2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bethesda of Beresford operates a compact 39-bed skilled nursing facility on West Cedar Street in Beresford, South Dakota, about thirty miles south of Sioux Falls. Established originally in 1914 as a regional care resource, the property functions under a local government facility district setup. The surrounding neighborhood carries a walk score of 39, reflecting a spread-out layout where visiting family members and local relatives will require a car to manage regular trips and errands outside the grounds.
The home runs close to its operational limit, maintaining an average occupancy rate of roughly 85 percent and hosting an average resident stay of 329 days. Floor nurses provide an average of three hours and forty minutes of daily direct care to each individual, with registered nurses contributing over an hour of that personal time.
Weekend scheduling stands out with Saturday and Sunday registered nurse coverage tracking 86 percent higher than typical state benchmarks. Clinical programs focus on post-acute physical rehabilitation and therapy services, with measured outcomes for hospital readmissions, fall prevention, and pressure ulcer care outperforming standard state averages.
Interested individuals can call to inquire about current bed vacancies or to verify clinical entry parameters. The business coordinators can outline how they handle medical invoices across Medicare, state Medicaid, and out-of-pocket private payments, and they can schedule a time for you to view the therapy spaces and resident wings.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 58 nursing homes we track in South Dakota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 45mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +99% above South Dakota average
3 of 6 metrics below South Dakota average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 17 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 10 agency contractors.
17 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 6 total: 1 of the facility's own employee and 5 agency contractors.
6 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 50 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 32 agency contractors.
50 staff · 8-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
98
34 employees · 64 contractors · 21 on an average day
98 total staff / 34 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.88 : 1
↑ 51% · SD 1.90This facility: 2.88 staff per resident, 51% above the South Dakota average of 1.90 (among South Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
98 staff ÷ 34 residents
See full South Dakota ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 4% · SD 7.7 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 4% below the South Dakota average of 7.7 h (among South Dakota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
14,329 staff hours this quarter
See full South Dakota ranking →75.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Dakota average: 88.7% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (32), Registered Nurse (10), Licensed Practical Nurse (5), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Other Physician (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medication Aide/Technician (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Feeding Assistant (1), Physician Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
39
Rank #56 / 65Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 65 nursing homes we track in South Dakota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Dakota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #3 / 61Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 61 nursing homes we track in South Dakota for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other South Dakota facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #34 / 68Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 68 nursing homes we track in South Dakota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across South Dakota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #18 / 31Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 31 nursing homes we track in South Dakota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the South Dakota average, with its Statewide rank out of 31. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 34.1 residents and 39 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Similar to the South Dakota average: 84.4%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Bethesda of Beresford is administered by Britney Senger.
100% corrected
27 of 27 citations corrected South Dakota avg 0 (In line with South Dakota average)Latest inspection: Jun 11, 2026 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 7 of 27 citations · 9 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 27 citations resulted from standard inspections; 5 of 27 resulted from complaint investigations; and 5 of 27 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
66% lower than South Dakota averageSouth Dakota average: $47K
56% fewer fines than South Dakota averageSouth Dakota average: 2.3
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
In line with South Dakota averageSouth Dakota average: 0.0
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Penalties issued more than 3 years ago are included in the totals above, not in this list.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Dakota average.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 37% · SD 11.3This facility: 7.1, 37% below the SD average of 11.3 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 30% · SD 22.1This facility: 15.5, 30% below the SD average of 22.1 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 better, 1 worse, 2 near SD average
1 short-stay measure: 1 worse
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.6%
↓ 32% · SD 21.3This facility: 14.6, 32% below the SD average of 21.3 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.7%
↓ 40% · SD 19.4This facility: 11.7, 40% below the SD average of 19.4 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.3%
↓ 20% · SD 25.4This facility: 20.3, 20% below the SD average of 25.4 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
↓ 18% · SD 2.9This facility: 2.4, 18% below the SD average of 2.9 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
↓ 59% · SD 5.5This facility: 2.3, 59% below the SD average of 5.5 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3%
↑ 37% · SD 4.6This facility: 6.3, 37% above the SD average of 4.6 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.9%
↓ 84% · SD 5.6This facility: 0.9, 84% below the SD average of 5.6 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3%
↓ 24% · SD 5.7This facility: 4.3, 24% below the SD average of 5.7 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.0%
↓ 39% · SD 24.6This facility: 15.0, 39% below the SD average of 24.6 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.5%
↑ 4% · SD 94.9This facility: 98.5, 4% above the SD average of 94.9 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · SD 96.9This facility: 100.0, 3% above the SD average of 96.9 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 1 measures
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.6%
↓ 18% · SD 83.5This facility: 68.6, 18% below the SD average of 83.5 (among SD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
54% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
37% of new residents, often for short stays.
10% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
34Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Bethesda of Beresford from 2013–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #51 / 53Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 53 nursing homes we track in South Dakota. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Dakota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #50 / 53Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 53 nursing homes we track in South Dakota. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Dakota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Dakota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (54% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
J.J. Nygaard served as the first administrator of Bethesda of Beresford, also overseeing the Children’s home. He played a foundational role in the early years of the community, guiding its initial operations and growth as it established itself as a caring home for residents.
0.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Beresford's city center to Bethesda of Beresford's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SD Dept. of Health (DOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Dakota average is: 59.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethany Home Sioux Falls/Bethany Home-Brandon | NH AL IL MC SNF | Sioux Falls | 112
Facility
112
SD AVG
70
Rank
#4 / 65 | - | - | - | -15% | - | $0
Facility
$0
SD AVG
$45.9k
Rank
#1 / 62 | 12
Facility
12
SD AVG
17.2
Rank
#18 / 61 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
SD AVG
3.7
Rank
#23 / 61 | - | 42 | - |
65
Facility
65
SD AVG
40
Rank
#11 / 68 | Augustana Lutheran Church | $6.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SD AVG
$7.1M
Rank
#27 / 53 | $4.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
SD AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#18 / 53 | 67.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
67.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
SD AVG
59.1%
Rank
#6 / 53 | 435096 | ||||
| Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Village | NH AL IL MC | Sioux Falls | 177
Facility
177
SD AVG
70
Rank
#2 / 65 |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
SD AVG
84.4%
Rank
#13 / 31 | +8% | 4.26
Facility
4.26
SD AVG
4.31
Rank
#13 / 58 | +5% | -1% | $72.8k
Facility
$72.8k
SD AVG
$45.9k
Rank
#55 / 62 | 32
Facility
32
SD AVG
17.2
Rank
#53 / 61 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
SD AVG
3.7
Rank
#52 / 61 | 6 | 161 | - |
2
Facility
2
SD AVG
40
Rank
#68 / 68 | Dana Bachmeier | $22.9MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$22.9MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SD AVG
$7.1M
Rank
#3 / 53 | $10.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SD AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#3 / 53 | 45.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
45.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
SD AVG
59.1%
Rank
#35 / 53 | 435045 | ||||
| Avantara Norton | - | NH HOS SNF | Sioux Falls | 110
Facility
110
SD AVG
70
Rank
#5 / 65 |
88.9%
Facility
88.9%
SD AVG
84.4%
Rank
#17 / 31 | +5% | 3.53
Facility
3.53
SD AVG
4.31
Rank
#36 / 58 | - | - | - | +53% | -18% | $215.5k
Facility
$215.5k
SD AVG
$45.9k
Rank
#62 / 62 | 75
Facility
75
SD AVG
17.2
Rank
#61 / 61 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
SD AVG
3.7
Rank
#40 / 61 | 19 | 98 | - |
61
Facility
61
SD AVG
40
Rank
#15 / 68 | Jeremy Klinkhammer | $11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SD AVG
$7.1M
Rank
#6 / 53 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SD AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#17 / 53 | 51.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SD AVG
59.1%
Rank
#53 / 53 | 435039 |
| Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center | NH SNF | Sioux Falls | 98
Facility
98
SD AVG
70
Rank
#11 / 65 |
81.7%
Facility
81.7%
SD AVG
84.4%
Rank
#25 / 31 | -3% | 4.09
Facility
4.09
SD AVG
4.31
Rank
#18 / 58 | +21% | -5% | $54.9k
Facility
$54.9k
SD AVG
$45.9k
Rank
#47 / 62 | 18
Facility
18
SD AVG
17.2
Rank
#30 / 61 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
SD AVG
3.7
Rank
#32 / 61 | 3 | 80 | - |
73
Facility
73
SD AVG
40
Rank
#7 / 68 | Luke Wanous | $9.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SD AVG
$7.1M
Rank
#12 / 53 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SD AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#13 / 53 | 51.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
51.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
SD AVG
59.1%
Rank
#23 / 53 | 435046 | ||||
| Bethesda of Beresford | NH SNF | Cedar Beresford | 39
Facility
39
SD AVG
70
Rank
#56 / 65 |
87.4%
Facility
87.4%
SD AVG
84.4%
Rank
#18 / 31 | +4% | 3.75
Facility
3.75
SD AVG
4.31
Rank
#25 / 58 | +56% | -13% | $16.1k
Facility
$16.1k
SD AVG
$45.9k
Rank
#27 / 62 | 27
Facility
27
SD AVG
17.2
Rank
#47 / 61 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
SD AVG
3.7
Rank
#49 / 61 | 1 | 34 | - |
39
Facility
39
SD AVG
40
Rank
#34 / 68 | Bethesda Of Beresford | $3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SD AVG
$7.1M
Rank
#47 / 53 | $1.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SD AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#51 / 53 | 41.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SD AVG
59.1%
Rank
#50 / 53 | 435080 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SD nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Bethesda of Beresford is located in Cedar Beresford, South Dakota.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in South Dakota.
Bethesda of Beresford has a walk score of 39. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
According to SD state health department records, Bethesda of Beresford's license number is 10595.
Bethesda of Beresford's occupancy is 87.4%.
Bethesda of Beresford has been operating for approximately 1 year, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, Bethesda of Beresford has a no-pet policy.
The team at Bethesda of Beresford can be reached at help@bethesdasd.com.
Bethesda of Beresford is registered as a non-profit in SD.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
