Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
38
28 employees · 10 contractors · 12 on an average day Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Anaconda, MT
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Anaconda, MT
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Overview of Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Located in Anaconda, Montana, the Community Nursing Home of Anaconda offers a 62-bed facility that holds licenses from Medicare, Medicaid, and the Veterans Administration. Beyond its impressive credentials, this establishment has garnered positive reviews, with a reception area that radiates cleanliness and comfort. The atmosphere is a testament to the warmth of senior living, amplified by a friendly staff. Operating as a nonprofit nursing home, it becomes a choice for residents seeking a welcoming and dependable abode.
This facility’s commitment extends beyond its inviting ambiance. It serves as a beacon for individuals in need of assurance, even offering nursing home insurance coverage. Moreover, the Community Nursing Home of Anaconda operates in adherence to nursing home rules and regulations, ensuring a secure and compliant environment. Here, residents can find not only a home but also a reliable sanctuary that resonates with the essence of community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 41m
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 41mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +40% above Montana average
1 of 6 metrics below Montana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 7 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
7 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
1h 10m
↑ 6% · MT 1h 6mThis facility: 1h 10m per resident per day, 6% above the Montana average of 1h 6m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 7 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
7 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 3 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
3 staff · 7-hour shifts
54m
↑ 40% · MT 39mThis facility: 54m per resident per day, 40% above the Montana average of 39m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 3 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
3 staff · 7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 15 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 8 agency contractors.
15 staff · 10.1-hour shifts
3h 36m
↑ 18% · MT 3h 3mThis facility: 3h 36m per resident per day, 18% above the Montana average of 3h 3m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 15 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 8 agency contractors.
15 staff · 10.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 98% · MT 5mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 98% below the Montana average of 5m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 3m
↑ 20% · MT 4h 12mThis facility: 5h 3m per resident per day, 20% above the Montana average of 4h 12m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
48m
↑ 22% · MT 39mThis facility: 48m per resident per day, 22% above the Montana average of 39m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
38
28 employees · 10 contractors · 12 on an average day
38 total staff / 17 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.24 : 1
↑ 29% · MT 1.74This facility: 2.24 staff per resident, 29% above the Montana average of 1.74 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
38 staff ÷ 17 residents
See full Montana ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
↓ 5% · MT 8.6 hThis facility: 8.2 h, 5% below the Montana average of 8.6 h (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
9,044 staff hours this quarter
See full Montana ranking →62.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Montana average: 89.5% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (8), Registered Nurse (1), Licensed Practical Nurse (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
62
Rank #26 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
62
Rank #26 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #6 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #6 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
73
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #25 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #25 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
29.8%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 62 beds.
Lower than the Montana average: 71.9%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
19
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
About This Community
Resident Council
Accept Medicare
Doctor on Staff
Oncology/Hematology
Urology
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
4
↓ 27% · MT 5.5This facility: 4, 27% below the Montana average of 5.5 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
26
Rank #9 / 30Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Montana State average, with a ranking across all 30 MT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 16% · MT 31This facility: 26, 16% below the Montana average of 31 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.5
Rank #23 / 30Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Montana mean across 30 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 15% · MT 5.66This facility: 6.5, 15% above the Montana average of 5.66 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
26 of 26 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MT 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Montana average of 0.3 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MT 1.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Montana average of 1.9 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
26
↓ 7% · MT 28.1This facility: 26, 7% below the Montana average of 28.1 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MT 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Montana average of 0.7 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Dec 17, 2025 · 13 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 7 of 26 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Dec 17, 2025
13 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 17, 2025
1 citation
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 28, 2024
4 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 30, 2023
8 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 26 citations
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (27%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (19%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (15%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (12%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (8%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (4%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (4%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
23 of 26 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 26 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 26 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
MT avg $81KMontana average: $80,691. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MT avg 2.16Montana average: 2.16. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MT avg 0.33Montana average: 0.33. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Montana average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.6
Score · lower is better
≈ 0% · MT 10.6This facility: 10.6, level with the MT average of 10.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
25.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 24% · MT 20.1This facility: 25.0, 24% above the MT average of 20.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 4 worse, 2 near MT average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.8%
↑ 11% · MT 18.7This facility: 20.8, 11% above the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.8%
↑ 11% · MT 18.7This facility: 20.8, 11% above the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.0%
↑ 27% · MT 17.2This facility: 22.0, 27% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.0%
↑ 27% · MT 17.2This facility: 22.0, 27% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.3%
↑ 34% · MT 24.1This facility: 32.3, 34% above the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.3%
↑ 34% · MT 24.1This facility: 32.3, 34% above the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 2.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 2.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 66% · MT 4.4This facility: 1.5, 66% below the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 66% · MT 4.4This facility: 1.5, 66% below the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.7%
↑ 37% · MT 6.3This facility: 8.7, 37% above the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.7%
↑ 37% · MT 6.3This facility: 8.7, 37% above the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 6.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 6.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 5.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 5.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
↓ 17% · MT 20.4This facility: 17.0, 17% below the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
↓ 17% · MT 20.4This facility: 17.0, 17% below the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.0%
↑ 1% · MT 96.5This facility: 97.0, 1% above the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.0%
↑ 1% · MT 96.5This facility: 97.0, 1% above the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
↑ 2% · MT 93.7This facility: 95.2, 2% above the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
↑ 2% · MT 93.7This facility: 95.2, 2% above the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Resident snapshot
17 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
10 · 59%
Private pay & other
7 · 41%
Places of interest near Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
0.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Anaconda's city center to Community Nursing Home of Anaconda's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Butte
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MT Dept. of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Montana average is: 49.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home | NH SNF | Butte | 60
Facility
60
MT AVG
97
Rank
#28 / 37 |
96.3%
Facility
96.3%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#3 / 25 | +34% | 6.40
Facility
6.40
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#5 / 29 | +62% | +34% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 18
Facility
18
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#5 / 30 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#20 / 30 | 1 | 58 | - |
14
Facility
14
MT AVG
47
Rank
#37 / 40 | - | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#16 / 26 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#5 / 26 | 71.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
71.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#1 / 26 | 275156 | ||||
| Crest Nursing Home | NH SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 103
Facility
103
MT AVG
97
Rank
#13 / 37 |
44.0%
Facility
44.0%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#23 / 25 | -39% | 3.55
Facility
3.55
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#20 / 29 | -20% | -26% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 11
Facility
11
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#2 / 30 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#2 / 30 | - | 45 | - | - | Christina Jayne Penn Management Trust | $5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#20 / 26 | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#19 / 26 | 50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#11 / 26 | 275122 | ||||
| Copper Ridge Health and Rehab | NH HOS SNF | Butte | 186
Facility
186
MT AVG
97
Rank
#4 / 37 |
35.1%
Facility
35.1%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#24 / 25 | -51% | 3.63
Facility
3.63
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#17 / 29 | +20% | -24% | $9.3k
Facility
$9.3k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#10 / 30 | 28
Facility
28
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#12 / 30 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#5 / 30 | 2 | 65 | - |
34
Facility
34
MT AVG
47
Rank
#31 / 40 | Brian Ramos | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#7 / 26 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#7 / 26 | 51%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#10 / 26 | 275060 | ||||
| Continental Care and Rehabilitation | NH MC RC SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 100
Facility
100
MT AVG
97
Rank
#16 / 37 |
87.1%
Facility
87.1%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#7 / 25 | +21% | 4.75
Facility
4.75
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#8 / 29 | -41% | -1% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 32
Facility
32
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#15 / 30 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#10 / 30 | 1 | 87 | - | - | Gary Plasschaert | $10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#5 / 26 | $5.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#4 / 26 | 52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#7 / 26 | 275103 | ||||
| Community Nursing Home of Anaconda | NH HC HOS SNF | Anaconda | 62
Facility
62
MT AVG
97
Rank
#26 / 37 |
29.8%
Facility
29.8%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#25 / 25 | -59% | 5.68
Facility
5.68
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#4 / 29 | +18% | +19% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 26
Facility
26
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#9 / 30 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#23 / 30 | - | 19 | - |
73
Facility
73
MT AVG
47
Rank
#6 / 40 | - | - | - | - | 275065 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Montana
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda is located in Anaconda, Montana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Montana.
Frequently Asked Questions about Community Nursing Home of Anaconda
Is Community Nursing Home of Anaconda in a walkable area?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda has a walk score of 73. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
What is the occupancy rate at Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda's occupancy is 29.8%.
Are pets allowed at Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
No, Community Nursing Home of Anaconda has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
The team at Community Nursing Home of Anaconda can be reached at abenes@chofa.net.
Does Community Nursing Home of Anaconda operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda is registered as a non-profit.
What is the overall rating for Community Nursing Home of Anaconda?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Community Nursing Home of Anaconda have?
Community Nursing Home of Anaconda has 62 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
