Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
159
145 employees · 14 contractors · 69 on an average day White Oak Manor Lancaster
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Lancaster, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
White Oak Manor Lancaster
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Lancaster, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
White Oak Manor Lancaster accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Set in a peaceful area in Lancaster, SC, White Oak Manor Lancaster is an inviting senior living community, offering long term nursing care, as well as short term rehabilitation. Featuring 132 units of comfortably designed accommodations, the community ensures every resident are provided with a living space that matches their needs. A team of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, certified nursing assistants, physicians, and therapists work hand-in-hand in creating residents’ individualized care plans, ensuring they are provided with the care they need.
Thanks to the community’s prime location, residents also enjoy easy access to the city’s local amenities, including attractions, restaurants, shops, and parks that provide plenty of opportunities for recreation. Committed to enhancing residents’ overall quality of life, the community makes sure they are provided with services that cater to their overall needs. With its expansive services, residents of White Oak Manor Lancaster are guaranteed to enjoy a speedy recovery and comfortable living experience.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 19m
This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 118 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 19mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +25% above South Carolina average
3 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
24m
↓ 37% · SC 38mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 37% below the South Carolina average of 38m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
1h 9m
↑ 12% · SC 1h 1mThis facility: 1h 9m per resident per day, 12% above the South Carolina average of 1h 1m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 91 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
91 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
2h 47m
↑ 25% · SC 2h 13mThis facility: 2h 47m per resident per day, 25% above the South Carolina average of 2h 13m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 91 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
91 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 55% · SC 5mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 55% below the South Carolina average of 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 44m
↑ 12% · SC 3h 20mThis facility: 3h 44m per resident per day, 12% above the South Carolina average of 3h 20m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
7m
↓ 72% · SC 24mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 72% below the South Carolina average of 24m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
159
145 employees · 14 contractors · 69 on an average day
159 total staff / 123 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.29 : 1
↓ 27% · SC 1.77This facility: 1.29 staff per resident, 27% below the South Carolina average of 1.77 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
159 staff ÷ 123 residents
See full South Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.7 h
↓ 3% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 7.7 h, 3% below the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
48,141 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →95% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
132
Rank #29 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
132
Rank #29 / 133Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 133 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #39 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 46 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across South Carolina facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #39 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 46 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across South Carolina facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
8
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #55 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #55 / 87Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 87 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Carolina average, with its Statewide rank out of 87. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
91.3%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 120.5 residents and 132 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Similar to the South Carolina average: 89.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
202
days
About This Community
Facility TypeHL- Nursing Home
CountyLancaster
License NumberNCF-1089
Business TypeLimited Liability
CMS Certification Number425017
Accelerated Care Plus Program — Accelerated Care PlusA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Patterned Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation (PENS)A branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
White Oak Manor Lancaster is legally operated by Nhc Healthcare/Lancaster LLC, and administered by Lisa R Gosnell.
Ownership TypeLimited Liability
Institutional Nursing Home
132 units
Total beds
132 units
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Dysphagia Therapy
Balance and Fall Prevention Training
Prosthetics and Orthotics Training
Speech TherapyListed as: Speech language therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Home Evaluations, Patient, Family and Caregiver Education
Social Work & Case ManagementListed as: Case management/discharge planning
Pets not allowed
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Types
Private Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
95 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
14 points above the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
15 severity-weighted points (7 deficiencies) · 3× lower than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 42)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
27 days to fix issues · about the same as the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 19% · SC 3.7This facility: 3, 19% below the SC average of 3.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
7
Rank #28 / 116Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the South Carolina State average, with a ranking across all 116 SC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 45% · SC 12.7This facility: 7, 45% below the SC average of 12.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.33
Rank #31 / 116Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the South Carolina mean across 116 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 31% · SC 3.4This facility: 2.33, 31% below the SC average of 3.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
7 of 7 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
7
↓ 40% · SC 11.6This facility: 7, 40% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the SC average of 0.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 29, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 2 of 7 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 29, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 06, 2025
4 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 14, 2023
2 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 7 citations
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (29%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (29%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (14%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (14%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (14%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 7 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
SC avg $28KSouth Carolina average: $28,139. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
SC avg 2.03South Carolina average: 2.03. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
SC avg 0.1South Carolina average: 0.1. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 27% · SC 3.9This facility: 5.0, 27% above the SC average of 3.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 82% · SC 2.8This facility: 5.0, 82% above the SC average of 2.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 23% · SC 7.4This facility: 5.7, 23% below the SC average of 7.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.3
Score · lower is better
↓ 31% · SC 13.5This facility: 9.3, 31% below the SC average of 13.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 10 better, 2 worse, 1 near SC average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.5%
↓ 10% · SC 11.6This facility: 10.5, 10% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.5%
↓ 10% · SC 11.6This facility: 10.5, 10% below the SC average of 11.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.5%
↓ 53% · SC 11.8This facility: 5.5, 53% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.5%
↓ 53% · SC 11.8This facility: 5.5, 53% below the SC average of 11.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.0%
↓ 26% · SC 16.2This facility: 12.0, 26% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.0%
↓ 26% · SC 16.2This facility: 12.0, 26% below the SC average of 16.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 63% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.5, 63% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 63% · SC 1.2This facility: 0.5, 63% below the SC average of 1.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
↓ 17% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.6, 17% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
↓ 17% · SC 3.2This facility: 2.6, 17% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
↑ 1% · SC 4.9This facility: 5.0, 1% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
↑ 1% · SC 4.9This facility: 5.0, 1% above the SC average of 4.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↓ 18% · SC 6.1This facility: 5.0, 18% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↓ 18% · SC 6.1This facility: 5.0, 18% below the SC average of 6.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3%
↓ 90% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.3, 90% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3%
↓ 90% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.3, 90% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.2%
↓ 27% · SC 15.4This facility: 11.2, 27% below the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.2%
↓ 27% · SC 15.4This facility: 11.2, 27% below the SC average of 15.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.5%
↓ 9% · SC 91.8This facility: 83.5, 9% below the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.5%
↓ 9% · SC 91.8This facility: 83.5, 9% below the SC average of 91.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.5%
↓ 34% · SC 92.5This facility: 61.5, 34% below the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.5%
↓ 34% · SC 92.5This facility: 61.5, 34% below the SC average of 92.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.81
↓ 60% · SC 2.03This facility: 0.81, 60% below the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.81
↓ 60% · SC 2.03This facility: 0.81, 60% below the SC average of 2.03 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.78
↓ 59% · SC 1.91This facility: 0.78, 59% below the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.78
↓ 59% · SC 1.91This facility: 0.78, 59% below the SC average of 1.91 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
65.5%
↑ 22% · US 53.7This facility: 65.5, 22% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
65.5%
↑ 22% · US 53.7This facility: 65.5, 22% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.8%
↓ 9% · US 50.6This facility: 45.8, 9% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.8%
↓ 9% · US 50.6This facility: 45.8, 9% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.9%
↑ 13% · US 0.8This facility: 0.9, 13% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.9%
↑ 13% · US 0.8This facility: 0.9, 13% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.4 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
58.1%
↓ 29% · SC 81.9This facility: 58.1, 29% below the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
58.1%
↓ 29% · SC 81.9This facility: 58.1, 29% below the SC average of 81.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.8%
↓ 23% · SC 79.0This facility: 60.8, 23% below the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.8%
↓ 23% · SC 79.0This facility: 60.8, 23% below the SC average of 79.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.3%
↓ 18% · SC 24.7This facility: 20.3, 18% below the SC average of 24.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.3%
↓ 18% · SC 24.7This facility: 20.3, 18% below the SC average of 24.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
8.2%
↓ 42% · SC 14.1This facility: 8.2, 42% below the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
8.2%
↓ 42% · SC 14.1This facility: 8.2, 42% below the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
White Oak Manor Lancaster’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2023. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2023
Latest cost report is for the fiscal year ending September 2023, older than most South Carolina homes. Rankings are not shown because peers report different years.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−2.1% operating margin
+6.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Other income (−$0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most South Carolina homes
71.0% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $1.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2023 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2023 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $11.9M | +$1.4M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $12.1M | +$0.8M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $12.9M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.2M | +$0.6M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −2.1% | +6.4 pts | Trend 20162023 | SC median 1.2% | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | −$0.0M | — | Trend — | SC median $0.1M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.3M | −$0.6M | Trend — | SC median $0.3M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.4M | +$0.7M | Trend 20162023 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 71.0% | −2.5 pts | Trend 20162023 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Not ranked | 10.2 pts over SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2023 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2016–2023 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.6M | $10.4M | $10.4M | $10.5M | $10.7M | $9.5M | $10.5M | $11.9M |
| Operating expenses | $9.3M | $9.8M | $10.0M | $10.2M | $10.9M | $10.1M | $11.4M | $12.1M |
| Net patient income | $0.2M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.6M | −$0.9M | −$0.2M |
| Operating margin | 2.3% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 3.5% | −1.7% | −6.6% | −8.5% | −2.1% |
| Net income | $0.2M | $0.7M | $0.4M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.6M | $0.4M | −$0.3M |
| Payroll costs | $6.0M | $6.4M | $6.4M | $6.5M | $7.1M | $6.7M | $7.7M | $8.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 63.0% | 61.4% | 61.7% | 61.7% | 66.2% | 70.3% | 73.5% | 71.0% |
| Beds | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 |
| Gross revenue | $11.2M | $11.8M | $12.1M | $11.9M | $12.0M | $10.4M | $11.7M | $13.1M |
| Salaries | $4.9M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $5.3M | $5.8M | $5.4M | $6.4M | $6.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.5M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $3.3M | $3.4M | $3.6M | $3.7M | $3.8M | $3.4M | $3.7M | $3.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $214 | $226 | $235 | $239 | $259 | $299 | $273 | $277 |
| Cost per day | $209 | $214 | $226 | $231 | $264 | $319 | $297 | $283 |
| Average length of stay | 161.0 days | 228.7 days | 229.8 days | 221.4 days | 265.0 days | 218.3 days | 244.2 days | 201.5 days |
Showing 2023–2021 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2023
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
216 admissions · FY2023
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
87 · 40%
Medicaid
36 · 17%
Private pay & other
93 · 43%
Resident snapshot
123 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 6%
Medicaid
87 · 71%
Private pay & other
29 · 24%
Leaving
213 discharges · FY2023
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
45 · 21%
Medicaid
53 · 25%
Private pay & other
115 · 54%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Jeff Skinner is the Administrator at White Oak Manor Lancaster. A Clemson University graduate, Jeff has over 32 years of experience as a nursing home administrator. He is a long-standing member and past chairman of the South Carolina Health Care Association. Jeff is dedicated to serving the residents and fostering a welcoming community.
Places of interest near White Oak Manor Lancaster
2.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Lancaster's city center to White Oak Manor Lancaster's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to White Oak Manor Lancaster
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Oak Manor Lancaster | NH SNF | Lancaster | 132
Facility
132
SC AVG
109
Rank
#29 / 133 | A |
91.3%
Facility
91.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#55 / 87 | +2% | 4.32
Facility
4.32
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#37 / 118 | -59% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 121 | - |
8
Facility
8
SC AVG
33
Rank
#39 / 46 | Nhc Healthcare/Lancaster LLC | $11.9M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $8.4M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 71%*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425017 | ||||
| Veterans Victory House | NH SNF | Walterboro | 220
Facility
220
SC AVG
109
Rank
#3 / 133 | A- |
86.5%
Facility
86.5%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#68 / 87 | -4% | 4.62
Facility
4.62
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#31 / 118 | +50% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 4
Facility
4
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#11 / 116 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#15 / 116 | - | 190 | - | - | South Carolina Department Of Veterans Affairs | $22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$22.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#12 / 104 | $12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#7 / 104 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#63 / 104 | 425386 | ||||
| Rock Hill Post Acute Care Center | NH SNF | Rock Hill | 99
Facility
99
SC AVG
109
Rank
#74 / 133 | A |
86.3%
Facility
86.3%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#69 / 87 | -4% | 3.77
Facility
3.77
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#69 / 118 | -21% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | - | 85 | - | - | Rock Hill Healthcare LLC | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#54 / 104 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#58 / 104 | 58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#43 / 104 | 425159 | ||||
| The Palms at Florence | NH RC SNF | Florence | 163
Facility
163
SC AVG
109
Rank
#16 / 133 | ? |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#23 / 87 | +5% | 4.16
Facility
4.16
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#43 / 118 | -34% | +1% | $32.9k
Facility
$32.9k
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#61 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#44 / 116 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#59 / 116 | 2 | 154 | - | - | Commander Operator LLC | $19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#15 / 104 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#26 / 104 | 46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#97 / 104 | 425119 | ||||
| Nhc Healthcare Anderson | NH HC HOS SNF | Anderson | 290
Facility
290
SC AVG
109
Rank
#2 / 133 | A |
95.6%
Facility
95.6%
SC AVG
89.7%
Rank
#13 / 87 | +7% | 3.80
Facility
3.80
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#69 / 118 | -2% | -8% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$28.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 6
Facility
6
SC AVG
12.7
Rank
#22 / 116 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#49 / 116 | - | 277 | - | - | Nhc Healthcare/Anderson LLC | $31.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$31.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#3 / 104 | $19.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#4 / 104 | 62.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
62.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#26 / 104 | 425052 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about White Oak Manor Lancaster
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of White Oak Manor Lancaster?
White Oak Manor Lancaster is legally operated by Nhc Healthcare/Lancaster LLC, and administered by Lisa R Gosnell.
02 Is White Oak Manor Lancaster in a walkable area?
White Oak Manor Lancaster has a walk score of 8. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the license number of White Oak Manor Lancaster?
According to SC state health department records, White Oak Manor Lancaster's license number is NCF-1089.
04 What is the occupancy rate at White Oak Manor Lancaster?
White Oak Manor Lancaster's occupancy is 91.3%.
05 Are pets allowed at White Oak Manor Lancaster?
No, White Oak Manor Lancaster has a no-pet policy.
06 What is the best email address for White Oak Manor Lancaster?
The team at White Oak Manor Lancaster can be reached at JSKINNER@WHITEOAKMANOR.COM.
07 Does White Oak Manor Lancaster operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
White Oak Manor Lancaster is registered as a for-profit in SC.
Updated on
