Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills
Nursing Home, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Farmington Hills, MI
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.

Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills

Nursing Home, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Farmington Hills, MI
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Calculator: See prices in your area
Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.

Overview of Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills

Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills, located at 21450 Archwood Circle in Farmington Hills, Oakland County, Michigan, is a 179-bed community operated by nonprofit Botsford General Hospital. The 33-acre setting provides independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing services to a mixed census spanning both short-term Medicare rehabilitation (typical 26-day stay) and long-term Medicaid placements (averaging two years). Medicare and Medicaid certified.

Nursing personnel deliver 4 hours 24 minutes of care per resident daily, marginally above the Michigan average and ranked 38th among 133 state facilities. The nursing roster comprises 20 registered nurses, 38 licensed practical nurses, and 75 certified nursing assistants. A 2.0-to-1 overall staff-to-resident ratio outperforms the Michigan average by 18%, reflecting the nonprofit commitment to direct-care staffing: payroll consumes 78% of revenue, the third-highest proportion in the state.

Health inspection performance runs 29.3% below Michigan average; the weaker component of the overall rating, which stands 4.4% below state average. Quality measures rank 33% above state average, and staffing rates 14.4% above. In 2023, CMS imposed a single $16,000 civil money penalty for regulatory violation; zero payment denials have been assessed.

High-risk clinical events score 4.7, 44% better than Michigan average; and functional decline score 8.4, 49% better than state baseline. Residents record below-average rates of falls with injury, pressure ulcers, weight loss, and depression. Infection control and antipsychotic restraint show less favorable profiles. Vaccination rates are generally strong, though pneumococcal vaccine uptake lags state average.

Current occupancy is 40.8% and substantially below the Michigan average of 75.8%; housing 87 of 179 licensed beds. Resident census breaks down as 57.5% Medicaid, 31% Medicare, 11.5% private pay. The facility has operated at a significant operating deficit since 2020.

Beaumont Commons serves long-term nursing care candidates, particularly Medicaid-eligible residents. Strong clinical and functional preservation metrics offset lower census and recent federal penalty, though financial pressures and health inspection concerns temper the overall profile.

Quality ratings

Measured by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Overall rating Info The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
▲ 27.5% Above MI avg. ▲ 27.5% Above MI avg.MI average: 3.1Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Health Inspection Info Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
▼ 29.3% Below MI avg. ▼ 29.3% Below MI avg.MI average: 2.8Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Staffing Info Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
▲ 43.0% Above MI avg. ▲ 43.0% Above MI avg.MI average: 3.5Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Quality Measures Info Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
▲ 33.0% Above MI avg. ▲ 33.0% Above MI avg.MI average: 3.8Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Staffing hours Info Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.

Hours per resident per day vs Michigan averages

Rank #32 / 126Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 32nd out of 126 homes in Michigan for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Michigan average, with a ranking across 126 Michigan facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Total nursing care Info This home is ranked 32nd out of 126 homes in Michigan for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.

4h 24m

At state avg
Staff type
Hours / day / resident
vs state avg
Registered Nurse (RN) Info RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
1h 4m
+40% State avg: 46m per day · National avg: 41m per day
LPN / LVN Info Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
1h 10m
+32% State avg: 53m per day · National avg: 52m per day
Nurse Aide Info Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
2h 28m
+6% State avg: 2h 20m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day
Weekend Total Nursing Info Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
3h 55m
+12% State avg: 3h 31m per day · National avg: 3h 27m per day
Physical Therapist Info Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
10m
+146% State avg: 4m per day · National avg: 4m per day
Weekend RN Info Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
31m
+7% State avg: 29m per day · National avg: 29m per day

All 6 underlying metrics are above the state average

Capacity and availability

This home usually has availability

Lower occupancy than the Michigan average: 74.4%
Occupancy rate
56.1% Rank #92 / 117Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 92nd out of 117 homes in Michigan for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Michigan average, with its Statewide rank out of 117. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Avg. Length of Stay Info Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
115 days
Bed community size
179-bed community Rank #15 / 429Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 15th out of 429 homes in Michigan for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Michigan facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
Walk Score
Walk Score: 24 / 100 Rank #484 / 676Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 484th out of 676 homes in Michigan for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Michigan facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.

Contact Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills

Staffing Data

Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.

Total staff 174
Employees 134
Contractors 40
Staff to resident ratio 2.00 : 1
18% more staff per resident than Michigan average
Michigan average ratio: 1.70 : 1 Michigan average ratio: 1.70 : 1See full Michigan ranking
Avg staff/day 70
Average shift 7.9 hours
0% compared with Michigan average
Michigan average: 7.9 hours Michigan average shift: 7.9 hoursSee full Michigan ranking
Total staff hours (quarter) 50,904

Nursing staff breakdown

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Registered Nurse

Manages medical care and health needs.

RN Staff Info 20 total: 19 full-time employees and 1 contractor. 20
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 8.5 hours
Licensed Practical Nurse

Assists with medical care and medications.

LPN Staff Info All 38 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role. 38
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 8.3 hours
Certified Nursing Assistant

Helps with daily care and mobility.

CNA Staff Info 75 total: 60 full-time employees and 15 contractors. 75
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 7.8 hours

Contractor staffing

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.

Total hours from contractors

18.7%

9,512 contractor hours this quarter

Certified Nursing Assistant: 15 Respiratory Therapy Technician: 8 Physical Therapy Assistant: 5 Physical Therapy Aide: 4 Mental Health Service Worker: 2 Registered Nurse: 1 Occupational Therapy Assistant: 1 Medical Director: 1 Occupational Therapy Aide: 1 Qualified Social Worker: 1 Speech Language Pathologist: 1

Staff by category

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Certified Nursing Assistant60157522,78992100%7.8
Licensed Practical Nurse380389,77192100%8.3
Registered Nurse191206,43192100%8.5
Clinical Nurse Specialist7072,9538087%8.1
Other Dietary Services Staff3031,6028896%8.4
Respiratory Therapy Technician0881,5667683%5.9
Mental Health Service Worker2241,2956975%8
RN Director of Nursing2021,0476672%8.7
Physical Therapy Assistant0558697379%6.8
Nurse Practitioner1015286672%8
Physical Therapy Aide0445257379%5.9
Administrator1014565762%8
Dietitian1014525762%7.9
Occupational Therapy Aide0114405560%8
Occupational Therapy Assistant0115667%9.4
Qualified Social Worker011501314%3.9
Speech Language Pathologist011441516%2.9
Medical Director0113033%10
75 Certified Nursing Assistant
% of Days 100%
38 Licensed Practical Nurse
% of Days 100%
20 Registered Nurse
% of Days 100%
7 Clinical Nurse Specialist
% of Days 87%
3 Other Dietary Services Staff
% of Days 96%
8 Respiratory Therapy Technician
% of Days 83%
4 Mental Health Service Worker
% of Days 75%
2 RN Director of Nursing
% of Days 72%
5 Physical Therapy Assistant
% of Days 79%
1 Nurse Practitioner
% of Days 72%
4 Physical Therapy Aide
% of Days 79%
1 Administrator
% of Days 62%
1 Dietitian
% of Days 62%
1 Occupational Therapy Aide
% of Days 60%
1 Occupational Therapy Assistant
% of Days 7%
1 Qualified Social Worker
% of Days 14%
1 Speech Language Pathologist
% of Days 16%
1 Medical Director
% of Days 3%

Penalties and fines

Includes penalties issued in 2023

Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.

Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total fines amount $16K Rank #81 / 129Federal fines — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 81st out of 129 homes in Michigan for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Michigan average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 129 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
80% lower than Michigan average

Michigan average: $76K

Number of fines 1
51% fewer fines than Michigan average

Michigan average: 2.0

Payment Denials Info Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed. 0
100% fewer payment denials than Michigan average

Michigan average: 0.8

Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
This facility $16K
Michigan average $76K
Penalty History

Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.

1 penalty in the past 3 years

Aug 24, 2023 · $16K

Civil Money Penalty Info Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation. Aug 24, 2023
$16K

Last updated: Jan 2026

Quality of care over time

These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.

High-risk clinical events score Info A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline. 4.7
44% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 8.4

Functional decline score Info A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence. 8.4
49% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 16.3

Long-stay resident measures
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased Info Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 5.8%
54% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 12.5%

Walking Ability Worsened Info Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened 4.9%
68% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 15.3%

Low Risk Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence Info Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 14.5%
31% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 21.0%

Falls with Major Injury Info Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 1.2%
64% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 3.2%

High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers Info Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers 4.9%
15% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 5.7%

Urinary Tract Infection Info Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 3.6%
110% worse than Michigan average

Michigan average: 1.7%

Lost Too Much Weight Info Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 6.7%
19% worse than Michigan average

Michigan average: 5.7%

Depressive Symptoms Info Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 1.2%
68% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 3.9%

Antipsychotic Use Info Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 21.5%
44% worse than Michigan average

Michigan average: 15.0%

Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 87.7%
8% worse than Michigan average

Michigan average: 94.9%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 100.0%
5% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 95.0%

Short-stay resident measures
Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 85.8%
In line with Michigan average

Michigan average: 82.5%

Antipsychotic medication increase Info Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 0.9%
41% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 1.4%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 90.9%
14% better than Michigan average

Michigan average: 79.5%

Breakdown by payment type

Medicare

40% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.

Typical stay 26 days

Private pay

50% of new residents, often for short stays.

Typical stay 1 - 2 months

Medicaid

10% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.

Typical stay 2 years

Facility Characteristics

Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total residents 87
Medicare
27
31% of residents
Medicaid
50
57.5% of residents
Private pay or other
10
11.5% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group

Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities

Active Resident Council

Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.

Finances and operations

Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.

Nonprofit
Nonprofit Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$10.1M
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$5.1M
Nonprofit Nonprofit Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$10.1M Rank #77 / 120Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 77th out of 120 homes in Michigan. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$5.1M
Other income Info Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$575.7K
Payroll costs Info Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs. Rank #36 / 120Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 36th out of 120 homes in Michigan. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.
$9.0M 88.8% of net patient revenue Info Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Rank #7 / 120Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 7th out of 120 homes in Michigan. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Michigan that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.
Other operating costs Info Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$6.2M
Total costs Info The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$15.2M

What does this home offer?

Pets allowed icon
Pets allowed icon

Pets Allowed

Housing options icon
Housing options icon

Housing Options: 1 Bed / 2 Bed

Building type icon
Building type icon

Building Type: 3-story

Housekeeping icon
Housekeeping icon

Housekeeping Services

Social and recreational activities icon
Social and recreational activities icon

Social and Recreational Activities

Who this home usually serves

TYPE OF STAY

Mix of rehab and long-term care

This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.

Most new residents arrive under private pay (50% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.

Admissions
237 total

Coverage residents most often arrive under.

Medicare 40%
Private pay 50%
Medicaid 10%
Discharges
232 total

Coverage residents most often leave under.

Medicare 31%
Private pay 51%
Medicaid 17%

Places of interest near Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills

Address 4.4 miles from city center Info Estimated distance in miles from Farmington Hills's city center to Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills's address, calculated via Google Maps.

Calculate Travel Distance to Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills

Add your location

Address

Compare Nursing Homes around the area

Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MI Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (LARA), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.

Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.

Chelsea Retirement Community
NH
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Chelsea
172
Facility 172
MI AVG 74
Rank #18 / 429
48.3%
Facility 48.3%
MI AVG 74.4
Rank #103 / 117
-35%
4.49
Facility 4.49
MI AVG 4.30
Rank #29 / 126
-12%+5%
$0
Facility $0
MI AVG $87.6k
Rank #1 / 129
14
Facility 14
MI AVG 33.5
Rank #20 / 128
3.5
Facility 3.5
MI AVG 5.2
Rank #33 / 128
-83-
13
Facility 13
MI AVG 40
Rank #578 / 676
Umrcph, Inc
$36.6MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $36.6MFiscal year ending 06/2024
MI AVG $13.2M
Rank #1 / 120
$19.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $19.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
MI AVG $7.7M
Rank #2 / 120
54.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility 54.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
MI AVG 59.2%
Rank #68 / 120
235021
Lourdes Senior Community
NH
AL
HOS
IL
MC
SNF
Waterford Twp (Watkins-Pontiac Estates)
80
Facility 80
MI AVG 74
Rank #176 / 429
88.0%
Facility 88.0%
MI AVG 74.4
Rank #45 / 117
+18%
4.06
Facility 4.06
MI AVG 4.30
Rank #50 / 126
+37%-5%
$15.6k
Facility $15.6k
MI AVG $87.6k
Rank #81 / 129
11
Facility 11
MI AVG 33.5
Rank #15 / 128
3.7
Facility 3.7
MI AVG 5.2
Rank #36 / 128
170-
8
Facility 8
MI AVG 40
Rank #617 / 676
Richard Acho
$10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG $13.2M
Rank #67 / 120
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG $7.7M
Rank #82 / 120
51.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 51.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG 59.2%
Rank #86 / 120
235252
Michigan Masonic Home
NH
AL
IL
MC
PC
RC
SNF
Alma
124
Facility 124
MI AVG 74
Rank #66 / 429
51.6%
Facility 51.6%
MI AVG 74.4
Rank #98 / 117
-31%
3.86
Facility 3.86
MI AVG 4.30
Rank #67 / 126
+123%-10%
$0
Facility $0
MI AVG $87.6k
Rank #1 / 129
9
Facility 9
MI AVG 33.5
Rank #10 / 128
3.0
Facility 3.0
MI AVG 5.2
Rank #16 / 128
-64A+
67
Facility 67
MI AVG 40
Rank #88 / 676
Michigan Masonic Home
$21.6MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility $21.6MFiscal year ending 03/2024
MI AVG $13.2M
Rank #15 / 120
$14.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility $14.8MFiscal year ending 03/2024
MI AVG $7.7M
Rank #8 / 120
68.4%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility 68.4%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
MI AVG 59.2%
Rank #17 / 120
235020
The Willows at Howell
NH
ADC
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Howell
39
Facility 39
MI AVG 74
Rank #293 / 429
--
3.73
Facility 3.73
MI AVG 4.30
Rank #96 / 126
+87%-13%
$0
Facility $0
MI AVG $87.6k
Rank #1 / 129
20
Facility 20
MI AVG 33.5
Rank #37 / 128
4.0
Facility 4.0
MI AVG 5.2
Rank #40 / 128
-55-
78
Facility 78
MI AVG 40
Rank #36 / 676
Jamie Scott
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG $13.2M
Rank #46 / 120
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG $7.7M
Rank #54 / 120
53.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 53.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG 59.2%
Rank #72 / 120
235707
Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills
NH
IL
SNF
Farmington Hills (Botsford Commons Senior Community)
179
Facility 179
MI AVG 74
Rank #15 / 429
56.1%
Facility 56.1%
MI AVG 74.4
Rank #92 / 117
-25%
4.40
Facility 4.40
MI AVG 4.30
Rank #32 / 126
+13%+2%
$15.6k
Facility $15.6k
MI AVG $87.6k
Rank #81 / 129
54
Facility 54
MI AVG 33.5
Rank #106 / 128
7.7
Facility 7.7
MI AVG 5.2
Rank #111 / 128
3101-
24
Facility 24
MI AVG 40
Rank #484 / 676
Botsford General Hospital
$10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG $13.2M
Rank #77 / 120
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG $7.7M
Rank #36 / 120
88.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 88.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG 59.2%
Rank #7 / 120
235462

Frequently Asked Questions about Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills

What neighborhood is Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills in?

Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills is in the Botsford Commons Senior Community neighborhood.

Is Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills in a walkable area?

Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills has a walk score of 24. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.

What is the occupancy rate at Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills?

Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills's occupancy is 40.8%.

Are pets allowed at Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills?

Yes, Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills allows residents to bring their pets.

Does Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills operate as a for-profit or non-profit?

Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills is registered as a non-profit.

Are there photos of Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills?

Yes — there are 4 photos of Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills in the photo gallery on this page.

What is the address of Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills?

Beaumont Commons – Farmington Hills is located at 21450 Archwood Cir, Farmington Hills, MI 48336.

Guides for Better Senior Living

Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area

Nursing Home Data Explorer

Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now

The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It

Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance