Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Cedar Lake Village
Cedar Lake Village sits on S Lone Elm Rd in Olathe. The building has been open for 24 years. It’s a mid-rise property with studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom layouts. Residents here can get several kinds of care in one place: assisted living, independent living, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing.
The building holds 72 beds. Right now 51 of them are filled, so occupancy sits at 71%. Getting around the neighborhood on foot isn’t really an option. The Walk Score here is 11, which means most trips call for a car.
Inside, residents have plenty to do. There’s an exercise gym, an indoor heated pool, and a chapel. A movie theater and a library give people different ways to spend downtime. Walking trails loop past a scenic pond, and there are puzzle stations for residents who want something quieter. An ice cream parlor adds a fun extra touch. Beyond the building itself, staff keep a full activity calendar running, and residents can turn to rehab services or respite care whenever they need them.
Joanna Randall serves as Executive Director. Kansas regulators check in on nursing homes like this one regularly. Their reviews tend to focus on a few core areas: how medications are managed, how ready the facility is for emergencies, how food service is handled, and how well resident rights are protected.
Families who tour Cedar Lake Village will find a mid-rise community that covers nearly every level of senior care under one roof, backed by a long list of amenities and a director whose name residents and families can put to a face.
Community insights.
About this community
Cedar Lake Village is administered by Robert Million.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2014 vs. Kansas state average• Total deficiencies (51% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (45% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 53 | 108 | This facility has 51% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (53 vs. KS avg 108).↓ 51% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 2.3 | 4.18 | This facility has 45% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (2.3 vs. KS avg 4.18).↓ 45% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 23 | 24 | This facility has had 4% fewer total inspections than the Kansas average (23 vs. KS avg 24). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 4% fewer |
What does this home offer?
Pets Allowed
Room Sizes: 286 - 970 sq. ft
Housing Options: Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: Mid-rise
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Cedar Lake Village
Places of interest near Cedar Lake Village
2.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Olathe's city center to Cedar Lake Village's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 8.48 miles to nearest hospital (Overland Park Regional Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Cedar Lake Village
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Olathe
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evergreen Community of Johnson County | NH AL IL MC SNF | Olathe | 84
Facility
84
KS AVG
69
Rank
#54 / 223 |
83.3%
Facility
83.3%
KS AVG
77.3%
Rank
#88 / 203 | +8% | 5.73
Facility
5.73
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#15 / 137 | +60% | +24% | $22.9k
Facility
$22.9k
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#100 / 143 | 30
Facility
30
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#91 / 143 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#70 / 143 | 3 | 70 | - |
76
Facility
76
KS AVG
47
Rank
#32 / 352 | Evergreen Living Innovations Inc | $9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$8.3M
Rank
#40 / 139 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#18 / 139 | 81.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
81.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
57.8%
Rank
#4 / 139 | 175355 | ||||
| Aberdeen Village | NH AL IL MC SNF | Olathe (Aberdeen Village) | 60
Facility
60
KS AVG
69
Rank
#94 / 223 |
86.7%
Facility
86.7%
KS AVG
77.3%
Rank
#67 / 203 | +12% | 4.91
Facility
4.91
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#42 / 137 | +6% | +6% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#64 / 143 | 22
Facility
22
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#60 / 143 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#61 / 143 | 1 | 52 | - |
45
Facility
45
KS AVG
47
Rank
#199 / 352 | Patricia Cook | $14.3MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$14.3MFiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
$8.3M
Rank
#17 / 139 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#32 / 139 | 45.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
45.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
57.8%
Rank
#116 / 139 | 175448 | ||||
| Azria Health Olathe | NH MC SNF | Olathe (Dennis Avenue Shops) | 125
Facility
125
KS AVG
69
Rank
#17 / 223 |
92.2%
Facility
92.2%
KS AVG
77.3%
Rank
#23 / 203 | +19% | 4.11
Facility
4.11
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#95 / 137 | -10% | -11% | $70.9k
Facility
$70.9k
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#127 / 143 | 29
Facility
29
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#90 / 143 | 9.7
Facility
9.7
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#132 / 143 | 1 | 115 | - |
52
Facility
52
KS AVG
47
Rank
#155 / 352 | Azria Olathe Equity LLC | $10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$8.3M
Rank
#37 / 139 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#29 / 139 | 65.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
65.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
57.8%
Rank
#35 / 139 | 175557 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Kansas
Cedar Lake Village is located in Olathe, Kansas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Kansas.
Frequently Asked Questions about Cedar Lake Village
What neighborhood is Cedar Lake Village in?
Cedar Lake Village is in the Cedar Lake Village neighborhood of Olathe.
Is Cedar Lake Village in a walkable area?
Cedar Lake Village has a walk score of 11. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the license number of Cedar Lake Village?
According to KS state health department records, Cedar Lake Village's license number is N046059.
What is the occupancy rate at Cedar Lake Village?
Cedar Lake Village's occupancy is 71%.
How long has Cedar Lake Village been in business?
Cedar Lake Village has been operating for approximately 24 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Cedar Lake Village?
Yes, Cedar Lake Village allows residents to bring their pets.
Who is the administrator of Cedar Lake Village?
Robert Million is the administrator of Cedar Lake Village.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





