At Royal Villa Home Care
Situated at 2970 S Torrey Pines Drive, At Royal Villa Home Care is a small, intimate nursing home and assisted living community in the Spring Valley neighborhood of Las Vegas. The 10-bed home offers a residential setting for older adults needing help with daily activities, personal care, and tasks support like bathing and transferring. With Heather Jacalne serving as the administrator, it provides 24-hour care to ensure that residents get assistance all the time.
Part of the daily routine is housekeeping and meal preparation, allowing residents to focus on their well-being without worrying about household tasks. The community maintains a Walk Score of 34, indicating that while a few nearby services may be walkable, most trips necessitate transportation. With eight residents in the 10-bed facility, the home currently operates at 80 percent occupancy. Social and recreational activities help residents engage and connect with the community.
At Royal Villa Home Care’s inspection record shows compliance with state regulations. No regulatory deficiencies or citations during its review process were found in an investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Touring on-site, for families contemplating the facility, will give a clear idea of the daily care atmosphere and the personal attention each resident gets in this intimate setting.
Capacity and availability
About this community
Occupancy
At Royal Villa Home Care is administered by Heather Jacalne.
Inspection History
In Nevada, the Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance performs unannounced onsite surveys to evaluate resident safety and care quality.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Nevada state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2025 vs. Nevada state average• Total deficiencies (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | NV Average | vs. NV Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 0 | 50 | This facility has 100% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Nevada nursing home (0 vs. NV avg 50).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | NV Average | vs. NV Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 1 | 21 | This facility has had 95% fewer total inspections than the Nevada average (1 vs. NV avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 95% fewer |
What does this home offer?
Building Type: Single-story
Housekeeping Services
Social and Recreational Activities
Places of interest near At Royal Villa Home Care
5.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Las Vegas's city center to At Royal Villa Home Care's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to At Royal Villa Home Care
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Las Vegas
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NV Dept. of Health & Human Services, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Nevada average is: 52.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Ventanas at Summerlin | NH IL MC SNF | Las Vegas (Summerlin) | 60
Facility
60
NV AVG
41
Rank
#82 / 319 |
93.7%
Facility
93.7%
NV AVG
80.2
Rank
#68 / 259 | +17% | 5.01
Facility
5.01
NV AVG
4.03
Rank
#2 / 41 | +49% | +24% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$34.1k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 19
Facility
19
NV AVG
36.2
Rank
#2 / 42 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
NV AVG
7.1
Rank
#7 / 42 | - | 56 | - |
62
Facility
62
NV AVG
46
Rank
#96 / 403 | Humangood Nevada | $30.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$30.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$17.4M
Rank
#2 / 36 | $12.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#5 / 36 | 40.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
40.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
52.4%
Rank
#36 / 36 | 295086 | ||||
| Advanced Health Care of Las Vegas | NH SNF | Las Vegas | 38
Facility
38
NV AVG
41
Rank
#96 / 319 |
89.5%
Facility
89.5%
NV AVG
80.2
Rank
#94 / 259 | +12% | 4.18
Facility
4.18
NV AVG
4.03
Rank
#7 / 41 | +13% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$34.1k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 11
Facility
11
NV AVG
36.2
Rank
#1 / 42 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
NV AVG
7.1
Rank
#2 / 42 | - | 34 | A+ |
23
Facility
23
NV AVG
46
Rank
#328 / 403 | Joseph Walker | $10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$17.4M
Rank
#32 / 36 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#31 / 36 | 46.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
46.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
52.4%
Rank
#29 / 36 | 295090 | ||||
| Marquis Centennial Hills | NH HOS RC SNF | Las Vegas (La Madre Foothills) | 115
Facility
115
NV AVG
41
Rank
#49 / 319 | - | - | 3.58
Facility
3.58
NV AVG
4.03
Rank
#20 / 41 | -11% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$34.1k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 29
Facility
29
NV AVG
36.2
Rank
#11 / 42 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
NV AVG
7.1
Rank
#7 / 42 | - | 182 | - |
31
Facility
31
NV AVG
46
Rank
#297 / 403 | Jacob Atwood | $14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$17.4M
Rank
#23 / 36 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#20 / 36 | 59.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
59.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
52.4%
Rank
#6 / 36 | 295089 | ||||
| Trellis Centennial | NH HOS SNF | Las Vegas (Paradise) | 72
Facility
72
NV AVG
41
Rank
#75 / 319 |
93.8%
Facility
93.8%
NV AVG
80.2
Rank
#66 / 259 | +17% | 3.12
Facility
3.12
NV AVG
4.03
Rank
#35 / 41 | +71% | -23% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
NV AVG
$34.1k
Rank
#28 / 42 | 25
Facility
25
NV AVG
36.2
Rank
#6 / 42 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
NV AVG
7.1
Rank
#9 / 42 | 2 | 68 | - |
53
Facility
53
NV AVG
46
Rank
#163 / 403 | Shivani Chopra | $17.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$17.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$17.4M
Rank
#18 / 36 | $9.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#18 / 36 | 52.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
52.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NV AVG
52.4%
Rank
#17 / 36 | 295106 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Nevada
At Royal Villa Home Care is located in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Nevada.
Frequently Asked Questions about At Royal Villa Home Care
What neighborhood is At Royal Villa Home Care in?
At Royal Villa Home Care is in the Spring Valley neighborhood of Las Vegas.
Is At Royal Villa Home Care in a walkable area?
At Royal Villa Home Care has a walk score of 34. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
When does At Royal Villa Home Care's license expire?
According to NV state health department records, At Royal Villa Home Care's license expires on December 31, 2026.
What is the occupancy rate at At Royal Villa Home Care?
At Royal Villa Home Care's occupancy is 80%.
Are pets allowed at At Royal Villa Home Care?
No, At Royal Villa Home Care has a no-pet policy.
Who is the administrator of At Royal Villa Home Care?
Heather Jacalne is the administrator of At Royal Villa Home Care.
How many beds does At Royal Villa Home Care have?
At Royal Villa Home Care has 10 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





