Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
96
96 employees · 0 contractors · 31 on an average day Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Oconto Falls, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Oconto Falls, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls is a nursing home in Oconto Falls, WI offering skilled nursing, hospice care, and respite care. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, hospice care focuses on comfort for someone nearing the end of life, and respite care gives a family a short stay option when the usual caregiver needs time to travel or recover.
The home has 99 beds, with total nurse staffing of 3h 46m per resident each day. That figure represents the amount of nursing staff time allocated to each resident across a day, while rehabilitation services give residents access to therapy as part of their care and the bariatric care program supports residents who require that specialized approach.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted. Medicare can apply to short term skilled care after a hospital stay, Medicaid may help when savings do not cover a long stay, and private pay allows a family to pay directly. Cody Roy Bell serves as the administrator, and the home is operated by Oconto Falls Nursing And Rehab. The combination of skilled nursing, hospice care, rehabilitation services, and respite care may suit a resident whose needs require nursing support or a family seeking a short term care arrangement.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 46m
This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 46mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +25% above Wisconsin average
5 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 9-hour shifts
43m
↓ 25% · WI 58mThis facility: 43m per resident per day, 25% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
48m
↑ 25% · WI 38mThis facility: 48m per resident per day, 25% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 61 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
61 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
2h 15m
↓ 13% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 2h 15m per resident per day, 13% below the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 61 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
61 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 100% · WI 4mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 24m
↓ 9% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 3h 24m per resident per day, 9% below the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
21m
↓ 48% · WI 40mThis facility: 21m per resident per day, 48% below the Wisconsin average of 40m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
96
96 employees · 0 contractors · 31 on an average day
96 total staff / 66 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.45 : 1
↓ 39% · WI 2.40This facility: 1.45 staff per resident, 39% below the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
96 staff ÷ 66 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.9 h
↑ 8% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.9 h, 8% above the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
22,176 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
99
Rank #58 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
99
Rank #58 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #43 / 55Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #43 / 55Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
6
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #151 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #151 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
25
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #132 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #132 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
59.4%
This home usually has availability
Based on 58.8 residents and 99 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Wisconsin average: 72.1%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
174
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyOconto
CMS Certification Number525449
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls is legally operated by Oconto Falls Nursing And Rehab LLC, and administered by Cody Roy Bell.
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Cardiac RehabilitationA supervised program that helps people regain strength and endurance after heart problems or procedures, often including exercise and risk-factor education.
Respiratory Care
Dietitian
Bariatric CareSpecialized care for people with severe obesity, including safe transfers, equipment, mobility support, and management of related health needs.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Meal Preparation
Fax(920) 848-2516
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
11 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
92 severity-weighted points (39 deficiencies) · 20% higher than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 76)
Enforcement
Typical
2 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 0) · $43,234 in fines
Persistence
Typical
24 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
11
↑ 77% · WI 6.2This facility: 11, 77% above the WI average of 6.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
53
Rank #118 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 87% · WI 28.3This facility: 53, 87% above the WI average of 28.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.82
Rank #116 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 14% · WI 4.24This facility: 4.82, 14% above the WI average of 4.24 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
79% corrected
42 of 53 citations corrected · 11 still open
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 11% · WI 0.9This facility: 1, 11% above the WI average of 0.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 17% · WI 1.2This facility: 1, 17% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
50
↑ 94% · WI 25.8This facility: 50, 94% above the WI average of 25.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
80% corrected · 10 open
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the WI average of 0.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
0% corrected · 1 open
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 19, 2026 · 3 citations, 0 corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 20 of 53 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 19, 2026
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Jul 22, 2026
8 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Nursing Services minor citation
Jul 07, 2026
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 13, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 29, 2025
6 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 16, 2024
5 citations
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 14, 2024
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 21, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 30, 2024
11 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 02, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 16, 2023
8 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 53 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 53 citations
Quality of Life & Care
20 deficiencies (38%)
Pharmacy Services
8 deficiencies (15%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
7 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (11%)
Infection Control
5 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services
3 deficiencies (6%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
28 of 53 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 25 of 53 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Dec 16, 2024 · $43,234 civil money penalty
Dec 16, 2024 · $43,234 civil money penalty
Apr 30, 2024 · 18-day payment denial
Total fines
$43,234
↓ 60% · WI $107KThis facility: $43,234, 60% below the Wisconsin average of $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #120 / 168Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Wisconsin average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 168 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 51% · WI 2.03This facility: 1, 51% below the Wisconsin average of 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
18 days
↑ 42% · WI 0.71This facility: 1, 42% above the Wisconsin average of 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Dec 16, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$43,234
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$43,234
Apr 30, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
18 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
18 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$43,234
Wisconsin average
$106,807
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 1% · WI 3.0This facility: 3.0, 1% below the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 31% · WI 2.9This facility: 2.0, 31% below the WI average of 2.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 8% · WI 9.0This facility: 9.7, 8% above the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 21% · WI 18.9This facility: 14.9, 21% below the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 4 worse, 1 near WI average
5 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.9%
↓ 50% · WI 15.8This facility: 7.9, 50% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.9%
↓ 50% · WI 15.8This facility: 7.9, 50% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.7%
↑ 10% · WI 17.0This facility: 18.7, 10% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.7%
↑ 10% · WI 17.0This facility: 18.7, 10% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.9%
↓ 24% · WI 23.6This facility: 17.9, 24% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.9%
↓ 24% · WI 23.6This facility: 17.9, 24% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
↑ 35% · WI 2.7This facility: 3.7, 35% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
↑ 35% · WI 2.7This facility: 3.7, 35% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
↓ 84% · WI 3.3This facility: 0.5, 84% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
↓ 84% · WI 3.3This facility: 0.5, 84% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.7%
↑ 139% · WI 4.9This facility: 11.7, 139% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.7%
↑ 139% · WI 4.9This facility: 11.7, 139% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8%
↑ 99% · WI 4.9This facility: 9.8, 99% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8%
↑ 99% · WI 4.9This facility: 9.8, 99% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4%
↓ 44% · WI 6.0This facility: 3.4, 44% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4%
↓ 44% · WI 6.0This facility: 3.4, 44% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.0%
↓ 18% · WI 15.9This facility: 13.0, 18% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.0%
↓ 18% · WI 15.9This facility: 13.0, 18% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 5 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.2%
↑ 12% · WI 86.9This facility: 97.2, 12% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.2%
↑ 12% · WI 86.9This facility: 97.2, 12% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
↑ 20% · WI 82.2This facility: 98.5, 20% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
↑ 20% · WI 82.2This facility: 98.5, 20% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
30.7%
↑ 35% · WI 22.7This facility: 30.7, 35% above the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
30.7%
↑ 35% · WI 22.7This facility: 30.7, 35% above the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
27.0%
↑ 80% · WI 15.0This facility: 27.0, 80% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
27.0%
↑ 80% · WI 15.0This facility: 27.0, 80% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−15.2% operating margin
+4.3 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.1M) trims the net loss to −$0.9M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Wisconsin homes
58.4% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #65 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.2M while revenue rose $0.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2013 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.7M | +$0.1M | Trend 20132024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #107 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 35% of homes | Below WI median Higher net patient revenue than 35% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.7M | −$0.2M | Trend 20132024 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Rank #94 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 94th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 43% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.0M | +$0.3M | Trend 20132024 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #126 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 126th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 23% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −15.2% | +4.3 pts | Trend 20132024 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Rank #128 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 128th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #90 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 90th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 45% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.9M | +$0.1M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Rank #149 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 149th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 9% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2013 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.9M | −$0.2M | Trend 20132024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #97 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 97th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | Below WI median Higher payroll than 41% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 58.4% | −4.3 pts | Trend 20132024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #65 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Near WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2013–2024 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2013–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2013 | 2014no report | 2015 | 2016no report | 2017 | 2018 | 2019no report | 2020no report | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.0M | $4.9M | $4.6M | $4.3M | $4.9M | $6.0M | $6.6M | $6.7M | ||||
| Operating expenses | $5.0M | $5.4M | $4.1M | $4.1M | $4.6M | $6.3M | $7.9M | $7.7M | ||||
| Net patient income | $1.0M | −$0.4M | $0.6M | $0.2M | $0.3M | −$0.3M | −$1.3M | −$1.0M | ||||
| Operating margin | 16.2% | −8.5% | 12.4% | 4.2% | 6.9% | −5.2% | −19.5% | −15.2% | ||||
| Net income | $1.0M | −$0.4M | $0.6M | $0.2M | $0.8M | $0.0M | −$1.0M | −$0.9M | ||||
| Payroll costs | $2.7M | $3.4M | $2.5M | $2.3M | $2.3M | $3.1M | $4.2M | $3.9M | ||||
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.0% | 69.5% | 52.9% | 53.5% | 46.9% | 51.7% | 62.7% | 58.4% | ||||
| Beds | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 75 | 75 | ||||
| Gross revenue | $6.0M | $6.4M | $7.5M | $6.9M | $5.9M | $6.7M | $7.1M | $6.0M | ||||
| Salaries | $2.4M | $3.0M | $2.0M | $2.1M | $2.0M | $2.7M | $3.6M | $3.5M | ||||
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.5M | ||||
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | $0.0M | $0.3M | $0.3M | ||||
| Other operating costs | $2.3M | $1.9M | $1.6M | $1.8M | $2.3M | $3.2M | $3.8M | $3.8M | ||||
| Net patient revenue per day | $197 | $173 | $209 | $218 | $322 | $296 | $305 | $363 | ||||
| Cost per day | $165 | $188 | $183 | $209 | $300 | $312 | $364 | $418 | ||||
| Average length of stay | 169.7 days | 206.0 days | 255.4 days | 130.1 days | 121.2 days | 148.9 days | 113.8 days | 174.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 9 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
117 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
76 · 65%
Medicaid
19 · 16%
Private pay & other
22 · 19%
Resident snapshot
66 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
32 · 48%
Private pay & other
34 · 52%
Leaving
106 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
52 · 49%
Medicaid
21 · 20%
Private pay & other
33 · 31%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls
0.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Oconto Falls's city center to Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Lutheran Home | NH AL MC RC SNF | Green Bay | - | 118
Facility
118
WI AVG
78
Rank
#29 / 197 | - |
67
Facility
67
WI AVG
48
Rank
#47 / 191 | - |
| Harbor Haven Health & Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC PC SNF | Fond Du Lac | - | 85
Facility
85
WI AVG
78
Rank
#81 / 197 | - |
57
Facility
57
WI AVG
48
Rank
#69 / 191 | Private / Semi-Private Rooms |
| Badger Prairie Health Care Center | NH SNF | Verona | - | 120
Facility
120
WI AVG
78
Rank
#23 / 197 | - |
31
Facility
31
WI AVG
48
Rank
#139 / 191 | - |
| Morrow Memorial Home | NH AL IL MC SNF | Sparta | - | 80
Facility
80
WI AVG
78
Rank
#91 / 197 | A+ |
68
Facility
68
WI AVG
48
Rank
#42 / 191 | - |
| Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls | NH HOS RC SNF | Oconto Falls | - | 99
Facility
99
WI AVG
78
Rank
#58 / 197 | A+ |
25
Facility
25
WI AVG
48
Rank
#151 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls?
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls is legally operated by Oconto Falls Nursing And Rehab LLC, and administered by Cody Roy Bell.
02 Is Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls in a walkable area?
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls has a walk score of 25. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls?
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls's occupancy is 59.4%.
04 How long has Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls been in business?
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls has been operating for approximately 6 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls?
No, Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls is registered as a for-profit in WI.
07 Who is the administrator of Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls?
Cody Roy Bell is the administrator of Meadowbrook at Oconto Falls.
Updated on
