Total staff
38
Employees
28
Contractors
10
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Anaconda, MT
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Anaconda, MT
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Overview of Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Located in Anaconda, Montana, the Community Nursing Home of Anaconda offers a 62-bed facility that holds licenses from Medicare, Medicaid, and the Veterans Administration. Beyond its impressive credentials, this establishment has garnered positive reviews, with a reception area that radiates cleanliness and comfort. The atmosphere is a testament to the warmth of senior living, amplified by a friendly staff. Operating as a nonprofit nursing home, it becomes a choice for residents seeking a welcoming and dependable abode.
This facility’s commitment extends beyond its inviting ambiance. It serves as a beacon for individuals in need of assurance, even offering nursing home insurance coverage. Moreover, the Community Nursing Home of Anaconda operates in adherence to nursing home rules and regulations, ensuring a secure and compliant environment. Here, residents can find not only a home but also a reliable sanctuary that resonates with the essence of community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs Montana averages
Total nursing care
This home is ranked 4th out of 30 homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 47m
28% above state avgStaff type
Hours / day / resident
vs state avg
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
1h 15m
+8% State avg: 1h 10m per day · National avg: 42m per day
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
52m
+43% State avg: 36m per day · National avg: 52m per day
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
3h 40m
+19% State avg: 3h 4m per day · National avg: 2h 24m per day
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
5h 14m
+23% State avg: 4h 16m per day · National avg: 3h 30m per day
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
−89% State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
51m
+20% State avg: 43m per day · National avg: 29m per day
1 of 6 metrics below state avg
Capacity and availability
This home usually has availability
Occupancy rate
28.4%
Rank #27 / 30Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 27th out of 30 homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 30. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Residents per day (avg)
18
62-bed community Rank #55 / 103Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 55th out of 103 homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A moderately sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
Walk Score: 73 / 100 Rank #23 / 149Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 23rd out of 149 homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Accept Medicare
Rehabilitation Services
Doctor on Staff
24-Hour Staffing
Specific ProgramsInpatient and outpatient hospital services, advanced imaging, oncology/hematology, urology, neurosurgery, general surgery, orthopedics, rheumatology, endocrinology, obstetrics, family medicine, Hospice/Home Health services
Operating HoursConvenient Care Hours: 7:00am-7:00pm 7 days/week; Emergency Room Hours: 24/7
Staffing Data
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Staff to resident ratio
2.11 : 1
14% more staff per resident than Montana average
Avg staff/day
12
Average shift
8.2 hours
5% worse than Montana average
Total staff hours (quarter)
9,044
Nursing staff breakdown
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Registered Nurse
Manages medical care and health needs.
RN Staff
7 total: 6 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
7
7 total: 6 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
7
Average shift length
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hours
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hoursLicensed Practical Nurse
Assists with medical care and medications.
LPN Staff
3 total: 2 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
3
3 total: 2 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
3
Average shift length
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7 hours
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7 hoursCertified Nursing Assistant
Helps with daily care and mobility.
CNA Staff
15 total: 7 full-time employees and 8 contractors.
15
15 total: 7 full-time employees and 8 contractors.
15
Average shift length
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
10.1 hours
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
10.1 hoursContractor staffing
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
37.7%
3,413 contractor hours this quarter
Certified Nursing Assistant: 8
Registered Nurse: 1
Licensed Practical Nurse: 1
Staff by category
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 7 | 8 | 15 | 5,214 | 92 | 100% | 10.1 |
| Registered Nurse | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1,139 | 91 | 99% | 7.7 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 2 | 1 | 3 | 864 | 85 | 92% | 7 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 449 | 55 | 60% | 8.2 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 425 | 54 | 59% | 7.9 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 1 | 0 | 1 | 314 | 41 | 45% | 7.7 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 2 | 0 | 2 | 312 | 29 | 32% | 10.7 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 130 | 45 | 49% | 2.9 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 111 | 14 | 15% | 7.9 |
| Other Physician | 3 | 0 | 3 | 52 | 47 | 51% | 1 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 2 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 3 | 3% | 9.5 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 9% | 0.8 |
15 Certified Nursing Assistant
% of Days
100%
7 Registered Nurse
% of Days
99%
3 Licensed Practical Nurse
% of Days
92%
1 Dietitian
% of Days
60%
1 Other Dietary Services Staff
% of Days
59%
1 RN Director of Nursing
% of Days
45%
2 Nurse Practitioner
% of Days
32%
1 Occupational Therapy Aide
% of Days
49%
1 Administrator
% of Days
15%
3 Other Physician
% of Days
51%
2 Occupational Therapy Assistant
% of Days
3%
1 Respiratory Therapy Technician
% of Days
9%
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total fines amount
$24K Rank #1 / 31Federal fines — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 1st out of 31 homes we track in Montana for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Montana average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 31 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
72% lower than Montana averageMontana average: $87K
Number of fines
1
57% fewer fines than Montana averageMontana average: 2.3
Payment Denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Montana averageMontana average: 0.2
Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
This facility
$24K
Montana average
$87K
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Quality of care over time
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
High-risk clinical events score
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
11.6
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
11.6
In line with Montana averageMontana average: 11.2
Functional decline score
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
26.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
26.8
23% worse than Montana averageMontana average: 21.8
Long-stay resident measures
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.2%
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.2%
20% worse than Montana averageMontana average: 19.4%
Walking Ability Worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.8%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.8%
5% better than Montana averageMontana average: 20.8%
Low Risk Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.4%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.4%
49% worse than Montana averageMontana average: 25.2%
Falls with Major Injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.5%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.5%
26% worse than Montana averageMontana average: 4.3%
High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2%
30% worse than Montana averageMontana average: 6.3%
Urinary Tract Infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than Montana averageMontana average: 2.8%
Lost Too Much Weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.5%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.5%
75% better than Montana averageMontana average: 6.1%
Depressive Symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
100% better than Montana averageMontana average: 4.7%
Antipsychotic Use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7%
28% better than Montana averageMontana average: 19.1%
Pneumococcal Vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.7%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.7%
6% worse than Montana averageMontana average: 93.8%
Influenza Vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
In line with Montana averageMontana average: 93.7%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
18
Medicaid
8
44.4% of residents
Private pay or other
10
55.6% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Places of interest near Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
0.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Anaconda's city center to Community Nursing Home of Anaconda's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Butte
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MT Dept. of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Montana average is: 47.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home | NH SNF | Butte | 60
Facility
60
MT AVG
70
Rank
#58 / 103 |
95.5%
Facility
95.5%
MT AVG
65.6
Rank
#3 / 30 | +46% | 5.68
Facility
5.68
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#5 / 30 | +62% | +25% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#1 / 31 | 18
Facility
18
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#8 / 31 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#20 / 31 | 1 | 57 | - |
14
Facility
14
MT AVG
45
Rank
#125 / 149 | - | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#12 / 18 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#2 / 18 | 68.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
68.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#1 / 18 | 275156 | ||||
| Crest Nursing Home | NH SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 103
Facility
103
MT AVG
70
Rank
#23 / 103 |
44.6%
Facility
44.6%
MT AVG
65.6
Rank
#23 / 30 | -32% | 3.49
Facility
3.49
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#20 / 30 | -20% | -23% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#1 / 31 | 6
Facility
6
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#1 / 31 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#1 / 31 | - | 46 | - | - | Christina Jayne Penn Management Trust | $4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#16 / 18 | $2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#15 / 18 | 53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#4 / 18 | 275122 | ||||
| Copper Ridge Health and Rehab | NH HOS SNF | Butte | 186
Facility
186
MT AVG
70
Rank
#4 / 103 |
36.3%
Facility
36.3%
MT AVG
65.6
Rank
#25 / 30 | -45% | 3.64
Facility
3.64
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#17 / 30 | +20% | -20% | $9.3k
Facility
$9.3k
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#9 / 31 | 27
Facility
27
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#13 / 31 | 3.9
Facility
3.9
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#5 / 31 | 3 | 68 | - |
34
Facility
34
MT AVG
45
Rank
#94 / 149 | Brian Ramos | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#7 / 18 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#3 / 18 | 52.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
52.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#6 / 18 | 275060 | ||||
| Community Nursing Home of Anaconda | NH HC HOS SNF | Anaconda | 62
Facility
62
MT AVG
70
Rank
#55 / 103 |
28.4%
Facility
28.4%
MT AVG
65.6
Rank
#27 / 30 | -57% | 5.78
Facility
5.78
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#4 / 30 | +18% | +28% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#1 / 31 | 22
Facility
22
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#11 / 31 | 4.4
Facility
4.4
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#7 / 31 | 2 | 18 | - |
73
Facility
73
MT AVG
45
Rank
#23 / 149 | - | - | - | - | 275065 | ||||
| Continental Care and Rehabilitation | NH MC RC SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 100
Facility
100
MT AVG
70
Rank
#26 / 103 |
86.5%
Facility
86.5%
MT AVG
65.6
Rank
#8 / 30 | +32% | 4.64
Facility
4.64
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#8 / 30 | -41% | +2% | $59.6k
Facility
$59.6k
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#20 / 31 | 50
Facility
50
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#24 / 31 | 7.1
Facility
7.1
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#24 / 31 | 2 | 87 | - | - | Gary Plasschaert | $13.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#2 / 18 | $4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#5 / 18 | 34.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
34.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#17 / 18 | 275103 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Montana
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda is located in Anaconda, Montana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Montana.
Frequently Asked Questions about Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Is Community Nursing Home of Anaconda in a walkable area?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda has a walk score of 73. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Are pets allowed at Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
No, Community Nursing Home of Anaconda has a no-pet policy.
Does Community Nursing Home of Anaconda operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda is registered as a non-profit.
Are there photos of Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
Yes — there is 1 photo of Community Nursing Home of Anaconda in the photo gallery on this page.
What is the address of Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda is located at 401 W Pennsylvania St, Anaconda, MT 59711.
What is the phone number of Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
(406) 563-8414 will put you in contact with the team at Community Nursing Home of Anaconda.
Is Community Nursing Home of Anaconda Medicare or Medicaid certified?
Yes — Community Nursing Home of Anaconda is a CMS-certified provider of Medicare and Medicaid.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
