Cedar Health and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Cedar City, UT
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.

Cedar Health and Rehabilitation

Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Cedar City, UT
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Calculator: See prices in your area
Cedar Health and Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.

Overview of Cedar Health and Rehabilitation

Owned by Cedar City Healthcare, Cedar Health and Rehabilitation is a skilled nursing home in Cedar City, Utah, that has been operating for 29 years. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, providing flexibility for families with different coverage options. Cedar City is a walkable community with a score of 76 out of 100. Cisiting family members can navigate the area easily, even without transportation.

The 120-bed home has an occupancy rate of 58%. Residents stay an average of 90 days, including short-term rehabilitation and longer-term care.

The nursing team includes registered nurses, nursing aides, and licensed practical nurses. They provide an average of 3 hours and 38 minutes of total daily nursing care per resident. This staffing level supports the home’s focus on rehabilitation services and in-house therapy. It’s a great choice for patients recovering from surgery or a hospital stay who need hands-on clinical care as they transition to a lower level of care.

State inspections showed compliance with resident rights, medication management, and safety protocols. However, earlier inspections identified areas for focused attention around care documentation and dietary practices. The home was able to address these.

Quality ratings

Measured by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Overall rating Info The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
▼ 40.3% Below UT avg. ▼ 40.3% Below UT avg.UT average: 3.4Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Health Inspection Info Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
▼ 28.1% Below UT avg. ▼ 28.1% Below UT avg.UT average: 2.8Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Staffing Info Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
▲ 29.8% Above UT avg. ▲ 29.8% Above UT avg.UT average: 3.1Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Quality Measures Info Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
▼ 8.1% Below UT avg. ▼ 8.1% Below UT avg.UT average: 4.4Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Staffing hours Info Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.

Hours per resident per day vs Utah averages

Rank #13 / 69Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 13th out of 69 homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Utah average, with a ranking across 69 Utah facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Total nursing care Info This home is ranked 13th out of 69 homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.

4h 2m

8% above state avg
Staff type
Hours / day / resident
vs state avg
Registered Nurse (RN) Info RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
46m
−36% State avg: 1h 11m per day · National avg: 41m per day
LPN / LVN Info Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
49m
+58% State avg: 31m per day · National avg: 52m per day
Nurse Aide Info Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
2h 28m
+4% State avg: 2h 22m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day
Weekend Total Nursing Info Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
3h 37m
+3% State avg: 3h 31m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day
Physical Therapist Info Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
8m
+15% State avg: 7m per day · National avg: 4m per day
Weekend RN Info Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
24m
−52% State avg: 50m per day · National avg: 28m per day

2 of 6 metrics below state avg

Capacity and availability

Residents per day (avg)
72
Avg. Length of Stay Info Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
90 days
Bed community size
120-bed community Rank #31 / 189Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 31st out of 189 homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A larger shared setting that may offer more common spaces and organized community services.
Years in operation
29 years in operation Rank #52 / 194Years in operation — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 52nd out of 194 homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care.
Walk Score
Walk Score: 76 / 100 Rank #27 / 266Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 27th out of 266 homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.

About this community

Occupancy

Occupancy rate
60%
Rank #50 / 66Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 50th out of 66 homes we track in Utah for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Utah average, with its Statewide rank out of 66. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Lower than the Utah average: 70.1%
Occupied beds
72 / 120
Average occupied beds in Utah homes 60 beds

License Details

Facility TypeNursing Care Facility
StatusRegulated
IssuanceSeptember 18, 1996
CountyIron
CMS Certification Number465143

Therapy & Rehabilitation

1 service
Rehabilitation Services

Additional Policies & Features

Pets not allowed

Amenities & Lifestyle

Specific ProgramsIn-house Therapy

Contact Cedar Health and Rehabilitation

Inspection History

In Utah, the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Facility Licensing conducts regular onsite inspections to ensure compliance with state and federal healthcare standards.

Inspection Scorecard Info This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Utah state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.

Overall vs. UT average 2 Worse Metrics worse than Utah average:
• Deficiencies High (200% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (25% above)
1 At Avg Metrics at Utah average:
• Deficiencies (at UT avg)
4 Better Metrics better than Utah average:
• Deficiencies Moderate (100% below)
• Deficiencies Low (100% below)
• Inspections with deficiencies (50% below)
• Inspection deficiency rate (34% below)

Deficiencies Info Deficiencies are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.

This FacilityUT Averagevs. UT Avg
Deficiencies Info Total deficiencies cited across all inspections on record. Utah reports these by severity; the levels below add up to this figure. 33 This facility has deficiencies in line with the Utah average (3 vs. UT avg 3).— At avg
Deficiencies High Info Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at high severity. The severity levels add up to the total. 31 This facility has 200% more deficiencies high than a typical Utah nursing home (3 vs. UT avg 1).↑ 200% worse
Deficiencies Moderate Info Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at moderate severity. The severity levels add up to the total. 01 This facility has 100% fewer deficiencies moderate than a typical Utah nursing home (0 vs. UT avg 1).↓ 100% better
Deficiencies Low Info Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at low severity. The severity levels add up to the total. 01 This facility has 100% fewer deficiencies low than a typical Utah nursing home (0 vs. UT avg 1).↓ 100% better
Deficiencies per inspection Info Average deficiencies per inspection. 1.00.8 This facility has 25% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 0.8).↑ 25% worse

Inspections Info State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.

This FacilityUT Averagevs. UT Avg
Total inspections Info Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility. 34 This facility has had 25% fewer total inspections than the Utah average (3 vs. UT avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 25% fewer
Inspections with deficiencies Info Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory deficiency. 12 This facility has 50% fewer inspections with deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 2).↓ 50% better
Inspection deficiency rate Info Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one deficiency. 33%50% This facility has 17 percentage points lower inspection deficiency rate than a typical Utah nursing home (33% vs. UT avg 50%).↓ 17% better

CMS Health Inspection History

Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.

Inspections Since 2021 · 5 years of data
Total health inspections 3

State average 3.5


Last Health inspection on Jun 2025

Total health citations
20 Rank #28 / 70Health citations — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 28th out of 70 homes we track in Utah for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Utah State average, with a ranking across all 70 UT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

State average 27.7

Citations per inspection
6.67 Rank #35 / 70Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 35th out of 70 homes we track in Utah for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Utah mean across 70 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

State average 7.62


Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.

17 of 20 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 20 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).

Breakdown of citation severity (last 5 years)
Critical health citations
0
100% better than State average

State average: 0.7


Serious health citations
1
60% better than State average

State average: 2.5

0 critical citations State average: 0.7

1 serious citation State average: 2.5

19 moderate citations State average: 24.5

0 minor citations State average: 0.1
Citations history (last 5 years)
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation Jun 26, 2025
Corrected

Infection Control moderate citation Jun 26, 2025
Corrected

Nutrition moderate citation Jun 26, 2025
Corrected

Nutrition moderate citation Jun 26, 2025
Corrected

Staffing Data

Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.

Total staff 145
Employees 141
Contractors 4
Staff to resident ratio 1.81 : 1
15% fewer staff per resident than Utah average
Utah average ratio: 2.14 : 1 Utah average ratio: 2.14 : 1See full Utah ranking
Avg staff/day 48
Average shift 7.1 hours
10% worse than Utah average
Utah average: 7.9 hours Utah average shift: 7.9 hoursSee full Utah ranking
Total staff hours (quarter) 31,526

Nursing staff breakdown

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Registered Nurse

Manages medical care and health needs.

RN Staff Info All 10 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role. 10
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 9 hours
Licensed Practical Nurse

Assists with medical care and medications.

LPN Staff Info All 16 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role. 16
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 8.2 hours
Certified Nursing Assistant

Helps with daily care and mobility.

CNA Staff Info All 77 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role. 77
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 7.1 hours

Contractor staffing

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.

Total hours from contractors

0.4%

134 contractor hours this quarter

Occupational Therapy Assistant: 1 Medical Director: 1 Occupational Therapy Aide: 1 Mental Health Service Worker: 1

Staff by category

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Certified Nursing Assistant7707714,78692100%7.1
Licensed Practical Nurse160164,67792100%8.2
Registered Nurse100102,68492100%9
Clinical Nurse Specialist6061,1286773%8.8
RN Director of Nursing3031,0816672%6.9
Dental Services Staff5059246874%5.9
Other Dietary Services Staff4048598997%5.5
Respiratory Therapy Technician2028297480%6.9
Speech Language Pathologist3038196773%6.9
Physical Therapy Aide2026696571%6.7
Nurse Practitioner1015416166%8.9
Qualified Social Worker4045346065%6.1
Administrator1015286672%8
Dietitian1014506166%7.4
Physical Therapy Assistant1014396368%7
Other Social Services Staff1012343235%7.3
Nurse Aide in Training3031883841%4
Medical Director011665257%1.3
Occupational Therapy Aide011643134%2.1
Medication Aide/Technician1012333%7.8
Occupational Therapy Assistant011211%2
Mental Health Service Worker011222%1
77 Certified Nursing Assistant
% of Days 100%
16 Licensed Practical Nurse
% of Days 100%
10 Registered Nurse
% of Days 100%
6 Clinical Nurse Specialist
% of Days 73%

Penalties and fines

Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.

Source: CMS Penalties Database

No penalties in the past 3 years

No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.

Quality of care over time

These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.

High-risk clinical events score Info A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline. 15.9
70% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 9.3

Functional decline score Info A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence. 28.9
44% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 20.1

Long-stay resident measures
Significantly above average Utah avg: 4.0 Info CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased Info Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 29.3%
87% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 15.7%

Walking Ability Worsened Info Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened 33.6%
58% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 21.3%

Low Risk Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence Info Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 23.7%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 23.1%

Falls with Major Injury Info Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.8%
122% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 2.6%

High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers Info Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers 0.5%
89% better than Utah average

Utah average: 4.2%

Urinary Tract Infection Info Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 0.5%
78% better than Utah average

Utah average: 2.1%

Lost Too Much Weight Info Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.1%
150% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 4.1%

Depressive Symptoms Info Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 12.0%
27% better than Utah average

Utah average: 16.5%

Antipsychotic Use Info Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 11.7%
13% better than Utah average

Utah average: 13.5%

Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 100.0%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 97.1%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 96.6%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 98.0%

Hospitalizations per 1,000 days Info Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days. 1.70
43% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 1.19

ED visits per 1,000 days Info Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days. 1.82
21% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 1.50

Short-stay resident measures
Above average Utah avg: 3.3 Info CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 93.8%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 92.9%

Antipsychotic medication increase Info Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 1.1%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 1.1%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 80.5%
11% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 91.0%

Re-hospitalized after SNF stay Info Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission. 17.0%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 17.4%

Emergency department visits Info Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit. 13.8%
17% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 11.8%

Falls with major injury Info Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay. 1.4%
78% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 0.8%

Ability to care for self at discharge Info Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge. 60.4%
13% better than Utah average

Utah average: 53.7%

Successful return to home or community Info Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility. 52.1%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 50.6%

Breakdown by payment type

Medicare

36% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.

Typical stay 22 days

Private pay

49% of new residents, often for short stays.

Typical stay 1 - 2 months

Medicaid

15% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.

Typical stay 1 years

Facility Characteristics

Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total residents 80
Medicare
14
17.5% of residents
Medicaid
49
61.3% of residents
Private pay or other
17
21.3% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group

Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities

Active Resident Council

Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.

Finances and operations

Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 06/2024.

For-profit
Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$9.5M
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
$864.3K
For-profit Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$9.5M Rank #30 / 71Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 30th out of 71 homes we track in Utah. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
$864.3K
Other income Info Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$6.3K
Payroll costs Info Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs. Rank #25 / 71Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 25th out of 71 homes we track in Utah. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
$5.2M 54.9% of net patient revenue Info Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Rank #22 / 69Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 22nd out of 69 homes we track in Utah. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other operating costs Info Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$3.4M
Total costs Info The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$8.7M

Who this home usually serves

TYPE OF STAY

Mix of rehab and long-term care

This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.

New residents most often arrive under private pay (49% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.

Admissions
273 total

Coverage residents most often arrive under.

Medicare 36%
Private pay 49%
Medicaid 15%
Discharges
280 total

Coverage residents most often leave under.

Medicare 27%
Private pay 58%
Medicaid 15%

Places of interest near Cedar Health and Rehabilitation

Address 0.0 miles from city center Info Estimated distance in miles from Cedar City's city center to Cedar Health and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.

Calculate Travel Distance to Cedar Health and Rehabilitation

Add your location

Address

Compare Nursing Homes around the area

Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the UT Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.

Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.

The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This Table AL (Assisted Living): Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing. NH (Nursing Home): 24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs. SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility): Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness. MC (Memory Care): Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia. RC (Respite Care): Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break. IL (Independent Living): Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care. HC (Home Care): Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing. HOS (Hospice Care): Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Utah average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Pointe Meadows Health and Rehabilitation
NH
MC
SNF
Lehi
99
Facility 99
UT AVG 81
Rank #65 / 189
85.4%
Facility 85.4%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #23 / 66
+19%
3.64
Facility 3.64
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #23 / 69
-6%-2%
$0
Facility $0
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #1 / 75
22
Facility 22
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #32 / 70
7.3
Facility 7.3
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #41 / 70
-85-
70
Facility 70
UT AVG 49
Rank #57 / 266
Pointe Meadow Healthcare Inc
$13.6MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $13.6MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #14 / 71
$7.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $7.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #6 / 71
55.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility 55.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #21 / 69
465188
Fairfield Village a Generations Community
NH
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Layton (Cherry Lane Heights)
112
Facility 112
UT AVG 81
Rank #46 / 189
--
4.41
Facility 4.41
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #8 / 69
+40%+18%
$0
Facility $0
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #1 / 75
10
Facility 10
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #7 / 70
5.0
Facility 5.0
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #19 / 70
-32-
31
Facility 31
UT AVG 49
Rank #197 / 266
Chp Trs Holding Inc
$15.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $15.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #10 / 71
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #4 / 71
52.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 52.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #29 / 69
465174
Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing
NH
HOS
RC
SNF
Spanish Fork
45
Facility 45
UT AVG 81
Rank #145 / 189
94.9%
Facility 94.9%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #8 / 66
+32%
2.83
Facility 2.83
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #65 / 69
-3%-24%
$69.1k
Facility $69.1k
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #67 / 75
12
Facility 12
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #9 / 70
4.0
Facility 4.0
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #10 / 70
143-
65
Facility 65
UT AVG 49
Rank #79 / 266
-
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #53 / 71
$2.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $2.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #64 / 71
39.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 39.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #51 / 69
465183
Cedar Health and Rehabilitation
NH
MC
SNF
Cedar City
120
Facility 120
UT AVG 81
Rank #31 / 189
59.9%
Facility 59.9%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #50 / 66
-16%
4.04
Facility 4.04
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #13 / 69
-59%+8%
$0
Facility $0
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #1 / 75
20
Facility 20
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #28 / 70
6.7
Facility 6.7
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #35 / 70
172-
76
Facility 76
UT AVG 49
Rank #27 / 266
Cedar City Healthcare, Inc
$9.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $9.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #30 / 71
$5.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $5.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #25 / 71
54.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility 54.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #22 / 69
465143
Sunshine Terrace Skilled Nursing
NH
AL
HC
HOS
MC
RC
SNF
North Logan
172
Facility 172
UT AVG 81
Rank #7 / 189
38.6%
Facility 38.6%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #59 / 66
-46%- -22%-
$0
Facility $0
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #1 / 75
23
Facility 23
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #35 / 70
7.7
Facility 7.7
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #44 / 70
-66-
85
Facility 85
UT AVG 49
Rank #11 / 266
Milford Memorial Hospital
$4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #66 / 71
$3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #46 / 71
70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #2 / 69
465079

Frequently Asked Questions about Cedar Health and Rehabilitation

Is Cedar Health and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?

Cedar Health and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 76. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.

What is the occupancy rate at Cedar Health and Rehabilitation?

Cedar Health and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 60%.

How long has Cedar Health and Rehabilitation been in business?

Cedar Health and Rehabilitation has been operating for approximately 29 years, based on available licensing and registration records.

Are pets allowed at Cedar Health and Rehabilitation?

No, Cedar Health and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.

Does Cedar Health and Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?

Cedar Health and Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit in UT.

How many beds does Cedar Health and Rehabilitation have?

Cedar Health and Rehabilitation has 120 beds.

Has Cedar Health and Rehabilitation had any deficiencies?

Cedar Health and Rehabilitation has had 3 reported deficiencies since 2023 according to records from Utah Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

Guides for Better Senior Living

Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area

Nursing Home Data Explorer

Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now

The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It

Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance