.8, 5% above the VT average of 6.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
21.1%
↑ 45% · VT 14.6This facility: 21.1, 45% above the VT average of 14.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
21.1%
↑ 45% · VT 14.6This facility: 21.1, 45% above the VT average of 14.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.6%
↑ 8% · VT 20.0This facility: 21.6, 8% above the VT average of 20.0 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.6%
↑ 8% · VT 20.0This facility: 21.6, 8% above the VT average of 20.0 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↓ 6% · VT 95.3This facility: 89.3, 6% below the VT average of 95.3 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↓ 6% · VT 95.3This facility: 89.3, 6% below the VT average of 95.3 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · VT 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the VT average of 97.0 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · VT 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the VT average of 97.0 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.41
↑ 67% · VT 1.44This facility: 2.41, 67% above the VT average of 1.44 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.41
↑ 67% · VT 1.44This facility: 2.41, 67% above the VT average of 1.44 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.19
↓ 12% · VT 2.48This facility: 2.19, 12% below the VT average of 2.48 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.19
↓ 12% · VT 2.48This facility: 2.19, 12% below the VT average of 2.48 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.5%
↑ 13% · US 53.7This facility: 60.5, 13% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.5%
↑ 13% · US 53.7This facility: 60.5, 13% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
51.5%
↑ 2% · US 50.6This facility: 51.5, 2% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
51.5%
↑ 2% · US 50.6This facility: 51.5, 2% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 4% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 4% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 4% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 4% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.5%
↑ 6% · VT 1.4This facility: 1.5, 6% above the VT average of 1.4 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.5%
↑ 6% · VT 1.4This facility: 1.5, 6% above the VT average of 1.4 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.4%
↑ 12% · VT 83.6This facility: 93.4, 12% above the VT average of 83.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.4%
↑ 12% · VT 83.6This facility: 93.4, 12% above the VT average of 83.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.8%
↓ 4% · VT 81.0This facility: 77.8, 4% below the VT average of 81.0 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.8%
↓ 4% · VT 81.0This facility: 77.8, 4% below the VT average of 81.0 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.9%
↑ 2% · VT 21.5This facility: 21.9, 2% above the VT average of 21.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.9%
↑ 2% · VT 21.5This facility: 21.9, 2% above the VT average of 21.5 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.7%
↑ 1% · VT 17.6This facility: 17.7, 1% above the VT average of 17.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.7%
↑ 1% · VT 17.6This facility: 17.7, 1% above the VT average of 17.6 (among VT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 11 Vermont nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
17.2% operating margin
+14.3 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $6.8M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Vermont homes
43.9% payroll share of revenue
VT average 40.8%Rank #5 / 11Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Vermont average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.0M while revenue rose $1.7M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Vermont homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | VT median | Compared with VT homesRank in VT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $13.5M | +$1.7M | Trend 20172024 | VT median $18.9M | Rank in VT Rank #9 / 11Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Vermont average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Below VT median Higher net patient revenue than 20% of VT homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.2M | −$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | VT median $17.9M | Rank in VT Rank #10 / 11Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Vermont homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $2.3M | +$2.0M | Trend 20172024 | VT median $0.9M | Rank in VT Rank #1 / 11Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Vermont homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 17.2% | +14.3 pts | Trend 20172024 | VT median 7.5% | Rank in VT Rank #1 / 11Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Vermont homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | VT median $0.0M | Rank in VT Rank #10 / 11Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Vermont homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $6.8M | +$6.4M | Trend — | VT median $1.4M | Rank in VT Rank #1 / 11Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Vermont homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Vermont homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | VT median | Compared with VT homesRank in VT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.9M | +$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | VT median $8.5M | Rank in VT Rank #8 / 11Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Vermont average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 30% of homes | Below VT median Higher payroll than 30% of VT homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 43.9% | −5.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | VT median 42.4% | Rank in VT Rank #5 / 11Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Vermont for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Vermont average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Vermont that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 60% of homes | 3.1 pts over VT average The VT average is 40.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · VT benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Vermont payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin VT payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.9M | $8.5M | $7.8M | $7.9M | $7.5M | $10.3M | $11.9M | $13.5M |
| Operating expenses | $8.4M | $8.0M | $7.7M | $8.5M | $8.5M | $11.0M | $11.5M | $11.2M |
| Net patient income | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.0M | −$0.5M | −$1.1M | −$0.7M | $0.4M | $2.3M |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 6.3% | 0.6% | −6.8% | −14.5% | −6.5% | 3.0% | 17.2% |
| Net income | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.0M | −$0.5M | −$1.0M | −$0.1M | $0.4M | $6.8M |
| Payroll costs | $4.0M | $3.8M | $3.5M | $3.5M | $3.3M | $4.1M | $5.9M | $5.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.3% | 44.1% | 44.5% | 43.5% | 43.8% | 39.6% | 49.7% | 43.9% |
| Beds | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 | 103 |
| Gross revenue | $13.9M | $13.2M | $11.9M | $11.7M | $11.0M | $14.5M | $16.4M | $17.1M |
| Salaries | $3.4M | $3.2M | $2.9M | $2.9M | $2.8M | $3.6M | $5.2M | $5.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.7M | $0.7M |
| Contract labor | $1.4M | $1.6M | $1.7M | $2.5M | $3.0M | $4.3M | $2.6M | $2.3M |
| Other operating costs | $4.3M | $4.2M | $4.3M | $5.0M | $5.3M | $6.9M | $5.6M | $5.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $262 | $269 | $276 | $291 | $282 | $309 | $337 | $397 |
| Cost per day | $246 | $252 | $274 | $311 | $323 | $330 | $327 | $328 |
| Average length of stay | 181.5 days | 143.2 days | 146.1 days | 221.4 days | 234.4 days | 227.6 days | 210.9 days | 473.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
32 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
26 · 81%
Medicaid
2 · 6%
Private pay & other
4 · 13%
Resident snapshot
86 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 8%
Medicaid
68 · 79%
Private pay & other
11 · 13%
Leaving
72 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
23 · 32%
Medicaid
10 · 14%
Private pay & other
39 · 54%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation
0.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Rutland's city center to Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Rutland
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the VT Dept. of Disabilities, Aging & Independent Living (DAIL), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Vermont average is: 40.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Pines at Rutland Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Rutland | 125
Facility
125
VT AVG
116
Rank
#6 / 11 | B+ |
88.4%
Facility
88.4%
VT AVG
84.1%
Rank
#4 / 11 | +5% | 3.51
Facility
3.51
VT AVG
4.49
Rank
#11 / 12 | +49% | -22% | $8.5k
Facility
$8.5k
VT AVG
$122.5k
Rank
#2 / 12 | 20
Facility
20
VT AVG
27.8
Rank
#4 / 12 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
VT AVG
4.2
Rank
#9 / 12 | 1 | 111 | - |
36
Facility
36
VT AVG
33
Rank
#4 / 14 | Diane Sullivan | $20.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
$18.2M
Rank
#2 / 11 | $10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
$7.7M
Rank
#2 / 11 | 49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
40.8%
Rank
#2 / 11 | 475018 | ||||
| Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation | NH RC SNF | Rutland (Rutland City) | 103
Facility
103
VT AVG
116
Rank
#8 / 11 | B+ |
84.6%
Facility
84.6%
VT AVG
84.1%
Rank
#5 / 11 | +1% | 3.85
Facility
3.85
VT AVG
4.49
Rank
#6 / 12 | -11% | -14% | $32.7k
Facility
$32.7k
VT AVG
$122.5k
Rank
#5 / 12 | 8
Facility
8
VT AVG
27.8
Rank
#2 / 12 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
VT AVG
4.2
Rank
#2 / 12 | 2 | 87 | - |
86
Facility
86
VT AVG
33
Rank
#1 / 14 | David Lamando | $13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
$18.2M
Rank
#9 / 11 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
$7.7M
Rank
#8 / 11 | 43.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
43.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
40.8%
Rank
#5 / 11 | 475039 | ||||
| Menig Nursing Home | NH SNF | Randolph Center | 30
Facility
30
VT AVG
116
Rank
#11 / 11 | C- |
95.7%
Facility
95.7%
VT AVG
84.1%
Rank
#1 / 11 | +14% | 5.43
Facility
5.43
VT AVG
4.49
Rank
#2 / 12 | +50% | +21% | $76.5k
Facility
$76.5k
VT AVG
$122.5k
Rank
#7 / 12 | 25
Facility
25
VT AVG
27.8
Rank
#5 / 12 | 8.3
Facility
8.3
VT AVG
4.2
Rank
#12 / 12 | - | 29 | - |
8
Facility
8
VT AVG
33
Rank
#12 / 14 | Gifford Health Care Inc | - | - | - | 475058 | ||||
| Mountain View Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Rutland | 158
Facility
158
VT AVG
116
Rank
#3 / 11 | C |
82.3%
Facility
82.3%
VT AVG
84.1%
Rank
#8 / 11 | -2% | 3.60
Facility
3.60
VT AVG
4.49
Rank
#8 / 12 | -13% | -20% | $29.6k
Facility
$29.6k
VT AVG
$122.5k
Rank
#3 / 12 | 27
Facility
27
VT AVG
27.8
Rank
#6 / 12 | 3.9
Facility
3.9
VT AVG
4.2
Rank
#6 / 12 | 3 | 130 | - |
24
Facility
24
VT AVG
33
Rank
#8 / 14 | Genesis Vt Holdings LLC | $19.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
$18.2M
Rank
#4 / 11 | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
$7.7M
Rank
#4 / 11 | 44%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
VT AVG
40.8%
Rank
#3 / 11 | 475012 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other VT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Vermont
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation is in Rutland, Vermont. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Choices for Care
VT Medicaid CFC
- Who it is for
- Older Vermonters and adults with physical disabilities who need long-term care
- Income limit
- Financial eligibility is determined under Vermont LTC Medicaid rules.
Eligibility
- General
- Vermont Choices for Care serves qualifying older adults and adults with physical disabilities; High/Highest Needs requires clinical eligibility and Long-Term Care Medicaid financial eligibility.
- VT specifics
- Moderate Needs and High/Highest Needs have different rules and service availability.
What it provides
- Approved long-term care services in an eligible home/community or institutional setting according to assessed need and program group.
Vermont Assistive Community Care Services (ACCS)
Vermont Assistive Community Care Services (ACCS)
- Who it is for
- Vermonters 65+, or 18+ with a disability, on Medicaid and living in a participating residential care setting
Eligibility
- General
- Vermont resident age 65 or older or age 18 or older with a disability; Medicaid eligibility and qualifying residential setting required.
- VT specifics
- ACCS is a Vermont Medicaid benefit for services in participating residential care settings; this is not a general home-care cash grant.
What it provides
- Case management personal care and residential support services as authorized.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
Vermont VA Aid and Attendance/Housebound
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- Countable income must be below the applicable Maximum Annual Pension Rate (MAPR); the rate depends on dependents and benefit category; Qualifying unreimbursed medical expenses may reduce countable income.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth limit is $163,699 from December 1 2025 through November 30 2026; net worth includes countable assets and annual income under VA rules.
Eligibility
- General
- Additional pension benefits for qualifying Veterans or survivors who satisfy VA pension eligibility and the medical requirements for Aid and Attendance or Housebound status; being an older veteran or spouse alone does not qualify.
- VT specifics
- This is a federal VA benefit rather than a state-specific grant; Aid and Attendance and Housebound benefits cannot be received together.
What it provides
- Increased monthly VA pension based on the applicable MAPR less countable income.
Older Americans Act (OAA) Services
Vermont OAA Services
- Who it is for
- Adults 60+ looking for meals, in-home help or other local aging services
- Income limit
- OAA nutrition services have no income means test; priority is directed to people with greatest economic or social need.
- Asset limit
- OAA nutrition eligibility is not asset-tested.
Eligibility
- General
- Older Americans Act supportive and nutrition services generally serve adults age 60 or older; individual services can have additional criteria and specified exceptions.
- VT specifics
- Services are subject to local availability and funding; the OAA does not guarantee an individual entitlement.
What it provides
- Locally available nutrition and supportive services may include meals and in-home assistance.
Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP)
Vermont Family Caregiver Support Program
- Who it is for
- Family or informal caregivers of an adult 60+ or of someone of any age with dementia
- Income limit
- Federal program prioritizes greatest economic and social need.
Eligibility
- General
- Federal NFCSP supports adult informal caregivers of people age 60 or older or people of any age with Alzheimer disease or related disorders; it also includes specified relative caregivers age 55 or older of children or adults with disabilities.
What it provides
- Information and assistance; counseling and support groups; caregiver training; respite and limited supplemental services.
Attendant Services Program (ASP)
Vermont Attendant Services Program
- Who it is for
- Vermont adults with a severe, permanent disability who need physical help with daily activities
Eligibility
- General
- Vermont adults with a severe and permanent disability who need physical assistance with daily activities; current program and Medicaid eligibility rules apply.
- VT specifics
- Attendant Services Program supports self-directed personal assistance.
What it provides
- Attendant assistance with daily activities according to authorized needs.
Essential Person Program
Vermont Essential Person Program
- Who it is for
- Vermonters 65+, or blind or disabled, with limited income who rely on a live-in helper
Eligibility
- General
- Vermont residents who are age 65 or older or blind or disabled, meet program income rules, receive or have applied for SSI and/or SSDI, and have an essential person living with them to provide needed daily care.
- VT specifics
- The live-in helper must not be eligible for SSI/AABD or Reach Up and must not already be paid by the Department of Disabilities, Aging and Independent Living to provide the applicant personal services. This supports living at home.
What it provides
- Monthly cash assistance helps cover part of the cost of essential live-in care.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Vermont Medicare Savings Program
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
- Income limit
- QMB and QI-1 income eligibility expanded effective January 1 2026.
- Asset limit
- Vermont QMB and QI have no resource limit.
Eligibility
- General
- Eligible Vermont Medicare beneficiaries; current MSP group rules apply.
- VT specifics
- SLMB ended December 31 2025; most SLMB members moved to QMB.
What it provides
- QMB provides Medicare premium and cost-sharing assistance; QI-1 provides Part B premium assistance subject to eligibility; Extra Help eligibility follows the applicable federal rules.
Fuel Assistance Program
Vermont Seasonal Fuel Assistance
- Who it is for
- Low-income Vermont households with home-heating costs
- Income limit
- Gross household income at or below 185% of federal poverty guidelines; use the current 2026-2027 household-size table.
Eligibility
- General
- Eligible low-income Vermont household; fuel assistance is not limited to seniors.
- VT specifics
- Seasonal Fuel Assistance and Crisis Fuel Assistance have separate application and benefit rules; amounts depend on the eligible household and heating arrangement.
What it provides
- Assistance with eligible home-heating costs.
Vermont Property Tax Credit
Vermont Property Tax Credit
- Who it is for
- Vermont homestead owners who meet the residency, ownership and income rules
- Income limit
- Credit depends on household income and the applicable claim year.
Eligibility
- General
- Vermont homestead owners meeting residency ownership and income requirements may claim a property-tax credit; this entry is not the separate renter credit and is not restricted to age 65 or older.
- VT specifics
- For 2026 claims the Homestead Declaration must have been filed by October 15 2026. Qualifying late property-tax credit claims may still be filed through March 15 2027 with a $150 reduction; payment goes directly to the homeowner.
What it provides
- Income-based property-tax credit calculated using the applicable year tax and household-income rules.
Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP)
Vermont CSFP
- Who it is for
- Low-income Vermonters 60+
Eligibility
- General
- CSFP serves eligible low-income adults age 60 or older; Vermont distribution is through participating Vermont Foodbank locations.
- VT specifics
- Vermont Foodbank publishes an April 2026 distribution-location list.
What it provides
- A supplemental food package distributed through participating sites.
VPharm Prescription Assistance
Vermont VPharm Prescription Assistance
- Who it is for
- Vermont Medicare Part D enrollees who meet VPharm income and eligibility rules; obtain federal Extra Help if eligible
- Income limit
- Income must not exceed 225% of the federal poverty guideline under the VPharm statute.
Eligibility
- General
- Vermont Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Part D who meet VPharm eligibility rules and secure the federal Low Income Subsidy if eligible. Medicaid enrollment is not compatible with VPharm coverage.
- VT specifics
- This is prescription-cost support rather than assistance with senior-living rent or room and board. Program premiums and copayments apply; use the current DVHA determination for the amount.
What it provides
- Helps pay covered prescription costs and eligible Medicare Part D cost-sharing.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation in?
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation is in the Rutland City neighborhood of Rutland.
02 Is Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 86. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation?
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 84.6%.
04 Are pets allowed at Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation?
No, Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation?
The team at Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation can be reached at info@rutlandclr.com.
06 Does Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit in VT.
07 What is the overall rating for Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation?
Rutland Center for Living and Rehabilitation received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
