3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Myrtle Beach Manor provides assisted living, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Myrtle Beach, SC. A dedicated Alzheimer’s unit is also provided through the memory care programs for those at risk of wandering, and respite care offers a short stay when a resident’s usual caregiver needs to travel or recover.
The range of care can suit a resident whose needs grow over time, since care levels can continue within the same community. The community has a 111-bed capacity, including studios and one-bedroom layouts. Studios have one private space, while a one-bedroom layout separates the sleeping and living areas.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 6 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily nursing time allocated to each resident. Medicare and private pay are also accepted, with Medicare covering short-term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay means paying directly for care. Pets are allowed, so a resident can continue living with a small animal companion.
A Walk Score of 41 places the area in a car-dependent setting, meaning most errands require a car or a ride. A resident who no longer drives would need transportation for those trips. Elizabeth Schmeizl serves as administrator, and SNH Sc Tenant operates the community.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 6mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +78% above South Carolina average
2 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 13 total: 10 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
13 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 19 total: 16 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
19 staff · 9-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 34 total: 31 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
34 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
102
70 employees · 32 contractors · 30 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.5 h
↓ 5% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 7.5 h, 5% below the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
20,798 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →88.1% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89.1% · Contractors this quarter: Feeding Assistant (5), Certified Nursing Assistant (3), Registered Nurse (3), Licensed Practical Nurse (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Other Physician (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
111
Rank #63 / 132Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 63rd out of 132 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #19 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 46 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across South Carolina facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Myrtle Beach Manor is legally operated by Snh Sc Tenant LLC, and administered by Elizabeth Schmeizl.
Sourced directly from the team at Myrtle Beach Manor.
90% corrected
10 of 11 citations corrected · 1 still open Latest inspection: Nov 20, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 3 of 11 citations · 6 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
7 of 11 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 11 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
4 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jul 30, 2025 · $14,901 civil money penalty
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,901
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,147
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,786
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
27 daysTotals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. South Carolina and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 49% · SC 3.9This facility: 2.0, 49% below the SC average of 3.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 9% · SC 2.8This facility: 3.0, 9% above the SC average of 2.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 76% · SC 7.8This facility: 13.7, 76% above the SC average of 7.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 28% · SC 14.1This facility: 18.1, 28% above the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 2 better, 7 worse, 1 without a benchmark
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.8%
↑ 24% · SC 11.9This facility: 14.8, 24% above the SC average of 11.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.3%
↑ 28% · SC 16.7This facility: 21.3, 28% above the SC average of 16.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5%
↑ 171% · SC 1.3This facility: 3.5, 171% above the SC average of 1.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
17.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8%
↑ 33% · SC 5.1This facility: 6.8, 33% above the SC average of 5.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.0%
↑ 154% · SC 6.3This facility: 16.0, 154% above the SC average of 6.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.5%
↑ 174% · SC 3.1This facility: 8.5, 174% above the SC average of 3.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · SC 91.7This facility: 100.0, 9% above the SC average of 91.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.51
↓ 26% · SC 2.03This facility: 1.51, 26% below the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.61
↑ 89% · SC 1.91This facility: 3.61, 89% above the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
62.6%
↑ 17% · US 53.7This facility: 62.6, 17% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.1%
↑ 25% · US 50.6This facility: 63.1, 25% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.5%
↑ 94% · US 0.8This facility: 1.5, 94% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 62% · SC 1.5This facility: 0.6, 62% below the SC average of 1.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.9%
↑ 18% · SC 81.5This facility: 95.9, 18% above the SC average of 81.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.5%
↑ 10% · SC 78.0This facility: 85.5, 10% above the SC average of 78.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.9%
↑ 29% · SC 24.7This facility: 31.9, 29% above the SC average of 24.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
8.5%
↓ 40% · SC 14.1This facility: 8.5, 40% below the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
37% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
63% of new residents, often for short stays.
Myrtle Beach Manor’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−16.1% operating margin
+2.8 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.1M) trims the net loss to −$1.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most South Carolina homes
55.5% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #64 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.1M while revenue rose $1.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.2M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #86 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Below SC median Higher net patient revenue than 17% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $9.6M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.3M | +$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −16.1% | +2.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.2M | −$0.0M | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Spends less of revenue on staff than most South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.6M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #90 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 90th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | Below SC median Higher payroll than 14% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 55.5% | −10.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #64 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 39% of homes | 5.3 pts under SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.6M | $8.3M | $8.7M | $7.1M | $5.4M | $6.4M | $7.1M | $8.2M |
| Operating expenses | $9.8M | $9.9M | $9.5M | $8.0M | $6.7M | $7.7M | $8.4M | $9.6M |
| Net patient income | −$1.2M | −$1.5M | −$0.8M | −$0.9M | −$1.2M | −$1.3M | −$1.3M | −$1.3M |
| Operating margin | −13.8% | −18.1% | −9.3% | −12.7% | −22.8% | −21.1% | −19.0% | −16.1% |
| Net income | −$1.1M | −$1.4M | −$0.7M | −$0.4M | −$1.0M | −$1.3M | −$1.2M | −$1.2M |
| Payroll costs | $4.8M | $5.1M | $5.7M | $4.9M | $4.0M | $4.4M | $4.7M | $4.6M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 55.3% | 61.0% | 65.8% | 69.1% | 74.3% | 68.4% | 66.4% | 55.5% |
| Beds | 171 | 171 | 171 | 171 | 171 | 171 | 171 | 171 |
| Gross revenue | $9.2M | $8.9M | $9.1M | $7.3M | $5.5M | $6.8M | $7.2M | $8.4M |
| Salaries | $3.9M | $4.0M | $4.2M | $3.9M | $3.1M | $3.8M | $4.0M | $3.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $1.1M | $1.5M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | — | — | — | $0.3M | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $5.0M | $4.8M | $3.8M | $3.1M | $2.6M | $3.4M | $3.7M | $5.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $216 | $219 | $259 | $208 | $206 | $221 | $257 | $290 |
| Cost per day | $246 | $259 | $283 | $235 | $254 | $268 | $306 | $337 |
| Average length of stay | 27.2 days | 26.2 days | 28.0 days | 28.9 days | 30.8 days | 26.2 days | 23.1 days | 19.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (63% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 2 - 3 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
7.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Myrtle Beach's city center to Myrtle Beach Manor's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Oak Manor Lancaster | NH SNF | Lancaster | 132
Facility
132
SC AVG
108
Rank
#28 / 132 |
91.3%
Facility
91.3%
SC AVG
88.6%
Rank
#44 / 84 | +3% | 4.32
Facility
4.32
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#33 / 116 | -59% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 121 | - |
8
Facility
8
SC AVG
33
Rank
#39 / 46 | Nhc Healthcare/Lancaster LLC | $11.9M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $8.4M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 71%*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425017 | ||||
| Resorts at Beaufort | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Beaufort | 170
Facility
170
SC AVG
108
Rank
#14 / 132 |
77.1%
Facility
77.1%
SC AVG
88.6%
Rank
#79 / 84 | -13% | 4.00
Facility
4.00
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#49 / 116 | -2% | -3% | $10.9k
Facility
$10.9k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#73 / 119 | 22
Facility
22
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#103 / 116 | 4.4
Facility
4.4
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#89 / 116 | 1 | 131 | - |
44
Facility
44
SC AVG
33
Rank
#16 / 46 | Resorts At Beaufort LLC | $11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#52 / 104 | $6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#59 / 104 | 56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#59 / 104 | 425067 | ||||
| Myrtle Beach Manor | NH AL MC RC SNF | Myrtle Beach | 111
Facility
111
SC AVG
108
Rank
#63 / 132 | - | - | 4.09
Facility
4.09
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#15 / 116 | +36% | -1% | $27.8k
Facility
$27.8k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#102 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#52 / 116 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#14 / 116 | 3 | 39 | - |
41
Facility
41
SC AVG
33
Rank
#19 / 46 | Snh Sc Tenant LLC | $8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#86 / 104 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#90 / 104 | 55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#64 / 104 | 425070 | ||||
| Peachtree Centre | NH HOS RC SNF | Gaffney | 151
Facility
151
SC AVG
108
Rank
#19 / 132 |
88.5%
Facility
88.5%
SC AVG
88.6%
Rank
#3 / 84 | 0% | 3.09
Facility
3.09
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#108 / 116 | -46% | -25% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 18
Facility
18
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#93 / 116 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#109 / 116 | - | 134 | - |
26
Facility
26
SC AVG
33
Rank
#28 / 46 | Peachtree Operating Group LLC | $13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#39 / 104 | $5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#76 / 104 | 41%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#101 / 104 | 425095 | ||||
| Brookdale Anderson | - | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Anderson | 160
Facility
160
SC AVG
108
Rank
#16 / 132 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
43
Facility
43
SC AVG
33
Rank
#17 / 46 | $5.9M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $3.3M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 56.1%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425398 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Myrtle Beach Manor is legally operated by Snh Sc Tenant LLC, and administered by Elizabeth Schmeizl.
Myrtle Beach Manor has a walk score of 41. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
According to SC state health department records, Myrtle Beach Manor's license number is CRC-2123.
Myrtle Beach Manor's occupancy is 45.3%.
Yes, Myrtle Beach Manor allows residents to bring their pets.
Myrtle Beach Manor is registered as a for-profit in SC.
Elizabeth Schmeizl is the administrator of Myrtle Beach Manor.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
