Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
343
135 employees · 208 contractors · 60 on an average day Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Milwaukee, WI
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Milwaukee, WI
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee
Ascension Living Alexian Village has been part of Milwaukee’s senior care landscape for 46 years now, sitting at 9301 North 76th Street on the city’s north side. It’s a car-dependent stretch of town, with a Walk Score of 24, so most errands and outings mean getting in a car rather than walking them.
The building itself is a mid-rise with 108 beds, split across one-, two-, and three-bedroom options. 78 of those beds are filled, which puts occupancy around 72 percent. Average length of stay runs about 71 days, which tells you something useful: this isn’t purely a long-term residence; there’s a real rehabilitation and short-stay population moving through alongside people settling in for longer.
On-site rehab services mean residents recovering from surgery or illness don’t have to leave the building for therapy. Nursing coverage runs throughout the day too, with registered nurses, LPNs, and nurse aides each putting in dedicated time per resident rather than being spread thin across shifts.
Amenity-wise, it’s understated but real: a library, a spa, and a patio. Nothing flashy, just spaces that give residents somewhere quiet to read, unwind, or sit outside. Medicare and private pay are both accepted, which covers a reasonably wide range of financial situations.
When state inspectors have looked at this community, their focus has tended to land on infection control, how well care gets documented, food and dietary service, resident rights, and fall prevention, the same areas regulators tend to scrutinize at long-term care communities generally.
What Alexian Village adds up to is a long-tenured, mid-sized community built around active rehabilitation and steady daily nursing support, more functional than showy, but functional in the ways that actually matter for recovery and daily care.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 125th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 36m
This nursing home is ranked 125th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 36mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +18% above Wisconsin average
5 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 73 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 62 agency contractors.
73 staff · 7.9-hour shifts
42m
↓ 28% · WI 58mThis facility: 42m per resident per day, 28% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 73 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 62 agency contractors.
73 staff · 7.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 30 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 15 agency contractors.
30 staff · 8-hour shifts
45m
↑ 18% · WI 38mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 18% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 30 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 15 agency contractors.
30 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 173 total: 73 of the facility's own employees and 100 agency contractors.
173 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
2h 10m
↓ 16% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 2h 10m per resident per day, 16% below the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 173 total: 73 of the facility's own employees and 100 agency contractors.
173 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 56% · WI 4mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 56% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 4m
↓ 17% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 3h 4m per resident per day, 17% below the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
38m
↓ 2% · WI 39mThis facility: 38m per resident per day, 2% below the Wisconsin average of 39m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
343
135 employees · 208 contractors · 60 on an average day
343 total staff / 88 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.90 : 1
↑ 61% · WI 2.42This facility: 3.90 staff per resident, 61% above the Wisconsin average of 2.42 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
343 staff ÷ 88 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.5 h
↑ 3% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.5 h, 3% above the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
41,340 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →84.1% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.1% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (100), Registered Nurse (62), Licensed Practical Nurse (15), Respiratory Therapy Technician (12), Physical Therapy Aide (8), Physical Therapy Assistant (6), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Qualified Social Worker (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
108
Rank #42 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
108
Rank #42 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #4 / 55Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 55 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #4 / 55Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 55 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
46
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #155 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 155th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #155 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 155th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
24
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #88 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #88 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
78.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 85 residents and 108 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Higher than the Wisconsin average: 71.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
95
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyMilwaukee
CMS Certification Number525523
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee is legally operated by Alexian Village Of Milwaukee Inc, and administered by Elsie Smith.
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Transportation
Fax(414) 357-5108
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Library
Spa
Patio
Volunteer Program
Building TypeMid-rise
Room Sizes
650 - 750 sq. ft.
850 - 1600 sq. ft.
1600 - 2513 sq. ft.
Room Types
1 Bed
2 Bed
3 Bed
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
12
↑ 97% · WI 6.1This facility: 12, 97% above the Wisconsin average of 6.1 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
80
Rank #158 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 158th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 186% · WI 28This facility: 80, 186% above the Wisconsin average of 28 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.67
Rank #148 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 148th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 57% · WI 4.24This facility: 6.67, 57% above the Wisconsin average of 4.24 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
80 of 80 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 11% · WI 0.9This facility: 1, 11% above the Wisconsin average of 0.9 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
4
↑ 264% · WI 1.1This facility: 4, 264% above the Wisconsin average of 1.1 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
75
↑ 194% · WI 25.5This facility: 75, 194% above the Wisconsin average of 25.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 14, 2026 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 24 of 80 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 14, 2026
6 citations
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 12, 2026
13 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 03, 2026
6 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 08, 2026
4 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 04, 2025
4 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 28, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2025
5 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 03, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 07, 2024
8 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 80 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 80 citations
Quality of Life & Care
24 deficiencies (30%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
16 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Rights
11 deficiencies (14%)
Administration
6 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
5 deficiencies (6%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (6%)
Nutrition & Dietary
5 deficiencies (6%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (3%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (1%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
27 of 80 citations resulted from standard inspections; 49 of 80 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 80 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
5 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Mar 12, 2026 · 48-day payment denial
Oct 7, 2024 · $74,120 civil money penalty
Jul 1, 2024 · $16,801 civil money penalty
Mar 12, 2026 · 48-day payment denial
Oct 7, 2024 · 51-day payment denial
Jul 1, 2024 · 22-day payment denial
Total fines
$90,921
↓ 4% · WI $95KThis facility: $90,921, 4% below the Wisconsin average of $94,855. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #137 / 168Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Wisconsin average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 168 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↓ 1% · WI 2.02This facility: 2, 1% below the Wisconsin average of 2.02. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
3
121 days
↑ 331% · WI 0.7This facility: 3, 331% above the Wisconsin average of 0.7. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Mar 12, 2026
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
48 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
48 days
Oct 7, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$74,120
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$74,120
Oct 7, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
51 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
51 days
Jul 1, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,801
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,801
Jul 1, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
22 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
22 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$90,921
Wisconsin average
$94,855
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 64% · WI 3.0This facility: 5.0, 64% above the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 4% · WI 2.9This facility: 3.0, 4% above the WI average of 2.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 3% · WI 9.4This facility: 9.1, 3% below the WI average of 9.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
17.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 12% · WI 19.8This facility: 17.5, 12% below the WI average of 19.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 4 better, 3 worse, 4 near WI average
8 short-stay measures: 4 worse, 1 near WI average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.2%
↑ 1% · WI 16.1This facility: 16.2, 1% above the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.2%
↑ 1% · WI 16.1This facility: 16.2, 1% above the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
↓ 31% · WI 18.4This facility: 12.8, 31% below the WI average of 18.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
↓ 31% · WI 18.4This facility: 12.8, 31% below the WI average of 18.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.5%
↓ 5% · WI 24.6This facility: 23.5, 5% below the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.5%
↓ 5% · WI 24.6This facility: 23.5, 5% below the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
↓ 25% · WI 2.7This facility: 2.0, 25% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
↓ 25% · WI 2.7This facility: 2.0, 25% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
↓ 4% · WI 3.3This facility: 3.1, 4% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
↓ 4% · WI 3.3This facility: 3.1, 4% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
↑ 37% · WI 5.0This facility: 6.9, 37% above the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
↑ 37% · WI 5.0This facility: 6.9, 37% above the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4%
↑ 27% · WI 5.1This facility: 6.4, 27% above the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4%
↑ 27% · WI 5.1This facility: 6.4, 27% above the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8%
↑ 2% · WI 5.7This facility: 5.8, 2% above the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8%
↑ 2% · WI 5.7This facility: 5.8, 2% above the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.2%
↓ 67% · WI 15.8This facility: 5.2, 67% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.2%
↓ 67% · WI 15.8This facility: 5.2, 67% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.7%
↓ 7% · WI 95.7This facility: 88.7, 7% below the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.7%
↓ 7% · WI 95.7This facility: 88.7, 7% below the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.7%
↑ 2% · WI 95.0This facility: 96.7, 2% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.7%
↑ 2% · WI 95.0This facility: 96.7, 2% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
74.5%
↑ 39% · US 53.7This facility: 74.5, 39% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
74.5%
↑ 39% · US 53.7This facility: 74.5, 39% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
52.9%
↑ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 52.9, 5% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
52.9%
↑ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 52.9, 5% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.4%
↑ 83% · US 0.8This facility: 1.4, 83% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.4%
↑ 83% · US 0.8This facility: 1.4, 83% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
↑ 46% · WI 1.2This facility: 1.8, 46% above the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
↑ 46% · WI 1.2This facility: 1.8, 46% above the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.9%
↓ 11% · WI 86.5This facility: 76.9, 11% below the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.9%
↓ 11% · WI 86.5This facility: 76.9, 11% below the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.7%
↓ 27% · WI 82.2This facility: 59.7, 27% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.7%
↓ 27% · WI 82.2This facility: 59.7, 27% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
22.2%
↓ 2% · WI 22.7This facility: 22.2, 2% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
22.2%
↓ 2% · WI 22.7This facility: 22.2, 2% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
18.4%
↑ 23% · WI 15.0This facility: 18.4, 23% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
18.4%
↑ 23% · WI 15.0This facility: 18.4, 23% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−29.7% operating margin
−14.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.6M) trims the net loss to −$4.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
47.3% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #129 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 129th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue fell $0.9M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $15.6M | −$0.9M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #17 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Top 10% in WI Higher net patient revenue than 90% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $20.2M | +$1.3M | Trend 20182025 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$4.6M | −$2.2M | Trend 20182025 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −29.7% | −14.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.6M | — | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$4.0M | −$2.2M | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.4M | +$0.3M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #33 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 80% of homes | Above WI median Higher payroll than 80% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 47.3% | +4.4 pts | Trend 20182025 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #129 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 129th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 21% of homes | 11.4 pts under WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $21.2M | $22.0M | $20.1M | $17.0M | $14.1M | $14.8M | $16.5M | $15.6M |
| Operating expenses | $23.7M | $25.4M | $24.6M | $22.0M | $22.5M | $33.6M | $18.9M | $20.2M |
| Net patient income | −$2.4M | −$3.4M | −$4.5M | −$5.0M | −$8.4M | −$18.8M | −$2.4M | −$4.6M |
| Operating margin | −11.5% | −15.6% | −22.3% | −29.3% | −59.2% | −126.5% | −14.8% | −29.7% |
| Net income | −$0.6M | −$1.9M | −$3.5M | $2.1M | −$8.2M | −$18.4M | −$1.8M | −$4.0M |
| Payroll costs | $9.6M | $12.4M | $12.7M | $9.8M | $8.6M | $6.9M | $7.1M | $7.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.4% | 56.4% | 63.3% | 57.4% | 60.8% | 46.7% | 42.9% | 47.3% |
| Beds | 201 | 201 | 201 | 201 | 201 | 201 | 201 | 201 |
| Gross revenue | $30.2M | $32.0M | $28.8M | $23.7M | $19.9M | $21.0M | $21.7M | $23.2M |
| Salaries | $8.1M | $10.3M | $10.1M | $7.9M | $6.9M | $5.7M | $5.8M | $6.1M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.6M | $2.1M | $2.6M | $1.9M | $1.7M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | $1.4M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $4.4M | $0.9M | — | $3.0M | $3.0M |
| Other operating costs | $14.0M | $13.0M | $11.9M | $12.2M | $13.9M | $26.7M | $11.9M | $12.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $352 | $381 | $341 | $335 | $347 | $402 | $439 | $386 |
| Cost per day | $393 | $440 | $418 | $433 | $552 | $910 | $504 | $501 |
| Average length of stay | 75.1 days | 56.2 days | 54.6 days | 56.3 days | 81.3 days | 72.0 days | 70.7 days | 95.3 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
294 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
65 · 22%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
229 · 78%
Resident snapshot
88 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 8%
Medicaid
22 · 25%
Private pay & other
59 · 67%
Leaving
282 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
47 · 17%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
235 · 83%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee
Places of interest near Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee
9301 N 76Th St, Milwaukee, WI 53223 — 6.81 miles to nearest hospital (Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Milwaukee
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Ann Health and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Milwaukee | - | 50
Facility
50
WI AVG
78
Rank
#114 / 197 | A- |
84
Facility
84
WI AVG
48
Rank
#16 / 191 | - |
| Eastcastle Place | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Milwaukee (Murray Hill) | $5,134 - $7,789 | 18
Facility
18
WI AVG
78
Rank
#195 / 197 | - |
92
Facility
92
WI AVG
48
Rank
#3 / 191 | Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed |
| Milwaukee Catholic Home | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Milwaukee (Northpoint) | $1,140 - $5,570 | 107
Facility
107
WI AVG
78
Rank
#43 / 197 | A+ |
83
Facility
83
WI AVG
48
Rank
#18 / 191 | 1 Bed / 2 Bed |
| Saint Johns on the Lake Central Tower | NH AL IL MC SNF | Milwaukee | - | 110
Facility
110
WI AVG
78
Rank
#35 / 197 | - |
87
Facility
87
WI AVG
48
Rank
#6 / 191 | - |
| Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee | NH ADC AL SNF | Milwaukee (Northridge) | - | 108
Facility
108
WI AVG
78
Rank
#42 / 197 | A+ |
24
Facility
24
WI AVG
48
Rank
#155 / 191 | 1 Bed / 2 Bed / 3 Bed |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Wisconsin
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee is located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee in?
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee is in the Northridge neighborhood of Milwaukee.
02 Who is the owner of Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee?
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee is legally operated by Alexian Village Of Milwaukee Inc, and administered by Elsie Smith.
03 Is Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee in a walkable area?
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee has a walk score of 24. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee?
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee's occupancy is 78.7%.
05 How long has Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee been in business?
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee has been operating for approximately 46 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee?
No, Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee has a no-pet policy.
07 Does Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Ascension Living Alexian Village – Milwaukee is registered as a for-profit in WI.
Updated on
