Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Access Mental Health LLC
Overseen by Mary Sue Bremerman, Access Mental Health is a nursing home in Peabody, KS, offering palliative care, respite care, and skilled nursing. The community provides symptom management for those with serious illness, while temporary relief is given to older adults whose primary caregiver needs time away. With a doctor on-site, residents receive continuous clinical support.
The community has 45 beds, with 41 currently in use, indicating a 91.1% occupancy. Medicaid and Medicare are accepted, providing options to cover costs when personal funds are limited. Medication management, psychotherapy, and telehealth are also available as specific programs, giving residents access to medication-related support, psychotherapy sessions, and remote visits.
Community insights.
Based on 41 residents and 45 beds. Source: state inspection report (Jan 2022)
About This Community
Access Mental Health LLC is legally operated by Access Mental Health LLC, and administered by Mary Sue Bremerman.
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 202 deficiencies 41 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2011 vs. Kansas state average• Total deficiencies (100% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (40% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 202 | 101.0 | This facility has 100% more total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (202 vs. KS avg 101).↑ 100% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 4.9 | 3.5 | This facility has 40% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (4.9 vs. KS avg 3.5).↑ 40% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 41 | 24.0 | This facility has had 71% more total inspections than the Kansas average (41 vs. KS avg 24). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 71% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Citation severity
Latest inspection: Jun 03, 2026 · 2 citations, 0 corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 11 of 45 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent firstTop deficiency categories
Share of 45 citationsHow citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
7 of 45 citations resulted from standard inspections; 27 of 45 resulted from complaint investigations; and 11 of 45 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
5 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Dec 10, 2025 · $14,508 civil money penalty
Penalty history · past 3 years
Fine amount comparison
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Kansas and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
10 long-stay measures: 7 better, 3 worse
1 short-stay measure: 1 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Safety & clinical stability
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 1 measures
Preventive care
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Places of interest near Access Mental Health LLC
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Peabody's city center to Access Mental Health LLC's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Access Mental Health LLC
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derby Health & Rehabilitation LLC | NH SNF | Derby | 74
Facility
74
KS AVG
74
Rank
#57 / 151 |
95.9%
Facility
95.9%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#20 / 143 | +19% | 5.42
Facility
5.42
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#22 / 136 | -11% | +11% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 14
Facility
14
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#14 / 138 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#13 / 138 | - | 71 | - |
68
Facility
68
KS AVG
49
Rank
#40 / 162 | Dhrc Property Development, LLC | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#45 / 139 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#50 / 139 | 50%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#93 / 139 | 175514 | ||||
| Garden Valley Retirement Village | NH IL RC SNF | Garden City | 62
Facility
62
KS AVG
74
Rank
#74 / 151 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#113 / 143 | +24% | 3.83
Facility
3.83
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#107 / 136 | +144% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 19
Facility
19
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#37 / 138 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#68 / 138 | - | 55 | - |
70
Facility
70
KS AVG
49
Rank
#36 / 162 | Garden Valley Property LLC | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#66 / 139 | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#86 / 139 | 41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#132 / 139 | 175175 | ||||
| Ahc of Overland Park LLC | NH SNF | Overland Park (South Lakes) | 38
Facility
38
KS AVG
74
Rank
#140 / 151 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#1 / 143 | +24% | 4.20
Facility
4.20
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#87 / 136 | +13% | -14% | $13.4k
Facility
$13.4k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#74 / 139 | 23
Facility
23
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#59 / 138 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#29 / 138 | 1 | 38 | - |
92
Facility
92
KS AVG
49
Rank
#1 / 162 | Overland Park Rp Snf LLC | $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#58 / 139 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#60 / 139 | 50.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#89 / 139 | 175542 | ||||
| Prairie Sunset Home | NH AL IL PC RC SNF | Pretty Prairie | 43
Facility
43
KS AVG
74
Rank
#133 / 151 |
90.5%
Facility
90.5%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#52 / 143 | +12% | 4.27
Facility
4.27
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#64 / 136 | -33% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 18
Facility
18
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#32 / 138 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#60 / 138 | 1 | 39 | - |
23
Facility
23
KS AVG
49
Rank
#136 / 162 | Prairie Sunset Home Incorporated | $4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#109 / 139 | $3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#77 / 139 | 73.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
73.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#8 / 139 | 175489 | ||||
| Access Mental Health LLC | - | NH PC RC SNF | Peabody Peabody | 45
Facility
45
KS AVG
74
Rank
#108 / 151 |
91.1%
Facility
91.1%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#28 / 143 | +13% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 45 | 6.4 | 10 | 41 | - |
46
Facility
46
KS AVG
49
Rank
#91 / 162 | Access Mental Health LLC | - | - | - | 17E210 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other KS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities




